On Monday 11 March 2013 22:14, J G Miller conveyed the following to
comp.os.linux.networking...
> Op maandag, 11 mars, 2013, om 21:09:50u +0100, schreef Aragorn:
>
>> but I was under the impression that the term Oranje-Vrijstaat
>> was the Dutch name for South Africa before it became an
>> independent nation.
>
> Well South Africa consisted of independent tribal states before
> it was colonized by Europeans.
That I know, yes, but I am less familiar with how the colonization
occurred, up until the Boer War, when "die Boere" fought the British.
> Following the persecution of the Boers in Cape Province by the
> English, Die Groot Trek resulted in the establishment of the republics
> of Winburg 1836, Potchefstroom 1837, Natalia in 1839, Oranje-Vrystaa
> in 1854, and Transval (incorporating Winburg and Potchefstroom) in
> 1862.
>
> But although the English recognized the independence of these
> republics, they followed long term objectives in provoking war and
> thus give the English a political excuse to use the military to
> subjugate them and annex their territories.
I see. Thanks for the elaboration.
> Incidentally, the Voortrekkers were not only Dutch but also consised
> of French Hugenots and Germans, and they also indulged to a certain
> degree in ethnic cleansing in their newly independent territories.
>
> The history of RSA is indeed complex.
Indeed, it is.
>> Also, I wasn't really aware that Chris Glurr was from South Africa.
>
> His constant references to living in a failed state should at least
> give a hint.
>
> I should apologize for my typographical error as it is Glur
> with only one "r". I do hope he will forgive me.
>
>> [...] but most significantly his rudeness towards people trying to
>> humor him in.
>
> I suspect that he does not intend to be rude and in fact
> does not realize that he is being rude in his manner.
>
> After all, it is accepted normal practice in some cultures
> to treat people who are regarded as inferior in such a manner:
> "because it is the only thing they understand" being the reason
> given.
Strange as it may sound, I am beginning to believe that it is very much
an accepted part of South African culture, as I have come to experience
myself in dealing with South Africans. Not all South Africans I know
are like that, but many are.
It is also one of the things which I found highly shocking when watching
Peter Jackson's "District 9" movie, which - in case you haven't seen it
- is a science-fiction movie set in the vicinity of Johannesburg, and is
a clear allegory for the whole syndrome of Apartheid. The interpersonal
rudeness and disdain were very ubiquitous in that movie, and according
to one of the actors, that is how things really are in the vicinity of
Johannesburg.
>> That's because the South African regime is imbued with corruption,
>> just like the Walloon Region - not that there isn't any corruption in
>> the Flanders Region or the Brussels Capitol Region either.
>
> Corruption infects and festers wherever politicians gather.
Not just politicians. Corporations are just as corrupt, and have just
as much power and influence in society as the politicians themselves,
not to mention that most politicians are also on the payroll of
corporations, whether overtly or covertly.
>> The cops are so afraid of the criminals that they either refuse
>> to come out when a crime is being reported, or that they take bribes.
>
> Or they tie them to their vehicle and take them for a drag around the
> block, or in the case of striking miners, just shoot them, killing at
> least 18.
Indeed. Shockingly barbaric and beyond any civilized comprehension.
> When people have been maltreated for generations, it takes at least
> two generations to be able to build a civilized peaceful society.
I firmly agree with that. With regard to South Africa concretely, I see
this as the primary reason for all the dismay and suffering in that
country right now.
> In Europe, it took most countries over a thousand years to do this,
> and many of them continue to have only a semblance of liberal
> bourgeois democracy today.
According to what I've read not too long ago, only Germany [*] currently
seems to be doing very well in Europe. Even France has taken a beating,
and the UK is somewhat on the sidelines, as they are treated as
"privileged members" of the EU, given that they don't use the Euro as
currency and that they only pay half the taxes to the EU compared to
other EU member states.
[*] One could rhetorically posit the question whether this would be a
Hegelian writing on the political wall with regard to history
repeating itself.