This is with regard to running RHL5.1. Sorry to have to post it here but the
RHL lists are useless.
In a day or two I will be upgrading my laptop to 96MB, is this a requirement to
stipulate RAM over 64MB? I've only ever had 64MB in my desktop and have yet to
run into this problem.
--
*********************************************************
* We the willing, led by the unknowing,
* are doing the impossible for the ungrateful.
* We have done so much for so long with so little.
* We are now qualified to do anything with nothing!!!
*********************************************************
* Colin Cyr cc...@house.com
* (Replace 'house' with 'home' to reply)
*********************************************************
> This is with regard to running RHL5.1. Sorry to have to post it here but the
> RHL lists are useless.
> In a day or two I will be upgrading my laptop to 96MB, is this a requirement to
> stipulate RAM over 64MB? I've only ever had 64MB in my desktop and have yet to
> run into this problem.
AFAIK, it is a requirement if your machine owns more than 64Mb RAM.
Try updating the memory and see. Redhat may already apply a patch
to better detect memory, so you won't have to do that horrible
kludge to make it work.
____
david parsons \bi/ patching memory sizes is for the birds.
\/
Sorry, no, you do indeed have to add an append="mem=96M" line to your
/etc/lilo.conf. Otherwise, only the first 64MB of RAM will be detected.
Phil