Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

What's your BogoMIPS ??

0 views
Skip to first unread message

uh...@freenet.victoria.bc.ca

unread,
Jun 30, 1997, 3:00:00 AM6/30/97
to uh...@freenet.victoria.bc.ca

Hello,

I have K6-200 (3x66) and it runs at 398.85 bogomips ..
The same at 225(3x75) runs at about 440 bogomips ..
(It boots at 83.5 x 3 but just that... it doesn't go ahead...maybe the
memory?? HELP if you can :PP)

What's you score? (Any of you a PentII 200/233/M2/similar ??)

Thank you..

-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet

Matthew S. Crocekr

unread,
Jun 30, 1997, 3:00:00 AM6/30/97
to

uh...@freenet.victoria.bc.ca wrote:

>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I have K6-200 (3x66) and it runs at 398.85 bogomips ..
> The same at 225(3x75) runs at about 440 bogomips ..
> (It boots at 83.5 x 3 but just that... it doesn't go ahead...maybe the
> memory?? HELP if you can :PP)
>

I have a PPro 200 w/ 128 MB Ram (Micron Millenium2 Pro) which rates
199.07 BogoMips


David Konerding

unread,
Jul 1, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/1/97
to


Total of 2 processors activated (398.13 BogoMIPS).

:)

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email: d...@cgl.ucsf.edu David Konerding WWW: http://picasso.ucsf.edu/~dek
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Snail: Graduate Group in Biophysics
Medical Sciences 926, Box 0446
University of California
San Francisco, CA 94143

o r c e l l . p o r t l a n d . o r . u s

unread,
Jul 1, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/1/97
to

In article <8676836...@dejanews.com>,

<uh...@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I have K6-200 (3x66) and it runs at 398.85 bogomips ..
>The same at 225(3x75) runs at about 440 bogomips ..
>(It boots at 83.5 x 3 but just that... it doesn't go ahead...maybe the
>memory?? HELP if you can :PP)
>
>What's you score? (Any of you a PentII 200/233/M2/similar ??)

Intel 4004. 5,789,4001,303.98 bogomips.

Joey Hess

unread,
Jul 1, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/1/97
to

In article <slrn45rgv...@socrates.ucsf.edu>, David Konerding wrote:
| >> I have K6-200 (3x66) and it runs at 398.85 bogomips ..
| >> The same at 225(3x75) runs at about 440 bogomips ..
| >> (It boots at 83.5 x 3 but just that... it doesn't go ahead...maybe the
| >> memory?? HELP if you can :PP)
| >>
| >I have a PPro 200 w/ 128 MB Ram (Micron Millenium2 Pro) which rates
| >199.07 BogoMips
| >
| Total of 2 processors activated (398.13 BogoMIPS).

My 286 running linux ELKS gets 0.75 bogomips.

--
see shy jo

Sascha Bohnenkamp

unread,
Jul 2, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/2/97
to

In article <slrn5rijo...@kite.ml.org>,

jo...@kite.ml.org (Joey Hess) writes:
> My 286 running linux ELKS gets 0.75 bogomips.
>
Hihi my 386sx 10MHz has 2 BogoMips and my
386dx40 has 5
and my Pentium with 66MHz (60 overclocked) has 25

Thomas Krull

unread,
Jul 2, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/2/97
to

Hi !

On my 486DX4/100:

49.87 BogoMIPS

good luck !
Thomas
--
--------------------------------------------
Thomas Krull df...@flux.hh.provi.de DF1HX
PGP Key: 0xC9E74329
--------------------------------------------

HaJo Simons

unread,
Jul 2, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/2/97
to

In article <8676836...@dejanews.com>,

uh...@freenet.victoria.bc.ca writes:
> What's you score? (Any of you a PentII 200/233/M2/similar ??)

K5PR133
199.07

--
HaJo Simons ha...@frodo.com hajo....@muelheim.netsurf.de
http://www.do.netsurf.de/~hajo.simons

Michael F. Hogsett

unread,
Jul 2, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/2/97
to

Joey Hess wrote:

<snip>

> My 286 running linux ELKS gets 0.75 bogomips.

<snip>

My AMD 486DX4 100Mhz get 49.87 BogoMIPS

Michael F. Hogsett

--
"In the valley of the blind the one-eyed man is king."
---------------------------------------------------------------
to reply : remove the anti-SPAM "NOSPAM" from my email address
http://www.hogsoft.com or http://www.hogsoft.com/people/mcgrude

Colin Fox

unread,
Jul 2, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/2/97
to

bon...@informatik.uni-bremen.de (Sascha Bohnenkamp) writes:

>
> In article <slrn5rijo...@kite.ml.org>,
> jo...@kite.ml.org (Joey Hess) writes:

> > My 286 running linux ELKS gets 0.75 bogomips.
> >

> Hihi my 386sx 10MHz has 2 BogoMips and my
> 386dx40 has 5
> and my Pentium with 66MHz (60 overclocked) has 25

I think it would be more interesting to see what the LOWEST running
bogomip value would be. Anyone can throw thousands of dollars at a
computer and get a faster rating - but how many people can get
Linux running on, say, a commodore 64?

--
Colin Fox - Radical Entertainment Inc.
Only I am responsible for what I say.
f...@radical.ca or cf...@globalserve.net

James McNalley

unread,
Jul 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/3/97
to

Sascha Bohnenkamp <bon...@informatik.uni-bremen.de> wrote:
: In article <slrn5rijo...@kite.ml.org>,

: jo...@kite.ml.org (Joey Hess) writes:
: > My 286 running linux ELKS gets 0.75 bogomips.
: >
: Hihi my 386sx 10MHz has 2 BogoMips and my
: 386dx40 has 5
: and my Pentium with 66MHz (60 overclocked) has 25

My 486DX-50 gets 24.93 :) my dual p100 gets 40.04 each.

--
James E. McNalley |
epsilon -> epsilon |
Hoboken, NJ |
jmcn...@attila.stevens-tech.edu

Christian Bjelle

unread,
Jul 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/3/97
to

How is this 'BogoMips' calcul8ed? What does it measure? Would it be
useful to compare BogoMips between a Linux box and the same computer
running NT?

Yours curiously,
Christian

--
Christian Bjelle - Programmer
Disclaimer:
My views are my own, and usually doesn't coincide with my employer's.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Matthew B. Henniges

unread,
Jul 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/3/97
to

check out the Bogomips (mini?)HOWTO
i seem to remeber the lowest being something like .02

Matthew Hannigan

unread,
Jul 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/3/97
to

My Z80 with data cassette drive gets 6.023x10e23 BogoMips!!


Julien Sebot

unread,
Jul 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/3/97
to

On a Power mac 8600 with mklinux, (PPC 604e 200Mhz)
i get 320 bogomips.
On a Cyrix P166+ with linux 2.1.29 i get 133.52
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sebot Julien se...@lri.fr Stagiaire au LRI - Equipe archi
Xpilot fan known as Phoenix
If you find :q too hard to find, then perhaps you need to edit your
stuff with 'sed'. 'sed' quits automatically. :)
df...@belvdere.vip.best.com (David E. Fox)

G. Sumner Hayes

unread,
Jul 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/3/97
to

Colin Fox <cf...@globalserve.net> wrote:
>
> I think it would be more interesting to see what the LOWEST running
> bogomip value would be. Anyone can throw thousands of dollars at a
> computer and get a faster rating - but how many people can get
> Linux running on, say, a commodore 64?
>

As the curator of the Museum of Computer History in Pittsburgh, I recently
managed to get a heavily modified Linux/ELKS to run on ENIAC; it got
0.34E-173 BogoMips. That seemed a little on the high side, so I'm now
working on a port to the Difference Engine we built based on Babbage's
plans. I'll be sure to keep you posted; I anticipate that it'll be
at least 100,000 times slower than ENIAC. (The Difference Engine only
has a SpecInt95 of 0.72E-10589)

[Followups! Bogomips posts, real or fake, don't belong in dev.system.
There's a Bogomips mini-HOWTO that lists values from 0.57 on a misconfigured
386 up to 912.00 on a Cray Y-MP. It tells you where to send submissions
to get them added]

[No, I don't have access to ENIAC or a difference engine]

TTFN,

Sumner

--
sum...@pathway.nospam.net <- Spam protected. Remove nospam.
PGP public key and other info at http://www.pathway.net/sumner/

Hamish Marson

unread,
Jul 3, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/3/97
to

Sascha Bohnenkamp (bon...@informatik.uni-bremen.de) wrote:
: In article <slrn5rijo...@kite.ml.org>,
: jo...@kite.ml.org (Joey Hess) writes:
: > My 286 running linux ELKS gets 0.75 bogomips.
: >
: Hihi my 386sx 10MHz has 2 BogoMips and my
: 386dx40 has 5
: and my Pentium with 66MHz (60 overclocked) has 25

100Mhz PowerPC gets 199.

--
Disclaimer: I don't speak for IBM, and they don't speak for me
==============================================================
= Hamish Marson. =
= On-Site Services Consultant =
==============================================================
= ph. +64-4-576-5572 or +64-21-523-591 =
= fax +64-4-576-5615 =
==============================================================

Paul Schmidt

unread,
Jul 4, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/4/97
to

On 3 Jul 1997 02:57:55 GMT Matthew Hannigan (m...@zipper.zip.com.au) wrote:

: My Z80 with data cassette drive gets 6.023x10e23 BogoMips!!

Holy Avogadro, Batman!

And for the K5-PR133 that got 199.07, *MINE* gets 199.48 :)

I think it's time to get out the BogoMIPS doc again... It's useful
to see if your system is misconfigured or something, but that's about
all.

--
Paul Schmidt, pschmidt(at)viaduct(dot)custom(dot)net

Alex Butcher

unread,
Jul 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/8/97
to

In article <8676836...@dejanews.com>, you wrote:
>Hello,

>
>I have K6-200 (3x66) and it runs at 398.85 bogomips ..
>The same at 225(3x75) runs at about 440 bogomips ..
>(It boots at 83.5 x 3 but just that... it doesn't go ahead...maybe the
>memory?? HELP if you can :PP)
>
>What's you score? (Any of you a PentII 200/233/M2/similar ??)

FWIW,

500MHz Alpha 21164 = 497.something BogoMIPS.

Real performance is somewhere around 5-11 times faster than an iP5-90.

<http://www.annex.co.uk/wildfire/index.html>

>Thank you..

Regards,
Alex.
--
Alex Butcher - Support Specialist Annex Technology Europe Ltd.
Tel: +44 (0)118 984 1207 (Fax 1217) [http://www.annex.co.uk]
9 Horseshoe Park, Pangbourne, Reading, RG8 7JW #include [stdisclaim.h]


Mike

unread,
Jul 8, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/8/97
to

Julien Sebot <se...@lri.fr> wrote:
> On a Power mac 8600 with mklinux, (PPC 604e 200Mhz)
> i get 320 bogomips.
> On a Cyrix P166+ with linux 2.1.29 i get 133.52
> --


processor : 0
cpu : 486
model : Am5x86-WB
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
stepping : 4
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid : yes
wp : yes
flags : fpu
bogomips : 66.56


--
Mike Teague - yng...@glock.triax.com - http://www.triax.com/yngwie
Home Recording, Libertarianism, Firearms and more at the WWW page
"I am not disgruntled"


Charles Eicher

unread,
Jul 9, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/9/97
to

In article <5pf372$q...@aixrules.nz.ibm.com>, hamish@bofh (Hamish Marson) wrote:

> Sascha Bohnenkamp (bon...@informatik.uni-bremen.de) wrote:
> : In article <slrn5rijo...@kite.ml.org>,
> : jo...@kite.ml.org (Joey Hess) writes:
> : > My 286 running linux ELKS gets 0.75 bogomips.
> : >
> : Hihi my 386sx 10MHz has 2 BogoMips and my
> : 386dx40 has 5
> : and my Pentium with 66MHz (60 overclocked) has 25
>
> 100Mhz PowerPC gets 199.

Huh? Did you actually try this, or are you guessing? I am running MKLinux
on my PowerMac 8100/110 (110Mhz 601+ chip) with 48M ram, and I get
108.something bogomips. I think your figure of 199 is rather unlikely.


| Charles Eicher |
| -=- |
| cei...@inav.net |

Simon Karpen

unread,
Jul 10, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/10/97
to

Alright, here's a couple data points (all #'s are bogomips)

Sun Sparc SLC (20mhz sparc1): 19.86
AMD 5x86/133: 66.56
AMD K5/75: 149.91
Intel P54C/120: 47.82
Intel P54C/133: 53.25
Intel P54C/166: 66.36

but remember, bogomips are just that... bogus. use lmbench
or byte bench for some relevent numbers.
--
Simon Karpen
s...@linux-shell.net http://www.linux-shell.net
System and Network Administrator, linux-shell.net
Not just a shell account, but a Linux shell account

David Sugar

unread,
Jul 10, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/10/97
to


Simon Karpen <s...@bash.linux-shell.net> wrote in article
<m3lo3fh...@bash.linux-shell.net>...


> Alright, here's a couple data points (all #'s are bogomips)
>
> Sun Sparc SLC (20mhz sparc1): 19.86
> AMD 5x86/133: 66.56
> AMD K5/75: 149.91
> Intel P54C/120: 47.82
> Intel P54C/133: 53.25
> Intel P54C/166: 66.36
>
> but remember, bogomips are just that... bogus. use lmbench
> or byte bench for some relevent numbers.

Bogomips are certainly not a substitute for real benchmarks, other than to
get a vague gauge of processor speed. On several machines I have a
P54C/166, which reports the expected 66.xx bogo mips and also,
/proc/cpuinfo identifies them as "Genuine Intel", but, on every machine I
have with a P166, it also claims "Pentium 75+"! What is this about??


Giles Coochey

unread,
Jul 10, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/10/97
to


David Sugar <dy...@tycho.com> wrote in article
<01bc8d27$f8c91560$0c15...@clavius.tycho.com>...


>
>
> /proc/cpuinfo identifies them as "Genuine Intel", but, on every machine I
> have with a P166, it also claims "Pentium 75+"! What is this about??
>

Just that Pentium 75 (or plus) ie P100 P120 P133 etc.. etc..


H. Peter Anvin

unread,
Jul 11, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/11/97
to

Followup to: <01bc8d27$f8c91560$0c15...@clavius.tycho.com>
By author: "David Sugar" <dy...@tycho.com>
In newsgroup: comp.os.linux.development.system

>
> Bogomips are certainly not a substitute for real benchmarks, other than to
> get a vague gauge of processor speed. On several machines I have a
> P54C/166, which reports the expected 66.xx bogo mips and also,
> /proc/cpuinfo identifies them as "Genuine Intel", but, on every machine I
> have with a P166, it also claims "Pentium 75+"! What is this about??
>

"Pentium 75+" == P54C. I'd rather have it just report "P5" or "P54C",
as it shows P5 overdrive processors as "Pentium 60/66", even if you
have a 133 MHz Socket 4 chip.

-hpa
--
PGP: 2047/2A960705 BA 03 D3 2C 14 A8 A8 BD 1E DF FE 69 EE 35 BD 74
See http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/ for web page and full PGP public key
Always looking for a few good BOsFH. ** Linux - the OS of global cooperation
I am Baha'i -- ask me about it or see http://www.bahai.org/

Hiten Sonpal

unread,
Jul 11, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/11/97
to

http://sunsite.unc.edu/linux/HOWTO/mini/BogoMips

Hiten Sonpal World Connection Services
Programmer / System Analyst The Home of Evansville Online

Jacco de Kraker

unread,
Jul 16, 1997, 3:00:00 AM7/16/97
to

: >I have a PPro 200 w/ 128 MB Ram (Micron Millenium2 Pro) which rates
: >199.07 BogoMips

Hihi... My AMD K5 100 with 32 MB RAM also has 199.something Bogomips. So
off you go, with your Pentium Pro :-)

(However, let's not forget that we are talking about BOGO mips, the're
BOGUS!)

--
Regards,

JFK

0 new messages