DG <
d...@veronica.net> wrote:
>On Mon, 09 Oct 2023 20:13:26 +0000, DG wrote:
>
>> As I previously stated, Android is NOT Linux and Ubuntu is NOT
>> Linux.
>
>What the fuck is this?
>
>I make a brilliant comment and no one responds?
>
>What the fuck is the matter with you degenerate deadbeats?
>
>GNU/Linux is the greatest and most potent OS in the history
>of technical man.
>
>So respond. I said, fucking respond!
>
>And I want substantive, technical comments and not juvenile
>pussy banter.
>
>C'mon! Get movin'!
>
>Lackluster fucking deadbeats.
Linux powers Android and ChromeOS, just as Unix powers macOS.
Microsoft's Windows NT line is the only other platform of any
significance, but Linux is the obvious choice for large scale servers
and supercomputers, and thus overall is really the larger platform
unless we blow desktop OS use out of proportion - it has a lot of
numbers, obviously important to the market, but if Windows is
strongest in that particular market, it illustrates that it has
drawbacks for larger scale use.
I would also point out that the server market for NT is a corporate,
specialty IT platform, to compare that to an Internet hub handling
massive data nonstop, is absurd, or the many other advanced uses of
Linux on servers. NT can compete on performance with Linux (on
hardware sufficient for it), but its design leaves much to be desired
for some important purposes.
--
Joel Crump