Always Remember Why the WinTrolls/Munchkins Are in C.O.L.A.
Roy Schestowitz
Hash: SHA1
"Ideally, use of the competing technology becomes associated with mental
deficiency, as in, "he believes in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and OS/2."
Just keep rubbing it in, via the press, analysts, newsgroups, whatever. Make
the complete failure of the competition's technology part of the mythology of
the computer industry. We want to place selection pressure on those companies
and individuals that show a genetic weakness for competitors' technologies,
to make the industry increasingly resistant to such unhealthy strains, over
time."
--- Microsoft, internal document
http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/Comes-3096.pdf
This was "REQUIRED" training at Microsoft, said the man who presented this. He
told me that he regrets this because it's unethical.
Behind an army of criminal "evangelists" remains a whole generation of
brainwashed Munchkins who day after day corrupt the press, the newsgroups, the
comment sections of blogs, TalkBacks in ZDNET (Microsoft sends its employees
there too) and the mouths of so-called "analysts".
Microsoft is a criminal organisation. The honourable Judge Jackson called
them "criminals".
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAklK+JwACgkQU4xAY3RXLo5NwwCfYWgTCaUxgypGUBXNWQ2D0nZC
DRgAn0UFAS1hXCprjAWvLj3kKntw+zdJ
=yfDq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
DFS
> Behind an army of criminal "evangelists" remains a whole generation of
> brainwashed Munchkins who day after day corrupt the press, the
> newsgroups, the comment sections of blogs, TalkBacks in ZDNET
> (Microsoft sends its employees there too) and the mouths of so-called
> "analysts".
blah blah blah...
Hey, did all that Windows/closed-source/proprietary software experience help
you get a job yet, Spamowitz?
> Microsoft is a criminal organisation.
Roy Schestowitz is a lying, spamming idiot.
> The honourable Judge Jackson called them "criminals".
Shortly afterwards that "honourable" biased moron was thrown off the case
and severely reprimanded and was found to have violated Federal ethics laws.
"The D.C. court of appeals essentially found Judge Jackson "guilty" of
judicial misconduct when it remanded the Microsoft case to a different trial
judge. The court said, "... we vacate the Final Judgment on remedies,
because the trial judge engaged in impermissible ex parte contacts by
holding secret interviews with members of the media and made numerous
offensive comments about Microsoft officials in public statements outside of
the courtroom, giving rise to an appearance of partiality. Although we find
no evidence of actual bias {HA!}, we hold that the actions of the trial
judge seriously tainted the proceedings before the District Court and called
into question the integrity of the judicial process.
"All indications are that the District Judge violated each of these [Canons
of the Code of Conduct] by talking about the case with reporters... " Except
for criminal misconduct, it doesn't get much worse than this. The court even
broached the topic of judicial misconduct complaints. "The Code of Conduct
contains no enforcement mechanism. There are, however, remedies extrinsic to
the Code. One is an internal disciplinary proceeding, begun with the filing
of a complaint with the clerk of the court of appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
s 372(c)." And yet, even though a chief judge - or any judge - can initiate
such a complaint, apparently, no one did. Not even in this slam dunk case.
Does anyone really care about the integrity of the judiciary? Perhaps they
thought the press coverage was corrective action and he'd been shamed
already?
But after this travesty, even though the court said Mr. Jackson's
"violations were deliberate, repeated, egregious, and flagrant," he was
named a Judicial Honoree by the Bar Association of D.C. If members of the
esteemed profession think breaking the Code of Conduct is a joke, why should
the public think different?
Terry Porter
>> Microsoft is a criminal organisation.
>
> Roy Schestowitz is a lying, spamming idiot.
Roys remark a bit close to home was it trollboy ?
--
If we wish to reduce our ignorance, there are people we will
indeed listen to. Trolls are not among those people, as trolls, more or
less by definition, *promote* ignorance.
Kelsey Bjarnason, C.O.L.A. 2008
7
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> "Ideally, use of the competing technology becomes associated with mental
> deficiency, as in, "he believes in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and
> OS/2." Just keep rubbing it in, via the press, analysts, newsgroups,
> whatever. Make the complete failure of the competition's technology part
> of the mythology of the computer industry. We want to place selection
> pressure on those companies and individuals that show a genetic weakness
> for competitors' technologies, to make the industry increasingly resistant
> to such unhealthy strains, over time."
>
> --- Microsoft, internal document
>
> http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/Comes-3096.pdf
>
> This was "REQUIRED" training at Microsoft, said the man who presented
> this. He told me that he regrets this because it's unethical.
>
> Behind an army of criminal "evangelists" remains a whole generation of
> brainwashed Munchkins who day after day corrupt the press, the newsgroups,
> the comment sections of blogs, TalkBacks in ZDNET (Microsoft sends its
> employees there too) and the mouths of so-called "analysts".
I completely agree there is some kind of sub species developing
at micoshaft that is simply a money leeching lying spherical baastards.
Spherical Bastard:
Someone who looks the same no matter what angle
you view them from.
Micoshaft is FULL of SPHERICAL BASTARDS.
And the COLA-TROLLS are ALL SPHERICAL BASTARDS.
And come New Year, all the COLA-TROLLS will still be SPHERICAL BASTARDS
and still be SPHERICAL BASTARDS employed by Micoshaft Corporation
who are full of SPHERICAL BASTARDS.
---
If we wish to reduce our ignorance, there are people we will
indeed listen to. Trolls are not among those people, as trolls, more or
less by definition, promote ignorance.
Kelsey Bjarnason, C.O.L.A. 2008
Erik Funkenbusch
to finally come through.
Tattoo Vampire
> Because he thinks he'll get rich off it someday while he waits for his PhD
> to finally come through.
Shoo, troll.
--
Regards,
[tv]
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...How do you know if you run out of invisible ink?
Terry Porter
> Because he thinks he'll get rich off it someday while he waits for his
> PhD to finally come through.
Perhaps you will have graduated from wintroll kindergarten by then ?
--
If we wish to reduce our ignorance, there are people we will
indeed listen to. Trolls are not among those people, as trolls, more or
less by definition, *promote* ignorance.
Kelsey Bjarnason, C.O.L.A. 2008
Snit
an33h936izov$.dlg@this.domain.or.that on 12/24/08 5:59 PM:
> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>
>> Because he thinks he'll get rich off it someday while he waits for his PhD
>> to finally come through.
>
> Shoo, troll.
You name call a lot.
--
Computers are incredibly fast, accurate, and stupid: humans are incredibly
slow, inaccurate and brilliant; together they are powerful beyond
imagination. - attributed to Albert Einstein, likely apocryphal
Sinister Midget
> Because he thinks he'll get rich off it someday while he waits for his PhD
> to finally come through.
What's the explanation for why you troll COLA, then? Is that making you
rich?
--
The most important thing in art is the frame. For painting: literally;
for other arts: figuratively - because, without this humble appliance,
you can't know where The Art stops and The Real World begins. You have to
put a "box" around it because otherwise, what is that shit on the wall?
-- Frank Zappa
Tattoo Vampire
> You name call a lot.
Shut the fuck up, twat.
--
Regards,
[tv]
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...Despite the high cost of living, it remains popular.
Snit
> Snit wrote:
>
>> You name call a lot.
>
> Shut the fuck up, twat.
See, you could not help but name call, even there.
I hope Santa brings you a better way to try to feel good about yourself.
You current method of just putting everyone else down and calling them names
is certain to fail in the long run.
--
Do you ever wake up in a cold sweat wondering what the world would be
like if the Lamarckian view of evolution had ended up being accepted
over Darwin's?
Tattoo Vampire
> You current method of just putting everyone else down and calling them names
> is certain to fail in the long run.
It's worked all these years, why change now?
Feliz Navidad.
--
Regards,
[tv]
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...Basic programmers never die, they gosub and don't return
7
wrote on behalf of Half Wits from Micoshaft Department of Marketing:
> Because he thinks he'll get rich off it someday while he waits for his PhD
> to finally come through.
Wrote the fscktard tool, sock operative retard, net loon and life long
BUM BOYEE for Micoshaft corporation asstrotrufing to get paid to buy some
dope to hallucinate harder and scream abuse on the internet at strangers
and Linux advocates in a Linux newsgroup. (TM)*
--
* This message is licensed not sold.
Snit
> Snit wrote:
>
>> You current method of just putting everyone else down and calling them names
>> is certain to fail in the long run.
>
> It's worked all these years, why change now?
Only to a minimum degree. If it really worked you would not dislike
yourself as much as you clearly do... those people who really like
themselves do not feel the need to arbitrarily put others down.
> Feliz Navidad.
Happy Holidays to you...
Tattoo Vampire
> those people who really like themselves do not feel the need to
> arbitrarily put others down.
What do you base this statement on, Dr. Snit?
--
Regards,
[tv]
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...First Rule of Intelligent Tinkering - Save all parts
High Plains Thumper
> Snit wrote:
>
>> those people who really like themselves do not feel the need
>> to arbitrarily put others down.
>
> What do you base this statement on, Dr. Snit?
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/eef9510552ad6013
[quote]
Snit wrote:
[...]
> Comcast made it clear that the reason they made their business
> decision is that Steve and a small number of others made it
> not worth it for them to offer the service. They were
> spending too many resources to make it worth it for them. As
> even Steve has now admitted, though he denied it in the past,
> Comcast and he had talks and he felt the need to try to defend
> himself. He failed. His Usenet access was dropped and,
> apparently, he then got another account from them (though at
> the same house? Not sure how that works - just going on what
> others have said). Whatever the details are, Comcast then
> decided that it was not in their interest to keep Usenet
> services. Steve was a part of a very small number of Comcast
> users who ruined it for the majority.
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/357/1027357/comcast-shut-free-usenet-access
[quote]
The Big Media companies have been pressuring ISP companies to
discontinue their Usenet services, because the MAFIAA simply
can't stand the thought that some Internet users might be using a
few Usenet newsgroups to share some bootleg copies of tunes and
clips.
It means nothing to either the media cartels or the ISPs that
most casual file sharing on Usenet probably doesn't infringe any
copyrights, nor that the volume of other very useful content on
Usenet is far larger, by several orders of magnitude, than any
that is suspect.
Comcast is just the latest of the large ISPs to buckle under to
MAFIAA pressure from the music and movie cartels, but that
doesn't mean that they deserve to get away with this.
[/quote]
Similar to the Nazis blaming the Jews for things beyond their
control, Snit attempts to blame Steve Carroll, how sad.
Yup, the Snit Circus of pathological lies continues ....
[/quote]
--
HPT
Snit
> Snit wrote:
>
>> those people who really like themselves do not feel the need to
>> arbitrarily put others down.
>
> What do you base this statement on, Dr. Snit?
Dr. Snit? You think it takes a doctor to have common sense?
--
The answer to the water shortage is to dilute it.
Snit
gj08l6$lba$1...@news.albasani.net on 12/25/08 8:25 AM:
You already posted that tolling BS. Why post it again?
--
"And so, in no sense, is stability a reason to move to a new version. It零
never a reason." - Bill Gates
Tattoo Vampire
> You think it takes a doctor to have common sense?
Do you think you have common sense? Some would disagree.
--
Regards,
[tv]
Owner/proprietor, Trollus Amongus, LLC
...Politics n. Poly "many" + ticks "blood sucking insects"
Snit
> Snit wrote:
>
>> You think it takes a doctor to have common sense?
>
> Do you think you have common sense? Some would disagree.
Who?
--
The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits.
--Albert Einstein
Roy Schestowitz
Hash: SHA1
____/ 7 on Thursday 25 December 2008 12:50 : \____
I could get it when I was 24 and get out of campus, but they are happy to have
me around for longer. In fact, I'm meeting the head of the Computer Science
Department next week.
For Munchkins who pretend that there is an issue, there is _none_. I passed my
viva with corrections, like the vast majority of the people. I was given over
a year to do that, which is normal.
- --
~~ Best of wishes
"If the operating system is in fact a natural monopoly, then what could be
better than having an operating system that nobody owns?"
--James Love
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAklTzO0ACgkQU4xAY3RXLo7xVQCfWa7/Q6Ks5BOWAWayRy/EmHsN
nYkAn0HNNe5uMdtyfB8LeRM7Gdc/kYkq
=H01I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
7
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> ____/ 7 on Thursday 25 December 2008 12:50 : \____
>
>> Micoshaft asstroturfing fraudster pounding the sock Erik Funkenbusch
>> wrote on behalf of Half Wits from Micoshaft Department of Marketing:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Because he thinks he'll get rich off it someday while he waits for his
>>> PhD to finally come through.
>>
>>
>> Wrote the fscktard tool, sock operative retard, net loon and life long
>> BUM BOYEE for Micoshaft corporation asstrotrufing to get paid to buy some
>> dope to hallucinate harder and scream abuse on the internet at strangers
>> and Linux advocates in a Linux newsgroup. (TM)*
>
> I could get it when I was 24 and get out of campus, but they are happy to
> have me around for longer. In fact, I'm meeting the head of the Computer
> Science Department next week.
>
> For Munchkins who pretend that there is an issue, there is _none_. I
> passed my viva with corrections, like the vast majority of the people. I
> was given over a year to do that, which is normal.
If micoshaft and appil asstroturfers are getting under your skin
then ignore / give them your best terse response and lets see what
they have to say to defend themselves (if they have the strength to
fight back / get paid to waste time fighting back)
You really don't need to offer anyone from the troll community
any explanation for ANY single thing no matter what they say.
Someone pointed out that to me a long time ago, and I've never
looked back.
Terry Porter
> Because he thinks he'll get rich off it someday while he waits for his
> PhD to finally come through.
Either way, he *will* ....
Do you have any idea what a PhD earns ?
No ?
You never will either.
Dickhead.
Doug Mentohl
> Because he thinks he'll get rich off it someday while he waits for his PhD to finally come through.
Do you mind if we troll the InterTUBES looking for dirt to dig up on
you, purely to be posted in COLA of course ?