info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
New Vid Card Performance Report
5 views
Skip to first unread message
Alvin P. Picker
Oct 1, 2022, 9:59:54 AM10/1/22
to
My brand spanking new GTX 1660 vid card with TU116 GPU has been successfully
installed,
On GNU/Linux the install is simple. Just plug in and boot.
On Microcrap Winblows one must also install a "driver," whatever
the fuck that is.
On the superior GNU/Linux there is but one nvidia kernel module that
handles them all -- and that's how it's supposed to be.
Glxgears:
__GL_SYNC_TO_VBLANK=0 glxgears -fullscreen
56195 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11238.937 FPS
59852 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11970.226 FPS
59849 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11969.716 FPS
59858 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11971.469 FPS
59855 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11970.911 FPS
59857 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11971.383 FPS
Holy cucamonga! I gets roughly 12,000 frames per second
full screen!
Now that's GNU/Linux power!
And all for just $218! With free shipping!
Pound for pound, GNU/Linux will knock the brains out of all
competition.
Alvin P. Picker
Don't dare snicker
At the Alvin P Picker
'Cause he'll put you down quicker
Than a fat city slicker
Or a fag boot licker
With a jail house sticker
installed,
On GNU/Linux the install is simple. Just plug in and boot.
On Microcrap Winblows one must also install a "driver," whatever
the fuck that is.
On the superior GNU/Linux there is but one nvidia kernel module that
handles them all -- and that's how it's supposed to be.
Glxgears:
__GL_SYNC_TO_VBLANK=0 glxgears -fullscreen
56195 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11238.937 FPS
59852 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11970.226 FPS
59849 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11969.716 FPS
59858 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11971.469 FPS
59855 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11970.911 FPS
59857 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11971.383 FPS
Holy cucamonga! I gets roughly 12,000 frames per second
full screen!
Now that's GNU/Linux power!
And all for just $218! With free shipping!
Pound for pound, GNU/Linux will knock the brains out of all
competition.
Alvin P. Picker
Don't dare snicker
At the Alvin P Picker
'Cause he'll put you down quicker
Than a fat city slicker
Or a fag boot licker
With a jail house sticker
vallor
Oct 1, 2022, 12:00:14 PM10/1/22
to
On Sat, 01 Oct 2022 13:59:51 +0000, Alvin P. Picker wrote:
> My brand spanking new GTX 1660 vid card with TU116 GPU has been
> successfully installed,
>
> On GNU/Linux the install is simple. Just plug in and boot.
>
> On Microcrap Winblows one must also install a "driver," whatever the
> fuck that is.
>
> On the superior GNU/Linux there is but one nvidia kernel module that
> handles them all -- and that's how it's supposed to be.
>
> Glxgears:
>
> __GL_SYNC_TO_VBLANK=0 glxgears -fullscreen
>
> 56195 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11238.937 FPS 59852 frames in 5.0 seconds
> = 11970.226 FPS 59849 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11969.716 FPS 59858 frames
> in 5.0 seconds = 11971.469 FPS 59855 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11970.911
> FPS 59857 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11971.383 FPS
>
> Holy cucamonga! I gets roughly 12,000 frames per second full screen!
That's what happens when your run at 640x480.
> My brand spanking new GTX 1660 vid card with TU116 GPU has been
> successfully installed,
>
> On GNU/Linux the install is simple. Just plug in and boot.
>
> On Microcrap Winblows one must also install a "driver," whatever the
> fuck that is.
>
> On the superior GNU/Linux there is but one nvidia kernel module that
> handles them all -- and that's how it's supposed to be.
>
> Glxgears:
>
> __GL_SYNC_TO_VBLANK=0 glxgears -fullscreen
>
> 56195 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11238.937 FPS 59852 frames in 5.0 seconds
> = 11970.226 FPS 59849 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11969.716 FPS 59858 frames
> in 5.0 seconds = 11971.469 FPS 59855 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11970.911
> FPS 59857 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11971.383 FPS
>
> Holy cucamonga! I gets roughly 12,000 frames per second full screen!
> Now that's GNU/Linux power!
>
> And all for just $218! With free shipping!
--
-v
Alvin P. Picker
Oct 1, 2022, 12:58:13 PM10/1/22
to
On 1 Oct 2022 16:00:08 GMT, vallor wrote:
>>
>> Holy cucamonga! I gets roughly 12,000 frames per second full screen!
>
> That's what happens when your run at 640x480.
>
Nope. Wrong again, fathead.
>>
>> Holy cucamonga! I gets roughly 12,000 frames per second full screen!
>
> That's what happens when your run at 640x480.
>
It's 1920x1080.
>
> You got taken to the cleaners.
>
You are in the same league as that other idiot, the Dufus Supremus.
You and he both use Microcrap Windows, except your version is
called "Mint."
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
0 new messages