Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Linus Torvalds gives the finger and more to Nvidia!
63 views
Skip to first unread message
John Gohde
Apr 6, 2016, 1:17:48 PM4/6/16
to
Linus Torvalds gives the finger and more to Nvidia!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVpOyKCNZYw&nohtml5=False
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVpOyKCNZYw&nohtml5=False
RayLopez99
Apr 6, 2016, 1:34:17 PM4/6/16
to
On Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 1:17:48 AM UTC+8, John Gohde wrote:
> Linus Torvalds gives the finger and more to Nvidia!
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVpOyKCNZYw&nohtml5=False
Your wet dream! And your 1% market share. You're in the 1%! Not in wealth, but in desktop market share for Linux. Dream on!
> Linus Torvalds gives the finger and more to Nvidia!
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVpOyKCNZYw&nohtml5=False
RL
Omar
Apr 6, 2016, 1:34:19 PM4/6/16
to
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:17:45 -0700 (PDT), John Gohde wrote:
> Linus Torvalds gives the finger and more to Nvidia!
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVpOyKCNZYw&nohtml5=False
Like I've already stated, when the leaders of the Linux / oss movement
> Linus Torvalds gives the finger and more to Nvidia!
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVpOyKCNZYw&nohtml5=False
behave like idiots or in the case of Richard Stallman are freaks of
nature, it should come as no surprise why Linux attracts freaks,
oddballs, social misfits and idiots looking for companionship and a
like kindred.
Here is Stallman giving a presentation and at the same time eating
fungus from his feet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I25UeVXrEHQ
John Gohde
Apr 6, 2016, 1:58:38 PM4/6/16
to
John Gohde
Apr 6, 2016, 1:59:06 PM4/6/16
to
On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 1:34:19 PM UTC-4, Omar wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:17:45 -0700 (PDT), John Gohde wrote:
>
> > Linus Torvalds gives the finger and more to Nvidia!
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVpOyKCNZYw&nohtml5=False
>
> Like I've already stated, when the leaders of the Linux / oss movement
> behave like idiots or in the case of Richard Stallman are freaks of
> nature, it should come as no surprise why Linux attracts freaks,
> oddballs, social misfits and idiots looking for companionship and a
> like kindred.
Nvidia, Fuck You!
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:17:45 -0700 (PDT), John Gohde wrote:
>
> > Linus Torvalds gives the finger and more to Nvidia!
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVpOyKCNZYw&nohtml5=False
>
> Like I've already stated, when the leaders of the Linux / oss movement
> behave like idiots or in the case of Richard Stallman are freaks of
> nature, it should come as no surprise why Linux attracts freaks,
> oddballs, social misfits and idiots looking for companionship and a
> like kindred.
Me Sham
Apr 6, 2016, 2:19:01 PM4/6/16
to
What was the whining about? I skimmed through it without audio and just saw some transgender Linux apologist stand up and ask a question about something.
Meanwhile Nvidia dominates the GPU market and supports all relevant operating systems, no wonder 400 people running Linux are mad at them for existing.
Meanwhile Nvidia dominates the GPU market and supports all relevant operating systems, no wonder 400 people running Linux are mad at them for existing.
John Gohde
Apr 6, 2016, 2:28:35 PM4/6/16
to
On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 2:19:01 PM UTC-4, Me Sham wrote:
> What was the whining about? I skimmed through it without audio and just saw some transgender Linux apologist stand up and ask a question about something.
>
> Meanwhile Nvidia dominates the GPU market and supports all relevant operating systems, no wonder 400 people running Linux are mad at them for existing.
Who let the dogs out, Snit?
> What was the whining about? I skimmed through it without audio and just saw some transgender Linux apologist stand up and ask a question about something.
>
> Meanwhile Nvidia dominates the GPU market and supports all relevant operating systems, no wonder 400 people running Linux are mad at them for existing.
Omar
Apr 6, 2016, 2:32:01 PM4/6/16
to
chrisv
Apr 6, 2016, 2:35:55 PM4/6/16
to
Ray Dopez wrote:
>You're in the 1%! Not in wealth, but in desktop market share for Linux.
Kind of like Sam Adams beer drinkers, eh, Dopey?
>You're in the 1%! Not in wealth, but in desktop market share for Linux.
But if you prefer Bud, that's your choice.
Hey, Dopey, how's that cracked copy of Vista, that you bought in
Thailand, working-out for you?
--
"Bangkok, Thailand, near the old Don Muang airport. You can get any
software for $5 or less. I am using a stable, cracked version of
Vista as I type this; and have several hundred dollars worth of
software on my machine from there." - Ray Dopez
Me Sham
Apr 6, 2016, 2:38:37 PM4/6/16
to
On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 1:32:01 PM UTC-5, Omar wrote:
> Everyone is snit. The oldest running gag in COLA.
I dunno, I think "Linux is a viable operating system" is even older.
> Everyone is snit. The oldest running gag in COLA.
Omar
Apr 6, 2016, 3:29:30 PM4/6/16
to
William Poaster
Apr 6, 2016, 6:10:05 PM4/6/16
to
It was reported that chrisv posted:
> Ray Dopez wrote:
>
>>You're in the 1%! Not in wealth, but in desktop market share for Linux.
>
> Kind of like Sam Adams beer drinkers, eh, Dopey?
>
> But if you prefer Bud, that's your choice.
>
> Hey, Dopey, how's that cracked copy of Vista, that you bought in
> Thailand, working-out for you?
Dopez still quoting the old discredited "Linux 1% desktop market share"
crap. Like a broken record.
--
openSUSE 13.2 64-bit
KDE 4.14.9
Kernel: 4.2.2-1.gb3ecf72-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT
Tue Sep 29 18:51:15 UTC 2015 (b3ecf72) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
This message is virus free, as absolutely
NO Micro$oft products were used in its preparation.
"If you do want to clean your computer of malware, the first software to
delete is Windows."
http://www.gnu.org/proprietary/malware-microsoft.en.html
> Ray Dopez wrote:
>
>>You're in the 1%! Not in wealth, but in desktop market share for Linux.
>
> Kind of like Sam Adams beer drinkers, eh, Dopey?
>
> But if you prefer Bud, that's your choice.
>
> Hey, Dopey, how's that cracked copy of Vista, that you bought in
> Thailand, working-out for you?
crap. Like a broken record.
--
openSUSE 13.2 64-bit
KDE 4.14.9
Kernel: 4.2.2-1.gb3ecf72-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT
Tue Sep 29 18:51:15 UTC 2015 (b3ecf72) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
This message is virus free, as absolutely
NO Micro$oft products were used in its preparation.
"If you do want to clean your computer of malware, the first software to
delete is Windows."
http://www.gnu.org/proprietary/malware-microsoft.en.html
Omar
Apr 6, 2016, 6:19:55 PM4/6/16
to
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 23:07:00 +0100, William Poaster wrote:
> It was reported that chrisv posted:
>
>> Ray Dopez wrote:
>>
>>>You're in the 1%! Not in wealth, but in desktop market share for Linux.
>>
>> Kind of like Sam Adams beer drinkers, eh, Dopey?
>>
>> But if you prefer Bud, that's your choice.
>>
>> Hey, Dopey, how's that cracked copy of Vista, that you bought in
>> Thailand, working-out for you?
>
> Dopez still quoting the old discredited "Linux 1% desktop market share"
> crap. Like a broken record.
You're right.
> It was reported that chrisv posted:
>
>> Ray Dopez wrote:
>>
>>>You're in the 1%! Not in wealth, but in desktop market share for Linux.
>>
>> Kind of like Sam Adams beer drinkers, eh, Dopey?
>>
>> But if you prefer Bud, that's your choice.
>>
>> Hey, Dopey, how's that cracked copy of Vista, that you bought in
>> Thailand, working-out for you?
>
> Dopez still quoting the old discredited "Linux 1% desktop market share"
> crap. Like a broken record.
Most people peg Linux desktop market share at less than 1 percent and
dropping every month.
Peter Köhlmann
Apr 6, 2016, 6:42:39 PM4/6/16
to
Those with at least some brains don't
Me Sham
Apr 6, 2016, 8:26:40 PM4/6/16
to
Linux retards always claim discredited stats but can never provide stats to the contrary, they are nothing but propagandists.
Omar
Apr 6, 2016, 8:30:14 PM4/6/16
to
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 17:26:36 -0700 (PDT), Me Sham wrote:
> Linux retards always claim discredited stats but can never provide
> stats to the contrary, they are nothing but propagandists.
Linux retards are the biggest liars on the planet.
> Linux retards always claim discredited stats but can never provide
> stats to the contrary, they are nothing but propagandists.
They would lie straight faced to their own mother if it meant
suckering in another soon to be Linux victim.
William Poaster
Apr 7, 2016, 3:55:05 AM4/7/16
to
It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted:
This trolling "Omar" guy's an idiotic moron. Apart from the fact that the
dumbass is wrong, he keeps replying to someone who has him binned.
How cretinous is that!
> Well, most idiots
> Those with at least some brains don't
dumbass is wrong, he keeps replying to someone who has him binned.
How cretinous is that!
> Well, most idiots
> Those with at least some brains don't
Peter Köhlmann
Apr 7, 2016, 5:22:51 AM4/7/16
to
Me Sham wrote:
> Linux retards always claim discredited stats but can never provide stats
> to the contrary, they are nothing but propagandists.
Why would I "disprove" those completely made up "stats"?
> Linux retards always claim discredited stats but can never provide stats
> to the contrary, they are nothing but propagandists.
Strange that the lying imbeciles never provide any proof either, isn't it?
so why should anyone "disprove" something which has no backing in the first
place?
Peter Köhlmann
Apr 7, 2016, 5:24:16 AM4/7/16
to
William Poaster wrote:
> It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted:
>
>> Omar wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 23:07:00 +0100, William Poaster wrote:
>>>
>>>> It was reported that chrisv posted:
>>>>
>>>>> Ray Dopez wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>You're in the 1%! Not in wealth, but in desktop market share for
>>>>>>Linux.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind of like Sam Adams beer drinkers, eh, Dopey?
>>>>>
>>>>> But if you prefer Bud, that's your choice.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey, Dopey, how's that cracked copy of Vista, that you bought in
>>>>> Thailand, working-out for you?
>>>>
>>>> Dopez still quoting the old discredited "Linux 1% desktop market share"
>>>> crap. Like a broken record.
>>>
>>> You're right.
>>> Most people peg Linux desktop market share at less than 1 percent and
>>> dropping every month.
>
> This trolling "Omar" guy's an idiotic moron. Apart from the fact that the
> dumbass is wrong, he keeps replying to someone who has him binned.
> How cretinous is that!
Well, it is flatfish Gary Stewrat after all. There is no worse liar (except
> It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted:
>
>> Omar wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 23:07:00 +0100, William Poaster wrote:
>>>
>>>> It was reported that chrisv posted:
>>>>
>>>>> Ray Dopez wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>You're in the 1%! Not in wealth, but in desktop market share for
>>>>>>Linux.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind of like Sam Adams beer drinkers, eh, Dopey?
>>>>>
>>>>> But if you prefer Bud, that's your choice.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey, Dopey, how's that cracked copy of Vista, that you bought in
>>>>> Thailand, working-out for you?
>>>>
>>>> Dopez still quoting the old discredited "Linux 1% desktop market share"
>>>> crap. Like a broken record.
>>>
>>> You're right.
>>> Most people peg Linux desktop market share at less than 1 percent and
>>> dropping every month.
>
> This trolling "Omar" guy's an idiotic moron. Apart from the fact that the
> dumbass is wrong, he keeps replying to someone who has him binned.
> How cretinous is that!
Snit Michael Glasser) than that rabid rat "flatfish"
William Poaster
Apr 7, 2016, 5:45:05 AM4/7/16
to
It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted:
of person, to have a particular skill, etc.
That describes the trolling googlegroup retard "Me Sham" perfectly.
Chris Ahlstrom
Apr 7, 2016, 5:49:22 AM4/7/16
to
Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
I see "Omar" has ventured to outright lying.
> Well, most idiots
> Those with at least some brains don't
He's just an anonymous k00k.
--
Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest.
-- Mark Twain
> Well, most idiots
> Those with at least some brains don't
--
Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest.
-- Mark Twain
William Poaster
Apr 7, 2016, 5:55:05 AM4/7/16
to
It was reported that Chris Ahlstrom posted:
> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Omar wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 23:07:00 +0100, William Poaster wrote:
>>>
>>>> It was reported that chrisv posted:
>>>>
>>>>> Ray Dopez wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>You're in the 1%! Not in wealth, but in desktop market share for Linux.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind of like Sam Adams beer drinkers, eh, Dopey?
>>>>>
>>>>> But if you prefer Bud, that's your choice.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey, Dopey, how's that cracked copy of Vista, that you bought in
>>>>> Thailand, working-out for you?
>>>>
>>>> Dopez still quoting the old discredited "Linux 1% desktop market share"
>>>> crap. Like a broken record.
>>>
>>> You're right.
>>> Most people peg Linux desktop market share at less than 1 percent and
>>> dropping every month.
>
> I see "Omar" has ventured to outright lying.
Naturally, it's all the troll has got.
>> Well, most idiots
>> Those with at least some brains don't
>
> He's just an anonymous k00k.
A *moronic* anonymous k00k.
> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Omar wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 23:07:00 +0100, William Poaster wrote:
>>>
>>>> It was reported that chrisv posted:
>>>>
>>>>> Ray Dopez wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>You're in the 1%! Not in wealth, but in desktop market share for Linux.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind of like Sam Adams beer drinkers, eh, Dopey?
>>>>>
>>>>> But if you prefer Bud, that's your choice.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey, Dopey, how's that cracked copy of Vista, that you bought in
>>>>> Thailand, working-out for you?
>>>>
>>>> Dopez still quoting the old discredited "Linux 1% desktop market share"
>>>> crap. Like a broken record.
>>>
>>> You're right.
>>> Most people peg Linux desktop market share at less than 1 percent and
>>> dropping every month.
>
> I see "Omar" has ventured to outright lying.
>> Well, most idiots
>> Those with at least some brains don't
>
> He's just an anonymous k00k.
Omar
Apr 7, 2016, 7:59:33 AM4/7/16
to
On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 23:57:11 +0100, William Poaster wrote:
> It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted:
>
>> Omar wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 23:07:00 +0100, William Poaster wrote:
>>>
>>>> It was reported that chrisv posted:
>>>>
>>>>> Ray Dopez wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>You're in the 1%! Not in wealth, but in desktop market share for Linux.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind of like Sam Adams beer drinkers, eh, Dopey?
>>>>>
>>>>> But if you prefer Bud, that's your choice.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey, Dopey, how's that cracked copy of Vista, that you bought in
>>>>> Thailand, working-out for you?
>>>>
>>>> Dopez still quoting the old discredited "Linux 1% desktop market share"
>>>> crap. Like a broken record.
>>>
>>> You're right.
>>> Most people peg Linux desktop market share at less than 1 percent and
>>> dropping every month.
>
> This trolling "Omar" guy's an idiotic moron. Apart from the fact that the
> dumbass is wrong, he keeps replying to someone who has him binned.
Someone who keeps talking about him.
> It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted:
>
>> Omar wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 23:07:00 +0100, William Poaster wrote:
>>>
>>>> It was reported that chrisv posted:
>>>>
>>>>> Ray Dopez wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>You're in the 1%! Not in wealth, but in desktop market share for Linux.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind of like Sam Adams beer drinkers, eh, Dopey?
>>>>>
>>>>> But if you prefer Bud, that's your choice.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey, Dopey, how's that cracked copy of Vista, that you bought in
>>>>> Thailand, working-out for you?
>>>>
>>>> Dopez still quoting the old discredited "Linux 1% desktop market share"
>>>> crap. Like a broken record.
>>>
>>> You're right.
>>> Most people peg Linux desktop market share at less than 1 percent and
>>> dropping every month.
>
> This trolling "Omar" guy's an idiotic moron. Apart from the fact that the
> dumbass is wrong, he keeps replying to someone who has him binned.
> How cretinous is that!
How ignorant are you?
You don't seem to be very intelligent.
Omar
Apr 7, 2016, 8:00:22 AM4/7/16
to
On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 10:44:42 +0100, William Poaster wrote:
> It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted:
>
>> Me Sham wrote:
>>
>>> Linux retards always claim discredited stats but can never provide stats
>>> to the contrary, they are nothing but propagandists.
>>
>> Why would I "disprove" those completely made up "stats"?
>>
>> Strange that the lying imbeciles never provide any proof either, isn't it?
>> so why should anyone "disprove" something which has no backing in the first
>> place?
>
> "Sham": someone who deceives people by pretending to be a particular kind
> of person, to have a particular skill, etc.
>
> That describes the trolling googlegroup retard "Me Sham" perfectly.
You aren't very intelligent are you.
> It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted:
>
>> Me Sham wrote:
>>
>>> Linux retards always claim discredited stats but can never provide stats
>>> to the contrary, they are nothing but propagandists.
>>
>> Why would I "disprove" those completely made up "stats"?
>>
>> Strange that the lying imbeciles never provide any proof either, isn't it?
>> so why should anyone "disprove" something which has no backing in the first
>> place?
>
> "Sham": someone who deceives people by pretending to be a particular kind
> of person, to have a particular skill, etc.
>
> That describes the trolling googlegroup retard "Me Sham" perfectly.
Omar
Apr 7, 2016, 8:01:06 AM4/7/16
to
On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 10:52:47 +0100, William Poaster wrote:
> It was reported that Chris Ahlstrom posted:
>
>> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> Omar wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 23:07:00 +0100, William Poaster wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It was reported that chrisv posted:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ray Dopez wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You're in the 1%! Not in wealth, but in desktop market share for Linux.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kind of like Sam Adams beer drinkers, eh, Dopey?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But if you prefer Bud, that's your choice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey, Dopey, how's that cracked copy of Vista, that you bought in
>>>>>> Thailand, working-out for you?
>>>>>
>>>>> Dopez still quoting the old discredited "Linux 1% desktop market share"
>>>>> crap. Like a broken record.
>>>>
>>>> You're right.
>>>> Most people peg Linux desktop market share at less than 1 percent and
>>>> dropping every month.
>>
>> I see "Omar" has ventured to outright lying.
>
> Naturally, it's all the troll has got.
>
>>> Well, most idiots
>>> Those with at least some brains don't
>>
>> He's just an anonymous k00k.
>
> A *moronic* anonymous k00k.
> It was reported that Chris Ahlstrom posted:
>
>> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> Omar wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 23:07:00 +0100, William Poaster wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It was reported that chrisv posted:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ray Dopez wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You're in the 1%! Not in wealth, but in desktop market share for Linux.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kind of like Sam Adams beer drinkers, eh, Dopey?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But if you prefer Bud, that's your choice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey, Dopey, how's that cracked copy of Vista, that you bought in
>>>>>> Thailand, working-out for you?
>>>>>
>>>>> Dopez still quoting the old discredited "Linux 1% desktop market share"
>>>>> crap. Like a broken record.
>>>>
>>>> You're right.
>>>> Most people peg Linux desktop market share at less than 1 percent and
>>>> dropping every month.
>>
>> I see "Omar" has ventured to outright lying.
>
> Naturally, it's all the troll has got.
>
>>> Well, most idiots
>>> Those with at least some brains don't
>>
>> He's just an anonymous k00k.
>
> A *moronic* anonymous k00k.
Omar
Apr 7, 2016, 8:15:59 AM4/7/16
to
On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 05:45:20 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Omar wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 23:07:00 +0100, William Poaster wrote:
>>>
>>>> It was reported that chrisv posted:
>>>>
>>>>> Ray Dopez wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>You're in the 1%! Not in wealth, but in desktop market share for Linux.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind of like Sam Adams beer drinkers, eh, Dopey?
>>>>>
>>>>> But if you prefer Bud, that's your choice.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey, Dopey, how's that cracked copy of Vista, that you bought in
>>>>> Thailand, working-out for you?
>>>>
>>>> Dopez still quoting the old discredited "Linux 1% desktop market share"
>>>> crap. Like a broken record.
>>>
>>> You're right.
>>> Most people peg Linux desktop market share at less than 1 percent and
>>> dropping every month.
>
> I see "Omar" has ventured to outright lying.
Interesting.
> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Omar wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 23:07:00 +0100, William Poaster wrote:
>>>
>>>> It was reported that chrisv posted:
>>>>
>>>>> Ray Dopez wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>You're in the 1%! Not in wealth, but in desktop market share for Linux.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind of like Sam Adams beer drinkers, eh, Dopey?
>>>>>
>>>>> But if you prefer Bud, that's your choice.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey, Dopey, how's that cracked copy of Vista, that you bought in
>>>>> Thailand, working-out for you?
>>>>
>>>> Dopez still quoting the old discredited "Linux 1% desktop market share"
>>>> crap. Like a broken record.
>>>
>>> You're right.
>>> Most people peg Linux desktop market share at less than 1 percent and
>>> dropping every month.
>
> I see "Omar" has ventured to outright lying.
Your Linux advocate buddies like 7, Fibian and others tell an enormous
number of lies on a daily basis and you don't say a single word about
it.
In fact none of you Linux losers say anything about it.
You just let it stand without challenge.
I post a single statement that "might" be misconstrued as a lie and
you go bonkers.
It's a perfect demonstration of what hypocrites the Linux community
are.
Thanks for playing!
Me Sham
Apr 7, 2016, 8:58:31 AM4/7/16
to
http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=8&qptimeframe=M&qpsp=206&qpch=350&qpmr=100&qpdt=1&qpct=3&qpcustomd=0&qpcid=fw339432&qpf=1
*eagerly awaits "you can't trust those numbers because...." excuse*
Omar
Apr 7, 2016, 9:28:34 AM4/7/16
to
DFS
Apr 7, 2016, 10:33:04 AM4/7/16
to
https://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php?year=2016&month=3
Mar 2015: 2.48%
Mar 2016: 1.76%
The "advocate" idiots can suck an egg. They're too lazy to do their own
research.
DFS
Apr 7, 2016, 10:43:31 AM4/7/16
to
On 4/6/2016 1:17 PM, John Gohde wrote:
> Linus Torvalds gives the finger and more to Nvidia!
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVpOyKCNZYw&nohtml5=False
That's 4 years old, GodHesDumb. Everybody already knows about it.
> Linus Torvalds gives the finger and more to Nvidia!
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVpOyKCNZYw&nohtml5=False
DFS
Apr 7, 2016, 11:02:33 AM4/7/16
to
On 4/6/2016 6:07 PM, William Poaster wrote:
> It was reported that chrisv posted:
>
>> Ray Dopez wrote:
>>
>>> You're in the 1%! Not in wealth, but in desktop market share for Linux.
>>
>> Kind of like Sam Adams beer drinkers, eh, Dopey?
>>
>> But if you prefer Bud, that's your choice.
>>
>> Hey, Dopey, how's that cracked copy of Vista, that you bought in
>> Thailand, working-out for you?
>
> Dopez still quoting the old discredited "Linux 1% desktop market share"
> crap. Like a broken record.
1% is now 1.5%. At most.
> It was reported that chrisv posted:
>
>> Ray Dopez wrote:
>>
>>> You're in the 1%! Not in wealth, but in desktop market share for Linux.
>>
>> Kind of like Sam Adams beer drinkers, eh, Dopey?
>>
>> But if you prefer Bud, that's your choice.
>>
>> Hey, Dopey, how's that cracked copy of Vista, that you bought in
>> Thailand, working-out for you?
>
> Dopez still quoting the old discredited "Linux 1% desktop market share"
> crap. Like a broken record.
Is that what you mean by 'discredited', Dumb Willie?
John Gohde
Apr 7, 2016, 11:07:10 AM4/7/16
to
Linux is doomed - NOT.
Omar
Apr 7, 2016, 11:44:45 AM4/7/16
to
any research at all. That's the reason why they make things up and lie
profusely.
Desk Rabbit
Apr 7, 2016, 11:57:29 AM4/7/16
to
On 06/04/2016 18:17, John Gohde wrote:
> Linus Torvalds gives the finger and more to Nvidia!
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVpOyKCNZYw&nohtml5=False
>
Are you in a time warp?
> Linus Torvalds gives the finger and more to Nvidia!
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVpOyKCNZYw&nohtml5=False
>
Published on 17 Jun 2012
Aalto Talk with Linus Torvalds - Nvidia F_ck You!
Desk Rabbit
Apr 7, 2016, 12:01:52 PM4/7/16
to
On 06/04/2016 18:17, John Gohde wrote:
> Linus Torvalds gives the finger and more to Nvidia!
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVpOyKCNZYw&nohtml5=False
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDeG4S-mJts&nohtml5=False
> Linus Torvalds gives the finger and more to Nvidia!
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVpOyKCNZYw&nohtml5=False
>
Desk Rabbit
Apr 7, 2016, 12:07:54 PM4/7/16
to
his generic out of the box excuse is that it is up to everyone else to
prove him right, which of course never happens.
Desk Rabbit
Apr 7, 2016, 12:11:15 PM4/7/16
to
posted a link to back up their claim or debunk the data.
They lie, put people in block lists, stick their fingers in their ears
and their heads in the sand, anything but face up to the truth.
Peter Köhlmann
Apr 7, 2016, 12:13:40 PM4/7/16
to
that is the case
Me Sham
Apr 7, 2016, 12:16:24 PM4/7/16
to
On Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 11:13:40 AM UTC-5, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> Those "numbers" are balderdash. And it has been explained several times why
> that is the case
Ah, *exactly* what was predicted. You Linux apologists are in such denial that you can't even begin to realize how ridiculous you sound.
> Those "numbers" are balderdash. And it has been explained several times why
> that is the case
I'm sure next you'll explain that pedophiles' air-gapped kiddie porn viewing Linux boxes aren't counted because they have no internet access.
Snit
Apr 7, 2016, 12:50:25 PM4/7/16
to
On 4/7/16, 2:24 AM, in article ne58pp$fg7$2...@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann"
What the hell do you even mean by that, Peter? Yeah, you just call them
"lies" but you make it clear you know they are "unquotable" - otherwise you
would quote them (and then actually show they are lies!)
You and your herd rarely even offer a quote, and when you do you offer no
evidence of the quote being dishonest. Just things like my noting I post to
COLA only with the name Snit, which you then deem a lie with NO evidence.
Just weird how scared you and your herd are of me. Just sick.
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
<peter-k...@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>> You're right.
>>>> Most people peg Linux desktop market share at less than 1 percent and
>>>> dropping every month.
>>
>> This trolling "Omar" guy's an idiotic moron. Apart from the fact that the
>> dumbass is wrong, he keeps replying to someone who has him binned.
>> How cretinous is that!
>
> Well, it is flatfish Gary Stewrat after all. There is no worse liar (except
> Snit Michael Glasser) than that rabid rat "flatfish"
Ah, Peter's obsession with my unquotable lies.
>>>> You're right.
>>>> Most people peg Linux desktop market share at less than 1 percent and
>>>> dropping every month.
>>
>> This trolling "Omar" guy's an idiotic moron. Apart from the fact that the
>> dumbass is wrong, he keeps replying to someone who has him binned.
>> How cretinous is that!
>
> Well, it is flatfish Gary Stewrat after all. There is no worse liar (except
> Snit Michael Glasser) than that rabid rat "flatfish"
What the hell do you even mean by that, Peter? Yeah, you just call them
"lies" but you make it clear you know they are "unquotable" - otherwise you
would quote them (and then actually show they are lies!)
You and your herd rarely even offer a quote, and when you do you offer no
evidence of the quote being dishonest. Just things like my noting I post to
COLA only with the name Snit, which you then deem a lie with NO evidence.
Just weird how scared you and your herd are of me. Just sick.
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
Peter Köhlmann
Apr 7, 2016, 1:23:40 PM4/7/16
to
Me Sham wrote:
> On Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 11:13:40 AM UTC-5, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>> Those "numbers" are balderdash. And it has been explained several times
>> why that is the case
>
> Ah, *exactly* what was predicted.
Certainly. After all, it is true
> On Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 11:13:40 AM UTC-5, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>> Those "numbers" are balderdash. And it has been explained several times
>> why that is the case
>
> Ah, *exactly* what was predicted.
> You Linux apologists are in such denial
> that you can't even begin to realize how ridiculous you sound.
Peter Köhlmann
Apr 7, 2016, 1:24:16 PM4/7/16
to
Snit Michael Glasser babbled:
> On 4/7/16, 2:24 AM, in article ne58pp$fg7$2...@dont-email.me, "Peter
> Köhlmann" <peter-k...@t-online.de> wrote:
>
>>>>> You're right.
>>>>> Most people peg Linux desktop market share at less than 1 percent and
>>>>> dropping every month.
>>>
>>> This trolling "Omar" guy's an idiotic moron. Apart from the fact that
>>> the dumbass is wrong, he keeps replying to someone who has him binned.
>>> How cretinous is that!
>>
>> Well, it is flatfish Gary Stewrat after all. There is no worse liar
>> (except Snit Michael Glasser) than that rabid rat "flatfish"
>
> Ah, Peter's obsession with my unquotable lies.
Idiot
> On 4/7/16, 2:24 AM, in article ne58pp$fg7$2...@dont-email.me, "Peter
> Köhlmann" <peter-k...@t-online.de> wrote:
>
>>>>> You're right.
>>>>> Most people peg Linux desktop market share at less than 1 percent and
>>>>> dropping every month.
>>>
>>> This trolling "Omar" guy's an idiotic moron. Apart from the fact that
>>> the dumbass is wrong, he keeps replying to someone who has him binned.
>>> How cretinous is that!
>>
>> Well, it is flatfish Gary Stewrat after all. There is no worse liar
>> (except Snit Michael Glasser) than that rabid rat "flatfish"
>
> Ah, Peter's obsession with my unquotable lies.
John Gohde
Apr 7, 2016, 1:26:36 PM4/7/16
to
Me Sham
Apr 7, 2016, 1:47:53 PM4/7/16
to
On Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 12:23:40 PM UTC-5, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> Idiot
I know in the world of delusional Linux apologists this qualifies as a "rebuttal", but the rest of us are still waiting for your statistics and justification for your ridiculous Linux claims.
> Idiot
I know in the world of delusional Linux apologists this qualifies as a "rebuttal", but the rest of us are still waiting for your statistics and justification for your ridiculous Linux claims.
Me Sham
Apr 7, 2016, 1:55:55 PM4/7/16
to
On Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 9:33:04 AM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
> https://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php?year=2016&month=3
>
> Mar 2015: 2.48%
> Mar 2016: 1.76%
>
>
> The "advocate" idiots can suck an egg. They're too lazy to do their own
> research.
Population decline. It's what happens when your species in incapable of reproduction.
> https://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php?year=2016&month=3
>
> Mar 2015: 2.48%
> Mar 2016: 1.76%
>
>
> The "advocate" idiots can suck an egg. They're too lazy to do their own
> research.
Snit
Apr 7, 2016, 2:13:22 PM4/7/16
to
On 4/7/16, 10:24 AM, in article ne64tp$v19$2...@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann"
Wow... what an amazing response. LOL!
Seriously, Peter, I hope you gain some self respect some day.
>> What the hell do you even mean by that, Peter? Yeah, you just call them
>> "lies" but you make it clear you know they are "unquotable" - otherwise you
>> would quote them (and then actually show they are lies!)
>>
>> You and your herd rarely even offer a quote, and when you do you offer no
>> evidence of the quote being dishonest. Just things like my noting I post to
>> COLA only with the name Snit, which you then deem a lie with NO evidence.
>>
>> Just weird how scared you and your herd are of me. Just sick.
>
> Idiot
>> "lies" but you make it clear you know they are "unquotable" - otherwise you
>> would quote them (and then actually show they are lies!)
>>
>> You and your herd rarely even offer a quote, and when you do you offer no
>> evidence of the quote being dishonest. Just things like my noting I post to
>> COLA only with the name Snit, which you then deem a lie with NO evidence.
>>
>> Just weird how scared you and your herd are of me. Just sick.
>
Wow... what an amazing response. LOL!
Seriously, Peter, I hope you gain some self respect some day.
Peter Köhlmann
Apr 7, 2016, 3:22:19 PM4/7/16
to
Peter Köhlmann
Apr 7, 2016, 3:23:57 PM4/7/16
to
> Seriously, Peter, I hope you gain some self respect some day.
>
don't need to lie 24/7 like you do, lunatic POS
Me Sham
Apr 7, 2016, 3:45:55 PM4/7/16
to
W3Counter: 1.76%
https://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php?year=2016&month=3
Statcounter: Not available, Linux isn't even listed. It must be lumped in with 'Other' or 'Unknown'
http://gs.statcounter.com/#desktop-os-ww-monthly-201604-201604-bar
NetMarketshare: 1.78%
http://netmarketshare.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=8&qpcustomd=0
Steam: 0.85%
http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey
But of course, all of these figures are "wrong" according to Linux apologists. They themselves are utterly incapable of providing any evidence to the contrary however rest assured that all these stats must be "wrong" somehow.
https://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php?year=2016&month=3
Statcounter: Not available, Linux isn't even listed. It must be lumped in with 'Other' or 'Unknown'
http://gs.statcounter.com/#desktop-os-ww-monthly-201604-201604-bar
NetMarketshare: 1.78%
http://netmarketshare.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=8&qpcustomd=0
Steam: 0.85%
http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey
But of course, all of these figures are "wrong" according to Linux apologists. They themselves are utterly incapable of providing any evidence to the contrary however rest assured that all these stats must be "wrong" somehow.
Snit
Apr 7, 2016, 3:46:03 PM4/7/16
to
On 4/7/16, 12:23 PM, in article ne6bu4$smu$3...@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann"
You CAN be a decent person, Peter. I have faith in you. Why don't you try to
build some confidence and show yourself you can be decent?
Remember: every time you whine about my lies you cannot quote (and let us be
clear, you CANNOT quote them) you just show how insecure you are.
I feel sorry for you.
build some confidence and show yourself you can be decent?
Remember: every time you whine about my lies you cannot quote (and let us be
clear, you CANNOT quote them) you just show how insecure you are.
I feel sorry for you.
Omar
Apr 7, 2016, 3:59:05 PM4/7/16
to
> Remember: every time you whine about my lies you cannot quote (and let us be
> clear, you CANNOT quote them) you just show how insecure you are.
>
> I feel sorry for you.
He deserves our sympathy.
Chris Ahlstrom
Apr 7, 2016, 4:52:05 PM4/7/16
to
Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
claimed it was under 1%, and dropping.
--
You are not dead yet. But watch for further reports.
Me Sham
Apr 7, 2016, 4:57:19 PM4/7/16
to
On Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 3:52:05 PM UTC-5, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> You are not dead yet. But watch for further reports.
Ah, I see we're back to talking about desktop Linux and aren't off topic anymore.
> You are not dead yet. But watch for further reports.
ronb
Apr 7, 2016, 8:17:57 PM4/7/16
to
On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 16:48:01 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> Heck, that number, at 1.8%, puts the lie to Sham's shill Omar, who
> claimed it was under 1%, and dropping.
The 1.8% is a B.S. number. If it was true, the WinTrolls wouldn't be so
> Heck, that number, at 1.8%, puts the lie to Sham's shill Omar, who
> claimed it was under 1%, and dropping.
obsessed with Linux.
--
Zero tolerance for WinDrones and iCultists
Me Sham
Apr 7, 2016, 8:21:32 PM4/7/16
to
DFS
Apr 7, 2016, 9:58:16 PM4/7/16
to
On 4/7/2016 8:14 PM, ronb wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 16:48:01 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Heck, that number, at 1.8%, puts the lie to Sham's shill Omar, who
>> claimed it was under 1%, and dropping.
>
> The 1.8% is a B.S. number. If it was true, the WinTrolls wouldn't be so
> obsessed with Linux.
>
Great "logic", wRonG.
> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 16:48:01 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Heck, that number, at 1.8%, puts the lie to Sham's shill Omar, who
>> claimed it was under 1%, and dropping.
>
> The 1.8% is a B.S. number. If it was true, the WinTrolls wouldn't be so
> obsessed with Linux.
>
Desk Rabbit
Apr 8, 2016, 4:31:04 AM4/8/16
to
expect any facts from them.
Dr. John Grubor
Apr 8, 2016, 6:12:51 AM4/8/16
to
DFS wrote:
> That's 4 years old, GodHesDumb. Everybody already knows about it.
It took 4 years for the video to download over his shitty dialup
connection.
> That's 4 years old, GodHesDumb. Everybody already knows about it.
It took 4 years for the video to download over his shitty dialup
connection.
Peter Köhlmann
Apr 8, 2016, 6:23:46 AM4/8/16
to
ronb wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 16:48:01 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Heck, that number, at 1.8%, puts the lie to Sham's shill Omar, who
>> claimed it was under 1%, and dropping.
>
> The 1.8% is a B.S. number. If it was true, the WinTrolls wouldn't be so
> obsessed with Linux.
>
It may be true in certain parts of the world, like backwater US
> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 16:48:01 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Heck, that number, at 1.8%, puts the lie to Sham's shill Omar, who
>> claimed it was under 1%, and dropping.
>
> The 1.8% is a B.S. number. If it was true, the WinTrolls wouldn't be so
> obsessed with Linux.
>
It is *much* higher in germany or france, for example
Germans leading computer magazine c't published figures last year about the
type of OS accessing their websites. Linux had a 37% share, windows wasn't
that much more. OSX had less than 10%
Now is c't not the typical site everyone and his cat would access, but it
shows that among computer savvy people linux is much more prevalent than the
wintendo idiots like to see
If windows were not pre-installed on 99.999% of wintel machines, windows
would be a niche OS by now, as the vast majority of people don't stand a
snowballs chance in hell to successfully install that crap. Linux is *much*
easier to install, and even most wintendo cretins would be able to use it
John Gohde
Apr 8, 2016, 6:32:18 AM4/8/16
to
Desk Rabbit
Apr 8, 2016, 7:45:48 AM4/8/16
to
On 08/04/2016 11:23, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> ronb wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 16:48:01 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Heck, that number, at 1.8%, puts the lie to Sham's shill Omar, who
>>> claimed it was under 1%, and dropping.
>>
>> The 1.8% is a B.S. number. If it was true, the WinTrolls wouldn't be so
>> obsessed with Linux.
>>
>
> It may be true in certain parts of the world, like backwater US
> It is *much* higher in germany or france, for example
>
> Germans leading computer magazine c't published figures last year about the
> type of OS accessing their websites. Linux had a 37% share, windows wasn't
> that much more. OSX had less than 10%
More "facts". c't is the second most popular mag, not the leading
> ronb wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 16:48:01 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Heck, that number, at 1.8%, puts the lie to Sham's shill Omar, who
>>> claimed it was under 1%, and dropping.
>>
>> The 1.8% is a B.S. number. If it was true, the WinTrolls wouldn't be so
>> obsessed with Linux.
>>
>
> It may be true in certain parts of the world, like backwater US
> It is *much* higher in germany or france, for example
>
> Germans leading computer magazine c't published figures last year about the
> type of OS accessing their websites. Linux had a 37% share, windows wasn't
> that much more. OSX had less than 10%
magazine as you suggest.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C't
And a search of the web site shows no sign of the report the claim they
published.
http://www.heise.de/ct/
>
> Now is c't not the typical site everyone and his cat would access, but it
> shows that among computer savvy people linux is much more prevalent than the
> wintendo idiots like to see
<Cue Peter's usual retort where he will now claim it's not his fault he
can't provide evidence to back up his claim, it's the other persons
fault for not being able to search properly.>
>
> If windows were not pre-installed on 99.999% of wintel machines, windows
> would be a niche OS by now, as the vast majority of people don't stand a
> snowballs chance in hell to successfully install that crap. Linux is *much*
> easier to install, and even most wintendo cretins would be able to use it
>
system, it still fails to sell.
http://www.slashgear.com/wal-mart-no-longer-selling-linux-based-computers-in-stores-1110690/
http://www.techrepublic.com/article/can-we-please-stop-talking-about-the-linux-desktop/
Desk Rabbit
Apr 8, 2016, 7:46:54 AM4/8/16
to
chrisv
Apr 8, 2016, 7:54:35 AM4/8/16
to
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>Heck, that number, at 1.8%, puts the lie to Sham's shill Omar, who
>claimed it was under 1%, and dropping.
Such a small competitor, yet the monopolists were unable to wipe it
>Heck, that number, at 1.8%, puts the lie to Sham's shill Omar, who
>claimed it was under 1%, and dropping.
out. Poor Micro$oft. Now they are conceeding defeat in key areas of
the market, and trying to save face by claiming that they "love
Linux".
Bwa. They "love" Linux about as much as "Hadron" did.
--
"Yes, theres choice alright - that buggy heap of shit, or that one, or
that one.... etc etc etc." - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
Me Sham
Apr 8, 2016, 8:48:57 AM4/8/16
to
http://gs.statcounter.com/#desktop-os-DE-monthly-201503-201603-bar
Chris Ahlstrom
Apr 8, 2016, 9:20:19 AM4/8/16
to
chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
Speaking of that ol' rat stanker:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/large-hardon-collider-bbc-news-5467745
LOL
--
Q: What's a WASP's idea of open-mindedness?
A: Dating a Canadian.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/large-hardon-collider-bbc-news-5467745
LOL
--
Q: What's a WASP's idea of open-mindedness?
A: Dating a Canadian.
DFS
Apr 8, 2016, 10:59:17 AM4/8/16
to
On 4/8/2016 6:23 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> ronb wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 16:48:01 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Heck, that number, at 1.8%, puts the lie to Sham's shill Omar, who
>>> claimed it was under 1%, and dropping.
>>
>> The 1.8% is a B.S. number. If it was true, the WinTrolls wouldn't be so
>> obsessed with Linux.
>>
>
> It may be true in certain parts of the world, like backwater US
> It is *much* higher in germany or france, for example
>
> Germans leading computer magazine c't published figures last year about the
> type of OS accessing their websites. Linux had a 37% share, windows wasn't
> that much more. OSX had less than 10%
heh! Great proof there!
> ronb wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 16:48:01 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Heck, that number, at 1.8%, puts the lie to Sham's shill Omar, who
>>> claimed it was under 1%, and dropping.
>>
>> The 1.8% is a B.S. number. If it was true, the WinTrolls wouldn't be so
>> obsessed with Linux.
>>
>
> It may be true in certain parts of the world, like backwater US
> It is *much* higher in germany or france, for example
>
> Germans leading computer magazine c't published figures last year about the
> type of OS accessing their websites. Linux had a 37% share, windows wasn't
> that much more. OSX had less than 10%
It's like that idiot 7 said: "Linux owns 100% of the Linux desktop market"
> Now is c't not the typical site everyone and his cat would access, but it
> shows that among computer savvy people linux is much more prevalent than the
> wintendo idiots like to see
>
> If windows were not pre-installed on 99.999% of wintel machines, windows
> would be a niche OS by now, as the vast majority of people don't stand a
> snowballs chance in hell to successfully install that crap. Linux is *much*
> easier to install,
> and even most wintendo cretins would be able to use it
DFS
Apr 8, 2016, 11:27:57 AM4/8/16
to
On 4/7/2016 12:16 PM, Me Sham wrote:
> On Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 11:13:40 AM UTC-5, Peter Köhlmann
> denial that you can't even begin to realize how ridiculous you
> sound.
One of the Linux idiots used to defend Rex Ballard as a "great man", and
another one (Creepy Chris Ahlstrom) labels the head-injury victim 7
"intelligent and insightful".
Every day is Linux Loon Day in comp.os.linux.advocacy.
> On Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 11:13:40 AM UTC-5, Peter Köhlmann
> wrote:
>> Those "numbers" are balderdash. And it has been explained several
>> times why that is the case
>
> Ah, *exactly* what was predicted. You Linux apologists are in such
>> Those "numbers" are balderdash. And it has been explained several
>> times why that is the case
>
> denial that you can't even begin to realize how ridiculous you
> sound.
One of the Linux idiots used to defend Rex Ballard as a "great man", and
another one (Creepy Chris Ahlstrom) labels the head-injury victim 7
"intelligent and insightful".
Every day is Linux Loon Day in comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Omar
Apr 8, 2016, 12:03:18 PM4/8/16
to
Very freaky.
0 new messages