As I have noted, the folks who make Firefox clearly get what many in COLA do
not: the importance of a good UI that is not just internally consistent but
also consistent with other aspects of the users environment.
--
Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments
that take our breath away.
> <http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080330-when-in-rome-engineering-the-
> firefox-3-user-experience.html>
> -----
> we talked to user experience design expert Alex Faaborg about
> the Firefox 3 visual refresh
> ...
> Platform integration has been a very high priority for the
> Firefox 3 development cycle. Visual consistency with the
> underlying operating system is important, says Faaborg,
> because it creates a more seamless user experience and makes
> it easier for the user to focus on web content rather than on
> the web browser
Uh oh! Rick and Gregory are going to have to st him straight on that one!
What a silly waste of time! Talking to users too! Bah! Clearly far too
much time on his hands.
> ...
> Few artists were interested in doing the Windows work,
> however, so Mozilla ended up hiring The Iconfactory to do
> complete sets for Windows Vista and Windows XP.
> ...
> Although the visual style and theme of the application are
> the most highly visible aspect of his work, Faaborg notes
> that interaction design goes much deeper than the browser's
> surface. Many subtle usability enhancements that are included
> in Firefox 3 improve the overall user experience and make
> complex features more easily accessible. One example that he
> cites is the new single-click bookmark system. Usability
> testing revealed that many users eschew bookmarks entirely
> and simply use Google because it often requires less effort.
> -----
>
> Consistency... user testing... spending *money* to have people design parts
> of the UI because there is a clear benefit to doing so.
>
> As I have noted, the folks who make Firefox clearly get what many in COLA do
> not: the importance of a good UI that is not just internally consistent but
> also consistent with other aspects of the users environment.
Rick voice : "It's all about choice"
Gregory voice : "Fuck off, Where the fucking fuck did I fucking well
disagree with that you fucking fucktard?"
Snit voice (like HAL from 2001) : "You disagreed here Dave. Err, I mean
Gregory. Here's the link too".
<sound of Gregory punching his monitor at the horrific moment he
realises that he has been 'pwned'>
--
<Overfiend> Joy: Hey, I'm an asshole. Assholes emit odious gas.
That's what we do.
> Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:
>
>> <http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080330-when-in-rome-engineering-the-
>> firefox-3-user-experience.html>
>> -----
>> we talked to user experience design expert Alex Faaborg about
>> the Firefox 3 visual refresh
>> ...
>> Platform integration has been a very high priority for the
>> Firefox 3 development cycle. Visual consistency with the
>> underlying operating system is important, says Faaborg,
>> because it creates a more seamless user experience and makes
>> it easier for the user to focus on web content rather than on
>> the web browser
>
> Uh oh! Rick and Gregory are going to have to st him straight on that one!
> What a silly waste of time! Talking to users too! Bah! Clearly far too
> much time on his hands.
Keep reading: they even *paid* to get work done that nobody wanted to do for
free. Paid! And the work that was so important they were willing to pay
for it: UI issues related to consistency.
LOL!
--
"Innovation is not about saying yes to everything. It's about saying NO to
all but the most crucial features." -- Steve Jobs