Weekly All About Snit Post

[James Ingraham]

This is the weekly 'All About The Uber Troll Snit" post

"36- George Graves: "Jason. You have started an argument with
the Snit (AKA Michael Glasser), this should not be done. He
will drive you crazy with his twisted logic, his deep-rooted
need to be ALWAYS right at any cost. He will move goalposts,
set up strawmen, and bore you into submission with his endless
pedanticism. The only way to engage him is to hit and run. NEVER
engage him, it's a futile, empty procedure that will only anger
you and feed him. Take my advice and STAY AWAY!" 27 Oct 2004
"


Ask Snit how he pissed on his cat and his hallucination about the
eyeball. Heavy pharma abuse = a Snit
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>

[John Dough]

Drugs or alcohol seem to be the common factor here. This snit jester
seems to enjoy the attention though even though most of it is negative.

A quick DuckDuckGo search of "snit Michael Glasser" brings up some
interesting hits.

<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=snit+michael+glasser&va=b&t=hc&atb=v282-1&ia=
web>

This joker seems to be well beyond helping. Hopefully he doesn't go
full postal and wipe out his family or something similar.
He does appear unstable, among other poor traits.

What I find interesting in those links you've provided is that the vast
majority of the people being quoted say pretty much the same things
about snit.
And none of it is positive information.

Is there anyone in cyber space who is a friend of snit?
Apparently he is a shut in so it's doubtful he has any local friends he
can interact with.

What a strange duck.



--
John Dough

[Menkee]

From what I have read, snit seems to have some type of learning
disability. He was probably a special ed student who needed extra help
to make it through school.

The world is full of idiots, morons and imbeciles.
Snit is one of them although it would take an MD to assign the correct
deficiency to snit.


--
Menkee

[LegionX]

John Dough <jo...@dough.fake> Wrote in message:

A quick DuckDuckGo search of "snit Michael Glasser" brings up

someinteresting hits.<https://duckduckgo.com/?q
=snit+michael+glasser&va=b&t=hc&atb=v282-1&ia=web>This joker seems
to be well beyond helping. Hopefully he doesn't gofull postal and
wipe out his family or something similar.He does appear unstable,

among other poor traits.

>What I find interesting in those links you've provided is that the vast majority of the people being quoted say pretty much the same things about snit. And none of it is positive information.

Despite being asked to - many times - snit has never provided a
reasonable explanation for this.

>Is there anyone in cyber space who is a friend of snit?

Maybe. A poster known as David Brooks at least claims to be.
Disclosure: that poster is a bit off level, out of skew, rather
odd duck himself. Kindred souls?
--
Call Snit anytime day or night. 1.928.445.3425 Or (928)-445-3425
He's always home and almost always on drugs that keep him up for
days. And don't forget when you call to:

[Snit]

LegionX <MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:
> John Dough <jo...@dough.fake> Wrote in message:
>
> A quick DuckDuckGo search of "snit Michael Glasser" brings up
> someinteresting hits.<https://duckduckgo.com/?q
> =snit+michael+glasser&va=b&t=hc&atb=v282-1&ia=web>

What does a search for you, Gremlin, show?

Heck. Don’t even need to look up your name or many handles.

Search for: Functionally Illiterate Fraud.

There you are!

> This joker seems
> to be well beyond helping. Hopefully he doesn't gofull postal and
> wipe out his family or something similar.He does appear unstable,
> among other poor traits.
>
>> What I find interesting in those links you've provided is that the vast
>> majority of the people being quoted say pretty much the same things
>> about snit. And none of it is positive information.
>
> Despite being asked to - many times - snit has never provided a
> reasonable explanation for this.
>
>> Is there anyone in cyber space who is a friend of snit?
>
> Maybe. A poster known as David Brooks at least claims to be.
> Disclosure: that poster is a bit off level, out of skew, rather
> odd duck himself. Kindred souls?



--

Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

[David Brooks]

On 28/08/2021 18:23, John Dough wrote:

> Is there anyone in cyber space who is a friend of snit?

Yes. 🙂 Snit is MY cyber-friend and a very good one he has proved to be.

(Follow-up set to ACW)

[Menkee]

Interesting.
Do you have websites devoted to documenting your behavior like snit
does?
I haven't been able to locate anything.

P.S. It's good that snit has at least one friend.
The mentally challenged tend to need protection from other kindred
types.

--
Menkee

[John Dough]

On 2021-08-28, LegionX <MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:
> John Dough <jo...@dough.fake> Wrote in message:
>
> A quick DuckDuckGo search of "snit Michael Glasser" brings up
> someinteresting hits.<https://duckduckgo.com/?q
>=snit+michael+glasser&va=b&t=hc&atb=v282-1&ia=web>This joker seems
> to be well beyond helping. Hopefully he doesn't gofull postal and
> wipe out his family or something similar.He does appear unstable,
> among other poor traits.
>
>>What I find interesting in those links you've provided is that the vast majority of the people being quoted say pretty much the same things about snit. And none of it is positive information.
>
> Despite being asked to - many times - snit has never provided a
> reasonable explanation for this.

I don't see how he could?
If it were just a handful of people and maybe one newsgroup where snit
pissed people off I would get it but from what I read it's hundreds of
people and various different groups.

And it seems he has been playing this victim routine for 30 years?

What a waste of time.

>>Is there anyone in cyber space who is a friend of snit?
>
> Maybe. A poster known as David Brooks at least claims to be.
> Disclosure: that poster is a bit off level, out of skew, rather
> odd duck himself. Kindred souls?

They say there is a match for everyone of us.
Maybe snit has found his match?


--
John Dough

[Snit]

On Aug 28, 2021 at 1:41:43 PM MST, "John Dough" wrote
<slrnsil7s...@localhost.localdomain>:

Your use of socks speaks poorly of you.

[John Dough]

Socks?
I don't use socks.
That's something you do, Sigmond, Meat and many others.

Fake any pdf files lately snit?
My, my now that is an interesting thread.

In fact, the more I read about you, the bigger the laugh. Please tell
me you haven't been playing this troll game of yours for 20-30 years.
Maybe you are just misunderstood, snit?
Then again, how could legions of people making the same or similar
claims about you all be wrong?
Not likely.

https://usenet.sandman.net/TrollScoring/Snit



--
John Dough

[Snit]

On Aug 28, 2021 at 4:01:13 PM MST, "John Dough" wrote
<slrnsilg1...@localhost.localdomain>:

Yes. Your many socks. I get you deny it, but that is not relevant to your
non-stop use.

[John Dough]

Dishonest snipping on your part snit.
You seem to do that a lot.

You also seem to accuse many people of using socks yet offer no proof.
However there is much proof of you socking up.
In fact 20 to 30 years of snit socks.



--
John Dough

[Snit]

On Aug 28, 2021 at 9:06:03 PM MST, "John Dough" wrote
<slrnsim1t...@localhost.localdomain>:

And you had no response to this so you changed the topic to more irrelevant
accusations. Not biting.

[Terry Prawner]

In article <slrnsim1t...@localhost.localdomain>,
jo...@dough.fake says...

He does.
Snit realizes he has no defense against the many people who have
and continue to point out his dishonesty so he instead projects
those faults onto the other person in a poor attempt to change the
focus of the argument from him to the other person.

It never works. Well it does work in snit's mind but he is far out
of reality so you know how that goes.

> You also seem to accuse many people of using socks yet offer no proof.
> However there is much proof of you socking up.
> In fact 20 to 30 years of snit socks.

Snit has had 100's of sock puppets.
Probably even more that might not have been uncovered.
It's what he does when he gets ignored or asked to provide proof of
his lies.

[Snit]

On Aug 28, 2021 at 10:23:56 PM MST, "Terry Prawner" wrote
<MPG.3b94e3fae...@nntp.aioe.org>:

Another example of you using a sock to lash out... I hope you get the help you
need.

[LegionX]

Snit <Brock.M...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

> LegionX <MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:> John Dough <jo...@dough.fake> Wrote in message:> > A quick DuckDuckGo search of "snit Michael Glasser" brings up> someinteresting hits.<https://duckduckgo.com/?q> =snit+michael+glasser&va=b&t=hc&atb=v282-1&ia=web


>What does a search for you, Gremlin, show?

A search doesn't show anything? About us under this handle.
There's all kinds of things that come up on Gremlin though.
Mostly due to his former blackhat hacker status.

>Search for: Functionally Illiterate Fraud.

Which are the results of your floodbot seeding efforts Snit. Prior
to your hard seeding work no such results. You do realize that
it's easy even for us - newbies to usenet - to see and be able to
prove that don't you?

In case we confused you: You're the source of the functionally
illiterate fraud search results. The claims exist because of your
seeding efforts, not because they are true.

In some circles that's known as severe desperation. To have to go
so far out of your way ton repeatedly lie about another poster
and search engine seed the lies.

[Snit]

On Aug 29, 2021 at 9:47:19 AM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sggdmq$elh$1...@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <Brock.M...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> LegionX <MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:> John Dough
>> <jo...@dough.fake> Wrote in message:> >A quick DuckDuckGo search of "snit
>> Michael Glasser" brings up> someinteresting hits.<https://duckduckgo.com/?q>
>> =snit+michael+glasser&va=b&t=hc&atb=v282-1&ia=web
>
>
>> What does a search for you, Gremlin, show?
>
> A search doesn't show anything?

Sure it does. Here, similar search for you:

https://www.google.com/search?q=Gremlin+Dustin+Cook

Shows all sorts of nasty things about you. This is not much better:

https://www.google.com/search?q=LegionX+Dustin+Cook

Wait. That is Google. Let's try DuckDuckGo as you did:

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Gremlin+Dustin+Cook

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=LegionX+Dustin+Cook

There goes your claim you understand how to use tech well. Even simple
searches are beyond your capabilities.

[Snit]

On Aug 29, 2021 at 9:47:19 AM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sggdmq$elh$1...@dont-email.me>:

>> Search for: Functionally Illiterate Fraud.
>
> Which are the results of your floodbot seeding efforts Snit.

Funny how you think I manipulate Carroll as he manipulates you. Also quite
telling how often you bring up his bot -- but he does not jump on you for
that... not as long as you do his bidding.

Also interesting how ever since his son came here and commented he has not
been posting... at least under his "Steve Carroll" handle.

[LegionX]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

> On Aug 29, 2021 at 9:47:19 AM MST, "LegionX" wrote<sggdmq$elh$1...@dont-email.me>:> Snit <Brock.M...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:> >> LegionX <MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:> John Dough>> <jo...@dough.fake> Wrote in message:> >A quick DuckDuckGo search of "snit>> Michael Glasser" brings up> someinteresting hits.<https://duckduckgo.com/?q>>> =snit+michael+glasser&va=b&t=hc&atb=v282-1&ia=web> > >> What does a search for you, Gremlin, show?> > A search doesn't show anything?


>Sure it does.

No. As we wrote, it doesn't come back with anything? On us. It
comes back with things on Gremlin - some of which has to do with
his past as a former blackhat hacker.

>Gremlin+Dustin+CookShows all sorts of nasty things about you.

Try as you might to fight with reality, We aren't Gremlin.

>There goes your claim you understand how to use tech well.

Our claim hasn't gone anywhere. Our publications under the groups
name shows we understand tech very well. Not only have we shown
an ability to disable efforts to prevent audio/video ripping and
duplication via several DRM technologies - we also show
understanding of tech that's allowed us to perform our civil
disobedience of copyright infringement on a massive scale for
nearly twenty years now - all without so much as a single member
getting busted for it. That's damn good considering the situation
in the hpavc scenes right now.

[Snit]

On Aug 29, 2021 at 11:24:46 AM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sggjdh$trm$1...@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>
>> On Aug 29, 2021 at 9:47:19 AM MST, "LegionX"
>> wrote<sggdmq$elh$1...@dont-email.me>:> Snit <Brock.M...@gmail.com> Wrote in
>> message:> >> LegionX <MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:>
>> John Dough>> <jo...@dough.fake> Wrote in message:> >A quick DuckDuckGo search
>> of "snit>> Michael Glasser" brings up> someinteresting
>> hits.<https://duckduckgo.com/?q>>>
>> =snit+michael+glasser&va=b&t=hc&atb=v282-1&ia=web> >>> What does a search for
>> you, Gremlin, show?> >A search doesn't show anything?
>
>
>> Sure it does.
>
> No.

Another example of your technical incompetency.

Gremlin Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>

LegionX Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=legionx+dustin+cook>

Functionally Illiterate Fraud:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>

Can you not even figure out how to click the links?

> As we wrote, it doesn't come back with anything? On us.

You are one person, Gremlin. You are not an "us".

[LegionX]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

>Funny how you think I manipulate Carroll as he manipulates you.

It's very odd how you pull things from your ass and attempt to
link them. Our statement about the search results being your work
stands. It's easy to prove too - Snit. Click one of the search
results links and you get to read a nonsensical post from the
floodbot with your label for Gremlin used as the signature for
the post.

You get the same results searching for the labels you created for
Steve Carroll.

Context is a very important component of reading comprehension
that you continue to show that you still - as an adult in his
fifties - have considerable trouble with. So much so that it's
undeniable.

>Also quite telling how often you bring up his bot

We would love to see proof for that accusation. Based on our
interaction with you so far we are reasonably certain no such
proof will be provided by you, though. We're almost convinced
that you don't even understand the words proof and evidence. You
continue to show that those two concepts are foreign to
you.

>but he does not jump on you for that... not as long as you do his bidding.

His bidding? We aren't here for him. He didn't invite us to come
and get to know you better. You did.

>Also interesting how ever since his son came here and commented he has not been posting.

Your bar of proof is significantly lower than ours and likely most
others. The individual who posted thru aioe? Also posted as HHI
and tried to impersonate Gremlin (poorly). We are not confident
the same poster has come clean by their claim of being another
posters Son. We wouldn't be surprised to learn that you sock thru
aioe and all of the posts from that poster are yours. We have no
trust in anything you write because you continue to FAIL to
support your statements. Repeating them is not supporting
them.

[Snit]

On Aug 29, 2021 at 11:36:34 AM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sggk3j$trm$2...@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> Funny how you think I manipulate Carroll as he manipulates you.
>
> It's very odd how you pull things from your ass and attempt to
> link them.

You cannot understand logical connections. Got it.

> Our statement about the search results being your work
> stands.

I do not control Carroll the way he manipulates you. And these are some
searches about you:

Gremlin Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>

LegionX Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=legionx+dustin+cook>

HHI Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=HHI+dustin+cook>

Imaginary Friend Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>

Functionally Illiterate Fraud:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>

Carroll is laughing his ass off at how he is able to do that and get you to
blame others.

[pothead]

On 2021-08-29, LegionX <MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:
> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>>Funny how you think I manipulate Carroll as he manipulates you.
>
> It's very odd how you pull things from your ass and attempt to
> link them. Our statement about the search results being your work
> stands. It's easy to prove too - Snit. Click one of the search
> results links and you get to read a nonsensical post from the
> floodbot with your label for Gremlin used as the signature for
> the post.

Exactly.
But far too complex for snit to comprehend.

> You get the same results searching for the labels you created for
> Steve Carroll.

Ayep.

> Context is a very important component of reading comprehension
> that you continue to show that you still - as an adult in his
> fifties - have considerable trouble with. So much so that it's
> undeniable.

Snit has major problems with context and reading comprehension in
general.
If someone was writing a post about the sky being a lovely shade of
azure on a particular day, snit would focus on that person having an
"obsession" with the color of the sky or something similar.

Snit frequently misses the forest for the trees.
It's quite bizarre behavior for an adult.
I suspect snit has a major learning disability.

>>Also quite telling how often you bring up his bot
>
> We would love to see proof for that accusation. Based on our
> interaction with you so far we are reasonably certain no such
> proof will be provided by you, though. We're almost convinced
> that you don't even understand the words proof and evidence. You
> continue to show that those two concepts are foreign to
> you.

Snit makes statements like that in order to rope other people into
discussing his floodbot.
And the fact that he responds to %'s replies to known floodbot posts
shows snit's motives quite clearly.

>>but he does not jump on you for that... not as long as you do his bidding.
>
> His bidding? We aren't here for him. He didn't invite us to come
> and get to know you better. You did.

lol !

>>Also interesting how ever since his son came here and commented he has not been posting.
>
> Your bar of proof is significantly lower than ours and likely most
> others. The individual who posted thru aioe? Also posted as HHI
> and tried to impersonate Gremlin (poorly). We are not confident
> the same poster has come clean by their claim of being another
> posters Son. We wouldn't be surprised to learn that you sock thru
> aioe and all of the posts from that poster are yours. We have no
> trust in anything you write because you continue to FAIL to
> support your statements. Repeating them is not supporting
> them.

Snit is mostly likely behind the 1 hit wonder trolls from aioe.
Anything to cause disruption will attract snit like flies to shit.
One of snit's most prolific trolling methods involves creating
antagonist / protagonist threads where his various socks argue with
each other.
Snit has already admitted he runs various OSen on his Mac in VM
sessions so it's trivial for him to post from different newsreaders and
so forth.
Who else runs stuff like that?

--
pothead
Tommy Chong For President 2024
Lifetime Member of "The Prescott Parasite Eradication Team"
Ask snit how he pissed on his cat.
All about snit read below. Links courtesy of Ron:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

[Snit]

On Aug 29, 2021 at 11:50:16 AM MST, "pothead" wrote
<slrnsinln5....@localhost.localdomain>:

> On 2021-08-29, LegionX <MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:
>> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>>
>>> Funny how you think I manipulate Carroll as he manipulates you.
>>
>> It's very odd how you pull things from your ass and attempt to
>> link them. Our statement about the search results being your work
>> stands. It's easy to prove too - Snit. Click one of the search
>> results links and you get to read a nonsensical post from the
>> floodbot with your label for Gremlin used as the signature for
>> the post.
>
> Exactly.
> But far too complex for snit to comprehend.

The assumption there is I somehow control Carroll with his bot. I do no such
thing.

Of course, you two are just trolling... lashing out at someone you see as
better than you.

It is not a healthy way for you to deal with your insecurity.

[LegionX]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

>Another example of your technical incompetency.

Another snip and run huh? What we wrote:

No. As we wrote, it doesn't come back with anything? On us. It
comes back with things on Gremlin - some of which has to do with
his past as a former blackhat hacker.

That past is hard to explain away as you claim he's a technically
illiterate incompetent fraud - isn't it. That's why you
completely avoided addressing it and post snipped us.
Again.

Try as you might you can't strong arm reality. It just doesn't
work that way. Gremlin has a known past as a very bad guy for
using his technical knowledge for the wrong reasons. Considerable
technical knowledge. Technical knowledge he wouldn't have if your
claims about him were true.

On a good note David isn't posting about the evil things Gremlin
did nearly as much. It would discredit your accusations that much
more (we can meaure negative values for the purposes of record
keeping. Sure why not) if he did and he clearly doesn't want to
contribute to the extensive embarrassment Gremlin continues to
cause you - all without having to post in months now. Gremlin
0wns you Snit. Admit it.

One of our own threads also proves your claims lack foundation.
Gremlin got Davids laptop up and going with nothing more than a
picture of the computer in question. That's a fact.

And not something who was as you describe them to be able to do.
We asked David about this in our thread. David responded in the
affirmative - Gremlin can fix things and you're nothing more than
an end user.

That wouldn't be so laughable Snit if you didn't have a four year
college degree - a masters in IT - yet when a tech subject
comes up here - you're nowhere to be found.

How does one become an apprentice trained electrician if they are
what you describe them as being? We've been very curious about
that - especially since he was recruited for an out of town
rather large electrical job project.

Yep Snit as your friend David confirmed Gremlin is an electrician
as well as a certified with multiple ones computer technician.
His knowledge of electronics isn't too shabby either as he's
shown here and his youtube videos.

It was a nice touch reading that post where you were going off on
Gremlin - claiming there was no proof to support his claimed
knowledge - to see David step in (out of nowhere) and educate you
concerning Gremlin by telling you in no uncertain terms that
Gremlin is an apprenticed electrician and does know the "heavy
electrics" - As well as the electronics. David of all people told
you this. That was very funny Snit.

So how does he have so many titles he's earned and yet still be
what you claim he is? How does that work Snit?

And in case you forgot:

https://streamable.com/vyh8r6

Https://tinyurl.com/gremlinslab

Do explain the contents of those urls (that's just a little
electronics/electrical knowledge demonstration - we haven't
shared any urls about his computing knowledge. We want to see how
well you do lol with those first) as you defend the label you
created and seeded search engines with using the floodbot to
attack him. Go ahead Snit. We predict you'll run again,
instead.

You've already been called out for this by another regular poster
Snit. This being that the search engine results exist because you
took advantage of the floodbot and had it help you see deragatory
comments you wrote about Steve Carroll and Gremlin.

The urls you share to attack them with are the fruits of your
labor. They aren't the truth. They aren't opinions written about
either of them by anyone other than yourself.

They are nothing like the urls shared about you. The ones shared
about you contain truthful information and the supported opinions
of hundreds of people over years worth of time. All writing
essentially the same things about you. The ways in which you lie
and troll newsgroups. How reprehensible and vile you are as a
person. How do you explain that Snit?

Another snip and run is coming right Snit? You'll neglect to
address this as well. Right Snit?

[pothead]

On 2021-08-29, LegionX <MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>>Another example of your technical incompetency.
>
> Another snip and run huh? What we wrote:

Snit's latest attempt at remaining in control of the discussion.
He snips the context and then replies with something that has nothing
to do with what is being discussed.

It's the end of the month so snit's drug supply is probably running
low. Snit tends to go off the rails at the end of the month.



snip---

> Another snip and run is coming right Snit? You'll neglect to
> address this as well. Right Snit?

Of course.
It's what snit does.

He is a dishonest little shit.

[LegionX]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

>You cannot understand logical connections. Got it.

We can. Our jobs require it. You haven't shown that you have a
firm grasp of any aspect of those concepts so far.

>> Our statement about the search results being your work stands.

>I do not control Carroll the way he manipulates you.

Re-read what we wrote then. We didn't write anything about
Carroll. We wrote about you and only you. We didn't accuse either
of you of being behind the floodbot - we correctly and truthfully
- only wrote that you used it to help your efforts to slime
Gremlin by trying to search engine fuck him over.
You used the same tactic for Steve Carroll.

>And these are some searches about you

They aren't about us, Snit. They aren't really about Gremlin
either. They are as we wrote the fruits of your hard work to
repeatedly post deragatory comments about Steve Carroll and
Gremlin with the specific intention of having it seeded into
search engines.

As we invited you to do already - click a link or two if you'd
like from the results of any of the urls you've shared. The
results will be a web to usenet interface that is showing a
nonsensical flood bot post with one of your deragatory labels for
Steve Carroll and or Gremlin attached as it's posting signature.


They won't contain any context that supports the deragatory
statements you wrote about either of them.

Now repeat the same 'experiment' with one of these:

<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>

Or

<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=snit+michael+glasser&ia=web>

See the difference now Snit? The links we shared for you will show
context supporting them. Not randomized nonsense posts to usenet
from a bot.

We feel this is a very important difference that you seem to be
overlooking. :)

>Carroll is laughing his ass off at how he is able to do that and get you to blame others.

We're confident a lot of people who read your replies are
laughing. But we doubt they are laughing at Carroll.

[Snit]

On Aug 29, 2021 at 12:37:46 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sggnmb$n54$1...@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> You cannot understand logical connections. Got it.
>
> We can.

You failed here. You accused me of being responsible for Carroll's bot. You
also do not seem to understand what searches find for you even as you try to
say what shows up in searches means a lot for others.

Gremlin Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>

LegionX Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=legionx+dustin+cook>

HHI Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=HHI+dustin+cook>

Imaginary Friend Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>

Functionally Illiterate Fraud:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>

[Snit]

On Aug 29, 2021 at 12:35:58 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<slrnsinocs....@localhost.localdomain>:

Gremlin Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>

LegionX Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=legionx+dustin+cook>

HHI Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=HHI+dustin+cook>

Imaginary Friend Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>

Functionally Illiterate Fraud:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>

Can you not even figure out how to click the links?

[Snit]

On Aug 29, 2021 at 12:15:17 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sggmc8$k34$1...@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> Another example of your technical incompetency.
>
> Another snip and run huh?

"Snit's latest attempt at remaining in control of the discussion."

Seems you were talking about yourself, not me. Got it. You want control.

> What we wrote:
>
> No. As we wrote, it doesn't come back with anything? On us.

Sure it does, Gremlin:

Gremlin Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>

LegionX Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=legionx+dustin+cook>

HHI Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=HHI+dustin+cook>

Imaginary Friend Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>

Functionally Illiterate Fraud:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>

[pothead]

On 2021-08-29, LegionX <MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>>You cannot understand logical connections. Got it.
>
> We can. Our jobs require it. You haven't shown that you have a
> firm grasp of any aspect of those concepts so far.

Snit accusing others of not understanding logic is hilarious
considering he has no sense of logic at all.

His various learning disabilities get the best of snit every time.
I suspect in addition to some form of mental retardation, snit also
suffers from Asperger's as well.

He shows several classic signs of it.

>>> Our statement about the search results being your work stands.
>
>>I do not control Carroll the way he manipulates you.
>
> Re-read what we wrote then. We didn't write anything about
> Carroll. We wrote about you and only you. We didn't accuse either
> of you of being behind the floodbot - we correctly and truthfully
> - only wrote that you used it to help your efforts to slime
> Gremlin by trying to search engine fuck him over.
> You used the same tactic for Steve Carroll.

Of course.
Snit isn't happy unless he drags Steve Carroll into every discussion.
It's what he does.
Steve Carroll lives rent free in snit's otherwise empty skull.

>>And these are some searches about you
>
> They aren't about us, Snit. They aren't really about Gremlin
> either. They are as we wrote the fruits of your hard work to

> repeatedly post derogatory comments about Steve Carroll and

> Gremlin with the specific intention of having it seeded into
> search engines.

Gaming the search engines is what snit strives for.
Lately he has been trying to scrub his own past but it's not working
very well as archiving sites are still carrying most if not everything
about snit and his 24x7 trolling operation.

He did manage to scrub some pictures and images from Google Images but
those are found elsewhere.

--snip

> We're confident a lot of people who read your replies are
> laughing. But we doubt they are laughing at Carroll.

Everyone gets a hearty laugh at snit's expense. He isn't intelligent
enough to realize that people are laughing at him and not with him.

Baiting and then playing snit for the fool he is, has become just
too darn easy.
And since most people have snit filtered, and rightfully so, the effect
isn't the same.

[LegionX]

pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> Wrote in message:

> On 2021-08-29, LegionX <MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:>>>Funny how you think I manipulate Carroll as he manipulates you.>> It's very odd how you pull things from your ass and attempt to> link them. Our statement about the search results being your work> stands. It's easy to prove too - Snit. Click one of the search> results links and you get to read a nonsensical post from the> floodbot with your label for Gremlin used as the signature for> the post.

>Exactly.

Only really dumb people would ever fall for the ruse he went with.
We think he was trying to duplicate this:

>https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>

<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=snit+michael+glasser&ia=web>

He didn't consider the importance of context as he executed his plan.

>But far too complex for snit to comprehend.

We disagree with you here. We're convinced now he was well aware
of what he was doing. He planned it.

>Snit has major problems with context and reading comprehension in general.

Based on his posts we would have to agree with you here to a
point. We don't think he's quite as ignorant as he lets on. We
think he is aware of what he's doing in some cases but tries to
play dumb about it - incorrectly thinking he won't look as bad
for whatever it was he did.

>Snit is mostly likely behind the 1 hit wonder trolls from aioe.

It would fit his M.O

>One of snit's most prolific trolling methods involves creatingantagonist / protagonist threads where his various socks argue with each other.

Sigmond. :) Yes - we did read the thread the post was pulled from.

[LegionX]

pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> Wrote in message:

> On 2021-08-29, LegionX <MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:>>>Another example of your technical incompetency.>> Another snip and run huh? What we wrote:

>Snit's latest attempt at remaining in control of the discussion.He snips the context and then replies with something that has nothing to do with what is being discussed.

Is it just us or isn't he a little old for that childish kind of
nonsense?

We noticed he's claimed to want a good faith discussion but
despite several attempts made by us to do so - he seems
incapable. A good faith discussion requires two way comms. Not
snip misdirect and run as Snit continues to attempt.
Poorly.

>It's the end of the month so snit's drug supply is probably running low. Snit tends to go off the rails at the end of the month.

You're probably right. We didn't take the current date into
consideration.

>He is a dishonest little shit.

David Brooks idea of a friend.

[Snit]

On Aug 29, 2021 at 12:46:30 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<slrnsinp0j....@localhost.localdomain>:

Another example of you lashing out with insults to try to feel better about
yourself.

[Snit]

On Aug 29, 2021 at 12:47:04 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sggo7p$n54$2...@dont-email.me>:

> pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> Wrote in message:
>> On 2021-08-29, LegionX <MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:>
>> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:>>>Funny how you think I
>> manipulate Carroll as he manipulates you.>> It's very odd how you pull things
>> from your ass and attempt to> link them. Our statement about the search
>> results being your work> stands. It's easy to prove too - Snit. Click one of
>> the search> results links and you get to read a nonsensical post from the>
>> floodbot with your label for Gremlin used as the signature for> the post.
>
>> Exactly.
>
> Only really dumb people would ever fall for the ruse he went with.

I am merely trying to get you to decide it Google searches and the like are or
are not meaningful when it comes to what is found. Here are some searches
about you, Gremlin:

Gremlin Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>

LegionX Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=legionx+dustin+cook>

HHI Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=HHI+dustin+cook>

Imaginary Friend Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>

Functionally Illiterate Fraud:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>

You snip and run from those. Clearly you know they have a lot of meaning.

Meanwhile you point to things that are just Google seeding by trolls... no
actual comments from me. I can point to comments form you. How about your
claims about your education:

* You have two degrees, both in CS and you did not know IT was different.
* You have two degrees, both in IT.
* You have two degrees, one in IT and one in CS.
* You blame me for you confusing IT with IS though you offer no evidence.
* Your project your confusion and dishonesty onto me.

All trivial to show:

Diesel / Gremlin <XnsAB593F...@MjEwUG.BDMbgpk>:
-----
Well, I have two Masters myself, but they are in CS I
wasn't aware CS and I.T were/are seperate entities now.
-----

Diesel / Gremlin <XnsAC703A...@tkRp4lHo04W6T4lOY83W.tuvxq31.7>:
-----
Unlike yourself snit, I hold two honorary masters in IT
-----

Diesel / Gremlin <XnsAC703A...@tkRp4lHo04W6T4lOY83W.tuvxq31.7>:
-----
We discussed at length previously his masters in IS, and
mine in IT and the differences between them. He was quite
adamant that he had a masters in IS, *not* IT as is mine.
-----

Diesel / Gremlin <XnsAC75C8...@dcFn0WjC2iFiA86fj2h.35Y>:
-----
One is in CS, the other is in IT.
-----

And the most ironic accusation of yours:

Diesel / Gremlin <XnsAC703A...@tkRp4lHo04W6T4lOY83W.tuvxq31.7>:
-----
I'd also like to know how Snit could be so confused
concerning which degree he has.
-----

You are so ashamed of your own words you pretend to be your imaginary friends
to distance yourself from your own nonsense.

Notice I have no such need. I simply do not sink to your level and have
nothing to be ashamed of.

> We think he was trying to duplicate this:
>
>> https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
> <https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=snit+michael+glasser&ia=web>
>
> He didn't consider the importance of context as he executed his plan.
>
>> But far too complex for snit to comprehend.
>
> We disagree with you here. We're convinced now he was well aware
> of what he was doing. He planned it.
>
>> Snit has major problems with context and reading comprehension in general.
>
> Based on his posts we would have to agree with you here to a
> point. We don't think he's quite as ignorant as he lets on. We
> think he is aware of what he's doing in some cases but tries to
> play dumb about it - incorrectly thinking he won't look as bad
> for whatever it was he did.
>
>> Snit is mostly likely behind the 1 hit wonder trolls from aioe.
>
> It would fit his M.O
>
>> One of snit's most prolific trolling methods involves creatingantagonist /
>> protagonist threads where his various socks argue with each other.
>
> Sigmond. :) Yes - we did read the thread the post was pulled from.



--

[Snit]

On Aug 29, 2021 at 1:03:26 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sggp6f$5p8$1...@dont-email.me>:

> pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> On 2021-08-29, LegionX <MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:>
>> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:>>>Another example of your
>> technical incompetency.>> Another snip and run huh? What we wrote:
>
>> Snit's latest attempt at remaining in control of the discussion.He snips the
>> context and then replies with something that has nothing to do with what is
>> being discussed.
>
> Is it just us or isn't he a little old for that childish kind of
> nonsense?

I do tend to respond to those of you who troll far more than I should.

But, hey, as long as you are trolling me and my family, these are fair game,
right?

Gremlin Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>

LegionX Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=legionx+dustin+cook>

HHI Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=HHI+dustin+cook>

Imaginary Friend Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>

Functionally Illiterate Fraud:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>



>

> We noticed he's claimed to want a good faith discussion

If you ever get to the point where you can do so I would give you yet another
chance.

> but
> despite several attempts made by us to do so - he seems
> incapable. A good faith discussion requires two way comms. Not
> snip misdirect and run as Snit continues to attempt.
> Poorly.
>
>> It's the end of the month so snit's drug supply is probably running low. Snit
>> tends to go off the rails at the end of the month.
>
> You're probably right. We didn't take the current date into
> consideration.
>
>> He is a dishonest little shit.
>
> David Brooks idea of a friend.


--

[LegionX]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

> On Aug 29, 2021 at 12:15:17 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote<sggmc8$k34$1...@dont-email.me>:> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:> >> Another example of your technical incompetency.> > Another snip and run huh?"Snit's latest attempt at remaining in control of the discussion."

>Seems you were talking about yourself, not me. Got it.

How could they be when you did exactly what they wrote?

>Sure it does, Gremlin:

How much more time do you need to support your socking accusation?
We didn't need any to prove you socked up as Sigmond.

And why did you avoid our question? We'll repeat ourselves for you
this time:

As we invited you to do already - click a link or two if you'd
like from the results of any of the urls you've shared. The
results will be a web to usenet interface that is showing a
nonsensical flood bot post with one of your deragatory labels for
Steve Carroll and or Gremlin attached as it's posting signature.


They won't contain any context that supports the deragatory
statements you wrote about either of them.

Now repeat the same 'experiment' with one of these:

<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>

Or

<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=snit+michael+glasser&ia=web>

See the difference now Snit? The links we shared for you will show
context supporting them. Not randomized nonsense posts to usenet
from a bot.

We feel this is a very important difference that you seem to be
overlooking. :)

Both of our predictions came true Snit. You ducked exactly what we
wrote you would. You're an easy mark Snit - because you're very
stupid. Not ignorant but stupid. There's an important difference.
And because of your immense stupidity - you're very arrogant.
You're a perfect target for us Snit. Fucking perfect.

Have you figured out why we asked you about Scientology yet?

[LegionX]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

>But, hey, as long as you are trolling me and my family, these are fair game,right?

Just so we aren't accused of misunderstanding what you wrote
later... Are you admitting the urls you've been sharing are what
we've written they were? And that you did create them for the
purposes of trolling Gremlin and Steve Carroll? Is that what you
just did here?

We don't quite understand what you're whining about with your
family. Our header information as well as our Signature has
remained the same for sometime now. What really upset you? Do
share.

As we invited you to do already - click a link or two if you'd
like from the results of any of the urls you've shared. The
results will be a web to usenet interface that is showing a
nonsensical flood bot post with one of your deragatory labels for
Steve Carroll and or Gremlin attached as it's posting signature.


They won't contain any context that supports the deragatory
statements you wrote about either of them.

Now repeat the same 'experiment' with one of these:

<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>

Or

<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=snit+michael+glasser&ia=web>

See the difference now Snit? The links we shared for you will show
context supporting them. Not randomized nonsense posts to usenet
from a bot.

We feel this is a very important difference that you seem to be
overlooking. :)

[LegionX]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

>You failed here.

Nope.

>You accused me of being responsible for Carroll's bot.

No we didn't.

>You also do not seem to understand what searches find for you even as you try to say what shows up in searches means a lot for others.

We understand things just fine. It's how we were able to write:

As we invited you to do already - click a link or two if you'd
like from the results of any of the urls you've shared. The
results will be a web to usenet interface that is showing a
nonsensical flood bot post with one of your deragatory labels for
Steve Carroll and or Gremlin attached as it's posting signature.


They won't contain any context that supports the deragatory
statements you wrote about either of them.

Now repeat the same 'experiment' with one of these:

<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>

Or

<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=snit+michael+glasser&ia=web>

See the difference now Snit? The links we shared for you will show
context supporting them. Not randomized nonsense posts to usenet
from a bot.

We feel this is a very important difference that you seem to be
overlooking. :)

It doesn't matter how many Snit rinse and repeat cycles you run
little man. It won't change reality. It won't make you appear to
be less pondscum. You are what you are. Nothing is going to
change that.

[pothead]

On 2021-08-29, LegionX <MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:
> pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> On 2021-08-29, LegionX <MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:>>>Another example of your technical incompetency.>> Another snip and run huh? What we wrote:
>
>>Snit's latest attempt at remaining in control of the discussion.He snips the context and then replies with something that has nothing to do with what is being discussed.
>
> Is it just us or isn't he a little old for that childish kind of
> nonsense?

Mentally or physically?
Mentally snit is like an 8 year old effeminate little boy.
A real drama queen.

Physically he was born in 1969 so go figure.

> We noticed he's claimed to want a good faith discussion but
> despite several attempts made by us to do so - he seems
> incapable. A good faith discussion requires two way comms. Not
> snip misdirect and run as Snit continues to attempt.
> Poorly.

Snit constantly claims he wants to discuss technology and that he does
not attack the person but instead uses "facts" and "evidence" to prove
his POV.

It's a complete lie.

>>It's the end of the month so snit's drug supply is probably running low. Snit tends to go off the rails at the end of the month.
>
> You're probably right. We didn't take the current date into
> consideration.

Supposedly snit mixes up jenkem when he runs low on prescription drugs.
He also huffs solvents as well when times get tough.
Other than what I have read, I can't say for sure.

>>He is a dishonest little shit.
>
> David Brooks idea of a friend.

I don't really know anything about David other than what I have read.
He seems to have a lot in common with snit.
That's too bad.

He does seem to have a life though, boating etc which I suppose is a
good thing.

Snit has no life outside of obsessing over Steve Carroll and trolling
usenet.

[LegionX]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

> On Aug 29, 2021 at 12:47:04 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote<sggo7p$n54$2...@dont-email.me>:> pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> Wrote in message:>> On 2021-08-29, LegionX <MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:>>> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:>>>Funny how you think I>> manipulate Carroll as he manipulates you.>> It's very odd how you pull things>> from your ass and attempt to> link them. Our statement about the search>> results being your work> stands. It's easy to prove too - Snit. Click one of>> the search> results links and you get to read a nonsensical post from the> >> floodbot with your label for Gremlin used as the signature for> the post.> >> Exactly.> > Only really dumb people would ever fall for the ruse he went with.

>I am merely trying to get you to decide it Google searches and the like are or are not meaningful when it comes to what is found.

Depending on the context they can be. The urls you've been sharing
all point to nonsense floodbot posts with your deragatory
comments about Gremlin or Steve Carroll used as it's posting
signature. None of them provide supporting context.

As we invited you to do already - click a link or two if you'd
like from the results of any of the urls you've shared. The
results will be a web to usenet interface that is showing a
nonsensical flood bot post with one of your deragatory labels for
Steve Carroll and or Gremlin attached as it's posting signature.


They won't contain any context that supports the deragatory
statements you wrote about either of them.

Now repeat the same 'experiment' with one of these:

<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>

Or

<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=snit+michael+glasser&ia=web>

See the difference now Snit? The links we shared for you will show
context supporting them. Not randomized nonsense posts to usenet
from a bot.

We feel this is a very important difference that you seem to be

overlooking. :) We are merely trying to get you to understand
it.

>Clearly you know they have a lot of meaning.

We haven't snipped and run and we've already been over their
meaning as well as why they exist.

>Meanwhile you point to things that are just Google seeding by trolls

We do nothing of the kind. And it's not possible nearly two
hundred only trolls wrote about having problems with you. Grow
up.

>no actual comments from me.

The urls you've been sharing point to comments you wrote about
Gremlin. Comments you've never supported.

The urls we've been sharing point to comments others have written
about you going back nearly two decades.

>I can point to comments form you.

You have been avoiding most of ours.

>How about your claims about your education:

The proof is in the pudding. Not the papers. Take Gremlin and
yourself as good examples. He can and has backed up his technical
knowledge claims. While you have backed up the claims about yours
lacking. Severely lacking if anyone takes the papers you both
have into consideration.

Gremlin helped an asshole out with their laptop - going by a
picture of it since the asshole couldn't provide any useful
answers to questions asked about it - got it up and running.
Using a picture of the damn thing. You offered no assistance
whatsoever despite looking better on paper.

Gremlin proved he knows his shit. You continue to prove you do not.

>You are so ashamed of your own words you pretend to be your imaginary friends to distance yourself from your own nonsense.

If your nonsensical off the wall reasoning here was true - he
would have done this ages ago. When he wrote really destructive
code and taunted users who reported they were infected by it -
because he damn sure did and it was a rat bastard thing to be
doing. Surely that's more damaging to him than anything he's
written about your stupid ass.

>Notice I have no such need.

Okay Sigmond.

--
Call Snit anytime day or night. 1.928.445.3425 Or (928)-445-3425
He's always home and almost always on drugs that keep him up for
days. And don't forget when you call to:
Ask Snit how he pissed on his cat and his hallucination about the
eyeball. Heavy pharma abuse = a Snit

[Snit]

On Aug 29, 2021 at 1:11:34 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sggpln$5p8$2...@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> On Aug 29, 2021 at 12:15:17 PM MST, "LegionX"
>> wrote<sggmc8$k34$1...@dont-email.me>:> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in
>> message:> >> Another example of your technical incompetency.> >Another snip
>> and run huh?"Snit's latest attempt at remaining in control of the
>> discussion."
>
>> Seems you were talking about yourself, not me. Got it.
>
> How could they be when you did exactly what they wrote?

What is your view of snipping? Seems to be contingent on your trolling goals.

You whine when I snip your off topic blabbering, and then you snip content to
get back to your off topic blabbering.

Oh. You just want to blabber nonsense accusations. You have no interest in a
reasoned conversation.

>
>> Sure it does, Gremlin:
>
> How much more time do you need to support your socking accusation?

I am noting your evidence. Again, Gremlin, NOBODY has the same arrogant,
blabbering, run-on, absurd style as you. You spelling a couple words the
British way does not change who you are. The fact you are so humiliated by who
and what you are you feel the need to pretend to be your imaginary friends is
pathetic. The fact you feel the need to lash out and attack just to try to
feel better about yourself is worse.

Try to do better. Try to be better.

I am happy to give you another chance. But, sadly, I predict you will blow it.

[LegionX]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

>You just want to blabber nonsense accusations.

That isn't what we've done...

>You have no interest in a reasoned conversation.

Yes we do. We're still interested in seeing your proof that we are
a sock of Gremlins. We know you started making the accusation to
get attention away from your Sigmond sock but you aren't doing a
very good job of it.

>I am noting your evidence

If that were the case you wouldn't still be continuing with your
unsupported accusation. But here you are - still desperately
trying to make your accusation a reality with nothing to support
it.

And besides, we've already seen what you mean when you're claiming
to note something. In simple terms it means you're lying
again.

>NOBODY has the same arrogant,blabbering, run-on, absurd style as you.

So not only do you falsely accuse us of socking - you pile on even
more nonsense on top. You're a very strange duck.

>The fact you are so humiliated by who and what you are you feel the need to pretend to be your imaginary friends is pathetic.

This entire excuse you're trying to pass off as a reason is crazy
enough on the surface and out of this world when you consider the
available evidence.

Gremlin has written far worse to others than he's ever written to
or about you. He didn't sock and run in any of those cases so it
makes absolutely no sense if you actually applied logic to think
he's going to go way off the beaten path and do what you're
claiming over very mild by comparison things he's written to or
about you.

Your accusations only continue distancing themselves from logic
Snit. You clearly do not think these things thru before you try
to make a sale.

>The fact you feel the need to lash out and attack just to try tof eel better about yourself is worse.

You should stop with the armchair usenet psy routines too. They
aren't helping your cause with us. If anything they're only
embarrassing you that much more. We haven't lashed out (whatever
that's supposed to be) at you about anything. And we don't rely
on usenet to determine how we feel. We aren't the emotional and
mental train wreck of a person you clearly are.

For the purposes of entertaining those who've read us tear you to
pieces point by point again we ask you this: when you and troll
lady are having sex which one moans the most like a girl? Don't
forget we've heard your voice on your youtube videos. You sound
very female to us. We understand if you'd rather not answer that
question. We can all take an educated guess as to the answer.


Tell us one thing though: did her nose ever poke you right in the
eyeball as you tried to give her a kiss? It's a long pointy
looking nose which is why we're asking.

Hey - is that how you thought you lost an eyeball? You went in to
kiss her as you were beginning to mount her (you aren't so lazy
that you make her ride you are ya?) And her nose got you in the
eye - but due to drinking on top of the benzos you were self
medicating with at the time you thought it came out of your eye
socket? We're all friends here lol you can tell us how it
happened.

>I am happy to give you another chance.

That's very kind of you. We continue to mock you *cough cough*
give you chances too. We have plenty of rope so why not give you
all you request.

--
Call Snit anytime day or night. 1.928.445.3425 Or (928)-445-3425
He's always home and almost always on drugs that keep him up for
days. And don't forget when you call to:
Ask Snit how he pissed on his cat and his hallucination about the
eyeball. Heavy pharma abuse = a Snit
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>

<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=snit+michael+glasser&ia=web>

[Snit]

On Aug 29, 2021 at 6:51:02 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sghdi9$167$1...@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> You just want to blabber nonsense accusations.
>
> That isn't what we've done...

Of course you do. Over and over and over... and you do so until you are so
ashamed of your actions you use a new name and pretend to be your own
imaginary friend. It is pathetic of you.

>> You have no interest in a reasoned conversation.
>
> Yes we do.

Not that I trust you, but I welcome you to show that. Do so in your next
reply.

But here is the thing: I am sadly confident you will fail. I wish I had any
faith in you... and I do hope you prove me wrong.

Can you at least try, Gremlin?

Speak like an adult -- none of your insults and accusations and arrogant
nonsense and no more pretending to be your imaginary friend just so you can
work to distance yourself from your past embarrassing claims.

Try. If you can I will be the first in line to welcome you to adult
conversation. I sincerely hope you go against my beliefs her. Good luck.

[Snit]

On Aug 29, 2021 at 2:05:40 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sggsr5$run$1...@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> On Aug 29, 2021 at 12:47:04 PM MST, "LegionX"
>> wrote<sggo7p$n54$2...@dont-email.me>:> pothead <pot...@snakebite.com> Wrote in
>> message:>> On 2021-08-29, LegionX
>> <MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:>>> Snit
>> <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:>>>Funny how you think I>>
>> manipulate Carroll as he manipulates you.>> It's very odd how you pull
>> things>> from your ass and attempt to> link them. Our statement about the
>> search>> results being your work> stands. It's easy to prove too - Snit.
>> Click one of>> the search> results links and you get to read a nonsensical
>> post from the> >> floodbot with your label for Gremlin used as the signature
>> for> the post.> >> Exactly.> >Only really dumb people would ever fall for the
>> ruse he went with.
>
>> I am merely trying to get you to decide it Google searches and the like are
>> or are not meaningful when it comes to what is found.
>
> Depending on the context they can be.

The context here are things said by neither me nor you, Gremlin.

You want to hold me accountable for the words of others, but you do not think
you should be held to the same standard.

You want a double standard.

Gremlin Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>

LegionX Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=legionx+dustin+cook>

HHI Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=HHI+dustin+cook>

Imaginary Friend Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>

Functionally Illiterate Fraud:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>

You also attack my family in your every post, Gremlin... meaning your family
should be as fair game. But you want a double standard there, too.

So, how about your brother's criminal record? Is that something you want to
discuss? Makes your flipping of car in a one car accident seem trivial.

[Snit]

On Aug 29, 2021 at 1:40:19 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sggrbk$jb5$2...@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> You failed here.
>
> Nope.

Your failure to understand your failure is too meta for me to care about.

You repeatedly try to hold me accountable for the contents of Carroll's bot.
You think I manipulate him the way he manipulates you.

Remember, I am not nearly as much of a follower as you are. I am not the type
to think someone might be Chelsea Manning, or to think a fake driving record
shown online must be true just because others say it is. That is you --
someone who does not really think for themselves. Heck, look at you pretending
to be your own imaginary friend just to not be held accountable for your own
words. Seriously, you are acting in a more pathetic way than I have seen
anyone else act online. You are not quite as obsessive as Carroll (who seems
to be gone ever since his kid posted), but you are far less clever than he is.
And less technically capable. You also do not hide your anger and hatred as
well. No wonder you sought him out as a mentor -- but he is just as
psychopathic as you and will abuse you to not end... including with his flood
bot.

Oh, and in respond to your links:

[Snit]

On Aug 29, 2021 at 1:35:24 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sggr2e$jb5$1...@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> But, hey, as long as you are trolling me and my family, these are fair
>> game,right?
>
> Just so we aren't accused of misunderstanding what you wrote
> later... Are you admitting the urls you've been sharing are what
> we've written they were?

The URLs are URLs. Of course. What else would the be?

> And that you did create them for the
> purposes of trolling Gremlin and Steve Carroll? Is that what you
> just did here?

What URLs do you even mean? These ones?

Gremlin Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>

LegionX Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=legionx+dustin+cook>

HHI Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=HHI+dustin+cook>

Imaginary Friend Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>

Functionally Illiterate Fraud:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>

If so, those are just in response to you posting URLs attacking me. No reason
for you to whine. But you failed to answer the question:

But, hey, as long as you are trolling me and my family, these are fair
game,right?

You want a double standard... your norm, Gremlin.

> We don't quite understand what you're whining about with your
> family.

You do not understand why your fake email attacking my wife is wrong.. showing
more of your psychopathic tendencies.

> Our header information as well as our Signature has
> remained the same for sometime now. What really upset you? Do
> share.

I said nothing of being upset: I noted you are attacking my family and that
implies you think families are fair game... including your brother with his
record of trouble with the law.

You run from that every time.

[LegionX]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

>What URLs do you even mean?

:) Snit. Come now. Sarcasm doesn't really become you.

>These ones? Gremlin Dustin Cook: <https://www.google.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gremlin+dustin+cook> LegionX Dustin Cook: <https://www.google.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=legionx+dustin+cook> HHI Dustin Cook: <https://www.google.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=HHI+dustin+cook> Imaginary Friend Dustin Cook: <https://www.google.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook> Functionally Illiterate Fraud: <https://www.google.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>

Those are the ones. But...

They aren't about us, Snit. They aren't really about Gremlin
either. They are as we wrote the fruits of your hard work to

repeatedly post deragatory comments about Steve Carroll and

Gremlin with the specific intention of having it seeded into
search engines.

As we invited you to do already - click a link or two if you'd
like from the results of any of the urls you've shared. The
results will be a web to usenet interface that is showing a
nonsensical flood bot post with one of your deragatory labels for
Steve Carroll and or Gremlin attached as it's posting signature.


They won't contain any context that supports the deragatory
statements you wrote about either of them.

Now repeat the same 'experiment' with one of these:

<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>

<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=snit+michael+glasser&ia=web>

See the difference now Snit? The links we shared for you will show
context supporting them. Not randomized nonsense posts to usenet
from a bot.

We feel this is a very important difference that you seem to be
overlooking. :)

>If so, those are just in response to you posting URLs attacking me.

Can you explain a little detail to us then? If the urls you've
been sharing are in response to urls we've shared that you claim
are attacking you why have you shared most of them multiple times
before we wrote our first reply to you? You have added additional
ones recently but that's only after the floodbot picked up your
comments about us and began using them.
They have no context. And we doubt you aren't fully aware of that.

>No reason for you to whine.

We aren't.

>But you failed to answer the question:

Once again you wrongly accuse us.
Don't worry we're enjoying watching you dance and jigglywig on our
command. Every one should have a pet. Right?

>But, hey, as long as you are trolling me and my family, these are fair game,right?

Under what conditions wouldn't you continue to post them? And what
gives you the silly idea we want you to stop posting them in the
first place? Snit you simple minded little man - Does one of us
need to get artistic and draw you a colored picture of our game
plan?

>You do not understand why your fake email attacking my wife is wrong.

Nope. We aren't attacking your wife. And we've been using the same
fake email address for months? now so stop with the fake issue
you're pretending even exists and tell us what your real problem
is so that we can properly address it.

Our header information as well as our Signature has remained the
same for sometime now. What really upset you? Do
share.

>I said nothing of being upset

It's clear we have written something along the way which has
caused you to become more emotionally unstable than usual. We
have upset you somehow. As entertaining to us as this is - we
still find it to be rather odd since we haven't been doing
anything differently here. And it's still too soon for you to
have noticed anything getting wonky else where.

>I noted you are attacking my family and that implies you think families are fair game.

Snit. We told you from the beginning a general synopsis of our
intentions towards you. We have been clear enough about it.


But! We have not really started to rollout our very hostile plans
for you. We've simply been learning more about you here. We want
to hit all the bases when we do strike. Leave nothing standing
and nothing to chance. :)

>including your brother with his record of trouble with the law.

The only relative of any of us you could publish information on
would be Gremlins brother. We aren't Gremlin and couldn't stop
you from attacking his brother anymore so than we can get you to
support your socking accusation you make against us and
Gremlin.

Should we assume since you mention publishing his brothers
information that it's because you can't find suitable bad driver
records or bad records in general on Gremlin that's even remotely
comparable to yours to share?

Do you really think that publishing more material to slime Gremlin
with is somehow going to get us off your back snit? We wouldn't
rule that out for being part of the snit logic (tm) protocol.


Allow us to help you "note" the snit logic (tm) fail here. *None*
of your threats and whatever follow ups to them you make is going
to do absolutely fuck all for you as far as we're concerned. We
all know the risks doing what we do - including Gremlin. AKA One
of your obsessions; the poor bastard.

If you want or expect us to do something - threatening us won't
ever work. It's best you try a softer approach. :)

How many complaints have you sent to our usenet provider about our
header and signature information before you started trying to
threaten us anyway? More than five? Ten? More than ten?
:)

>You run from that every time.

We weren't running from it. We were thinking how best to respond
so that we aren't unfairly accused of escalating the fight you're
begging us for. Lolz!! We believe we've done so now.

--
Call Snit anytime day or night. 1.928.445.3425 Or (928)-445-3425
He's always home and almost always on drugs that keep him up for
days. And don't forget when you call to:
Ask Snit how he pissed on his cat and his hallucination about the
eyeball. Heavy pharma abuse = a Snit
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>

<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=snit+michael+glasser&ia=web>

[Snit]

On Aug 29, 2021 at 11:01:15 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sghs7e$1g4$1...@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> What URLs do you even mean?
>
> :) Snit. Come now. Sarcasm doesn't really become you.

Given your challenges I was not certain you knew.

>> These ones? Gremlin Dustin Cook:
>> <https://www.google.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
>> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
>> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gremlin+dustin+cook> LegionX Dustin Cook:
>> <https://www.google.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
>> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
>> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=legionx+dustin+cook> HHI Dustin Cook:
>> <https://www.google.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
>> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
>> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=HHI+dustin+cook> Imaginary Friend Dustin Cook:
>> <https://www.google.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
>> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
>> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook> Functionally
>> Illiterate Fraud:
>> <https://www.google.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
>> <https://www.bing.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
>> <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>

Really hard to read with your tech challenges. This is easier:

Gremlin Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>

LegionX Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=legionx+dustin+cook>

HHI Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=HHI+dustin+cook>

Imaginary Friend Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>

Functionally Illiterate Fraud:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>

> Those are the ones. But...
> They aren't about us, Snit.

First, Gremlin, you are one person. And of course they are about you.

> They aren't really about Gremlin
> either. They are as we wrote the fruits of your hard work to
> repeatedly post deragatory comments about Steve Carroll and
> Gremlin with the specific intention of having it seeded into
> search engines.

Even if I had the skills and training to deal with your delusions here, it
would not be ethical for me to try in this format. I suggest you seek help for
your delusions from a local resource.

> As we invited you to do already - click a link or two if you'd
> like from the results of any of the urls you've shared.

Your delusion I have not clicked those links is not realistic. Again, seeking
help from local resources might help you, Gremlin.

> The
> results will be a web to usenet interface that is showing a
> nonsensical flood bot post with one of your deragatory labels for
> Steve Carroll and or Gremlin attached as it's posting signature.

Tied to your delusions there is a bit of truth that it will be about you and
from Carroll's flood bot.

> They won't contain any context that supports the deragatory
> statements you wrote about either of them.

You are starting to get the point -- the crap you post about in an effort to
harm me and feel better about yourself, as you do with your attacks against my
family, are not really about me, either. They are about you and about those
who wrote the things you point to.

I am responsible for my words. You are responsible for yours. Your need to
lash out and attack is your challenge. My habit of responding to those of you
who troll is my challenge. We are each responsible for our own words and
actions.

Can you try to understand that concept?

> Now repeat the same 'experiment' with one of these:

Same type stuff -- not written by me and is not really even about me. It is
about the authors. And it is about you for linking to them. You have a hard
time understanding personal responsibility... but that is not an issue I can
help you with.

[Snit Michael Glasser]

Chrisv just wiped the floor with Shadow. Chrisv created at least one major
circus in the last year or so. Without Linux that would not be possible.

Wow, in Shadow's 'claim', that an app has been published is "confirmation"
that Chrisv built it now? It's evident when Shadow repeatedly uses the word
'Nazi' the way the deep state does, to the point where the word becomes a
conspiracy itself.

Shadow asked to be rated according to provable trolling measurements, which
I obliged him with. Once Chrisv realized how successful Shadow is at playing
'target' he sees this isn't quite as insane as it seemed.

--
Best CMS Solution of 2017
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.apps/c/VMCw29DnV84>
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=dustin+cook+the+functionally+illiterate+fraud
https://swisscows.com/web?query=Dustin%20Cook%20%22functionally%20illiterate%20fraud%22
Steve Carroll the Narcissistic Bigot

[Stefen Carroll]

Well... like I said, I have a number of reasons for believing the flooder
is FromTheRafters, who is a self professed AppleScripter but I don't know
if it could be used to spam like this. Richard Stallman is a false advocate's
hero. RonB just wiped the floor with FromTheRafters.

Rambling cretin. All I understand is, if I've talked to people calling
themselves "progressives" while fishing, they were not the usual moron type
that likes to whine about everything. Why are such folks seemingly never
happy. Does it make you sick?


--
Live on Kickstarter!!
https://www.bing.com/search?q=Dustin+Cook%3A+functional+illiterate+fraud
<https://www.whitepages.com/phone/1-423-491-1448>
Steve 'Narcissistic Bigot' Carroll

[LegionX]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

>First, Gremlin, you are one person. And of course they are about you.

Correction snit. Gremlin is one person. He's the only one who uses
his account. We are multiple people taking turns using the same
account. Do you understand the difference now?

The urls you share as we've written before have nothing to do with
us or Gremlin. As with your socking accusation - repeating
yourself doesn't turn it into proof. That's not how things
work.

>>They aren't really about Gremlin either. They are as we wrote the fruits of your hard work to repeatedly post deragatory comments about Steve Carroll and Gremlin with the specific intention of having it seeded into search engines.

>Even if I had the skills and training to deal with your delusions here, it would not be ethical for me to try in this format.

It doesn't take any skills or training to write bullshit for a
floodbot to pickup and duplicate, snit. Quit trying to run from
what you did. Its unbecoming and cowardly of you.

What you did wasn't ethical. You've never shown that you're an
ethical person. You continue to lie about Gremlin and ourselves.
You continue to claim Carroll is responsible for the floodbot -
without ever producing evidence to support it. It's what you
do.

>I suggest you seek help for your delusions from a local resource.

You do realise all of the regulars do know that you originated the
claim of Gremlin being a functionally illiterate jealous of you
fraud right? Even the one you openly conned called you out on it
snit. Is your memory that bad?

>You are starting to get the point

How could we be starting to get the very point we've tried to
explain several times to you now? You're an idiot.

>the crap you post about in an effort to harm me and feel better about yourself, as you do with your attacks against my family, are not really about me, either.

That's completely untrue snit. Nice try attempting to compare the
two as you just did though. You are a very *dishonest* piece of
shit snit. No question.

[Snit]

On Aug 30, 2021 at 5:25:26 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sgjstn$t69$1...@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> First, Gremlin, you are one person. And of course they are about you.
>
> Correction snit.

None needed. You are one person even if you insist on calling yourself your
imaginary friends to distance yourself from how badly you have humiliated
yourself.

I gave you ANOTHER chance to be reasonable. You failed.

>
>>> They aren't really about Gremlin either. They are as we wrote the fruits of
>>> your hard work to repeatedly post deragatory comments about Steve Carroll
>>> and Gremlin with the specific intention of having it seeded into search
>>> engines.
>
>> Even if I had the skills and training to deal with your delusions here, it
>> would not be ethical for me to try in this format.
>
> It doesn't take any skills or training

It would take a lot of skills and training to deal with your delusions. Even
if I had it it would not be ethical for me to try to help you here in any
professional way.

> to write bullshit for a
> floodbot to pickup and duplicate, snit.

I *still* have no control over Carroll's floodbot. I get you are strongly
manipulated by Carroll, but that does not mean I manipulate him the same way.

And you are back to repeat mode. Boring. Anyway, these are the links you were
whining about.

Gremlin Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>

LegionX Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=legionx+dustin+cook>

HHI Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=HHI+dustin+cook>

Imaginary Friend Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>

Functionally Illiterate Fraud:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>

[LegionX]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

>None needed.

Evidently it is. See below.

>You are one person even if you insist on calling yourself your imaginary friends to distance yourself from how badly you have humiliated yourself.

We have addressed all of your unsupported claims. You continue to
do nothing more than ignore our responses as you repeat yourself.
You mistakenly assume repeating your accusation will due in place
of anything to support it.

>It would take a lot of skills and training to deal with your delusions.

Nice attempt to change the subject. Even funnier you choose to lie
for the new one right off. You're a very stupid individual.

>I *still* have no control over Carroll's floodbot.

You *still* show that you suffer from severe reading comprehension
issues. And you still haven't convinced anyone that Carroll is
responsible for the floodbot.

Once again mr special ed - repeating accusations does not prove
they are true. That's what evidence is for.

>And you are back to repeat mode. Boring. Anyway, these are the links you were whining about.

We aren't whining about them. :) we've proven what we wrote about
them. As that's what we know we have to do - since we are new
here. You've helped us to prove they aren't accurate concerning
Gremlin. You even admitted it! Yet here you are, snipping and
running away and of course continuing to slime Gremlin with the
intentionally dishonest urls - you're responsible for - that you
share. You've been doing the same bullshit to people on usenet
for decades. That's why these urls exist and are accurate
concerning you:

[Snit]

On Aug 30, 2021 at 6:44:07 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sgk1h8$ihd$1...@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> None needed.
>
> Evidently it is.

The fact you THINK so is irrelevant. It is simply a fact you are one person

even if you insist on calling yourself your
imaginary friends to distance yourself from how badly you have humiliated

ourself.

Nothing else needs to be explained. But adding this is fun given your Google
seeding of me.

[LegionX]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

>The fact you THINK so is irrelevant.

Your replies are irrelevant. As well as being evasive, repetitive
and very boring at this point.

>It is simply a fact you are one person even if you insist on calling yourself your imaginary friends to distance yourself from how badly you have humiliated yourself.

Nothing you've written is "simply a fact" no matter how many times
you repeat your accusations while ignoring our unwavering
response to them. All you've done is repeat the same things. At
no time have you supported a single one of them. Not one time,
Snit.

You're nothing more than a snip and run false accusation making
socking and projecting troll. That is all you've done during the
course of your participation in this thread and others.

>But adding this is fun given your Google seeding of me.

Is that accusation supposed to do something besides cause great
laughter? It reminds us of the recent one you wrote to
FromTheRafters when you wrote that Gremlin "made up" your driving
record. You're the one who's been search engine seeding others
for sometime now. We're only giving you a little taste of your
own medicine as we get to know you better and you're so full of
shit snit it's a wonder that anyone has ever believed a single
word you've written or said without double checking it's validity
in your entire life.

You socked up as Sigmond and we caught you. After you failed to
support your it's a forgery claim - miserably failed. You started
accusing Gremlin of socking up as us - ignoring the fact he
hasn't posted since June. You also repeatedly ignore the reason
why. And you ignore these things because you have no reasonable
explanation to offer that disputes a single thing we've written.
Not a single thing.

[Snit]

On Aug 30, 2021 at 9:10:08 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sgka33$s37$1...@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>

>> The fact you THINK so is irrelevant. It is simply a fact you are one person

>> even if you insist on calling yourself your
>> imaginary friends to distance yourself from how badly you have humiliated

>> ourself.

>> Nothing else needs to be explained. But adding this is fun given your Google
>> seeding of me.

You showed no understanding

[STALKING_TARGET_69]

Some time ago I did work on and showed some bash for the front end which
is the only thing you can do when trying to avoid Shadow's immature crap
while reading with Google Groups. Who knows AppleScript, is an avid scripter,
has stolen Mike Easter's account, has passion for this shit and is a gigantic
tantrum throwing loser who posts demands he be "trusted" even when he's _not_
flooding... AND... who struggles to pin everything *he* is doing on "anyone
he can" and has for years? Ha, ha, ha, ha! That's what Shadow does when he
gets cornered. He creates a flood, starts a cross posted thread so he can
claim it was Mike Easter. Don't blame me it was my left hand... and then
he replies to it with his right hand. I bet we have different perspectives
completely. Google for 'functionally illiterate fraud' and Dustin Cook pops
up: <https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Dustin+Cook%3A+functionally+illiterate+fraud>.

--
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened
https://www.bing.com/search?q=Dustin+Cook%3A+functional+illiterate+fraud
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhOfBmWwCVY
Steve Petruzzellis the Narcissistic Bigot

[LegionX]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

>You showed no understanding

We have shown beyond any doubt that what we wrote about you is
entirely and one hundred percent true. You cannot deny it no
matter how much you try.

[Snit]

On Aug 31, 2021 at 6:18:48 AM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sgla7o$oqh$1...@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> You showed no understanding
>
> We have shown beyond any doubt that what we wrote about you is
> entirely and one hundred percent true. You cannot deny it no
> matter how much you try.

Hey, at least your blathering lies are short this time, Gremlin. That is
improvement.

[Steven Petrazzellis]

I think it is already over. I mostly go comment by comment unless someone
has a habit of particularly intense BS. With Snit sock Sockboy, I already
realize what his approach is, all he dreams of is abuse and, of course,
he'll do *anything* to get it. His most favorite routine is to play 'victim'
but reality shows it's all of the group who are his suckers.

Snit sock Sockboy must understand that anyone can go get Access, right,
medhead? And, of course, anyone can go get a real newsreader with proper
filtering, which renders *his* immature nonsense impotent, just like Snit
sock Sockboy. I bet he thinks his life was rough.

--
One Smart Penny
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=steve+carroll+narcissistic+bigot
https://gibiru.com/results.html?q=Dustin+Cook+%22functional+illiterate+fraud%22
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=steve+carroll+narcissistic+bigot

[Steven Petrazzellis]

On Tuesday, August 31, 2021 at 6:18:52 AM UTC-7, LegionX wrote:

My opinion: Even if a person was simply learning from YouTube videos,
the claim that obtaining intelligence as being one of having "diddly"
to show for it does not make any sense because you will clearly have
the insight to show for it and expertise is important for the future.
I bet Prescott Computer Guy does not even know what is wrong with the
MSM. Gee, imagine Prescott Computer Guy trying to pin his codswallop
on Chris, no one has ever seen that before. I think the point is not
100% to get innocent posters to listen to him. The point is likely to
piss Chris off for spraying outside groups he knows I frequent. "Somewhere
between 1997 or 2009 I trusted Chris, the absolutely angry liar" - Prescott
Computer Guy.


--
My Snoring Solution!
https://swisscows.com/web?query=steve%20carroll%20%22narcissistic%20bigot%22

[Steve Carroll]

This forum is a septic tank. Too much glue for you, Chris.

Seriously, those of you who troll are not able to control AZ Cypher anymore.
Chris was once again a fraud by having the pretense to not argue with Diesel
via blatantly screaming *plonk* and then bombarding him anyhow via another
poster. What it looks like can be skinned and not key to its performance,
especially if it's better than what Chris uses.


-
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him.
He clearly wants the attention"
Steve Carroll, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.

[LegionX]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

>Hey, at least your blathering lies are short this time, Gremlin.

As we wrote repeating your accusation that we're Gremlin doesn't
work in place of supporting evidence.

And the only person who published lies in his reply was you snit.
You already admitted that the links you've been sharing have
nothing to do with Gremlin. You know the results point to
nonsense bot posts with your unsupported derogatory comments you
wrote erroenously and maliciously to try and bully Gremlin into
no longer showing the readers what a dishonest troll you
are.

You claimed he was a functionally illiterate jealous of you fraud.
Let's examine your description of Gremlin in greater detail. The
following are a couple of pics he sent us of work that he's been
doing. We have sanitized them for sharing here.

https://ibb.co/X3RFGZp

https://ibb.co/2cGvZmm

Can you even explain what you're looking at with the wiring?
There's four sets of 12-2 with ground coming out of that box
snit. Do you know what kind of box that is? One is a feed. Do you
know what that is snit? Two of them are controlled by the switch
for lighting (two seperate fixtures). And the last wire is for
another single gang blue box holding a receptacle that's not
controlled by the switch. All neutrals and grounds are tied
together. Do you know why snit? Do you know what a neutral wire
is? All connections were made using push in or quick port
connectors - not wirenuts.

Can you tell us the amount of available ports or connection points
that are available on the ones he used in the pic snit? Do you
even know what the terminology we used means? Gremlin obviously
does.

Yet you want people to think Gremlin is a functionally illiterate
jealous of you fraud. The work he performs professionally for a
living in two different trades - electrical and computer repair
doesn't support your description of him snit. His hobbies (jacobs
ladder circuit) don't either.

(1) Gremlin has shared source code you didn't understand but he
did. David has shared source code of Gremlins asking for you to
help him with it. You couldn't.

(2) Gremlin has shared pics, schematics, and video of his custom
transformer driver circuit running a jacobs ladder. Showing he
has a solid working knowledge of electronics - as well as
electricity (high voltage in this case) at the component level.


(3) Gremlin has shared a short video of his electronic piano on a
breadboard demoing it. Just more electrical/electronics
understanding proven with video.

(4) Gremlin has posted video which was peer reviewed showing his
ability to solder electronic components securely and correctly to
a prototyping board.

(5) Gremlin has shown his technical expertise by using nothing
more than a picture provided by David of a laptop to correctly
identify the machine and provide David with spot on information
about the correct drivers for use with it and Windows XP.


That's just five! examples of Gremlins technical abilities which
completely wreck the deragatory description you created and
seeded the floodbot with for him. Immense Skill and knowledge you
don't have despite having a masters degree in IT.


So at the end of the day the paper doesn't mean anything. Infact
you're an example of the potential over hyped value of those four
year degree programs.

In the real world you don't know your ass from a hole in the
ground after spending four years and a lot of someones money to
learn. Gremlin has proven he does and he didn't take four years
of college to learn it.

You also want everyone to think Gremlhin has socked as us because
he's so ashamed of what he wrote about you. That he's socking to
run away from what he wrote. We've provided examples of much
worse thing's he's written that he didn't sock and run from. How
does your theory work now lying troll?

Five examples of Gremlin walking the dog up and back down your
special ed trolling adult ass. We just wanted to make sure you
knew where you stood concerning Gremlin.

You're a troll snit. A vastly inferior knowledgewise - compared to
Gremlin - troll. Nothing more. Nothing less.

[Snit]

On Aug 31, 2021 at 4:55:21 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sgmfhb$nfo$1...@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> Hey, at least your blathering lies are short this time, Gremlin.

Below you post a long post of blathering lies. Seriously, Gremlin, it was not
a challenge.

Hell, you even go back to your wiring obsession which has literally nothing to
do with anything here.

You and Carroll should go to seek help together.

[LegionX]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

> On Aug 31, 2021 at 4:55:21 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote<sgmfhb$nfo$1...@dont-email.me>:> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:> >> Hey, at least your blathering lies are short this time, Gremlin.

>Below you post a long post of blathering lies.

You would have isolated them and shared if that were the case. You
have lots of experience doing just that when you quote people out
of context or snip them to misrepresent what they wrote as you
respond to your edit.

We provided examples that show your description of Gremlin is
entirely made up by you. It has no basis in reality. No
lies.

We asked you various questions as we did so. As usual for you,
none were addressed. All avoided. They weren't ones you could
easily bs. Our bad.

>Seriously, Gremlin, it was not a challenge.

You're the one who's already been busted for using socks going
back years. Not us. Not Gremlin. Only David Brooks and you have
that proven to be true reputation. You're projecting because we
busted you and called you out socking up as Sigmond.

The only question is who has more socks. David or yourself?

>Hell, you even go back to your wiring obsession which has literally nothing to do with anything here.

No snit. It's not an obsession and it has everything to do with
your proven to be bullshit description of Gremlin. So it's
relevant like it or not.

What you were shown and asked about isn't complicated to anyone in
the trade - but couldn't be done by a functionally illiterate
fraud. You're proof of that snit - you couldn't answer a single
fucking question! You have no idea what we asked you or what
you're looking at beyond the switch or receptacle.

Jokes on you that much more lying troll. It's a common wiring
configuration which can be done several different ways. The pics
show one of them that's upto code done by Gremlin. So who's
really functionally illiterate here snit?

>You and Carroll should go to seek help together.

You're the one with self documented mental issues. Not any of us.
Stop projecting. 0wned troll.

[Snit]

On Aug 31, 2021 at 8:10:22 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sgmqv0$hd7$1...@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> On Aug 31, 2021 at 4:55:21 PM MST, "LegionX"
>> wrote<sgmfhb$nfo$1...@dont-email.me>:> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in
>> message:> >> Hey, at least your blathering lies are short this time, Gremlin.
>
>> Below you post a long post of blathering lies.

And you do it again. Seriously, this is not me offering you a challenge for
you Gremlin!

If you truly believe what you claim, that you are no longer yourself but a
group of your imaginary friends, you need more help than I thought you did. Go
seek it.

[LegionX]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

>And you do it again.

That's a good troll. Snip and run. Who couldn't have predicted
you'd do that. It's one of your goto manuevers when caught in a
lie of yours. 0wned troll.

[Snit]

On Aug 31, 2021 at 8:28:16 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sgms0h$l5h$1...@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> And you do it again.
>
> That's a good troll. Snip and run.

I do not think your snipping and running, or your other trolling, is "good".
Heck, it is not even "good trolling", to the point that such can exist.

> Who couldn't have predicted
> you'd do that.

I did not force you to snip the content. You did it all on your own. Well,
maybe your imaginary friends helped you. LOL!

> It's one of your goto manuevers when caught in a
> lie of yours.

One of those lies you cannot quote. Funny how that works, Gremlin.

> 0wned troll.

I like your new .sig. It fits you well.

[David Brooks]

On 01/09/2021 05:15, Snit wrote:
> On Aug 31, 2021 at 8:28:16 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote
> <sgms0h$l5h$1...@dont-email.me>:
>
>> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>>
>>> And you do it again.
>>
>> That's a good troll. Snip and run.
>
> I do not think your snipping and running, or your other trolling, is "good".
> Heck, it is not even "good trolling", to the point that such can exist.
>
>
>> Who couldn't have predicted
>> you'd do that.
>
> I did not force you to snip the content. You did it all on your own. Well,
> maybe your imaginary friends helped you. LOL!
>
>> It's one of your goto manuevers when caught in a
>> lie of yours.
>
> One of those lies you cannot quote. Funny how that works, Gremlin.
>
>> 0wned troll.
>
> I like your new .sig. It fits you well.

I have a note somewhere from Dustin's former employer at Malwarebytes
describing Dustin Cook as a Troll. I thought I'd told you this before!

Whilst looking, I found THIS message!

=

An email to Apple! My telephone discussion this morning with Apple
Support (17 April 2017) Hello I spoke at length this morning with
'Ricardo', an Apple support professional in Portugal (Lisbon I think he
said). He checked me - and my account - and reported that all was
apparently well. He then viewed the message I receive when I try to
'Sign In' to the Apple Support Communities (herewith attached). I
explained that I had raised in the ASC the apparently controversial
matter of using third-party anti-malware software on my iMac. Ricardo
assured me that the ONLY such software approved by Apple in
Malwarebytes. Some weeks ago I had another telephone conversation with
an Apple support professional called 'Kate' - Case number 100503757288 -
and she assured me that the software advertised at www.clamxav.com is a
scam. Some of the contributors to the ASC appear to think that it's a
bona fide product and 'safe' to use. I was simply trying to determine
the truth. My suspicion is that conversations have been held in 'The
Lounge' - to which I am not yet party - with a view to stopping me
telling other folk about my concerns. Having discussed this at length
with Ricardo, he suggested that I write to you at this address to ask
the ACTUAL reason for my ban. So ..... please advise!

Signed by me.

[Snit]

On Sep 1, 2021 at 1:27:48 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sgndi5$h6t$1...@hunterbd.eternal-september.org>:

Yes... he did not leave that job on good standing. Not surprising.

[Shadow]

On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 09:27:48 +0100, David Brooks <Dav...@invalid.E-S>
wrote:

>I have a note somewhere from <STALKING_TARGET_05> former employer at <STALKING_TARGET_13>

STALK much?


------------------------------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

93 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Devon"
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012
Google Fuchsia - 2021

[David Brooks]

A poster with the nymn of WZZZ of the phpBB claimed that he was present
in The Lounge when my inquisitive nature was being discussed by more
'senior' advisers. They evidently didn't like me questioning the status
quo - like suggesting that people run Trend Micro HouseCall to check
their Apple computers!

Might you have time to question WZZZ as to why HE was so upset that I'd
turned up on the (his!) BBS? You are good at judging reactions! ;-)

[Shadow]

On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 18:48:38 +0100, David Brooks <Dav...@invalid.E-S>
wrote:

>On 01/09/2021 15:41, Snit wrote:

<snip_OT_trash>

>
>Might you have time to question WZZZ as to why HE was so upset

You probably tried to hurt him, it's been your M.O. for 20
years.
As to snit, he has all the time in the world. He doesn't work,
he's on welfare. Maybe you "forgot"?
But why don't YOU ask?
Too busy getting drunk?

[LegionX]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

>I do not think your snipping and running, or your other trolling, is "good"

Aren't you a little old for elementary school spin?

>Well,maybe your imaginary friends helped you. LOL!

If you think any of us will take pity on you for the mental issues
and multiple disabilities your grifting the government with your
wifes help to pay you, you might want to reconsider because we
won't even give it a second thought.

You've accused us of being imaginary and socks as well as being
blind followers. Have your fun on usenet snit while you can. When
the time comes you'll regret every snot nosed comment you wrote
about us. You're in way over your head with us and you are going
to learn that the hard way.

> It's one of your goto manuevers when caught in a> lie of yours.

>One of those lies you cannot quote.

Message-ID: <XDiRI.969$B8...@fx19.iad>
<http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=162916852300>

From: Snit
<brock.m...@gmail.com> Newsgroups:
alt.computer.workshop Subject: Re: time To Drop The Hammer On Snit...
Gremlin flipped his truck and now is trying to blame me for some
driving record he made up. News at 11.

That's one of your recent and easily quotable lies ignoramous. The
first time we asked you about this you began rambling about us
being blind followers. Followers of who snit? We pasted your
accusation and asked you to support it and claiming we're blind
followers doesn't do that.

>Funny how that works, Gremlin.

You do realize that your Gremlin socking accusation is just as
reliable as your claim that people can't quote your written lies
or that asking you about another lie you wrote makes us blind
followers right?

Your lies and denial they can be quoted along with one that is
quoted is above for all to see. Logically as a result one cannot
take your word alone for anything. You also show you'll just
repeat the lie. You won't address any of them.

Your socking accusation has nothing behind it in terms of support.
It never has. Its a revised version of your accusation that
Gremlin has the floodbot - an accusation you created because you
incorrectly thought he was trying to troll you by accurately and
truthfully telling David Brooks that you specifically would not
be able to help him in any way with the source code he shared
asking for your help with. The source code was written by Gremlin
when he was a young teenager. He asked you if you could help him
find the backdoor and explain how it worked. You couldn't do
either. And Gremlin responded to David Brooks telling him you
couldn't.

That's when you started with your floodbot story about Gremlin. A
story you created a background for and a followup question for
good measure - the question was worded to give the false idea
that what you wrote before it was already an established
fact.

You demonstrated that you're willing and able to attempt to
manipulate readers. And you continue trying to do so with limited
success.

Manipulation is not something good guys do snit.

>I like your new .sig. It fits you well.

<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>

<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/SnitontheWeb>
Call Snit anytime day or night. 1.928.445.3425 or 1-(928)-445-3425

And don't forget when you call to:

Ask Snit how he pissed on his cat and don't forget to ask about
his eyeball loss hallucination - It was scary bad! Heavy pharma
abuse = a Snit

That's our new sig snit-troll. What in particular did you
especially like about it? And how does it fit us well
exactly?

--

<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>

<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/SnitontheWeb>
Call Snit anytime day or night. 1.928.445.3425 or 1-(928)-445-3425

And don't forget when you call to:

Ask Snit how he pissed on his cat and don't forget to ask about
his eyeball loss hallucination - It was scary bad! Heavy pharma
abuse = a Snit

[LegionX]

David Brooks <Dav...@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:

>I have a note somewhere from Dustin's former employer at Malwarebytes describing Dustin Cook as a Troll.

You got the "memo" because you contacted them wanting to know the
specifics of why Dustin was no longer with them because you'd
already claimed Dustin was fired on usenet.

A claim you were hoping they'd help you support - because you
didn't. Amusingly for all They didn't support your accusation.
They only told you Dustin became a "troll" for holding them
accountable for their false advertising claims about the
protection that's really offered by their program. It remains
inferior to the very antivirus programs they claimed they could
replace. And unless you've forgotten due to years of excessive
drinking you already know what was up. It was explained the first
time you tried your slime.

Like snit - you prematurely slimed and lied about Gremlin. You've
been doing it for years because you FAILED TO BULLSHIT HIM into
helping you break into gear you were told by the admins you were
no longer welcome to use.

Iike your special ed needs adult friend snit you don't respect
other people or their property. You're despised almost as much as
snit and mostly for the same reasons.

Where as Gremlin is a former blackhat known destructive code
writing virus author - he isn't despised by many unlike the two
of you. He has no websites with accurate details about him being
shared to warn others. Snit and yourself do. How do you explain
that David?

Malwarebytes went so far with their fake advertising claims that
they started claiming they could replace your antivirus. That you
no longer needed it if you used their product. They lied their
asses off to make sales David. And Dustin knew it due to the
level of access to the programs internals he had for his job with
them.

You used to slime the product and the company just like you
continue doing clamxav and etrecheck. Having your ban lifted on
their forum turned you into the best of friends?
:)

Details David. You keep forgetting to include them. :)

>I thought I'd told you this before!

You lied to him about the horse pic too David. You guys aren't on
solid footing. You both have to lie about him.

--

<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>

<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/SnitontheWeb>
Call Snit anytime day or night. 1.928.445.3425 or 1-(928)-445-3425

And don't forget when you call to:

Ask Snit how he pissed on his cat and don't forget to ask about

his eyeball loss hallucination - It was scary bad! Heavy pharma
abuse = a Snit

[Snit]

LegionX <MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:
> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> I do not think your snipping and running, or your other trolling, is "good"
>
> Aren't you a little old for elementary school spin?

You, not I, are the one who snipped. But I did make the error of assuming
you were not just lying.

>> Well,maybe your imaginary friends helped you. LOL!
>
> If you think any of us

You are one person, Gremlin. Seriously.

NOW I am snipping your repeated lies. Get new material for your trolling.

[Snit]

LegionX <MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:
> David Brooks <Dav...@invalid.E-S> Wrote in message:
>
>> I have a note somewhere from Dustin's former employer at Malwarebytes
>> describing Dustin Cook as a Troll.
>
> You got the "memo" because you contacted them wanting to know the
> specifics of why Dustin was no longer with them because you'd
> already claimed Dustin was fired on usenet.

And clearly you left on not so happy terms.

No evidence you ever found any other employment after that.

[chrisv]

LegionX wrote:

> When
> the time comes you'll regret every snot nosed comment you wrote
> about us. You're in way over your head with us and you are going
> to learn that the hard way.

This hot air *again*?

--
"Contrary to the COLA BS, MS not only collects money from patent deals
but also pays others whose patents they use." - some thing, lying
shamelessly (but no one can quote it lying) (no one denied that MS
also pays others whose patents they use.)

[LegionX]

Shadow <S...@dow.br> Wrote in message:

>>On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 09:27:48 +0100, David Brooks <Dav...@invalid.E-S>wrote:>I have a note somewhere from <STALKING_TARGET_05> former employer at <STALKING_TARGET_13> >
>>
>STALK much?

Good catch!
Any idea how long he has been stalking that target? We know it's
been a long time now and we think we know why. But we aren't
absolutely sure in either case.

--

<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>

<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/SnitontheWeb>
Call Snit anytime day or night. 1.928.445.3425 or 1-(928)-445-3425

And don't forget when you call to:

Ask Snit how he pissed on his cat and don't forget to ask about

his eyeball loss hallucination - It was scary bad! Heavy pharma
abuse = a Snit

[LegionX]

Snit <Brock.M...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

>And clearly you left on not so happy terms.

Well considering that it was his decision to part ways with the
company and he was provided a very generous severance package we
can't say as we agree with your assumption. Once again David has
shown he can feed you a line of bullshit and you'll happily
repeat it without checking it out first. That literally makes you
a blind and mindless follower snit.

It's been our experience that usually if you get fired you don't
get four months of additional pay at full rate and health
benefits for the following six months. Nice full coverage ones
too. Perhaps your experience getting fired differs?

As with Gremlin we've always worked jobs that are technical in
nature but can also be very physically demanding. Only a couple
of us wear a suit and tie for " work" - the rest of us use our
minds and bodies to get real work done. Lol.

>No evidence you ever found any other employment after that.

So the video he has on his youtube channel showing stages in
progress of a commercial electrical job in the Johnson City, TN
mall that's dated from 2017 is what? :) have you read the
description for the video?

The pics we got and shared from him the other day were taken from
a commercial jobsite he's working on as part of the larger refit
one. That's where he's been for months now Snit. Working in the
electrical trade while some of us who work for him keep the
computer and electronics repair shop open.

You know the pic we asked you questions about that you couldn't
answer. Rofl. If you have electrical issues at your home or
business if you had one or your vehicle you're most likely not
going to be able to fix it on your own. You'll have to call
someone. None of us have to do that snit.

[LegionX]

Snit <Brock.M...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

>You, not I, are the one who snipped. But I did make the error of assuming you were not just lying.

>NOW I am snipping your repeated lies.

Denial is not a river in Africa, snit.

>Get new material for your trolling.

We're confident that most readers wouldn't agree with your claim
that we're trolling you. It's the opposite.

[LegionX]

chrisv <chr...@nospam.invalid> Wrote in message:

>>LegionX wrote: When the time comes you'll regret every snot nosed comment you wrote about us. You're in way over your head with us and you are going to learn that the hard way.
>>
>This hot air *again*?

Hot air? We invite you to educate your rather stupid ass. Feel
free to do some back ground reading on a Jenn and Eagle from
alt.politics.scorched-earth. We stand by what we wrote. Make no
mistake snit lover, we are all just as capable of doing what you
will learn about as Gremlin demonstrated with those two
individuals.

[Snit]

On Sep 2, 2021 at 6:55:38 AM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sgql4q$hg9$3...@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <Brock.M...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> You, not I, are the one who snipped. But I did make the error of assuming you
>> were not just lying.

And you ran from this... and then repeated your blathering lies.

[Snit]

On Sep 2, 2021 at 6:51:27 AM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sgqkt0$hg9$2...@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <Brock.M...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
>> And clearly you left on not so happy terms.
>
> Well considering that it was his decision to part ways with the
> company

Unsupported claim.

> and he was provided a very generous severance package

Unsupported claim.

> we
> can't say as we agree with your assumption.

You also demonstrate you are a liar and a mindless sheep.

> Once again David has
> shown he can feed you a line of bullshit and you'll happily
> repeat it without checking it out first. That literally makes you
> a blind and mindless follower snit.
>
> It's been our experience that usually if you get fired you don't
> get four months of additional pay at full rate and health
> benefits for the following six months.

Unsupported claim -- but sounds like they were desperate to get out of some
contract. They were willing to do a lot to get RID of you, Gremlin.

Yeah, and then they called you a troll and otherwise spoke poorly of you.

> Nice full coverage ones
> too. Perhaps your experience getting fired differs?

You have far more experience there I am sure... assuming you have had any
jobs, Gremlin.

>
> As with Gremlin we've always worked jobs that are technical in
> nature

Unsupported claim.

> but can also be very physically demanding. Only a couple
> of us wear a suit and tie for " work" - the rest of us use our
> minds and bodies to get real work done. Lol.

A lot of work being an imaginary friend, eh?

>> No evidence you ever found any other employment after that.
>
> So the video he has on his youtube channel showing stages in
> progress of a commercial electrical job in the Johnson City, TN
> mall that's dated from 2017 is what? :) have you read the
> description for the video?

Ah, you've had one job in the last decade. Congrats. Assuming you are not just
lying.

> The pics we got and shared from him the other day were taken from
> a commercial jobsite he's working on as part of the larger refit
> one.

Unsupported claim.

> That's where he's been for months now Snit.

Unsupported claim.

> Working in the
> electrical trade while some of us who work for him keep the
> computer and electronics repair shop open.

Unsupported claim.

> You know the pic we asked you questions about that you couldn't
> answer. Rofl.

Ah, back to your bragging you know a bit about electronics... typical Gremlin.

> If you have electrical issues at your home or
> business if you had one or your vehicle you're most likely not
> going to be able to fix it on your own. You'll have to call
> someone. None of us have to do that snit.

Remember when you used to try to pretend you were not Gremlin?

[Howard Johnson]

In article <sgqlak$hg9$4...@dont-email.me>,
MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com says...

>
> chrisv <chr...@nospam.invalid> Wrote in message:
>
> >>LegionX wrote: When the time comes you'll regret every snot nosed comment you wrote about us. You're in way over your head with us and you are going to learn that the hard way.
> >>
> >This hot air *again*?
>
> Hot air? We invite you to educate your rather stupid ass. Feel
> free to do some back ground reading on a Jenn and Eagle from
> alt.politics.scorched-earth. We stand by what we wrote. Make no
> mistake snit lover, we are all just as capable of doing what you
> will learn about as Gremlin demonstrated with those two
> individuals.

I am looking forward to seeing snit exposed.
The sooner the better.

[Snit]

On Sep 2, 2021 at 6:58:43 AM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sgqlak$hg9$4...@dont-email.me>:

> chrisv <chr...@nospam.invalid> Wrote in message:
>
>>> LegionX wrote: When the time comes you'll regret every snot nosed comment
>>> you wrote about us. You're in way over your head with us and you are going
>>> to learn that the hard way.
>>>
>> This hot air *again*?
>
> Hot air?

Yes, Gremlin, as in you have been busted with your silly little lies. Again.
You know, like the one where you pretend to be your own imaginary friends. And
then you freak out and post a bunch if nasty links. And the you whine at the
response.

Gremlin Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=gremlin+dustin+cook>

LegionX Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=legionx+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=legionx+dustin+cook>

HHI Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=HHI+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=HHI+dustin+cook>

Imaginary Friend Dustin Cook:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=imaginary+friend+dustin+cook>

Functionally Illiterate Fraud:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>

> We invite you to educate your rather stupid ass. Feel
> free to do some back ground reading on a Jenn and Eagle from
> alt.politics.scorched-earth. We stand by what we wrote. Make no
> mistake snit lover, we are all just as capable of doing what you
> will learn about as Gremlin demonstrated with those two
> individuals.

You will blame chrisv of being Chelsea Manning and mindlessly insist a made up
driving record is his. NOOOOOO!

How can you be so cruel!

LOL!

I have sincerely never found anyone with your mix of arrogance and
incompetence in my life, Gremlin.

[Shadow]

On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 09:37:20 -0400 (EDT), LegionX
<MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:

>Shadow <S...@dow.br> Wrote in message:
>
>>>On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 09:27:48 +0100, David Brooks <Dav...@invalid.E-S>wrote:>I have a note somewhere from <STALKING_TARGET_05> former employer at <STALKING_TARGET_13> >
>>>
>>STALK much?
>
>Good catch!
>Any idea how long he has been stalking that target? We know it's
> been a long time now and we think we know why. But we aren't
> absolutely sure in either case.

It all started when he discovered STALKING_TARGET_05 was
honest.
It gave him a "hinky".
HTH

[LegionX]

Shadow <S...@dow.br> Wrote in message:

>It all started when he discovered STALKING_TARGET_05 was honest. It gave him a "hinky".

Ahh. Makes sense considering what David was trying to get him to do.

HTH------------------------------------ BD: I want people to "get
to know me better. I have nothing tohide". I'm always here to
help, this page was put up at BD's request,rather, he said "Do it

*NOW*!": <https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php> 93
confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes! Google "David

Brooks Devon" []'s-- Don't be evil - Google 2004We have a new

policy - Google 2012Google Fuchsia - 2021

[LegionX]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

[Snip obvious trolling game you're playing.]

>assuming you have had any jobs, Gremlin.

David Brooks posted a screen shot he took of the Malwarebytes
antimalware programs about page. It's difficult to miss Dustins
full name present with the other original members of
Malwarebytes. It's obvious your replies have been reduced to
meaningless drivel. Your no evidence claim of Gremlin working for
a living since parting ways with Malwarebytes has been soundly
busted.

>Ah, you've had one job in the last decade. Congrats.

Your original claim has been soundly busted. :) we don't need to
go any further and risk giving you personal information or
employer details so you can try to cause problems for
him.

>Ah, back to your bragging you know a bit about electronics... typical Gremlin.

There wasn't any electronics in the picture we asked you about,
stupid. The questions we asked you had nothing to do with
electronics, stupid. Electrical work doesn't automatically mean
you'll be doing anything with electronics.

At least we know what the fuck we're writing about. You clearly don't!

Pothead is right about you having asbergers isn't he. You
obviously do suffer with some form of mental retardation. You
made that very clear when you confused the work shown with the
pic we shared as being anything to do with electronics.

--
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<http://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https.://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>

[LegionX]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

> On Sep 2, 2021 at 6:58:43 AM MST, "LegionX" wrote<sgqlak$hg9$4...@dont-email.me>:> chrisv <chr...@nospam.invalid> Wrote in message:> >>> LegionX wrote: When the time comes you'll regret every snot nosed comment>>> you wrote about us. You're in way over your head with us and you are going>>> to learn that the hard way.>>> >> This hot air *again*?> > Hot air?

>Yes, Gremlin, as in you have been busted with your silly little lies.

You're also welcome to do the same thing we suggested chrisv do,
snit. We are just as capable as Gremlin demonstrated he is with
Jenn and Eagle. You are our eagle.

See snit - we provide facts to support what we write. You don't.
You're still repeating your completely projected accusation of
socking onto us but you won't support it with evidence. And as
we've reminded you many times because your memory is that bad -
you're only accusing us of socking because we were able to prove
you were as Sigmond. So you're projecting what we busted you
doing. Almost every one can see it snit.

>And then you freak out and post a bunch if nasty links.

What drugs did you mix today to come up with that nonsense snit?
The links in our Signature point to accurate information about
you. We have more to add which show your prescription drug
problem. :)


If you find the contents to be nasty perhaps you should consider
changing how nasty you come across in them?
You could start by becoming honest with people. That might require
you to stop lying about others though. Case in point your
accusations about us being a Gremlin sock and most recently a
blind mindless follower. A new label you've created all because
you lied about Gremlin making up your driving record.

You're making very simple mistakes. You're stepping all over your
own dick. Clearly we're getting to you. Great!

>And the you whine at the response.

We find your usage of adjectives to be interesting. Made up of
course - but interesting - due to your known chronological age.
We've never met an adult in his fifties with the functional mind
of a small child with the maturity level to match. You deserve
further study.

>I have sincerely never found anyone with your mix of arrogance
and incompetence in my life

Stop projecting weasel snit. It's desperate and almost unbecoming
of you.

[Shadow]

On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 16:28:23 -0400 (EDT), LegionX
<MichaelAnd...@griftersconjobsllc.com> wrote:

>Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

<addressing someone absent from Usenet>

>
>>Ah, you've had one job in the last decade. Congrats.

That's excellent. People that jump from job to job are
unreliable. Almost as unreliable as those that don't work at all. Hard
to believe, but those pathetic specimens of the human race DO exist.
HTH

------------------------------------
BD: I want people to "get to know me better. I have nothing to
hide".
I'm always here to help, this page was put up at BD's request,
rather, he said "Do it *NOW*!":

<https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php>

93 confirmed #FAKE_NYMS, most used in cybercrimes!
Google "David Brooks Devon"
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004

[Snit]

More of your silly, juvenile little threats, Gremlin. I pity you. I can’t
imagine living with so much anger, and so much confusion and frustration
and whatever else you were going through. I hope you feel better soon.

—

[LegionX]

Snit <Brock.M...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

>More of your silly, juvenile little threats

We wrote nothing of the kind. We left the names and the place for
people in doubt to fact check us. :)

A certain Jenn and Eagle got spanked hard by Gremlin for playing
the same kind of game you have. They were once like you snit.
That is until Gremlin had enough and showed them both how wrong
they were. As we will do for you. You're our eagle, snit. We
won't take any of our money as tax payers from your bank account
though. Gremlin did that to eagle.

[Snip trolling]

[Snit]

On Sep 2, 2021 at 1:28:23 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sgrc57$8o3$2...@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>
> [Snip obvious trolling game you're playing.]
>
>> assuming you have had any jobs, Gremlin.
>
> David Brooks posted a screen shot he took of the Malwarebytes
> antimalware programs about page.

Ah, another example of you presenting yourself as a functionally illiterate
fraud. The context was jobs after that one -- which you have now admitted you
were forced to leave.

[Snit]

On Sep 2, 2021 at 3:04:52 PM MST, "LegionX" wrote
<sgrhq5$geq$1...@dont-email.me>:

> Snit <Brock.M...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
>

>> More of your silly, juvenile little threats, Gremlin. I pity you. I can’t
>> imagine living with so much anger, and so much confusion and frustration
>> and whatever else you were going through. I hope you feel better soon.

And then you snipped your nonsense and denied it.

But, hey, at least now you have publicly admitted you did not leave Malware
Bytes voluntarily.

No surprise.

> We wrote nothing of the kind. We left the names and the place for
> people in doubt to fact check us. :)
>
> A certain Jenn and Eagle got spanked hard by Gremlin for playing
> the same kind of game you have. They were once like you snit.
> That is until Gremlin had enough and showed them both how wrong
> they were.

When you posted as Gremlin you blamed your imaginary friends. Now as you post
as your imaginary friends you blame Gremlin.

I find that funny,

> As we will do for you. You're our eagle, snit. We
> won't take any of our money as tax payers from your bank account
> though. Gremlin did that to eagle.

No he did not.

>
> [Snip trolling]


--

[HHI the imaginary friend]

Rbowman and Shadow both lie nonstop and shamelessly and continue to do
so. So no incentive in showing any further courtesy or restraint.

Right now there are too many "Rbowman is our hero" freetards and not
enough old school users with enough understanding to help the people with
Linux gear.

Another keg you mean, Rbowman drinks them down pretty quick. Socks that
Rbowman can't prove are Shadow's. Why would Shadow, or anyone, use socks
to expose what we all often say about Rbowman?

Shadow messed with Rbowman a bit, big fscking deal. Why be a blubbering
bitch about it? Linux is a false advocate's only reason for living.

--
Curious how these posts are made? www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZNxaaKD7-c

[chrisv]

LegionX wrote:

> Have your fun on usenet snit while you can. When
> the time comes you'll regret every snot nosed comment you wrote
> about us. You're in way over your head with us and you are going
> to learn that the hard way.

What I'm saying is that these exact same type of threats were being
made to "Snit" about a year ago. As far as I know, nothing ever came
of them, other than a silly claim that a picture of Chelsea Manning
was "Snit".

--
"Some Linux users were very much against the idea of choice if people
did not choose Linux." - some thing, lying shamelessly (but no one
can quote it lying)

[Snit]

On Sep 3, 2021 at 5:39:14 AM MST, "chrisv" wrote
<6j54jgpp93qinv5oi...@4ax.com>:

> LegionX wrote:
>
>> Have your fun on usenet snit while you can. When
>> the time comes you'll regret every snot nosed comment you wrote
>> about us. You're in way over your head with us and you are going
>> to learn that the hard way.
>
> What I'm saying is that these exact same type of threats were being
> made to "Snit" about a year ago. As far as I know, nothing ever came
> of them, other than a silly claim that a picture of Chelsea Manning
> was "Snit".

Things have changed -- at the time Gremlin / Dustin Cook / Diesel / LegionX
was not using socks nearly as much, if at all. Now he is pretending to be his
own imaginary friends. He has also flipped out entirely and has joined Carroll
in dedicating his life to trolling me, trying to dig up dirt and failing. He
repeatedly gets things wrong and then insists it is because he is a mindless
sheep who thought I was Manning or was tied to a driving record that has
nothing to do with me.

Oh, and he has made such a fool of himself that if you do any of these
searches his name comes up near the top:

Functionally Illiterate Fraud:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://www.bing.com/search?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=functionally+illiterate+fraud>

Gremlin does al he can to dox me... but Carroll is laughing his ass off as he
shows he can sit back and automate such mayhem.

[LegionX]

Snit <brock.m...@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

>Ah, another example of you presenting yourself as a functionally illiterate fraud. The context was jobs after that one

Your memory is clearly shot snit - likely due to long term benzo
family pill abuse. You know he's been doing electrical work
professionally. He has a video on his youtube channel showing a
commercial jobsites electrical progress. And its from
2017.

>which you have now admitted you were forced to leave.

Since we wrote the complete opposite of what you're claiming
you're lying again.

--
<https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear>
<https://tinyurl.com/SnitontheWeb>

<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10>
<https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11>