Peter Kohlmann: "the Macro capabilities of OpenOffice are every bit as complex as those of MSOffice" 1

[DFS]

So prove it, dumbkopf. Below are MS Access 2003 commands that can be
called from macros. Show us the OpenOffice equivalents - or run away
like the fool you are.

acCmdAboutMicrosoftAccess
acCmdAddInManager
acCmdAddToNewGroup
acCmdAddWatch
acCmdAdvancedFilterSort
acCmdAlignBottom
acCmdAlignCenter
acCmdAlignLeft
acCmdAlignmentAndSizing
acCmdAlignMiddle
acCmdAlignRight
acCmdAlignToGrid
acCmdAlignTop
acCmdAlignToShortest
acCmdAlignToTallest
acCmdAnalyzePerformance
acCmdAnalyzeTable
acCmdAnswerWizard
acCmdApplyDefault
acCmdApplyFilterSort
acCmdAppMaximize
acCmdAppMinimize
acCmdAppMove
acCmdAppRestore
acCmdAppSize
acCmdArrangeIconsAuto
acCmdArrangeIconsByCreated
acCmdArrangeIconsByModified
acCmdArrangeIconsByName
acCmdArrangeIconsByType
acCmdAutoCorrect
acCmdAutoDial
acCmdAutoFormat
acCmdBackgroundPicture
acCmdBackgroundSound
acCmdBackup
acCmdBookmarksClearAll
acCmdBookmarksNext
acCmdBookmarksPrevious
acCmdBookmarksToggle
acCmdBringToFront
acCmdCallStack
acCmdChangeToCheckBox
acCmdChangeToComboBox
acCmdChangeToCommandButton
acCmdChangeToImage
acCmdChangeToLabel
acCmdChangeToListBox
acCmdChangeToOptionButton
acCmdChangeToTextBox
acCmdChangeToToggleButton
acCmdChartSortAscByTotal
acCmdChartSortDescByTotal
acCmdClearAll
acCmdClearAllBreakpoints
acCmdClearGrid
acCmdClearHyperlink
acCmdClearItemDefaults
acCmdClose
acCmdCloseWindow
acCmdColumnWidth
acCmdCompactDatabase
acCmdCompileAllModules
acCmdCompileAndSaveAllModules
acCmdCompileLoadedModules
acCmdCompleteWord
acCmdConditionalFormatting
acCmdConnection
acCmdControlWizardsToggle
acCmdConvertDatabase
acCmdConvertMacrosToVisualBasic
acCmdCopy
acCmdCopyDatabaseFile
acCmdCopyHyperlink
acCmdCreateMenuFromMacro
acCmdCreateRelationship
acCmdCreateReplica
acCmdCreateShortcut
acCmdCreateShortcutMenuFromMacro
acCmdCreateToolbarFromMacro
acCmdCut
acCmdDataAccessPageAddToPage
acCmdDataAccessPageBrowse
acCmdDataAccessPageDesignView
acCmdDataAccessPageFieldListRefresh
acCmdDatabaseProperties
acCmdDatabaseSplitter
acCmdDataEntry
acCmdDataOutline
acCmdDatasheetView
acCmdDateAndTime
acCmdDebugWindow
acCmdDelete
acCmdDeleteGroup
acCmdDeletePage
acCmdDeleteQueryColumn
acCmdDeleteRecord
acCmdDeleteRows
acCmdDeleteTab
acCmdDeleteTable
acCmdDeleteTableColumn
acCmdDeleteWatch
acCmdDemote
acCmdDesignView
acCmdDiagramAddRelatedTables
acCmdDiagramAutosizeSelectedTables
acCmdDiagramDeleteRelationship
acCmdDiagramLayoutDiagram
acCmdDiagramLayoutSelection
acCmdDiagramModifyUserDefinedView
acCmdDiagramNewLabel
acCmdDiagramNewTable
acCmdDiagramRecalculatePageBreaks
acCmdDiagramShowRelationshipLabels
acCmdDiagramViewPageBreaks
acCmdDocMaximize
acCmdDocMinimize
acCmdDocMove
acCmdDocRestore
acCmdDocSize
acCmdDocumenter
acCmdDropSQLDatabase
acCmdDuplicate
acCmdEditHyperlink
acCmdEditingAllowed
acCmdEditRelationship
acCmdEditTriggers
acCmdEditWatch
acCmdEncryptDecryptDatabase
acCmdEnd
acCmdExit
acCmdExport
acCmdFavoritesAddTo
acCmdFavoritesOpen
acCmdFieldList
acCmdFilterByForm
acCmdFilterBySelection
acCmdFilterExcludingSelection
acCmdFind
acCmdFindNext
acCmdFindNextWordUnderCursor
acCmdFindPrevious
acCmdFindPrevWordUnderCursor
acCmdFitToWindow
acCmdFont
acCmdFormatCells
acCmdFormHdrFtr
acCmdFormView
acCmdFreezeColumn
acCmdGoBack
acCmdGoContinue
acCmdGoForward
acCmdGroupByTable
acCmdGroupControls
acCmdHideColumns
acCmdHidePane
acCmdHideTable
acCmdHorizontalSpacingDecrease
acCmdHorizontalSpacingIncrease
acCmdHorizontalSpacingMakeEqual
acCmdHyperlinkDisplayText
acCmdImport
acCmdIndent
acCmdIndexes
acCmdInsertActiveXControl
acCmdInsertChart
acCmdInsertFile
acCmdInsertFileIntoModule
acCmdInsertHyperlink
acCmdInsertLookupColumn
acCmdInsertLookupField
acCmdInsertMovieFromFile
acCmdInsertObject
acCmdInsertPage
acCmdInsertPicture
acCmdInsertPivotTable
acCmdInsertProcedure
acCmdInsertQueryColumn
acCmdInsertRows
acCmdInsertSpreadsheet
acCmdInsertSubdatasheet
acCmdInsertTableColumn
acCmdInsertUnboundSection
acCmdInvokeBuilder
acCmdJoinProperties
acCmdLastPosition
acCmdLayoutPreview
acCmdLineUpIcons
acCmdLinkedTableManager
acCmdLinkTables
acCmdListConstants
acCmdLoadFromQuery
acCmdMacroConditions
acCmdMacroNames
acCmdMakeMDEFile
acCmdMaximiumRecords
acCmdMicrosoftAccessHelpTopics
acCmdMicrosoftOnTheWeb
acCmdMicrosoftScriptEditor
acCmdMoreWindows
acCmdNewDatabase
acCmdNewGroup
acCmdNewObjectAutoForm
acCmdNewObjectAutoReport
acCmdNewObjectClassModule
acCmdNewObjectDataAccessPage
acCmdNewObjectDiagram
acCmdNewObjectForm
acCmdNewObjectFunction
acCmdNewObjectMacro
acCmdNewObjectModule
acCmdNewObjectQuery
acCmdNewObjectReport
acCmdNewObjectStoredProcedure
acCmdNewObjectTable
acCmdNewObjectView
acCmdObjBrwFindWholeWordOnly
acCmdObjBrwGroupMembers
acCmdObjBrwHelp
acCmdObjBrwShowHiddenMembers
acCmdObjBrwViewDefinition
acCmdObjectBrowser
acCmdOfficeClipboard
acCmdOLEDDELinks
acCmdOLEObjectConvert
acCmdOLEObjectDefaultVerb
acCmdOpenDatabase
acCmdOpenHyperlink
acCmdOpenNewHyperlink
acCmdOpenSearchPage
acCmdOpenStartPage
acCmdOpenTable
acCmdOpenURL
acCmdOptions
acCmdOutdent
acCmdOutputToExcel
acCmdOutputToRTF
acCmdOutputToText
acCmdPageHdrFtr
acCmdPageNumber
acCmdPageProperties
acCmdPageSetup
acCmdParameterInfo
acCmdPartialReplicaWizard
acCmdPaste
acCmdPasteAppend
acCmdPasteAsHyperlink
acCmdPasteSpecial
acCmdPivotAutoAverage
acCmdPivotAutoCount
acCmdPivotAutoFilter
acCmdPivotAutoMax
acCmdPivotAutoMin
acCmdPivotAutoStdDev
acCmdPivotAutoStdDevP
acCmdPivotAutoSum
acCmdPivotAutoVar
acCmdPivotAutoVarP
acCmdPivotChartByRowByColumn
acCmdPivotChartDrillInto
acCmdPivotChartDrillOut
acCmdPivotChartMultiplePlots
acCmdPivotChartMultiplePlotsUnifiedScale
acCmdPivotChartShowLegend
acCmdPivotChartType
acCmdPivotChartUndo
acCmdPivotChartView
acCmdPivotCollapse
acCmdPivotDelete
acCmdPivotDropAreas
acCmdPivotExpand
acCmdPivotRefresh
acCmdPivotShowAll
acCmdPivotShowBottom1
acCmdPivotShowBottom10
acCmdPivotShowBottom10Percent
acCmdPivotShowBottom1Percent
acCmdPivotShowBottom2
acCmdPivotShowBottom25
acCmdPivotShowBottom25Percent
acCmdPivotShowBottom2Percent
acCmdPivotShowBottom5
acCmdPivotShowBottom5Percent
acCmdPivotShowBottomOther
acCmdPivotShowTop1
acCmdPivotShowTop10
acCmdPivotShowTop10Percent
acCmdPivotShowTop1Percent
acCmdPivotShowTop2
acCmdPivotShowTop25
acCmdPivotShowTop25Percent
acCmdPivotShowTop2Percent
acCmdPivotShowTop5
acCmdPivotShowTop5Percent
acCmdPivotShowTopOther
acCmdPivotTableClearCustomOrdering
acCmdPivotTableCreateCalcField
acCmdPivotTableCreateCalcTotal
acCmdPivotTableDemote
acCmdPivotTableExpandIndicators
acCmdPivotTableExportToExcel
acCmdPivotTableFilterBySelection
acCmdPivotTableGroupItems
acCmdPivotTableHideDetails
acCmdPivotTableMoveToColumnArea
acCmdPivotTableMoveToDetailArea
acCmdPivotTableMoveToFilterArea
acCmdPivotTableMoveToRowArea
acCmdPivotTablePercentColumnTotal
acCmdPivotTablePercentGrandTotal
acCmdPivotTablePercentParentColumnItem
acCmdPivotTablePercentParentRowItem
acCmdPivotTablePercentRowTotal
acCmdPivotTablePromote
acCmdPivotTableRemove
acCmdPivotTableShowAsNormal
acCmdPivotTableShowDetails
acCmdPivotTableSubtotal
acCmdPivotTableUngroupItems
acCmdPivotTableView
acCmdPreviewEightPages
acCmdPreviewFourPages
acCmdPreviewOnePage
acCmdPreviewTwelvePages
acCmdPreviewTwoPages
acCmdPrimaryKey
acCmdPrint
acCmdPrintPreview
acCmdPrintRelationships
acCmdProcedureDefinition
acCmdPromote
acCmdProperties
acCmdPublish
acCmdPublishDefaults
acCmdQueryAddToOutput
acCmdQueryGroupBy
acCmdQueryParameters
acCmdQueryTotals
acCmdQueryTypeAppend
acCmdQueryTypeCrosstab
acCmdQueryTypeDelete
acCmdQueryTypeMakeTable
acCmdQueryTypeSelect
acCmdQueryTypeSQLDataDefinition
acCmdQueryTypeSQLPassThrough
acCmdQueryTypeSQLUnion
acCmdQueryTypeUpdate
acCmdQuickInfo
acCmdQuickPrint
acCmdQuickWatch
acCmdRecordsGoToFirst
acCmdRecordsGoToLast
acCmdRecordsGoToNew
acCmdRecordsGoToNext
acCmdRecordsGoToPrevious
acCmdRecoverDesignMaster
acCmdRedo
acCmdReferences
acCmdRefresh
acCmdRefreshPage
acCmdRegisterActiveXControls
acCmdRelationships
acCmdRemove
acCmdRemoveFilterSort
acCmdRemoveTable
acCmdRename
acCmdRenameColumn
acCmdRenameGroup
acCmdRepairDatabase
acCmdReplace
acCmdReportHdrFtr
acCmdReset
acCmdResolveConflicts
acCmdRestore
acCmdRowHeight
acCmdRun
acCmdRunMacro
acCmdRunOpenMacro
acCmdSave
acCmdSaveAllModules
acCmdSaveAllRecords
acCmdSaveAs
acCmdSaveAsASP
acCmdSaveAsDataAccessPage
acCmdSaveAsHTML
acCmdSaveAsIDC
acCmdSaveAsQuery
acCmdSaveAsReport
acCmdSaveLayout
acCmdSaveModuleAsText
acCmdSaveRecord
acCmdSelectAll
acCmdSelectAllRecords
acCmdSelectDataAccessPage
acCmdSelectForm
acCmdSelectRecord
acCmdSelectReport
acCmdSend
acCmdSendToBack
acCmdServerFilterByForm
acCmdServerProperties
acCmdSetControlDefaults
acCmdSetDatabasePassword
acCmdSetNextStatement
acCmdShowAllRelationships
acCmdShowDirectRelationships
acCmdShowEnvelope
acCmdShowMembers
acCmdShowNextStatement
acCmdShowOnlyWebToolbar
acCmdShowTable
acCmdSingleStep
acCmdSizeToFit
acCmdSizeToFitForm
acCmdSizeToGrid
acCmdSizeToNarrowest
acCmdSizeToWidest
acCmdSnapToGrid
acCmdSortAscending
acCmdSortDescending
acCmdSortingAndGrouping
acCmdSpeech
acCmdSpelling
acCmdSQLView
acCmdStartupProperties
acCmdStepInto
acCmdStepOut
acCmdStepOver
acCmdStepToCursor
acCmdStopLoadingPage
acCmdSubdatasheetCollapseAll
acCmdSubdatasheetExpandAll
acCmdSubdatasheetRemove
acCmdSubformDatasheet
acCmdSubformDatasheetView
acCmdSubformFormView
acCmdSubformInNewWindow
acCmdSubformPivotChartView
acCmdSubformPivotTableView
acCmdSwitchboardManager
acCmdSynchronizeNow
acCmdTabControlPageOrder
acCmdTableAddTable
acCmdTableCustomView
acCmdTableNames
acCmdTabOrder
acCmdTestValidationRules
acCmdTileHorizontally
acCmdTileVertically
acCmdToggleBreakpoint
acCmdToggleFilter
acCmdToolbarControlProperties
acCmdToolbarsCustomize
acCmdTransferSQLDatabase
acCmdTransparentBackground
acCmdTransparentBorder
acCmdUndo
acCmdUndoAllRecords
acCmdUnfreezeAllColumns
acCmdUngroupControls
acCmdUnhideColumns
acCmdUpsizingWizard
acCmdUserAndGroupAccounts
acCmdUserAndGroupPermissions
acCmdUserLevelSecurityWizard
acCmdVerticalSpacingDecrease
acCmdVerticalSpacingIncrease
acCmdVerticalSpacingMakeEqual
acCmdViewCode
acCmdViewDataAccessPages
acCmdViewDetails
acCmdViewDiagrams
acCmdViewFieldList
acCmdViewForms
acCmdViewFunctions
acCmdViewGrid
acCmdViewLargeIcons
acCmdViewList
acCmdViewMacros
acCmdViewModules
acCmdViewQueries
acCmdViewReports
acCmdViewRuler
acCmdViewShowPaneDiagram
acCmdViewShowPaneGrid
acCmdViewShowPaneSQL
acCmdViewSmallIcons
acCmdViewStoredProcedures
acCmdViewTableColumnNames
acCmdViewTableColumnProperties
acCmdViewTableKeys
acCmdViewTableNameOnly
acCmdViewTables
acCmdViewTableUserView
acCmdViewToolbox
acCmdViewVerifySQL
acCmdViewViews
acCmdVisualBasicEditor
acCmdWebPagePreview
acCmdWebPageProperties
acCmdWebTheme
acCmdWindowArrangeIcons
acCmdWindowCascade
acCmdWindowHide
acCmdWindowSplit
acCmdWindowUnhide
acCmdWordMailMerge
acCmdWorkgroupAdministrator
acCmdZoom10
acCmdZoom100
acCmdZoom1000
acCmdZoom150
acCmdZoom200
acCmdZoom25
acCmdZoom50
acCmdZoom500
acCmdZoom75
acCmdZoomBox
acCmdZoomSelection

[Snit]

DFS stated in post jd4qjk$drb$2...@dont-email.me on 12/24/11 8:20 AM:

Peter *will* run. You are absolutely correct.


--
🙈🙉🙊

[Lusotec]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

DFS wrote:
> So prove it, dumbkopf. Below are MS Access 2003 commands that can be
> called from macros. Show us the OpenOffice equivalents - or run away
> like the fool you are.
>
> acCmdAboutMicrosoftAccess
> acCmdAddInManager
> acCmdAddToNewGroup

>(...)

OpenOffice has a large and varied automation/macro API, and can be easily
extended by creating more modules (e.g. using C++, Java), connecting to
external objects with CORBA, or even using other scripting engines.

http://api.openoffice.org/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/module-ix.html

Regards.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAk75D2wACgkQGQjO2ccW76qHmgD9HEMWQJy99Ef8JQs7zI3Wd5+r
vb150yvRPpfe/Jh2+fwA/jQzfh9G8gAIVnsjVAvk7RfaIAyEeFi8NI7G99jfzVCM
=KGJ5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Torre Starnes]

On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 00:21 +0000, Lusotec wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> DFS wrote:
>> So prove it, dumbkopf. Below are MS Access 2003 commands that can be
>> called from macros. Show us the OpenOffice equivalents - or run away
>> like the fool you are.
>>
>> acCmdAboutMicrosoftAccess
>> acCmdAddInManager
>> acCmdAddToNewGroup
>>(...)
>
> OpenOffice has a large and varied automation/macro API, and can be easily
> extended by creating more modules (e.g. using C++, Java), connecting to
> external objects with CORBA, or even using other scripting engines.
>
> http://api.openoffice.org/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/module-ix.html
>
> Regards.

That's funny.....
It's reassuring that when OpenOffice fails to deliver, the average
user can write their own extensions to it.

Seriously, you can't make this stuff up.

[Peter Köhlmann]

Idiot

Your reading comprehension is every bit as bad as Hadron Larries, Snit
flatfish

[Torre Starnes]

Just your saying so means nothing because nobody seems to be able to
provide any evidence of you ever being correct in a technical
discussion.

To refresh your memory:

DFS asked to specifically show the OpenOffice equivalents to a
collection of commands.

The best that was offered was Lusotec (good nym) showing how these
commands "might" possibly be able to be created, which means they
don't exist in the default OpenOffice and which proves DFS's points
rather nicely.

Hey, I can put a Corvette motor in a BMW if I want to as well.

Once again Peter Kohlmann fails to produce.
You really should find another hobby because Linux advocacy is just
not your gift Peter.

[Peter Köhlmann]

No. He claimed that OpenOffice is not capable of doing a certain set of
database operations.
Quite a different thing, wouldn't you agree?

And to top it off, he is totally unable to substantiate his idiotic claim.
Instead he wants others to prove his idiocy wrong

Why anybody should do the homework of DumbFullShit is really a mistery you
should explain, Snit flatfish Stewrat

If DumbFullShit has the opinion why something does not work as it should he
should provide at least a shred of evidence for his lunacy, right, Snit
flatfish?

> The best that was offered was Lusotec (good nym) showing how these
> commands "might" possibly be able to be created, which means they
> don't exist in the default OpenOffice and which proves DFS's points
> rather nicely.
>
> Hey, I can put a Corvette motor in a BMW if I want to as well.

You can't argue yourself out of a wet paper bag if your life depended on it,
Snit flatfish

> Once again Peter Kohlmann fails to produce.
> You really should find another hobby because Linux advocacy is just
> not your gift Peter.

Idiot

[Chris Ahlstrom]

Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Torre Starnes wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> Idiot

That's all the response the idiot troll deserves.

--
What that common "best" solution IS however I leave up to the people who
better know their needs. May the standardise on the BEST solution for
THEIR NEEDS. FOSS or Proprietary. Windows, OSX or Linux etc. I settled
on Linux. I went further. I settled on Debian Linux.
-- "Hadron" <ihsluq$17k$3...@news.eternal-september.org>
(A boastful anti-Linux mole)

[Foster]

Once again you are lying......

Here is what DFS wrote:

" DFS wrote:
So prove it, dumbkopf. Below are MS Access 2003 commands that can
be called from macros. Show us the OpenOffice equivalents - or run
away like the fool you are."

It's all in Google.....

Why do you lie so much Peter Kohlmann?

[Foster]

On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 20:10:10 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Torre Starnes wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> Idiot
>
> That's all the response the idiot troll deserves.

Look at Chris "Chrissy" Ahlstrom sucking on another dick.
Is this guy pathetic or what?

[Peter Köhlmann]

Right. He wantet me to prove that his lunatic claims are bullshit

Because he could not provide a shred of evidence that his Snit-claims have
any foundations in reality

> Below are MS Access 2003 commands that can
> be called from macros. Show us the OpenOffice equivalents - or run
> away like the fool you are."

Why would I do *his* homework?
It is DumbFuLLShit claiming bullshit.
So that imbecile should do his homework and provide evidence.

> It's all in Google.....

Right, it is.
Anyone with half a brain can see what you imbeciles are up to

> Why do you lie so much Peter Kohlmann?

I don't. I have written exactly what happened.

It was your task to try to paint it somewhat different.
As you are a imbecile and a Snit, you failed

[Big Steel]

On 12/26/2011 8:20 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:

<snipped>

Kholtinkle you are proving nothing other than you are a whining little
Superman.

[Foster]

He's jumping all over the place.
Pop goes the weasel!

[Peter Köhlmann]

Translation: You were caught in outright lying, Snit flatfish

What a surprise (not)

[Foster]

Too bad that's not what the Google Archives shows.
Nice try though.

Again, has anyone found an example of Peter Kohlmann being correct
in a technical thread?

[Peter Köhlmann]

Foster wrote:

> On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 02:39:34 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>
>> Foster (Snit flatfish Stewrat) wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 20:27:03 -0500, Big Steel wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12/26/2011 8:20 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snipped>
>>>>
>>>> Kholtinkle you are proving nothing other than you are a whining little
>>>> Superman.
>>>
>>> He's jumping all over the place.
>>> Pop goes the weasel!
>>
>> Translation: You were caught in outright lying, Snit flatfish
>>
>> What a surprise (not)
>
> Too bad that's not what the Google Archives shows.

It is exactly what they show.

> Nice try though.

Feel free to provide the links which prove me wrong, Snit flatfish

> Again, has anyone found an example of Peter Kohlmann being correct
> in a technical thread?

Has anyone ever found you *not* lying, Snit flatfish Gary Stewart?

[Snit]

Peter Köhlmann stated in post jdb8gg$o02$1...@dont-email.me on 12/26/11 6:52
PM:

>>> Translation: You were caught in outright lying, Snit flatfish
>>>
>>> What a surprise (not)
>>
>> Too bad that's not what the Google Archives shows.
>
> It is exactly what they show.

This is incorrect. A lie.

But if you wish to show otherwise, quote it.

You never will... hence the reason you fear me.


--
🙈🙉🙊

[William Poaster]

On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 20:10:10 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Torre Starnes wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> Idiot
>
> That's all the response the idiot troll deserves.

Too kind, IMO. Totally ignoring the trolling nymshifting fuckwit would be
better. :-)

--
Einstein defined insanity as doing the same thing over & over again,
expecting different results.
By that definition, the Mac & wintrolls repeating the same ol' FUD
over & over, means that their sanity is being brought into question.

[Foster]

I ignore him now because just like every debate Peter Kohlmann
loses, which is all of them from what I can see, it's the same old
routine.

Tell us again Peter Kohlmann how "Finale" is not used for music
composition because it doesn't compose the music by itself.

Or, how about your "expertise" regarding screen shots and font
aliasing?

You would never admit how wrong you were in those instances either.

No more time wasted on you Peter, you lost this one so let it die.

[Peter Köhlmann]

Foster wrote:

> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 19:25:36 -0700, Snit wrote:
>
>> Peter Köhlmann stated in post jdb8gg$o02$1...@dont-email.me on 12/26/11 6:52
>> PM:
>>
>>>>> Translation: You were caught in outright lying, Snit flatfish
>>>>>
>>>>> What a surprise (not)
>>>>
>>>> Too bad that's not what the Google Archives shows.
>>>
>>> It is exactly what they show.
>>
>> This is incorrect. A lie.
>>
>> But if you wish to show otherwise, quote it.
>>
>> You never will... hence the reason you fear me.
>
> I ignore him now because just like every debate Peter Kohlmann
> loses, which is all of them from what I can see, it's the same old
> routine.

Translation: You can't supply even a shred of evidence for your bullshit
claim of "conflicting libraries"

But that will not hinder you Snit to bring that up again in the future, like
so many outright lies you have presented here the last 16 years you have
trolled, lied and embarrassed honest windows users with your inane drivel

[Snit]

Foster stated in post 8slxznn9w51j$.4cub3xpi...@40tude.net on 12/27/11
6:21 AM:

When I debate I repeatedly go back to the data and the evidence... and those
on the losing end whine I am too repetitive. Poor them... in response to
their pleas to change the topic to whatever BS attacks they can think up I
stay focused on technology. They hate it.


--
🙈🙉🙊

[Lusotec]

Torre Starnes wrote:

> Lusotec wrote:
>> DFS wrote:
>>> So prove it, dumbkopf. Below are MS Access 2003 commands that can be
>>> called from macros. Show us the OpenOffice equivalents - or run away
>>> like the fool you are.
>>>
>>> acCmdAboutMicrosoftAccess
>>> acCmdAddInManager
>>> acCmdAddToNewGroup
>>>(...)
>>
>> OpenOffice has a large and varied automation/macro API, and can be easily
>> extended by creating more modules (e.g. using C++, Java), connecting to
>> external objects with CORBA, or even using other scripting engines.
>>
>> http://api.openoffice.org/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/module-ix.html
>>
>> Regards.
>
> That's funny.....
> It's reassuring that when OpenOffice fails to deliver, the average
> user can write their own extensions to it.
>
> Seriously, you can't make this stuff up.

Seriously, lear to read!

Regards.

[Lusotec]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Correction: lear => learn

Regards.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAk755WoACgkQGQjO2ccW76oKogD9HATxltBs9JXI1rUH9DzlGxQq
ECf86iscUHVucHgy/xgA/igQXfpzUEn/gcN2MPLHW3P+KsM7Z71O3HcvbFGFpLBf
=COFq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Snit]

Peter Köhlmann stated in post jdcjgp$ek9$2...@dont-email.me on 12/27/11 7:06
AM:

While others might or might not have been wrong, you clearly were:

Peter Köhlmann (26 Dec. 2011)
-----
There exists no RPM-Hell
-----

Peter Köhlmann (26 Dec. 2011)
-----
And "Dependency Hell" (which would be the right term, not
"RPM hell") is largely resolved in RPM since years.
-----

Either it does not exist, as you first claim, or it is only "largely
resolved" as you claimed later. The same day. Both cannot be true.

You flip-flopped. Why not just admit you made a mistake and stop blaming
the world when you are busted being wrong?


--
🙈🙉🙊

[Big Steel]

Right? You won. :) Huh?

[Lusotec]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> Torre Starnes wrote:
>> Just your saying so means nothing because nobody seems to be able to
>> provide any evidence of you ever being correct in a technical
>> discussion.
>>
>> To refresh your memory:
>>
>> DFS asked to specifically show the OpenOffice equivalents to a
>> collection of commands.

And that was what I did!

> No. He claimed that OpenOffice is not capable of doing a certain set of
> database operations.
> Quite a different thing, wouldn't you agree?
>
> And to top it off, he is totally unable to substantiate his idiotic claim.
> Instead he wants others to prove his idiocy wrong
>
> Why anybody should do the homework of DumbFullShit is really a mistery you
> should explain, Snit flatfish Stewrat
>
> If DumbFullShit has the opinion why something does not work as it should
> he should provide at least a shred of evidence for his lunacy, right, Snit
> flatfish?

OpenOffice/LibreOffice has an extensive automation/macro API, including full
RDBS support. All these DFS posts are just a show of ignorance.

>> The best that was offered was Lusotec (good nym) showing how these
>> commands "might" possibly be able to be created, which means they
>> don't exist in the default OpenOffice and which proves DFS's points
>> rather nicely.

DFS asked for "the OpenOffice equivalents" and I did exactly that. You lost
and now you resort to moving the goal. Classic.

Regards.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAk756/QACgkQGQjO2ccW76ptwAD/eyNNp4EowGRVnLc2IGBAqg6Q
8EqItQY8A2rh9wTbFyQA/1cKcvq244iIoGsqzduTcjpPqoAajtySCdVtIzVH1G1Z
=2pOd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Chris Ahlstrom]

Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

They're all alike, aren't they? Shameless, cowardly, lying, insulting,
and worse.

--
It's a business I don't know anything about, but I admire Bill Gates
enormously. I know him individually, and I think he's incredible in business.
-- Warren Buffett, in lecture at Kenan-Flagler Business School, University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. (1994)

[Chris Ahlstrom]

Lusotec wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> OpenOffice/LibreOffice has an extensive automation/macro API, including full
> RDBS support. All these DFS posts are just a show of ignorance.

Exactly. That doesn't stop him, or his feeble posse, though.

>>> The best that was offered was Lusotec (good nym) showing how these
>>> commands "might" possibly be able to be created, which means they
>>> don't exist in the default OpenOffice and which proves DFS's points
>>> rather nicely.
>
> DFS asked for "the OpenOffice equivalents" and I did exactly that. You lost
> and now you resort to moving the goal. Classic.

Nice try, Steve-o. Believing your own propaganda?

--
Our people, our shareholders, me, Bill Gates, we expect to change the world
in every way, to succeed wildly at everything we touch, to have the broadest
impact of any company in the world.
-- Steve Ballmer

[Snit]

Chris Ahlstrom stated in post jddq59$ps3$1...@dont-email.me on 12/27/11 6:08
PM:

> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Foster wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 19:25:36 -0700, Snit wrote:
>>>
>>>> Peter Köhlmann stated in post jdb8gg$o02$1...@dont-email.me on 12/26/11 6:52
>>>> PM:
>>>>
>>>>>>> Translation: You were caught in outright lying, Snit flatfish
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What a surprise (not)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Too bad that's not what the Google Archives shows.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is exactly what they show.
>>>>
>>>> This is incorrect. A lie.
>>>>
>>>> But if you wish to show otherwise, quote it.
>>>>
>>>> You never will... hence the reason you fear me.
>>>
>>> I ignore him now because just like every debate Peter Kohlmann
>>> loses, which is all of them from what I can see, it's the same old
>>> routine.
>>
>> Translation: You can't supply even a shred of evidence for your bullshit
>> claim of "conflicting libraries"
>>
>> But that will not hinder you Snit to bring that up again in the future, like
>> so many outright lies you have presented here the last 16 years you have
>> trolled, lied and embarrassed honest windows users with your inane drivel
>
> They're all alike, aren't they? Shameless, cowardly, lying, insulting,
> and worse.

See: this is how the herd is. Spewing insults and accusations and more.
With Chris, I recently noted how absurd a claim of his was - and now he is
on a rampage spewing BS about me. Here was the claim:

-----
Almost every function you find on Mac or Windows is available
on Linux.
-----

When faced with the fact that this was silly, Chris Ahlstrom went bonkers
and went on the attack. Weird.
--
🙈🙉🙊

[Lusotec]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Snit wrote:
> See: this is how the herd is. Spewing insults and accusations and more.
> With Chris, I recently noted how absurd a claim of his was - and now he is
> on a rampage spewing BS about me. Here was the claim:
>
> -----
> Almost every function you find on Mac or Windows is available
> on Linux.
> -----
>
> When faced with the fact that this was silly, Chris Ahlstrom went bonkers
> and went on the attack. Weird.

Again with this? You are a lying broken record!

Chris claim is true and you, Snit, supported his claim with your own list of
3rd party software or features that are available in GNU/Linux. Ignoring the
facts does not make you right. Just makes you a liar.

Regards.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAk763eQACgkQGQjO2ccW76qpxAD/TA4aD25AcEML9ybGBEq/r5Nh
AC6PF8r0zmAZlLrd8EQA/1DKGiAO0V4dXuKoTiSpRUCg/skCvrr8hue/fXckZhRQ
=HYSe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Chris Ahlstrom]

Lusotec wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Snit wrote:
>> See: this is how the herd is. Spewing insults and accusations and more.
>> With Chris, I recently noted how absurd a claim of his was - and now he is
>> on a rampage spewing BS about me. Here was the claim:
>>
>> -----
>> Almost every function you find on Mac or Windows is available
>> on Linux.
>> -----
>>
>> When faced with the fact that this was silly, Chris Ahlstrom went bonkers
>> and went on the attack. Weird.

*LMAO*

"bonkers"? "on the attack"?

> Again with this? You are a lying broken record!
>
> Chris claim is true and you, Snit, supported his claim with your own list of
> 3rd party software or features that are available in GNU/Linux. Ignoring the
> facts does not make you right. Just makes you a liar.

I would speculate that Snit has been imbibing too much holiday "cheer",
but he acts nutty *all* the time.

It's pretty silly. Granted, OOo isn't the same as MSO, but it, too, has
very powerful macros support, and support for *four* different macro
languages. Peter is essentially correct, and yet Snit tries to smear
Peter, with the help of Flounder et al.

Here's another goddam liar...

--
Since I deserted Windows a while back I havent stayed *too* uptodate
with gaming card. But to say ATI cards are crap is baloney.
They are crap on Linux. But that's ok because there are hardly any
decent modern games which run on Linux anyway...
-- "Hadron", http://www.webservertalk.com/archive230-2007-4-1853959.html

[Foster]

On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 07:36:25 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:


> It's pretty silly. Granted, OOo isn't the same as MSO, but it, too, has
> very powerful macros support, and support for *four* different macro
> languages. Peter is essentially correct, and yet Snit tries to smear
> Peter, with the help of Flounder et al.

Peter is dead wrong.
Just like he usually is when technical subjects are discussed.

[Peter Köhlmann]

Foster wrote:

> On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 07:36:25 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>
>> It's pretty silly. Granted, OOo isn't the same as MSO,

Naturally it is not the same as MSO.
But is is comparable to it in about every subject, and in some areas even
more powerful than MSO

>> but it, too, has
>> very powerful macros support, and support for *four* different macro
>> languages.

A fact I already pointed out.
DFS problem is that he can't do anything at all with those, as none of them
is his VB-toy.

>> Peter is essentially correct, and yet Snit tries to smear
>> Peter, with the help of Flounder et al.

News at 11. Snit Michael Glasser has already shown that he knows absolutely
*nothing* about Open/Libre Office
Just look at that video he did about image-handling in OO. "Total
incompetence" and "total absence of *any* knowledge whatsoever" would be way
too kind of an description for that demonstration of complete failure of
that Snit cretin

> Peter is dead wrong.

Because *you* say so?
You are even dumber than DumbFullShit, flatfish
Everything of that bullshit claim from DFS was abject stupid and wrong

> Just like he usually is when technical subjects are discussed.

Naturally. Do you actually think that repeatedly claiming that idiocy will
somehow magically make it true?

[Chris Ahlstrom]

Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Foster wrote:
>
>> Peter is dead wrong.
>
> Because *you* say so?
> You are even dumber than DumbFullShit, flatfish
> Everything of that bullshit claim from DFS was abject stupid and wrong
>
>> Just like he usually is when technical subjects are discussed.

Listing macros is "technical"?

> Naturally. Do you actually think that repeatedly claiming that idiocy will
> somehow magically make it true?

Flounder's ridicule gambit is a common one among the trolls. Why?
Because there is little that is easier to accomplish than pissing someone off
by lying about their abilities.

However, the effects of incessant lying wear off after awhile, and
actually become amusing.

Flounder was actually a more effective troll in years past when Linux
really did have some "deficiencies" in fonts, printing, etc.

Today? Other than always having to play catch-up with hardware vendors,
application creators, and web-site creators who think only
"Windows/Mac", Linux is fully up-to-date, handles more hardware, is
generally more efficient and fast (especially at networking and
multitasking), is a great development platform for web, apps,
sound, video, etc., is much more scalable in both directions than
Windows NT will ever be, and it makes a very good desktop, especially
for power users.

And this in spite of Microsoft's best efforts to quash Linux and keep
up with it in power and features.

Small wonder, then, that Flounder... flounders.

--
Perhaps if he spoke the truth rather than what he thinks people would
have more time for him. His "thoughts" are of no interest to people
interested in factual reporting. You will be jostling with Liarnut for a
place at the teet the way you're going.
-- "Hadron" <hb2j5a$g41$4...@news.eternal-september.org>

[Snit]

Peter Köhlmann stated in post jdf6od$ooa$1...@dont-email.me on 12/28/11 6:46
AM:

> Foster wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 07:36:25 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>
>>> It's pretty silly. Granted, OOo isn't the same as MSO,
>
> Naturally it is not the same as MSO.
> But is is comparable to it in about every subject, and in some areas even
> more powerful than MSO

It is silly claims like this which *real* advocates should call out.

But they do not.

Obviously Peter is lying to try to make OSS look better. OpenOffice is
wonderful, for a free program it is amazingly powerful and, at least for
some users, works well as an office suite. It has improved a lot over the
years and continues to improve.

But it is not in the same class as Microsoft Office. It is still far from
polished and many features are done poorly. Even more than are like this on
MSO. This is not up for any reasonable debate, though if there are those
who are not familiar with both I am happy to give examples.

But Peter is just lying. And the herd does not care.
...

> News at 11. Snit Michael Glasser has already shown that he knows absolutely
> *nothing* about Open/Libre Office

And Peter, to try to obfuscate his ignorance, spews insults and accusations.
If he can put me on the defensive then maybe the topic will be changed from
office suites.

It is typical herd BS. It is what they do.

> Just look at that video he did about image-handling in OO. "Total
> incompetence" and "total absence of *any* knowledge whatsoever" would be way
> too kind of an description for that demonstration of complete failure of
> that Snit cretin

And yet Peter cannot show any evidence of this claim. None. Not a thing
wrong with the video. Oh, and the video shows *LibreOffice*, which is not
the same thing as OpenOffice (even if they are very similar).

And he knows it. If Peter *really* believed his BS he would list (or at
least offer to list) areas where the video is lacking. He does not because
Peter knows he *cannot*. Here is the video:

<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ootjP-cFVO8>

Bottom line: in this area, at least, LibreOffice is primitive compared to
the competition. And here are some other examples (using OpenOffice):

<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/OOIndents.mov>
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/OOIndents2.mov>
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/OO.mov>

And I can provide more evidence if people want.

Peter (and the herd) have name calling and empty claims.

I have evidence.

Let the reader decide who has the more powerful case.

...


--
🙈🙉🙊

[Snit]

Chris Ahlstrom stated in post jdf2f1$uek$2...@dont-email.me on 12/28/11 5:36
AM:

> Lusotec wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Snit wrote:
>>> See: this is how the herd is. Spewing insults and accusations and more.
>>> With Chris, I recently noted how absurd a claim of his was - and now he is
>>> on a rampage spewing BS about me. Here was the claim:
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Almost every function you find on Mac or Windows is available
>>> on Linux.
>>> -----
>>>
>>> When faced with the fact that this was silly, Chris Ahlstrom went bonkers
>>> and went on the attack. Weird.
>
> *LMAO*
>
> "bonkers"? "on the attack"?

Yeah, you freaked out. You just started spewing nonsense insults and
accusations... running from your claim.

Not even you believe your claim. Look below - more insults and accusations
from you... but not a word to try to defend your clearly absurd claim. Not
a single word.

>> Again with this? You are a lying broken record!
>>
>> Chris claim is true and you, Snit, supported his claim with your own list of
>> 3rd party software or features that are available in GNU/Linux. Ignoring the
>> facts does not make you right. Just makes you a liar.
>
> I would speculate that Snit has been imbibing too much holiday "cheer",
> but he acts nutty *all* the time.

Not a word there to defend your clearly absurd claim, Chris. Just insults
and accusations. Just sucking up to the herd... it is what you do.

> It's pretty silly. Granted, OOo isn't the same as MSO, but it, too, has
> very powerful macros support, and support for *four* different macro
> languages. Peter is essentially correct, and yet Snit tries to smear
> Peter, with the help of Flounder et al.
>
> Here's another goddam liar...

Your comment had nothing to do with macros. Look how you run from your
quote.

No support... just insults. That is all you have.

--
🙈🙉🙊

[Snit]

Lusotec stated in post jdeml5$9a5$1...@dont-email.me on 12/28/11 2:14 AM:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Snit wrote:
>> See: this is how the herd is. Spewing insults and accusations and more.
>> With Chris, I recently noted how absurd a claim of his was - and now he is
>> on a rampage spewing BS about me. Here was the claim:
>>
>> -----
>> Almost every function you find on Mac or Windows is available
>> on Linux.
>> -----
>>
>> When faced with the fact that this was silly, Chris Ahlstrom went bonkers
>> and went on the attack. Weird.
>
> Again with this? You are a lying broken record!

Oh! Oh! Show how it is a lie! Show where Chris backed this absurd claim
of his.

But you will not. You, and your herd, will run from it... then whine that I
have not fallen for your BS and just let your running be ignored - I am
actually calling you and yours out on your BS claims.

And even you know Chris's claim is utter BS... if it was not you would show
I was wrong to say so by defending it. You know you cannot. You know I am
right.

So here you are, knowing I am right but still claiming otherwise - just to
suck up to the herd. It is what your herd demands.

> Chris claim is true and you, Snit, supported his claim with your own list of
> 3rd party software or features that are available in GNU/Linux. Ignoring the
> facts does not make you right. Just makes you a liar.

If you thought his claim was true you would defend it. You would show where
I was wrong in my list of counter-examples to Chris's claim. Here it is
again so you can show me how "wrong" I am:

----------
Aha! So you are willing to take me up on the challenge that Chris Ahlstrom
has not. Excellent... and to be clear, I will select none I do not use on
at least a fairly regular basis... and none that are all that rare. And so
I am not comparing desktop Linux to a group of compeitors, all are on OS X.
Also, to be fair, Chris did allow for *some* things not being available on
Linux... so let us say you need to find only 10 of the 12 items... fair
enough? Items that come with a distro or in its repository (if not that
kills the benefit of the repository, right?) Here they are.

1 Excellent screencasting software, similar to ScreenFlow
2 Anything like the media browser, a tool which helps novices and
advanced users alike.
3 Anything like Automator: allowing non-programmers to "program"
relatively complex tasks.
4 Anything like Tofu, allowing easier online screen reading
5 Tool to spellcheck a website (DreamCatcher)
6 PDF Services: and just before Peter runs in on this one, I am
not talking about Print-to-PDF
7 Email program with build in attachment viewing and slide shows.
8 Presentation software that allows for the relatively easy
creation of video-presentations similar to these:
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qodM2lCWiVw>
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvrpuBAMddw>
9 Ability to find path from almost any window in any program
(not just the file browser, most programs)
10 proxy icons: allowing for moving, attaching, copying of a
a file from its open window
11 System Services: allowing you to tap into features of one
program from within almost any other
12 Something similar to iWeb or RapidWeaver: super quick
web development

And I could go on and on and on: nothing on Linux like Photoshop or
Dreamweaver, nothing on Linux that works as well with one of the most
popular phones or the most popular MP3 players, nothing on Linux like Time
Machine (allowing you to get back data using the same UI as your media
organization apps shows you), nothing like Pages or MS Office, I have seen
no speech recognition worth using on Linux, many games, etc.

This also leaves out significant UI issues such as no standard naming or hot
keys for many common elements... you might have that on some systems if you
stick to KDE or Gnome, but no doubt you will kill that as you try to fulfill
the above (even if you can find such a system to start of with).

So there you go - start with a distro and tell me what software to add. Let
us see how many you can show work even *almost* as well on desktop Linux.

I look forward to it. Thanks for having more guts than Chris Ahlstrom does.
---------

But you and your whole herd will run. It is all you can do because you know
I am right. Better get some really clever name calling thought of... how
else can you obfuscate how you know I am right?


--
🙈🙉🙊

[Homer]

Verily I say unto thee that Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:

> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Foster wrote:
>>
>>> Peter is dead wrong.
>>
>> Because *you* say so?
>> You are even dumber than DumbFullShit, flatfish
>> Everything of that bullshit claim from DFS was abject stupid and
>> wrong
>>
>>> Just like he usually is when technical subjects are discussed.
>
> Listing macros is "technical"?

Gotta laugh at the irony of a slavering idiot like "Foster" questioning
the technical competence of someone who was writing BIOSes in assembly
language when "Foster" was still in diapers.

But I'm sure "Foster" is a l33t macro "developer" though.

LOL!

--
K. | "UNIX is basically a simple operating
http://slated.org | system, but you have to be a genius
Fedora 8 (Werewolf) on šky | to understand the simplicity"
kernel 2.6.31.5, up 219 days | ~ Dennis Ritchie

[Snit]

Homer stated in post 1d7ss8-...@sky.matrix on 12/28/11 12:31 PM:

> Verily I say unto thee that Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:
>> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> Foster wrote:
>>>
>>>> Peter is dead wrong.
>>>
>>> Because *you* say so?
>>> You are even dumber than DumbFullShit, flatfish
>>> Everything of that bullshit claim from DFS was abject stupid and
>>> wrong
>>>
>>>> Just like he usually is when technical subjects are discussed.
>>
>> Listing macros is "technical"?
>
> Gotta laugh at the irony of a slavering idiot like "Foster" questioning
> the technical competence of someone who was writing BIOSes in assembly
> language when "Foster" was still in diapers.
>
> But I'm sure "Foster" is a l33t macro "developer" though.
>
> LOL!

Peter repeatedly proves he is completely technically incompetent.


--
🙈🙉🙊

[Peter Köhlmann]

Homer wrote:

> Verily I say unto thee that Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:
>> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> Foster wrote:
>>>
>>>> Peter is dead wrong.
>>>
>>> Because *you* say so?
>>> You are even dumber than DumbFullShit, flatfish
>>> Everything of that bullshit claim from DFS was abject stupid and
>>> wrong
>>>
>>>> Just like he usually is when technical subjects are discussed.
>>
>> Listing macros is "technical"?
>
> Gotta laugh at the irony of a slavering idiot like "Foster" questioning
> the technical competence of someone who was writing BIOSes in assembly
> language when "Foster" was still in diapers.

That was *after* years being responsible for some sites with real *big*
mainframes. One of them was the only german site running Multics.

You know, that OS which was the precursor to its much simpler descendant
"Unix" and which had an installed base of 100 sites. Worldwide

> But I'm sure "Foster" is a l33t macro "developer" though.
>

Yes, he "developes" new troll stuff with his buddies Snit Michael Glasser
and Hadron Larry. Too bad that those vermin combined still have single digit
IQ

[Foster]

Absolutely and all the squawking on earth won't "un-google" all of
Peter Kohlmann's cockups.
And there are many.

He is the German Terry Porter.
A Complete idiot.
Even his village doesn't want him back!

I don't believe a word of what Peter Kohlmann says because if it
isn't a lie, then it's probably technically completely incorrect.
As demonstrated many times in COLA already.

[Snit]

Peter Köhlmann stated in post jdfs6m$t1m$1...@dont-email.me on 12/28/11 12:52
PM:

Your claims about your personal life are irrelevant... as irrelevant as your
claims about other's lives... and no more believable.


--
🙈🙉🙊

[DFS]

On 12/28/2011 2:31 PM, Homer wrote:
> Verily I say unto thee that Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:
>> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> Foster wrote:
>>>
>>>> Peter is dead wrong.
>>>
>>> Because *you* say so?
>>> You are even dumber than DumbFullShit, flatfish
>>> Everything of that bullshit claim from DFS was abject stupid and
>>> wrong
>>>
>>>> Just like he usually is when technical subjects are discussed.
>>
>> Listing macros is "technical"?
>
> Gotta laugh at the irony of a slavering idiot like "Foster" questioning
> the technical competence of someone who was writing BIOSes in assembly
> language when "Foster" was still in diapers.

Dumbkopf Kohlmann wrote BIOSes in assembly?

So the fuck what? He's not technically competent enough to write MS
Office or OpenOffice macros, or to evaluate which is the superior
environment (it's MS Office by a *landslide*).

[DFS]

On 12/26/2011 7:42 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:


> No. He claimed that OpenOffice is not capable of doing a certain set of
> database operations.
> Quite a different thing, wouldn't you agree?

Yes, it's a separate issue. You claimed OO matches the macro
capabilities of MS Office. I called you out in 4 posts, and like the
chickenshit you are, you ran away from all 4.

> And to top it off, he is totally unable to substantiate his idiotic claim.
> Instead he wants others to prove his idiocy wrong

It's not a claim, dumbkopf - it's a fact.

It's not a database operation, per se; it's a data display operation.
The inferior OpenOffice is unable to display more than one column of
data in a combobox or listbox.

* launch OpenOffice Base (latest version for Windows)
* create a table - add 2+ columns and put in some data
* create a form
* add a combobox
* set data source = SELECT Field1, Field2 FROM Table1
* run the form and drop down the combobox and whaddaya know - the
shitware can show only 1 column of data.

ho hum... it's nothing new... typical inferior open source crap
software. MS Access will display multiple columns of data, and has for
at least 15 years.

And you're right - this has nothing to do with OO's inferior macro/code
capabilities. Those are displayed in 4 posts you've been running away from.

[Foster]

On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 11:06:29 -0500, DFS wrote:

> On 12/28/2011 2:31 PM, Homer wrote:
>> Verily I say unto thee that Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:

>>> Peter K�hlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

>>>
>>>> Foster wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Peter is dead wrong.
>>>>
>>>> Because *you* say so?
>>>> You are even dumber than DumbFullShit, flatfish
>>>> Everything of that bullshit claim from DFS was abject stupid and
>>>> wrong
>>>>
>>>>> Just like he usually is when technical subjects are discussed.
>>>
>>> Listing macros is "technical"?
>>
>> Gotta laugh at the irony of a slavering idiot like "Foster" questioning
>> the technical competence of someone who was writing BIOSes in assembly
>> language when "Foster" was still in diapers.
>
>
> Dumbkopf Kohlmann wrote BIOSes in assembly?
>
> So the fuck what? He's not technically competent enough to write MS
> Office or OpenOffice macros, or to evaluate which is the superior
> environment (it's MS Office by a *landslide*).

Kohlmann has become the German Terry Porter.
He has been ROPE-A-DOPED several times recently due to his complete
and utter lack of technical abilities.

[Peter Köhlmann]

DFS wrote:

> On 12/26/2011 7:42 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>
>
>> No. He claimed that OpenOffice is not capable of doing a certain set of
>> database operations.
>> Quite a different thing, wouldn't you agree?
>
> Yes, it's a separate issue. You claimed OO matches the macro
> capabilities of MS Office. I called you out in 4 posts, and like the
> chickenshit you are, you ran away from all 4.

No, I did not. I told you that you are an incompetent nincompoop. And you
are.
All of which you /claimed/ you did with MSO can be easily done with OO as
well

>
>
>> And to top it off, he is totally unable to substantiate his idiotic
>> claim. Instead he wants others to prove his idiocy wrong
>
> It's not a claim, dumbkopf - it's a fact.

No. It is bullshit. Naturally coming from you, DumbFullShit

[DFS]

On 1/2/2012 11:45 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> DFS wrote:
>
>> On 12/26/2011 7:42 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>
>>
>>> No. He claimed that OpenOffice is not capable of doing a certain set of
>>> database operations.
>>> Quite a different thing, wouldn't you agree?
>>
>> Yes, it's a separate issue. You claimed OO matches the macro
>> capabilities of MS Office. I called you out in 4 posts, and like the
>> chickenshit you are, you ran away from all 4.
>
> No, I did not. I told you that you are an incompetent nincompoop. And you
> are.
> All of which you /claimed/ you did with MSO can be easily done with OO as
> well

So show me, dumbkopf. You made the claim, so you get to provide the proof.

>>> And to top it off, he is totally unable to substantiate his idiotic
>>> claim. Instead he wants others to prove his idiocy wrong
>>
>> It's not a claim, dumbkopf - it's a fact.
>
> No. It is bullshit. Naturally coming from you, DumbFullShit

Once again:

[Foster]

On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 12:03:56 -0500, DFS wrote:

> On 1/2/2012 11:45 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>> DFS wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/26/2011 7:42 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> No. He claimed that OpenOffice is not capable of doing a certain set of
>>>> database operations.
>>>> Quite a different thing, wouldn't you agree?
>>>
>>> Yes, it's a separate issue. You claimed OO matches the macro
>>> capabilities of MS Office. I called you out in 4 posts, and like the
>>> chickenshit you are, you ran away from all 4.
>>
>> No, I did not. I told you that you are an incompetent nincompoop. And you
>> are.
>> All of which you /claimed/ you did with MSO can be easily done with OO as
>> well
>
>
> So show me, dumbkopf. You made the claim, so you get to provide the proof.

Peter Kohlmann will run and hide just like he always does.
And if he doesn't do that, then he will squawk that he provides no
proof for anyone.

Peter Kohlmann is the German Terry Porter.
He's almost universally wrong about everything.

[Peter Köhlmann]

DFS wrote:

> On 12/28/2011 2:31 PM, Homer wrote:
>> Verily I say unto thee that Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:
>>> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> Foster wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Peter is dead wrong.
>>>>
>>>> Because *you* say so?
>>>> You are even dumber than DumbFullShit, flatfish
>>>> Everything of that bullshit claim from DFS was abject stupid and
>>>> wrong
>>>>
>>>>> Just like he usually is when technical subjects are discussed.
>>>
>>> Listing macros is "technical"?
>>
>> Gotta laugh at the irony of a slavering idiot like "Foster" questioning
>> the technical competence of someone who was writing BIOSes in assembly
>> language when "Foster" was still in diapers.
>
>
> Dumbkopf Kohlmann wrote BIOSes in assembly?

Yes, he did, idiot.
And to top it off, that fact is easily proveable. Just look into Ralf Browns
famous interrupt-list
One of the BIOS I wrote is mentioned several times, with my name, because it
enhanced existing interrupts

> So the fuck what? He's not technically competent enough to write MS
> Office or OpenOffice macros, or to evaluate which is the superior
> environment (it's MS Office by a *landslide*).
>

Hilarious.
DumbFullShit actually thinks that writing BASIC-Macros is more technical
complex than writing thousands of lines of assembly language, programming
dozens of chips like DMA-Controllers, Timers, FD-Controllers, Harddisk-
Controllers, Keyboard-contollers and CRT Controllers.
*All* of those (and quite some more) have to be correctly initialized and
set up to use them, and they have to be correctly programmed to achieve the
desired result.

And then comes that ctretinous incompetent VN-Macro-shuffler DumbFullShit
and thinks that his idiots plaything VB is more complex than that
You have no idea at all what you are talking about, DumbestFuckingShitbrains

[Foster]

On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 18:14:48 +0100, Peter K�hlmann wrote:


> And then comes that ctretinous incompetent VN-Macro-shuffler DumbFullShit
> and thinks that his idiots plaything VB is more complex than that
> You have no idea at all what you are talking about, DumbestFuckingShitbrains

Yet you still provide any proof of his errors.

[Foster]

Can't provide any proof of his errors.

[Chris Ahlstrom]

Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> DFS wrote:
>
>> Dumbkopf Kohlmann wrote BIOSes in assembly?
>
> Yes, he did, idiot.
> And to top it off, that fact is easily proveable. Just look into Ralf
> Browns famous interrupt-list One of the BIOS I wrote is mentioned
> several times, with my name, because it enhanced existing interrupts
>
>> So the fuck what? He's not technically competent enough to write MS
>> Office or OpenOffice macros, or to evaluate which is the superior
>> environment (it's MS Office by a *landslide*).
>
> Hilarious.
> DumbFullShit actually thinks that writing BASIC-Macros is more technical
> complex than writing thousands of lines of assembly language, programming
> dozens of chips like DMA-Controllers, Timers, FD-Controllers, Harddisk-
> Controllers, Keyboard-contollers and CRT Controllers.
> *All* of those (and quite some more) have to be correctly initialized and
> set up to use them, and they have to be correctly programmed to achieve the
> desired result.
>
> And then comes that ctretinous incompetent VN-Macro-shuffler DumbFullShit
> and thinks that his idiots plaything VB is more complex than that
> You have no idea at all what you are talking about, DumbestFuckingShitbrains

Yeah. It's pretty amazing. Not that VB work is all that simple, you
can dig pretty deep with it, but to compare writing VBA office-automation
macros in MS Office against coding whole BIOSes is a bit over-arrogant,
wouldn't you say?

--
We have no intention of shipping another bloated OS and shoving it down the
throats of our users.
-- Paul Maritz, Microsoft group vice president

[Peter Köhlmann]

DFS wrote:

> On 1/2/2012 11:45 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>> DFS wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/26/2011 7:42 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> No. He claimed that OpenOffice is not capable of doing a certain set of
>>>> database operations.
>>>> Quite a different thing, wouldn't you agree?
>>>
>>> Yes, it's a separate issue. You claimed OO matches the macro
>>> capabilities of MS Office. I called you out in 4 posts, and like the
>>> chickenshit you are, you ran away from all 4.
>>
>> No, I did not. I told you that you are an incompetent nincompoop. And you
>> are.
>> All of which you /claimed/ you did with MSO can be easily done with OO as
>> well
>
>
> So show me, dumbkopf. You made the claim, so you get to provide the
> proof.

No. *you* made the claim that it isn't possible.
I simply told you that you are incompetent. And you are.
You know nothing about OpenOffice

And no, I will not waste my time proving your bullshit claims wrong.
Either you can prove *your* claims or simply tough luck for you.

Your attempts to waste my time will simply fail because I will not waste it
for scum like you

[Chris Ahlstrom]

Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> DFS wrote:
>

> <snip>

>
> Your attempts to waste my time will simply fail because I will not waste it
> for scum like you

I don't get why these nuts won't prove there own case, and instead want
you to prove their from-their-butt claims wrong.

--
Bringing back memories of all COLA "advocates" claiming that MS has
framed Reiser and that he was not guilty.
-- Hadron Quark, lying shamelessly

[Peter Köhlmann]

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> DFS wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> Your attempts to waste my time will simply fail because I will not waste
>> it for scum like you
>
> I don't get why these nuts won't prove there own case, and instead want
> you to prove their from-their-butt claims wrong.
>

Oh, thats simple. DumbFullShit knows fully well that he is universally seen
here in cola as beeing abject stupid.
So he can claim moronic bullshit all the time, and it does nothing more than
reinforce the notion that dirt is smart compared to him.

But if he even manages to waste peoples time with them proving him wrong, he
is still seen as an abject stupid Snit, and he got wasting someones time as
a result. Which would be a "win" for that cretin

[William Poaster]

Here is a facsimile from Chris Ahlstrom who, on 2/1/2012 18:30, wrote:

> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> DFS wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> Your attempts to waste my time will simply fail because I will not waste it
>> for scum like you
>
> I don't get why these nuts won't prove there own case, and instead want
> you to prove their from-their-butt claims wrong.

Because:
1] *They* can't, they want you to waste your time disproving their "clai
ms".
2] They're wintrolls.


--
Linux - for IQs greater than 2000

What IS remarkable, is that a well developed ape has come
to realise that he lives on a planet, circling a sun, in a
planetary system, within a galaxy, within a universe.
- Professor Michio Kaku - Theoretical Physicist -