On 2015-11-07 9:25 AM, 7 wrote:
> More than 20% of all desktop capable computers are running Linux
What the Hell is a "desktop-capable" computer?
> Strange thing but if you march in and out of businesses taking notes on what
> kind of computing is needed by the business, the numbers become staggeringly
> large for Linux.
>
> For every desktop capable PC out there being used by staff some 20% or more
> are running Linux.
Assumption. You have no evidence of your claim as always.
> Whethers its mail servers, web servers, intranets, ftp servers, storage
> servers, etc, the count of around 20% of the total desktop PC count is
> unmistakable.
You're speaking of servers and then somehow associate them to desktop
computers. Do you not see how you're purposely lying here?
> If each PC has a staff member, then each mail server, web server etc
> Linux PC is another staff member handling mail, handling sales brochures,
> etc etc etc. In some companies like Google, the ratio is all in favor of
> Linux, which why they make so much money. In samller and medium size
> companies, it is possible to judge its potential by the number of Linux
> server army beavering away delivering revenue and profit. The smaller that
> number, the less likely that business is making real sustainable long term
> money.
>
> Pressing Linux servers into action and Linux desktops is the real strength
> a business has to show for itself if its out there making money.
You mention Google as a Linux-using enterprise except that Google
employees are routinely told to bring whatever machine they want to work
and it turns out to be a Mac in most cases. You also mention Linux
running mail servers but people are increasingly looking for
comprehensive, responsive and fully-featured servers which will take
full advantage of Outlook's capabilities. Those aren't Linux servers.
--
Slimer