Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Ping
40 views
Skip to first unread message
Rui Maciel
Feb 11, 2012, 4:20:42 PM2/11/12
to
Is this group still alive?
Rui Maciel
Rui Maciel
Vladimir Jovic
Feb 23, 2012, 5:01:34 AM2/23/12
to
On 11/02/12 22:20, Rui Maciel wrote:
> Is this group still alive?
>
>
> Rui Maciel
Doesn't seems like it is :(
> Is this group still alive?
>
>
> Rui Maciel
BGB
Mar 12, 2012, 12:56:10 PM3/12/12
to
Rui Maciel
Mar 12, 2012, 3:25:37 PM3/12/12
to
BGB wrote:
> Usenet is gradually dying it seems...
It looks that way.
> Usenet is gradually dying it seems...
Rui Maciel
BGB
Mar 12, 2012, 4:01:42 PM3/12/12
to
On 3/12/2012 12:25 PM, Rui Maciel wrote:
> BGB wrote:
>
>> Usenet is gradually dying it seems...
>
> It looks that way.
>
yep.
> BGB wrote:
>
>> Usenet is gradually dying it seems...
>
> It looks that way.
>
when I started reading/posting Usenet (over a decade ago), there was
lots of activity in lots of groups.
most have since become filled with little more than occasional bits of
spam and/or other automated messages (leading to looking far and wide
over a much larger range of groups for any interesting/relevant topics).
>
> Rui Maciel
nick_keigh...@hotmail.com
May 8, 2012, 9:34:08 AM5/8/12
to
Rui Maciel
May 8, 2012, 9:43:24 AM5/8/12
to
nick_keigh...@hotmail.com wrote:
> so where is OO discussed now? Fora? Blogs? Facebook? Twitter? Seems like a
> step backward. Most forums have user interfaces designed by morons (and I
> speak as someone who posts to usernet via google).
Discussing OOP through messages which are capped at 140 characters? That
> so where is OO discussed now? Fora? Blogs? Facebook? Twitter? Seems like a
> step backward. Most forums have user interfaces designed by morons (and I
> speak as someone who posts to usernet via google).
would be a challenge.
Rui Maciel
Anton Sharov
May 24, 2012, 9:42:07 AM5/24/12
to
> so where is OO discussed now? Fora? Blogs? Facebook? Twitter? Seems like a step backward. Most forums have user interfaces designed by morons (and I speak as someone who posts to usernet via google).
Rui Maciel
May 24, 2012, 9:56:42 AM5/24/12
to
Anton Sharov wrote:
> Maybe StackOverflow...
That site isn't suited to host discussions, as it is designed to host quick
and dirty Q&A, essentially limited to a single Q without follow through and
multiple A.
It also doesn't help that it sucks at what it is designed to do, too.
Rui Maciel
> Maybe StackOverflow...
That site isn't suited to host discussions, as it is designed to host quick
and dirty Q&A, essentially limited to a single Q without follow through and
multiple A.
It also doesn't help that it sucks at what it is designed to do, too.
Rui Maciel
0 new messages