In article
<819c4$5394ae9e$43da7656$
23...@nntpswitch.blueworldhosting.com>, Liam
O'Connor <
liamo...@example.com> wrote:
> > no you don't. what you think is how they *did* behave in the past.
>
> Hi Nospam,
>
> I respect you. And I respect your opinion, even when we both have
> different datapoints (e.g., the evil of iTunes vs the beauty of it),
> and I think it was even you who had turned me on to the free 200Mb/month
> t-mobile SIM card.
thanks.
> Certainly you've exposed me to software on the iPad which I wasn't
> aware of, which you've vetted well (which is the hard part with
> freeware).
actually i didn't try the recording app i mentioned last week. it just
came up in a search and its description looked interesting and relevant
to what you wanted to do.
> But, on how a computer *should* work, I'm pretty good at knowing
> a good use model from a lousy one.
yet you insist on using linux. :)
> I used to work in QA, and am
> fully aware that marketing plays a huge role in deceiving the
> customers, and, more importantly, in the propaganda that gets
> the customers to think that a lack of features is, in actuality,
> a benefit.
this isn't about marketing.
> I am familiar with all common operating systems except the
> current Mac-based ones, and I am becoming familiar with iOS
> day by day.
that's part of the problem.
> What I find shocking are the excuses people make for the absolutely
> huge limitations of iOS, which I attribute more to marketing slant
> than to actual personal opinions.
again, it's not marketing.
you're using the ipad in a way where you don't see any of its
advantages.
ios users do not have anything even close to the problems you've had.
that's not to say everything is perfect (nothing is) but on the whole,
things just work, with little to no effort from the user.
> By way of contrast, Linux has very little marketing slant,
> and, yet, Linux users are unabashed at seeing the bugs inherent
> with the beauties of Linux overall.
what beauty?
> Android users, for the most part, are similar to the Linux
> users, even as there is more marketing effort expended to sway
> opinion on Android than on Linux.
>
> Adding to the marketing spin is what Microsoft offers for Windows,
> but, well, it's hard to put in words, but, Microsoft Marketing
> looks so foolish lately (touch screen OS anyone?) that it goes
> without saying too much that nobody really believes that stuff.
>
> However, if you fast forward to iOS, it's shocking how many flaws
> are believed to be virtues of the iOS environment. Take, for
> example, the now-known-to-be-horrid app "QuickVoice Recorder",
> which we discussed in another thread. There is NOTHING of value
> to that app. Absolutely nothing of virtue to be had. Yet, it's
> said (by their marketing) to be the most used voice recorder in
> the iOS environment! Can *that many* users be that stupid?
that app turned out to be crap. it happens.
what a third party app does or doesn't do is not in any way flaw in the
operating system.
it's *only* about the app and the developers who released such crap.
> In a nutshell, the answer, must be, by way of explanation,
> yes. By way of more exact explanation, those users must not
> have any inkling of what a proper app *should* do with its
> files (which, by the way, are *your* files, not the apps's files!).
the app manages them so you don't have to. it's a feature.
> Yes, I know, you'll say the answer is 'iTunes', but, even you
> must realize that iTunes alone won't get your data out.
actually it will in most cases.
some apps make it more difficult than it should be, but again, that's
because such apps are not well designed.
> It requires an additional 'bonus' app, and an idiotic use model
> to boot.
quickvoice might require another app, but that's because it was
designed by idiots who didn't give a shit about the user experience.
that's not how all apps work. with other apps, the recordings can
automatically be synced to the computer, with *no* additional effort on
the part of the user.
> However, it's the most widely used Apple voice recorder app,
> I am told (by their marketing).
what did you think they were going to say? of course they're going to
hype it up and there's no real way for them to even know anyway.
> So, if I believe that,
don't. it's marketing bullshit.
> and,
> since I clearly understand the use model that I want, and the
> horrid use model that it provides, what am I supposed to
> conclude about the acceptance of flawed use models by a
> huge majority of iOS users?
you are assuming that one app sucks because of ios. that's a bad
assumption.
you are also assuming that all apps must be limited in the same manner
that one app is, which is also a bad assumption.
> This question, while it appears condescending to iOS users,
> must actually be the key question of why people put up with
> hugely flawed models. Of course, to *them*, the model isn't
> flawed at all. (Well, to be more precise, many iOS users
> did complain about the horrid use model - but many more do
> not).
what's flawed about having content move without any effort on the
user's part?
that's *not* a limitation and is actually a *huge* advantage.
you're trying to do it the old-fashioned way, which is more work.
> So, it actually scares and confuses me that people can just
> *accept* such restrictive use models, when there is no
> value to be had (to the user) by these restrictions.
the only restrictions are because you refuse to see what it can really
do.