In
comp.mobile.android, on Sun, 18 Dec 2016 15:21:49 -0600, VanguardLH
<V...@nguard.LH> wrote:
>micky <
NONONO...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>
>> I have a real compass**, and that's what I was planning to use, but I
>> won't be hiking, I'll be driving, and I think I'd have to stop the car
>> and get out every time I want to check direction. So I"m still going
>> to take the real compass, but I want to get a compass app for the phone
>> too.
>>
>> ** I have one I bought, plus I have one that one wears on his wrist that
>> I found in the desk drawer when I was about 10 years old. I finally
>> wore out the faded olive drab band and got a new band. I'm not sure
>> which I'm going to take.
>>
>> I still want an app, especially when it's raining or I don't want to
>> stop the car to get out.
>
>Why do you have to get out of the car to use a real compass? If true,
I believe I've tried this and a real compass didn't work in the car, but
I know if was very hard to set the compensating magnets on the car
compasses I've had (that used such magnets). That tells me that my
prior cars had a magnetic field inside them.
>why don't you have to get out of the same car to use an app on a
>smartphone using its magnetic sensors? Magnetic compasses work inside
You're right. Maybe I'm better off that the my phone doesn't have a
magnetic sensor.
I haven't posted for a while because I've been searching the web. It's
interesting to see the whiners and complainers who bought a phone that
didn't claim to have a compass sensor but now blame the phone maker that
it doesn't have one.
>of cars. You can even buy ones to mount inside your car (although they
They have compensating magnets that have to be adjusted. Stand-alone
compasses, like boy-scout compasses, don't have that.
Even the micronta electronic compass had two compensating magnets I had
to adjust, but it worked better than the non-electronic compasses
because it had a sensor and a suction cup to stick the sensor very close
to the windshield.
>are very rudimentary). Some rearview mirrors have them. I'm presuming
That's where the idea came from. I finally got around to installing my
rear view mirror w/compass, and it works great. I was thinking of
taking the mirror and installing it on my rental car, until someone
suggested a phone app.
>there are glass windows in your car and the dash isn't made of metal.
>
>Your smartphone doesn't have GPS?
Yes it does. But I coudlnt' find search terms that actually worked, to
find compass apps that could get by with GPS only. Because even the
ones that use the internal magnetometer discuss GPS in their
description. Even in the app name.
I installed one that looked good, that seemed to say it would work with
GPS, and when I first opened it, it said that there was no magnetometer
and it wouldn't work.
But finally I found one that said, only under What's New, "works without
magnetometer". I thought, aha, these are the magic words and I can put
them in quotes and find other apps that do that, but when I tried it,
every hit was either a discussion of the topic or it pointed to the same
app.
When I installed this app,
GPS Compass Explorer,
it too immediately gave me a warning, paraphrasing, "Your phone doesn't
have a magnetometer, but this app will work with GPS also."
>Are you taking maps, especially those that show magnetic deviation or
>anomalies? A compass without a map is only useful to get back to where
Maps, but no reference to deviation or anomalies.
>you started or keep you on a path already known or planned. You didn't
>mention what maps and types you were taking on your trip. Without a map
Probably google maps (although those expire in iirc 30 days, so I'm not
going to load them yet) Maps.me for sure. OSMand but I haven't
figured out how to use that. Plus i have a map that covers 200??
miles and I have a 6x8" book that has sepearate pages for different
areas, but it's in more detail than the one page map.
>showing magnetic deviation, you could end up going in circles. We used
No I won't do that. I'm not hiking. I'm in the car. I've never
considered magnetic deviation and I've only not known which direction to
turn about 10 times in the last 40 years. I've only not known both
which direction to go and where I am twice in the last 40 years.
>to take some scuba divers to Lake Superior, gave them maps and
>compasses, and told them to navigate out and back (I forget the
>distance). They ended up going in an arc and did not come back to the
>starting point on shore. After swimming for awhile, they had to pop up
Swimming provides even more routes than hiking does. Any direction
they want to go, they can.
>to peek over the surface to see where was the shore. In my dad's
>airplane, we had magnetic, inertia, and radio compasses. We often went
Same thing with an airplane. But I'll be on roads that I've already
planned on the map most of the time. When I make a turn off the
planned route. I don't know how to explain it but I do this all the
time and it's very rare I don't know how to get where I want to go, and
that I don't recognize the road I'm heading for, even if I approach it
from the side.
Say I'm trying to get back to Baltiomre but I'm in a rural area I've
never been to before, there's a river between me and Balt that has only
3 bridges 40 miles apart, and the roads wind around. This summer I
missed the road to the bridge and went about 4 miles too far south. I
asked 4 different people at different places and they were all from
somewhere else, so finally I found a guy driving into his driveway, and
of course he lived there and knew where hte bridge was.
But that's as bad as it's ever gotten and it was only 8 miles and 15
minutes extra.
>into very sparsely populated areas so the radio compasses became
>useless: no beacon stations. Because of magnetic anomalies, we had the
>inertia compass but it require constant recalibration: every time before
>taking off, it had to be calibrated. Even with a map and a compass, you
>may have to calibrate the magnetic compass away from magnetic north to
>follow the route you mapped out. That's why the good ones have bezels
>you can rotate. Some have a adjusting screw if all you want is for the
>compass to point north when you are in a known area of magnetic
>deviation.
Very interesting. Once I stopped reading this as if it applied to me,
it has become very interesting.
>I can put you at a starting point and tell you that exactly north as
>indicated currently by the compass is the town you need to find (since
>your supplies will run out). Unlikely you can travel straight north.
>Roads wind around. Walking means having to get around obstacles (lakes,
>swamps, cliffs, shotgun toting farmers with no trespassing signs). And
>then there is the problem of magnetic anomalies. Without maps, I'm not
>sure what is the point of taking a compass.
It would still be helpful. If I went south in the morning, I'd have to
go north in the afternoon.
Okay now I remember another occasion. It was a warm fall day, October
or even November, we were driving by Soldier's Delight, a natural area a
few miles outside Baltimore, at about 5 or 5:30PM. A girlfriend and I
started walking a blazed trail on flat land and eveyrthng was fine until
I noticed there were no more blazes. By this time it was getting dark,
so I figured I'd just walk straight ahead and eventually we'd get out of
the woods. It worked but we were on the far side of the woods. If I'd
had a compass, I would have gone west to the road where I was parked.
We were going to have to walk about 2 miles to get back to the car,
though someone stopped for us after about 10 minutes.
>Are you training for chart
>making?
I'm not going to make any charts.
> If you intend to only drive on roads, why take a compass?
So I'll know what direction north is.
>Directions will be go so far and turn left or right at some
>intersection. A GPS-capable smartphone and Google Maps (or alternative)
I have no interest in directions and I'm not going to use directions
even if one of the maps programs has it.
>can help with that - unless you are going into uncharted territory, like
>the roads are actually timber trails but timbering stopped some 20 years
>ago.
I go on worse roads than timber trails.
On the last trip, I saw a sign for a park and it was a nice road through
a wooded area. I saw a couple other cars, even though it was the middle
of a weekday and most people were at work. But I kept driving until
there were no more other cars, no trees, only rocks and scrub, but
rather than go back probably 4 miles, I figured I'd drive out the other
end. The road got worse and worse, more and bigger rocks, and I
finally realized I couldn't go forward and it was going to be hard to
turn around. I had a cell phone but no idea whom to call if I got
stuck, but it was about 6 miles to walk out, only 4 miles to the road,
and only 2 miles to where other park visitors might be,, and this time I
had plenty of daylight left. So I could have done that if I had to.
But, instead of a 3-point U-turn, I made a 21-point U-turn and was able
to drive out. So it was worse than a timber trail and since I got out,
it was a fun experience. A compass would not have helped for that one;
my mistake was thinking there was a 2nd way in/out.
>Doesn't sound like you are wandering that far away from civilization.
>If you have troubles with knowing if you're going the wrong way on a
>road (maybe you took a wrong turn) then get a car compass. No
I was thinking of looking for the Micronta and connecting a cigarette
lighter plug (It was hard wired on the previous car), but I had trouble
getting the suction cut to stick and I might have had to glue it on. I
use glue on a rental car. Any other car compass, except the rear view
mirror, would be worse. And the mirror presents some problems.
**The problem with the rear view mirror compass is that I don't know if
the rental will have a power rear view mirror. I could bring a cord
with a cigarrette plug, but I hate to have wires dangling down. I could
bring the same size torx wrench that my rear view mirror uses to hold it
in place, but I might have to buy another tool for the rental car.
>smartphone to grab while driving and turn on or unlock the lockscreen,
>no having to load an app, no requirement for a smartphone with magnetic
>sensors or even GPS, or having to dig into your pocket to pull out a
>compass. Just glance at the compass on your dash or windshield or in
>the rearview mirror that has a compass.
I agree that just glancing is better than using the phone. OTOH, I'm
only going to need this once or twice in a day, maybe 5 or 10 times
altogether.
It's no trouble to load an app, I already have a smartphone with GPS,
that I already plan to take with me in order to have a phone. If I can
plug the phone into the cigarette lighter, I'll turn off the
self-locking. Or I'll just turn it off anyhow, and turn off the screen
whenever I'm not using it. When I'm alone, it will sit on the
passenger seat, so maybe I'll only have to glance at it also.
>
>From what you already said, your smartphone doesn't have magnetic
>sensors. A compass app won't work there.
A lot of people say that -- I found it on the web more than 10 times
tonight - but I don't see how one can fairly say that. There are apps
that use GPS and the phone's movement along the highway to figure out
which direction one is going. That seems to me to meet the definition
of a compass app.
And whether it meets the definition or not, it's good enough for me.
> The gear needed for an
>intertial or gyroscopic compass would be much larger than the size of a
>phone, as would a radio compass (radio direction finder). Just go with
>the compass you already have. If you only on roads (that are charted)
>then that's all you need (well, maps, too, if you don't have GPS in the
>phone and/or you are out of range of cell towers).
I will definitely be out of range of cell towers some of the time, but
the phone has GPS. That won't change.
I have GPS Compass Explorer and "Compass" on the phone now and tomorrow
or Wednesday I'll go for a drive and see how they work. If the second
one works, I'll find out it's full name and I'll let you all know if
either of these is good enough.
Thanks for the advice, both the advice I'll take and and that I won't.