On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 08:43:46 -0000 (UTC), you wrote:
> He's also a troll who changes his name constantly, so you'd never know if
> it was him even if he reply.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Begin off-topic rant about simpletons.
-----------------------------------------------------------
I'm not a troll (simply because I don't troll).
And I'm always here, and I have been here for decades.
I won't respond further except to say that people like Chris are worrisome
to society because details are so far beyond his comprehension that his
opinions are based merely on a single item that he understands.
- He saw a red car, and it was fast,
hence
- To him, all red cars are fast.
His decisions are made upon a single datum that he understands.
Complex data befuddles people like Chris.
He can't comprehend that others (who can handle detail) think differently
than he does BECAUSE they can handle detail.
- He is capable of comprehending that a terrorist was a Muslim,
hence
- To him, all Muslims are terrorists.
Chris is a simpleton.
But lots of people are simpletons.
They're the ones who drag technical threads into the dirt.
Every time.
Because they make decisions based on what they understand.
Not on the facts.
Facts are far too complex for simpletons like Chris to comprehend.
Examples of decisions from sad people like you are:
a. You select batteries by warranty because specs are too confusing to you.
b. You buy tires by brand name, again, because specs are confusing to you.
c. You assume all Muslims are terrorists because that's how you think.
d. You prefer marketing claims on products because specs are too complex.
e. You believe all the old wives tales because actual facts befuddle you.
f. If someone won't tell you their SSN you feel they must be hiding crime.
g. Anyone wearing a ski mask is a bank robber to you (you think simple).
i. Anyone giving a fake email address to a web site is hiding something.
j. Anyone providing a fake birth date on the net is an illegal immigrant.
k. Anyone not providing their real name on Usenet is a malicious person.
l. Anyone who changes their nym (but doesn't ever troll) is a troll.
I can't fault you for latching on to a single fact and then making wildly
unsubstantiated conclusions because I realize there are MANY people like
you for whom facts just are too complex.
People like you pick cars and people by color.
Sure, it's easy. And, for sure, red cars are fast, so, what the heck, you
may as well conclude that ALL red cars are fast. That's how your mind
works, and you've shown that time and time and time again that you're
completely incapable of understanding the slightest bit of detail.
Which is why my next explanation will be so beyond your feeble capabilities
of comprehension that I don't expect you (or many others) to understand.
Nonetheless, I'll try since I believe in mankind, even simpletons such as
you appear to be from what you consistently spout.
1. A troll changes headers.
2. Therefore, anyone who changes headers, to you, is a troll.
3. Even if they don't ever troll.
Privacy is far too complex an issue for you to understand.
a. I don't hide who I am in my posts
b. There are two Usenet use models, where mine is simpler
c. I use Usenet to ask a question
d. That question is often VERY DETAILED
e. I realize details are beyond your comprehension
f. So you simply post your drivel (which you comprehend)
g. Others respond to your drivel (there are many like you)
h. In reality, all you can do, for technical questions, is troll.
Fact is, you can NEVER answer the technical question
Details confuse you immensely.
Your use mode for Usenet is to post drivel to many threads.
My use model is to create a thread, where the headers are consistent within
that thread, and where all the facts are provided inside that thread, so my
"history" is not meaningful to resolving the questions in that thread.
I realize this entire explanation above is far too complex for you to
comprehend, so, I expect you to continue to post your drivel (and others
will respond to your drivel because that's what they understand).
-----------------------------------------------------------
End off-topic rant about simpletons, which applies to
probably half or three quarters of this Usenet crowd, where,
if it wasn't for the quarter of intelligent people, Usenet
would be lost.
-----------------------------------------------------------
To answer the technical questions, I have long ago resolved the major
technical issue about Google MyTracks (and I believe the detailed answer
was posted long ago, but I'm not going to dig it up).
I'm still working on perfecting the minor technical issues where my needs
are similar to many other people's needs, but more complex than most.
Fact is, I hike off trail in rugged country where I am always on airplane
mode (for a variety of reasons too complex for simpletons to ever
understand) such that the phone has to be completely self sufficient with
regard to GPS location, offline maps, real-time tracking, and active
routing.
To summarize the main technical issues, the phone must do these things
well, for free:
a. Save a track (the freeware OSM Tracker works fine for this).
b. Show where I am on an offline USGS map (OSM maps aren't ready yet)
c. Route along a track or to a point (with navigational directives).
True to the fact that details make simple decisions less simple, the
"concept" of OSM maps is fantastic, but they're just not there yet when you
compare them to USGS topo maps. So, for now, the tools must work seamlessly
with offline USGS 1:24K topo maps.