On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:37:56 -0700, 123456789 wrote:
> If you're setting up K9 with Gmail for the first time you
> have to use Google to generate an password for the K9 app
> (just once). Your regular Gmail password won't work.
Hi 123456789,
I think this may not be fully correct in that none of the GSF independent
mail apps I tested ask for anything other than the mail address & password.
I set up K9 mail yesterday, where specifically I do NOT have any Google
account on my Android phone, and, where, I'm absolutely positive that K9
mail did NOT require anything except two things:
o My email address
o My Google Mail password
I know this because I tried _other_ mail programs, some of which DID
require a Google-specific authorization page where you literally had to
_first_ log into a Google Account from the app itself.
This is an example, from "BlueMail", which shows the Google login first:
<
https://i.postimg.cc/sfp3Rjsg/gsfindependent12.jpg>
But BlueMail is GSF-dependent - not GSF independent.
This is a K9 clone, named "OpenMail", which shows what K9 showed:
<
https://i.postimg.cc/8CrqB4Cz/gsfindependent13.jpg>
Where, for me, the GSF-independent mail apps simply ask for login/passwd.
o YMMV
> Different folks like different aspects of an app. Until that
> is, they stop functioning...
Me?
I put all the data that I want to keep, in a given well-organized place
o On the sd card
> For email security I would prefer all of K9 inside a locked
> phone's non-removable internal memory.
Can't you lock _all_ memory on Android (even external SD card)?
> You get what you pay for...
Hi 123456789,
< BEGIN RANT >
I don't think you're a moron, but that's something only morons say.
Morons, in general, can't fathom that "you get what you get".
o They think, somehow, a high price means you get "more".
That's only something stupid people say, simply because the're stupid.
o They all want a simple "number line" of how to choose stuff
That's why they "think" if you pay more, you get more.
As an example, I know batteries reasonably well, where I can fathom the
simple specs on batteries, and I know how few manufacturers actually make
the plethora of battery brands out there.
Recently, I bought a new battery, where I went to Autozone, O"reilly, Home
Depot, Lowe's and Costco.
At _all_ of those places, I asked how to tell a good battery from a
less-good battery (even though I already know the answer), where _every_
one went on about the warranty.
Guess what?
o The warranty is NOT an electrical spec about the battery.
The warranty is a marketing game designed for dumb people
o Dumb people want a number line that they can comprehend
So dumb people buy batteries by warranty.
o Me? I buy batteries by the spec.
I paid _half_ the price for a better battery at Costco than elsewhere.
SO you do NOT get what you pay for.
o You get what you get
How much you pay is up to how intelligent you are.
o And, a little with the demand for that product
I can wax philosophically on _plenty_ of other examples, e.g., high-test
gasoline is certainly not "better" than regular for any vehicle that
doens't need it - and yet - dumb people _think_ that, simply because it's
more expensive, that you get "more'.
Yet again, you _never_ get what you pay for.
o You get what you get
How much you pay for it is immaterial.
Same with Costco regular gas versus Chevron regular gas.
o Both Costco & Chevron are "top tier" (if you know what that means)
That means, mostly, the polyetheramines are above a certain level.
o And yet, Chevron (with Techron!) is generally more expensive
Do you know the difference between Techron & polyetheramines, 1thru9?
o I do.
The fact is that you _never_ get what you pay for, 1thru9
o Only stupid people, IMHO, even _think_ that
They're too stupid to figure out that you get what you get
O They desperately want a number line where dollars are their number line
So, please, never tell me "you get what you pay for"
o If you want to be considered as a reasonably intelligent person
< END RANT >
Freeware, in many cases, is just as good or better than the payware
o For example, the GMail mail app is, IMHO, a POS
Almost any mail app is better as long as it doesn't require me to sync
all my data when all I want to do is read my email.