John B. <
sloc...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 09:20:16 -0500, "(PeteCresswell)" <x...@y.Invalid>
> wrote:
[...]
> I'm not disagreeing with you other than to say that in my experience
> far more addresses are harvested through posts on Usenet
Hello? This is 1999 calling. We'd like our usenet-spammers back, pretty
please?
Seriously: I've been using my old university mail adress for … well …
usenet and not much else for the last five years, and all the spam it
ever gets are the two or three good old well-known scams that the
spam-filter dutifully drops without notice…
The adress that's active on the www (googlemail, incidentally) gets more
interesting(CN) pickled pork. Although not more, strictly
speaking. Actually: It's less. Not by much, though.
I believe the days of spammers harvesting usenet for valid mail adresses
are well over. From personal experience, I'd also say that the good old
days[TM] of 20 legit mails plus 200 spam mails a day are also
history. But then, I'm not on facebook, and generally not a naive user
of so-called social media…
> than from simply opening a gmail account
Well, yeah. Just creating that account will generate zero mail-spam. It
probably won't even interact with your experience of youtube & co. Which
actually using it likely will. And for the two computer-literate people
who don't use adblock pro or its likes, it will also affect their
browsing experience…
> :-)
Yes, I know… ;->