On 23 Dec 2021 13:24:41 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote:
> If your daughter can track you, I assume Wi-Fi is on (and cellular and
> Bluetooth are off).
Just as an interesting but related aside, I have my phone set to allow the
least amount of tracking that I can figure out how to prevent, and, as a
test, I've called T-Mobile multiple times to ask where each phone was on my
family plan account.
The stark fact is that T-Mobile can often tell you the cell tower that each
phone on your plan is using, where they easily give that information in
street addresses over the phone to the owner of the phones (which is me).
Interestingly, they often have that information instantly on hand for all
the phones in my family plan except mine and that of my wife, which is
interesting simply because there's no way we can possibly hide from their
cell towers.
I suspect that's simply because we're on a femtocell most of the time, and
for whatever reason, they don't have femtocell location information
instantly on hand. (I probably should test that while on the road.)
> 'location' is on, but is (the) GPS also on? If so, that's quite a
> battery eater and shouldn't be neccessary, because Wi-Fi location
> information should be enough when you're stationary (which you
> apparently are, because you have cellular off).
Frank knows this technical stuff better than I do, but what Frank is telling
the OP is that "location" to most of us means the GPS radio is on, but in
reality, I think Frank is making the point that "location" being turned on
doesn't necessarily mean the GPS radio receiver is turned on.
For me, I equate the little teardrop icon with turning on the GPS radio,
and, well, for me, that may be the case since I never turn on the enhanced
location stuff that the gms (google mobile services) packages always want.
But for other people, what Frank is trying to say (I think) is the location
being on doesn't mean the GPS is also on (although most times it might).