In
comp.mobile.android, on Sat, 02 Jun 2018 07:11:38 -0400, micky
<
NONONO...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>In
comp.mobile.android, on Sat, 2 Jun 2018 13:03:04 +0200 (GMT+02:00),
>Libor Striz <poutnik4R...@CAPITALSgmail.com> wrote:
>
>>micky <
NONONO...@bigfoot.com> Wrote in message:
>>> My IMEI number is only 14 digits and Cricket wants a 15-digit number.
>>>
>>> Do I have a mutant phone? Exposed to Kryptonite?
>>>
>>> Xioami? Are they all like this?
>>>
>>> My number is 86647103562246.
Was that in About Phone or did you find it some other way? If in
about, I wonder what makes your phone different.
>>
>>IMEI of the slot 1 of my Xiaomi MI A1 has 15 digits.
>
>Very strange. Above is slot 1 and slot 2 is the same except the last
>number is 7.
Well, this was a topic easy to google, 14-digit IMEI
And there were several hits.
The first said to dial *#06# . Cricket suggested that too, but I just
looked in About Phone, SIMs. That turned out to be a mistake.
So I dialed and it came back immediately for both slots, even the one I
didn't dial with. The first number has a 9 on the end and the second
number has a 7 on the end!! Still very strange.
I remember now I tried this with Cricket a few months ago and was
stymied when my number was too short.
It also gives a link to the Luhn algorithm in case this nmethod doesn't
work
https://www.unlockunit.com/blog/14-digit-imei/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luhn_algorithm
It is not intended to be a cryptographically secure hash function; it
was designed to protect against accidental errors, not malicious
attacks. Most credit cards and many government identification numbers
use the algorithm as a simple method of distinguishing valid numbers
from mistyped or otherwise incorrect numbers.
Too long to quote but nothing an 8-year old shouldn't be able to do.
I haven't tried the number in Cricket yet because I see theere are a lot
of other plans under 200 a year. I have to look at them.
>There are also two SV numbers, one for each slot, and they are both 00.
>What is an SV number?
>
>When I put a 0 in as the last number, it said the number was invalid or
>didn't exist (or something).
>
>Should I just try the other 9 numbers?
I guess this would have worked!