From the «no mention of kdevelop» department:
Feed: OSnews
Title: The IDEs we had 30 years ago… And we lost
Author: Thom Holwerda
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 15:29:45 -0500
Link:
https://www.osnews.com/story/138165/the-ides-we-had-30-years-ago-and-we-lost/
I grew up learning to program in the late 1980s / early 1990s. Back then, I
did not fully comprehend what I was doing and why the tools I used were
impressive given the constraints of the hardware we had. Having gained more
knowledge throughout the years, it is now really fun to pick up DOSBox to
re-experience those programs and compare them with our current state of
affairs.
This time around, I want to look at the pure text-based IDEs that we had in
that era before Windows eclipsed the PC industry. I want to do this because
those IDEs had little to envy from the IDEs of today—yet it feels as if we
went through a dark era where we lost most of those features for years and
they are only resurfacing now.
If anything, stay for a nostalgic ride back in time and a little rant on
“bloat”. But, more importantly, read on to gain perspective on what existed
before so that you can evaluate future feature launches more critically.
↫ Julio Merino[1]
Fast forward to today, and the most popular[2] text editor among programmers is
a website running in Chrome in a window. No wonder most popular applications are
Electron trashfires now.
Times sure have changed.
Links:
[1]:
https://blogsystem5.substack.com/p/the-ides-we-had-30-years-ago-and (link)
[2]:
https://visualstudiomagazine.com/articles/2022/06/23/stack-overflow-2022-survey.aspx (link)