Is this an appropriate use of the return-path? My guess is that
Worldnet is doing this to take some of the load of non-delivery
notices off of their servers and direct it elsewhere. Is there any way
around this?
Thanks in advance,
Ian
I don't understand this explanation, so let me just say how it should
work:
when forwarding a message, the return-path shall _not_ be changed,
only the recipient address ("rcpt to") changes. changing the sender
address ("mail from") will very easily lead to mail loops.
--
Kjetil T.