Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Eudora 8 vs Eudora 7

347 views
Skip to first unread message

Alfred Molon

unread,
Mar 5, 2010, 3:22:13 PM3/5/10
to
Is there any reason to switch from Eudora 7 to Eudora 8? I installed
Eudora 8 (8.0b8) on my computer. It took a very long time to import all
emails from Eudora 7, then it started indexing all emails. After several
hours I closed Eudora 8. Eudora 8 seems a bit slow compared to Eudora 7.
--

Alfred Molon
http://www.molon.de - Photos of Asia, Africa and Europe

Steve Urbach

unread,
Mar 5, 2010, 3:34:36 PM3/5/10
to
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 21:22:13 +0100, Alfred Molon <alfred...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>Is there any reason to switch from Eudora 7 to Eudora 8? I installed
>Eudora 8 (8.0b8) on my computer. It took a very long time to import all
>emails from Eudora 7, then it started indexing all emails. After several
>hours I closed Eudora 8. Eudora 8 seems a bit slow compared to Eudora 7.

Eudora 8 is /Thundora/ (Thunderbird with skins :P ) ...
It is not your old Eudora.

So...
Why do you /need/ to change?
Something your ISP forces on you that E7 does not support?


Laura Fredericks

unread,
Mar 5, 2010, 6:58:48 PM3/5/10
to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 12:34:36 -0800, Steve Urbach
<drago...@NOTmindspring.com> wrote in post:


>Eudora 8 is /Thundora/ (Thunderbird with skins :P ) ...

Lol. I never heard it called that. Did you some up with that name?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1

iQA/AwUBS5GasKRseRzHUwOaEQJaPgCgk9ys3MUIPUk4dGovVviPBM/0Q8EAnR/9
GdNtTAxmY8KfuR8OGAS1vkwJ
=UQjO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Laura Fredericks
PGP key ID - DH/DSS 2048/1024: 0xC753039A

Usenet Flamewars:
http://www.queenofcyberspace.com/usenet/

Remove CLOTHES to reply.

Steve Urbach

unread,
Mar 5, 2010, 7:20:37 PM3/5/10
to
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:58:48 -0500, Laura Fredericks
<anon...@CLOTHEShotmail.com> wrote:

>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 12:34:36 -0800, Steve Urbach
><drago...@NOTmindspring.com> wrote in post:
>>Eudora 8 is /Thundora/ (Thunderbird with skins :P ) ...
>
>Lol. I never heard it called that. Did you some up with that name?
>
>--

Where have you been ;)
I first saw that name usage over a year ago.

Alfred Molon

unread,
Mar 6, 2010, 3:09:13 AM3/6/10
to
In article <jfq2p5p9eb5fd7gdb...@4ax.com>,
drago...@NOTmindspring.com says...

> >Is there any reason to switch from Eudora 7 to Eudora 8? I installed
> >Eudora 8 (8.0b8) on my computer. It took a very long time to import all
> >emails from Eudora 7, then it started indexing all emails. After several
> >hours I closed Eudora 8. Eudora 8 seems a bit slow compared to Eudora 7.
> Eudora 8 is /Thundora/ (Thunderbird with skins :P ) ...
> It is not your old Eudora.
>
> So...
> Why do you /need/ to change?
> Something your ISP forces on you that E7 does not support?

I was wondering if Eudora 8 brings some benefits compared to Eudora 7.
No idea, but perhaps Eudora 8 is the newer software, still being
developed.

John H Meyers

unread,
Mar 6, 2010, 6:00:18 AM3/6/10
to
On 3/6/2010 2:09 AM, Alfred Molon wrote:

> I was wondering if Eudora 8 brings some benefits compared to Eudora 7.

o "Eudora 8" is Thunderbird (version 3)

o Handles UTF-8 (all languages).

o Probably better at forwarding HTML messages.

o Less capable at filtering, searching, logging.

o Lacks other "classic" features.

o Also does newsgroups, RSS feeds.

o Has all new bugs.

Thanks to "Leave mail on server,"
and the fact that E8 and E7
install completely independent of one another,
you can use both at the same time, and decide what you prefer.

E8 and TB install programs separately,
but share the mail and settings (TB "profile")

--

James Egan

unread,
Mar 6, 2010, 6:50:45 AM3/6/10
to

On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:58:48 -0500, Laura Fredericks
<anon...@CLOTHEShotmail.com> wrote:

>Lol. I never heard it called that. Did you come up with that name?
>

Hi Laura, it's been a long time. I still lurk around acv in the hope
that one day you'll brighten up the monotony of it all.

Jim x

Message has been deleted

Laura Fredericks

unread,
Mar 6, 2010, 11:10:28 AM3/6/10
to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 11:50:45 +0000, James Egan <je...@jegan.com>
wrote in post:


>Hi Laura, it's been a long time. I still lurk around acv in the hope
>that one day you'll brighten up the monotony of it all.

I'm still here, just lurking. As always, I only post when I have
something to say. ;-)

And fwiw, I'm still using Eudora 7.1.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1

iQA/AwUBS5J+a6RseRzHUwOaEQIDUwCeM0m6anNGnXUHcKxWgcLhFkXgPf8AmgOO
JjINI0lFawxoOy7YRYGzy5Ez
=MQQD

John H Meyers

unread,
Mar 6, 2010, 5:41:09 PM3/6/10
to
On 3/6/2010 8:42 AM, Jim Higgins wrote:

> I think we're looking at several more years of development
> before any recommendation to replace Eudora 7 with Eudora 8

"Eudora 8" is now caught up with the actual release of Thunderbird 3.

8.0b9 is now based on TB 3.0.1, very close to the current TB 3.0.3

http://www.eudora.com/betas/

Yes, it's just been updated today (6 March 2010)

You can alternate between TB3 and E8 if you wish;
each has its own set of program files,
but a common TB mail and settings "profile"

--

Mutlley

unread,
Mar 7, 2010, 2:47:23 PM3/7/10
to
I installed the new beta 9 and it imported every thing OK except my
filters. No idea how to get them to import. Downloaded 135 messages
all went to the Inbox and the filter area has no filters..

Don Wiss

unread,
Mar 7, 2010, 9:31:00 PM3/7/10
to
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Alfred Molon <alfred...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Is there any reason to switch from Eudora 7 to Eudora 8? I installed
>Eudora 8 (8.0b8) on my computer. It took a very long time to import all
>emails from Eudora 7, then it started indexing all emails. After several
>hours I closed Eudora 8. Eudora 8 seems a bit slow compared to Eudora 7.

I am not ready to even considering switching. I have hundreds of filters. I
have 247 mailboxes. My Eudora data folder is 1.56 GB. Maybe days to index?

Don <www.donwiss.com> (e-mail link at home page bottom).

Message has been deleted

C A Upsdell

unread,
Mar 8, 2010, 10:32:56 PM3/8/10
to
On 2010-03-08 16:54, Jim Higgins wrote:

> On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 21:31:00 -0500, Don Wiss<donwiss@no_spam.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Alfred Molon<alfred...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any reason to switch from Eudora 7 to Eudora 8? I installed
>>> Eudora 8 (8.0b8) on my computer. It took a very long time to import all
>>> emails from Eudora 7, then it started indexing all emails. After several
>>> hours I closed Eudora 8. Eudora 8 seems a bit slow compared to Eudora 7.
>>
>> I am not ready to even considering switching. I have hundreds of filters. I
>> have 247 mailboxes. My Eudora data folder is 1.56 GB. Maybe days to index?
>
> Eudora 8 is simply not ready as a general replacement for Eudora 7.
>
> I could ignore the time to index if the program were anywhere near as
> feature rich and easy to use as Eudora 7, but it isn't.

Yeah. Myself, I need support for wildcard filters, and it looks like I
will have to wait a long, long time for this essential feature.

0 new messages