On Sun, 08 Apr 2018 18:30:27 -0400, Dennis Lee Bieber
<
wlf...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 08 Apr 2018 12:45:14 -0400, John B. Smith <
cra...@verizon.net>
>declaimed the following:
>
>>> I asked how many LAYERS (ie; what does the hierarchy look like) -- not
>>>how many "boxes" are in one level.
>>
>>We may be talking apples and oranges. How do you implement your
>>'layers'?
>
> Using the "mailbox" view on the left side of my Eudora layout (this is
>the same area that has tabs for personalities, signatures, stationery).
>
> The top of the hierarchy is labeled "Eudora", below it are the first
>level mailboxes (in/out/junk/trash, and those I've created at that level).
>Also at the first level are two "folders" (indicated with a [+]) "mailing
>lists" and "processed mails". Clicking on the [+] changes it to [-] and
>opens the next layer down in the hierarchy showing the mailboxes at that
>level.
My Eudora is 7.0.0.16 Paid Mode 83. In the top hierarchy I don't have
'Eudora' and no way to add any mailboxes to this level. Under 'Trash'
I have a greyed-out line. Under that line, my next hierarchy is a
bunch of mailboxes, not folders. At the end of those I've added 3
folders (by using New and choosing Folder). There is no plus sign on
these folders. When you hover the mouse on a folder it opens and
displays the mailboxes that I've added to the folder. Per your naming
policy I'd say the contents (mailboxes) in these folders is third
hierarchy? But I don't see the folders in what Pandora imports either.
I think we may have two different versions of Eudora, and maybe that's
why Pandora doesn't find all my mailboxes. I can't remember if I
received any further offers to update Eudora further after I purchased
it, which looks to be Dec 2005. BTW I found that in my Eudora mailbox.
I've been keeping email that long.
>
> In my test, done just as a proof of concept, I had three entire levels
>nested into "processed mails". As I'd illustrated in an earlier email.
>
>
> Pandora imported all of them.
>
> It imports them into a "local mailboxes" "folder" (hence putting them
>all one level deeper in the hierarchy in Pandora).
>
>
>>I can't recall software that wouldn't run on XP, I sure there was
>>some. It's the software I've purchased and installed on XP since 2006?
>>that i resent being taken away from me just because Microsoft wanted
>>to sell a new OS.
>
> Anything that made use of a 16-bit (WfW3.11) library will not run on
>any 64-bit OS.
>
> Any application that stored user data in "program files" was already a
>problem in WinXP, though the OS made it easy to bypass the security.
>
> Those (16-bit) are the only applications to which I've lost access
>going to Win7 64 and Win10 64 (and the older HELP file system used by
>Eudora, which is not available on Win10 due to security flaws -- it can be
>installed on Win7).
One of my favorite peeves is Photoshop5 not working in Win7 (64 bit).
I can't make out if it is 16 bit. I noticed I've got it running in
Win95 compatability mode in XP. That is one hellish expensive program
to buy a new version of!