It was announced that CVS-Repo hosting will soon come to an end. As
such I have tried my best to migrate xHarbour Project files to SVN.
The jobs has been finished now. Developers can commit patches as usual
as how he usualy does on CVS. Of course, everyone has to have access
to SVN Client, be it Console or GUI mode.
The new place holders for xHarbour Project effective today follows:
Site: https://sourceforge.net/projects/xhrb/
To do a check-out of the new repo, issue the following command:
svn co https://xhrb.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/xhrb xhrb
SVN client is very much similar to CVS. Consult online help if you are
in question.
Download sites for SVN client:
Console:
http://www.sliksvn.com/pub/Slik-Subversion-1.6.15-win32.msi
GUI:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/tortoisesvn/TortoiseSVN-1.6.12.20536-win32-svn-1.6.15.msi?download
Andi
Andi,
Thank you so much for taking the time to complete this task.
Best regards,
Robb
When using TortoiseSVN to connect to the repository (from behind a
proxy-server that passes through other projects from SF just fine) I
get the following message:
Repository moved temporarily to "http://sourceforge.net/project/xhrb";
please relocate
If I then try that location I get this message:
The OPTIONS response did not include the requested activity-collection-
set; this often means that the URL is not WebDAV-enabled
effectively meaning: you can't access that.
What to do next?
Any simple-steps plan?
Try https://xhrb.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/xhrb
FabioNery
"Ath" <tonh...@gmail.com> escreveu na mensagem
news:1334bc48-5caa-484d...@d19g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
Hi Andi,
I realized that organized the ChangeLog xHarbour.
Would not it be better one ChangeLog, as is the Harbour?
Leonardo Machado
Thanks
"Andi Jahja" 在郵件張貼內容主旨
4d4d0361...@news.eternal-september.org 中撰寫...
>Hi,
>Updated to SVN, but the changelog is 10-2010, is it correct ?
No, it's incorrect.
This is the latest Id:
/*
* $Id: ChangeLog 35 2011-02-07 21:39:02Z andijahja $
*/
Andi
No, I'd rather let them like what is it now. Multi-Meg text file is
good for nobody's eyes :-)
Andi
thanks
"Andi Jahja" 在郵件張貼內容主旨
4d522029...@news.eternal-september.org 中撰寫...
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 12:14:55 +0800, "fatfat" <fat...@fatfat.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>Updated to SVN, but the changelog is 10-2010, is it correct ?
No, it's incorrect.
This is the latest Id:
/*
* $Id: ChangeLog 35 2011-02-07 21:39:02Z andijahja $
*/
Andi
>"Andi Jahja" 在郵件張貼內容主旨
>4d4d0361...@news.eternal-september.org ä¸æ’°å¯«...
Thank you, that works.
Who choose to not use default SVN rules of adding /trunk for the head
revision? It looks a bit weird.
I do.
SVN repo was created in a hurry because CVS was down too long.
You're right, the /trunk is important. I can move the files there in a
matter of minutes.
BTW, CVS seems to work again now. If there are developers monitor this
group, I would appreciate their opinions on what to act.
Andi