info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
User Defined Operators
19 views
Skip to first unread message
gnuarm.del...@gmail.com
Dec 15, 2020, 2:45:33 PM12/15/20
to
Is this possible? I can't find much info on the Internet addressing the possibility. Seems they only talk about overloading existing operators.
I created an example to define a new OR operator for integers as if they were 32 bits. That seemed to work ok. But when I called it "Ralph", the compiler complains, not at the definition, but at the usage. It seems to initial accept that, but when it sees the second operand (or maybe on completion of recognizing the Ralph operator) it barfs say it was expecting a WHEN.
So it is illegal to define new operators?
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
I created an example to define a new OR operator for integers as if they were 32 bits. That seemed to work ok. But when I called it "Ralph", the compiler complains, not at the definition, but at the usage. It seems to initial accept that, but when it sees the second operand (or maybe on completion of recognizing the Ralph operator) it barfs say it was expecting a WHEN.
So it is illegal to define new operators?
--
Rick C.
- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
0 new messages