[ANN] Ruby 1.9.0-3 is released

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)

unread,
Jul 25, 2008, 10:55:14 AM7/25/08
to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Ruby 1.9.0-3 has just been released. This is a snapshot release.

The next release is 1.9.0-4. It will be released at 25 Oct. See
[ruby-core:17644] for more details.

== Location
You can fetch it from:

ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.0-3.tar.bz2
MD5 = 033ea37e56c48f098f1bbde1467ac6dc
SHA256 = d5ca832db445e3251113c4027f2528d17e32ed9508d2dd507c469e546ad180db
SIZE = 5169699

ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.0-3.tar.gz
MD5 = f0fc07e2ce1fce07e6e23e0e5a1fc4df
SHA256 = ebf1e5b045972d73dd9c1aa780e3800b77463f4901ee634dd41fe2d6da654e23
SIZE = 6225372

ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.0-3.zip
MD5 = 9bea3a0402105d840ea4bc9aa382b609
SHA256 = 9ee23ed0f4126ce583113ec8381cc1a7853a05197232af7352d4ebdb3e03b742
SIZE = 7354642

== Platforms
Ruby 1.9 no longer supports the following platforms because they have no
active maintainer.
* BeOS
* WinCE
* OS/2
* Interix
* bcc32
* Classic MacOS
* djgpp
* VMS
* human68k

I will remove platform-specific codes for them from Ruby, unless someone
become a maintainer by 25 Sep.

Regards,

- --
Yugui <yu...@yugui.jp>
http://yugui.jp
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkiJ6rQACgkQOXzH5JLb/AUEdQCeNx1oS3WOmhR78PCqbo87dqla
UnEAmwTyIDZPS4TZbgYpRzm0PsavMz1a
=952x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Mike Shock

unread,
Jul 26, 2008, 11:59:00 PM7/26/08
to
It's a GREAT pity that WinCE won't be supported...
Is there anyone to becoma a maintainer?
(For some reasons I can't :-((

babu nair

unread,
Jul 29, 2008, 9:56:43 AM7/29/08
to
Mike Shock wrote:
> It's a GREAT pity that WinCE won't be supported...
> Is there anyone to becoma a maintainer?
> (For some reasons I can't :-((

Hi
wats a main advantage of ruby-1.9 with older versions like
ruby-1.8.6
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Pete

unread,
Jul 31, 2008, 5:13:11 PM7/31/08
to
In article <4889EAB4...@yugui.jp>,

Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yu...@yugui.jp> wrote:
>Ruby 1.9.0-3 has just been released. This is a snapshot release.
>
>The next release is 1.9.0-4. It will be released at 25 Oct. See
>[ruby-core:17644] for more details.
> [....]

>== Platforms
>Ruby 1.9 no longer supports the following platforms because they have no
>active maintainer.
>* BeOS
>* [.....]

>
>I will remove platform-specific codes for them from Ruby, unless someone
>become a maintainer by 25 Sep.

Well, Ruby is definitely not dead on BeOS (nor is BeOS itself...!)
I have v1.8.4 fully functional on my BeOS system, and use it extensively.
(Also available on BeBits -- the software distribution site for the OS.)

I never pursued any later version, because 1.8.4 matches the Pickaxe book,
and that was my main desire -- to have corresponding software and docs.

However, it would be a shame to have BeOS support disappear from the
next version, so I guess I should volunteer myself as a maintainer!
(The BeOS hooks in 1.8.4 BTW were not quite sufficient. I had to further
modify a few of the sources -- unfortunately long enough ago that I don't
remember all the twists and turns. I will proceed to dig back...)

[For those unfamiliar with BeOS -- or its current status -- I should note
that it is currently being redeveloped (and renamed) as the open-source OS
'Haiku'.]

-- Pete Goodeve --

--
The above email is a spam bin. If you want to contact directly, use
pete
<at>
goodeveca
<full-stop>
net

Ryan Davis

unread,
Aug 1, 2008, 3:04:37 PM8/1/08
to

On Jul 31, 2008, at 14:14 , Pete wrote:

> However, it would be a shame to have BeOS support disappear from the
> next version, so I guess I should volunteer myself as a maintainer!

you should subscribe to and write ruby-core@ just to make sure they
get this.

Mohit Sindhwani

unread,
Aug 2, 2008, 5:23:00 AM8/2/08
to

Yugui

Is there a lot of work required for maintaining? I would hate to see the
bcc32 version go away at a time when it looks like Borland/ CodeGear
seems to finally be getting it together. I'm sorry I've never maintained
anything this big, but would be interested to know a bit more if it's
possible.

Thanks
Mohit.


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages