Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

[ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 is released

8 views
Skip to first unread message

Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 11:38:35 AM1/30/09
to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi, folks.

I am proud to announce the release of Ruby 1.9.1. This is the first
stable release of Ruby 1.9 series.

Ruby 1.9 is a new series of Ruby. It is modern, faster, with clearer
syntax, multilingualized and much improved version of Ruby. Ruby 1.8
series has been used since 2003 and many great products were born on it.
Today Ruby 1.9 series starts its history as 1.8 series did.

Notice that Ruby 1.8 still remains. 1.8.8 will be released this year.

== Changes
You can read about major chanes since 1.8.7 at at
http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/tags/v1_9_1_0/NEWS .

We have fixed 7 bugs since 1.9.1 RC2.
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-19/issues?query_id=11

If you encounter any bugs or any problems, please let us know it via the
official issue tracking system (http://redmine.ruby-lang.org ).

== Location
* ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.1-p0.tar.bz2
SIZE: 7190271 bytes
MD5: 0278610ec3f895ece688de703d99143e
SHA256: de7d33aeabdba123404c21230142299ac1de88c944c9f3215b816e824dd33321

* ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.1-p0.tar.gz
SIZE: 9025004 bytes
MD5: 50e4f381ce68c6de72bace6d75f0135b
SHA256: a5485951823c8c22ddf6100fc9e10c7bfc85fb5a4483844033cee0fad9e292cc

* ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.1-p0.zip
SIZE: 10273609 bytes
MD5: 3377d43b041877cda108e243c6b7f436
SHA256: 00562fce4108e5c6024c4152f943eaa7dcc8cf97d5c449ac102673a0d5c1943b


Thanks,
- -- Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yu...@yugui.jp>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkmDLZ4ACgkQOXzH5JLb/AWYWgCcC2PXYjaV2tCFrO+LFQoObhrM
UmIAn0EXvi2E6+aIa+9KCdhKSie+2tcL
=fAek
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Pablo Q.

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 12:13:38 PM1/30/09
to
[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

Good news.

#ruby -e "p 'hello world'" -v
ruby 1.9.1 (2008-12-30 patchlevel-0 revision 21203) [i686-linux]
hello world

:D

2009/1/30 Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yu...@yugui.jp>


--
Pablo Q.

James Gray

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 12:20:23 PM1/30/09
to
On Jan 30, 2009, at 10:38 AM, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) wrote:

> I am proud to announce the release of Ruby 1.9.1. This is the first
> stable release of Ruby 1.9 series.

Three cheers for the entire Ruby core team who has worked so hard to
bring us this release! Please know that we appreciate your efforts.

James Edward Gray II

P.S. Does this mean we beat Perl 6? :D (This is a joke folks.
Relax!)

Gregory Brown

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 12:28:23 PM1/30/09
to
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:20 PM, James Gray <ja...@grayproductions.net> wrote:

> P.S. Does this mean we beat Perl 6? :D (This is a joke folks. Relax!)

Nah, we'll need to wait for Ruby 2 for that :)

-greg

--
Technical Blaag at: http://blog.majesticseacreature.com
Non-tech stuff at: http://metametta.blogspot.com
"Ruby Best Practices" Book now in O'Reilly Roughcuts:
http://rubybestpractices.com

James Gray

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 12:31:47 PM1/30/09
to
On Jan 30, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Gregory Brown wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:20 PM, James Gray <ja...@grayproductions.net
> > wrote:
>
>> P.S. Does this mean we beat Perl 6? :D (This is a joke folks.
>> Relax!)
>
> Nah, we'll need to wait for Ruby 2 for that :)

We may still have time to get that out too. ;)

James Edward Gray II

Andy Cooper

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 12:40:48 PM1/30/09
to

I think that as long as the language changes faster than COBOL we are
doing good.

Andy Cooper.

Gregory Brown

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 12:41:21 PM1/30/09
to
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yu...@yugui.jp> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi, folks.
>
> I am proud to announce the release of Ruby 1.9.1. This is the first
> stable release of Ruby 1.9 series.

A huge thanks to all of ruby-core for this, and for your hard work on
release management, Yugui.

> Notice that Ruby 1.8 still remains. 1.8.8 will be released this year.

Now that Ruby 1.9 is released, it seems there is no need for 1.8.7.

Is there a possibility that Ruby 1.8.8 will go back to being similar
to 1.8.6 and remove the 1.9 compatibility shims?
This would make maintaining old 1.8 code much easier.

James H.

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 1:01:52 PM1/30/09
to
On Jan 30, 11:38 am, "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yu...@yugui.jp> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi, folks.
>
> I am proud to announce the release of Ruby 1.9.1. This is the first
> stable release of Ruby 1.9 series.
>
> Ruby 1.9 is a new series of Ruby. It is modern, faster, with clearer
> syntax, multilingualized and much improved version of Ruby. Ruby 1.8
> series has been used since 2003 and many great products were born on it.
> Today Ruby 1.9 series starts its history as 1.8 series did.
>
> Notice that Ruby 1.8 still remains. 1.8.8 will be released this year.
>
> == Changes
> You can read about major chanes since 1.8.7 at athttp://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/tags/v1_9_1_0/NEWS.
>
> We have fixed 7 bugs since 1.9.1 RC2.
>  http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-19/issues?query_id=11
>
> If you encounter any bugs or any problems, please let us know it via the
> official issue tracking system (http://redmine.ruby-lang.org).
>
> == Location
> *ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.1-p0.tar.bz2

>   SIZE:   7190271 bytes
>   MD5:    0278610ec3f895ece688de703d99143e
>   SHA256: de7d33aeabdba123404c21230142299ac1de88c944c9f3215b816e824dd33321
>
> *ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.1-p0.tar.gz

>   SIZE:   9025004 bytes
>   MD5:    50e4f381ce68c6de72bace6d75f0135b
>   SHA256: a5485951823c8c22ddf6100fc9e10c7bfc85fb5a4483844033cee0fad9e292cc
>
> *ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.1-p0.zip

>   SIZE:   10273609 bytes
>   MD5:    3377d43b041877cda108e243c6b7f436
>   SHA256: 00562fce4108e5c6024c4152f943eaa7dcc8cf97d5c449ac102673a0d5c1943b
>
> Thanks,
> - -- Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yu...@yugui.jp>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -http://enigmail.mozdev.org

>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkmDLZ4ACgkQOXzH5JLb/AWYWgCcC2PXYjaV2tCFrO+LFQoObhrM
> UmIAn0EXvi2E6+aIa+9KCdhKSie+2tcL
> =fAek
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Hooray! Congratulations Ruby team!

masayoshi takahashi

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 1:21:51 PM1/30/09
to
2009/1/31 Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yu...@yugui.jp>:

> I am proud to announce the release of Ruby 1.9.1. This is the first
> stable release of Ruby 1.9 series.

Congrats!!!


By the way, from www.ruby-lang.org:

| * Server maintenance
|
| Services of ruby-lang.org will be unavailable for the server maintenance
| between 01:00-06:00 on 31 Juanuary 2009 (UTC). Sorry for any inconvenience.

( http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2009/01/28/20090131-server-maintenance/ )

You may not use the services of ruby-lang.org.

Just FYI.

Thanks,

Masayoshi Takahashi (takah...@gmail.com)

_why

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 1:23:12 PM1/30/09
to
Capital job, all of you. Nobu, Tanaka Akira, usa, yugui. And
especially koichi and matz. A big day for both of you. The new VM is
a lot of fun and you've worked so hard.

Also, many thanks to this list. I've often encountered Ruby 1.9
"bugs" and confusions, but it was all easily dismissed by finding
discussions about the internals which had already transpired here.

Yeah, so hearty backslaps and many rigorous unending handshakes
all around, this is great.

_why

Tim Hunter

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 2:07:37 PM1/30/09
to
Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) wrote:
> I am proud to announce the release of Ruby 1.9.1. This is the first
> stable release of Ruby 1.9 series.

Con grat u lations to Matz, Koichi, Yugui, and everybody who worked so
hard to
bring this off!

Pan Galactic Gargleblaster's all around!
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Bob Martens

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 2:11:25 PM1/30/09
to
[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

Congratulations to everyone involved. Fine work!

--
Sincerely,
Bob Martens

Jan Friedrich

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 2:37:19 PM1/30/09
to
Thanks a lot.

Now we can wait for Pickaxe 3. :)

Regards,
Jan Friedrich

Suraj Kurapati

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 2:43:30 PM1/30/09
to
_why wrote:
> hearty backslaps and many rigorous unending handshakes all around

Well put, sir! Indeed,

minna-san ni wa, domo arigato gozai-mashita!

puts "banzai! " * 3 # :-)

Charles Oliver Nutter

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 2:44:35 PM1/30/09
to
Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi, folks.
>
> I am proud to announce the release of Ruby 1.9.1. This is the first
> stable release of Ruby 1.9 series.

Congratulations! Now that the stable release is out, we will pull 1.9.1
stdlib into JRuby. We'll ship our 1.9.1-compatible (mostly? hopefully?)
release of JRuby 1.2 in late February.

> Notice that Ruby 1.8 still remains. 1.8.8 will be released this year.

Is 1.8.8 going to be based on 1.8.6 or 1.8.7? And is it planned to
change as many features as 1.8.7 did?

JRuby will remain at 1.8.6 compatibility (in 1.8 mode) until such time
that users let us know that they want support for 1.8.7+ features.

- Charlie

Zayd Abdullah

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 2:55:51 PM1/30/09
to
[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

Congradulations guys!! I am a noob so this might be a silly question to the
majority, but can someone give me the steps to install 1.9 in my vista
environment? Need some help. I already saved the zip folder. Should I be
looking for an executable, becauseI cannot find it

Thanks

Dave Thomas

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 3:05:32 PM1/30/09
to

On Jan 30, 2009, at 12:37 PM, Jan Friedrich wrote:

> Now we can wait for Pickaxe 3. :)

Final beta pushes early next week :)

Radosław Bułat

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 3:20:27 PM1/30/09
to
Congratulations and thanks for all your job to Matz, ko1 and the rest of us

Robert Dober

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 3:30:11 PM1/30/09
to
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 6:20 PM, James Gray <ja...@grayproductions.net> wrote:
> P.S. Does this mean we beat Perl 6? :D (This is a joke folks. Relax!)
Wait 1 minute, I thought this *was* Perl 6, do not tell me I am in the
wrong community!!!!
R.


--
It is change, continuing change, inevitable change, that is the
dominant factor in society today. No sensible decision can be made any
longer without taking into account not only the world as it is, but
the world as it will be ... ~ Isaac Asimov

hemant

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 5:21:26 PM1/30/09
to
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yu...@yugui.jp> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi, folks.
>
> I am proud to announce the release of Ruby 1.9.1. This is the first
> stable release of Ruby 1.9 series.
>
> Ruby 1.9 is a new series of Ruby. It is modern, faster, with clearer
> syntax, multilingualized and much improved version of Ruby. Ruby 1.8
> series has been used since 2003 and many great products were born on it.
> Today Ruby 1.9 series starts its history as 1.8 series did.
>
> Notice that Ruby 1.8 still remains. 1.8.8 will be released this year.

Awesome all the way!


PS: whats the status of RubySpec project w.r.t Ruby 1.9.1 ? Are specs
that fail are being corrected and stuff?

Michal Suchanek

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 5:35:13 PM1/30/09
to
On 30/01/2009, Zayd Abdullah <devru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Congradulations guys!! I am a noob so this might be a silly question to the
> majority, but can someone give me the steps to install 1.9 in my vista
> environment? Need some help. I already saved the zip folder. Should I be
> looking for an executable, becauseI cannot find it
>

I suggest you wait for the Windows One Click installer for 1.9/2.0.

Unless something has changed the Windows builds you can download at
garbagecollect are somewhat not completely finished. They are missing
parts, and not even documenting which ones. You could write a "hello
world" program using the build and perhaps explore some of the
features fof the new interpreter but you cannot even install gems.

I am not completely sure if anybody uses that stuff and what do they
use it for. It just shows Ruby *can* be built for WIndwows I guess.

Thanks

Michal

Zayd Abdullah

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 5:37:26 PM1/30/09
to
[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

Are there going to be a one click installer for this new version? I'm having
trouble installing 1.9

Thanks

Zayd Abdullah

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 5:39:09 PM1/30/09
to
[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

Hahahahaa Thanks Michal, you answered my question at the same time I was
typing it :)

Thanks

Bill Kelly

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 5:51:17 PM1/30/09
to

From: "James Gray" <ja...@grayproductions.net>

>
> On Jan 30, 2009, at 10:38 AM, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) wrote:
>
>> I am proud to announce the release of Ruby 1.9.1. This is the first
>> stable release of Ruby 1.9 series.
>
> Three cheers for the entire Ruby core team who has worked so hard to
> bring us this release! Please know that we appreciate your efforts.

+1 !!!


Very much appreciated indeed.


Thanks to all!

Bill

Michal Suchanek

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 6:20:39 PM1/30/09
to
On 30/01/2009, Zayd Abdullah <devru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are there going to be a one click installer for this new version? I'm having
> trouble installing 1.9
>

The problem is not with Ruby itself but with the libraries it uses
(zlib for gems, readline for irb, openssl for encryption and https
networking, sqlite, ...)

Most of these use unique build systems and have binaries built for
windows with different compilers.

To link this all together with Ruby is a recipe for disaster.

For that reason Luis is working on a new One Click installer which
builds all the libraries and ruby from source using the MinGW
compiler.

Unfortunately not all of the libraries build well in the MinGW
environment out of the box (or on Windows at all) so the project
requires lots of tedious work. There are only development and testing
releases of this installer. As far as I know no final release that
includes at least all the basic parts is available.

Thanks

Michal

Zayd Abdullah

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 6:32:32 PM1/30/09
to
[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

Cool, thanks!!! I will be patiently waiting :)

Jayce Meade

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 6:35:52 PM1/30/09
to
Yeah, I'm having some problems installing too... I can do the compiling,
I'll figure it out, but I can't figure out how I get the tools needed to do
it, the win32 readme said I needed these:

Note: building ruby requires following commands.
* nmake
* cl
* lib
* dumpbin

I have nmake, but how do I acquire the others? Google isn't helping me.

- Jayce

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Michal Suchanek" <hram...@centrum.cz>
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 3:20 PM
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby...@ruby-lang.org>
Subject: Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.1 is released

Patrick Ro

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 6:42:08 PM1/30/09
to
Thanks for this awesome release!

I was particularly interested in C-derrived languages due to my
experience with a scripting and config language based on C.

However, after some days of Ruby, I quickly got the gripe of the
dynamic, simple, yet powerful language and started to discover the
wonders this higher level language has to offer.
Pulled some friends into it, and have been able to learn from more
advanced programmers.

Since then i've been developing Ruby and Rails applications with a lot
of fun;
anything is basically easy to do.

Anyway, enough fan-talk!
Got a MinGW build ready and roling; Don't know if it's acustomed to
share, or self compile / wait for one click?

Roger Pack

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 7:29:12 PM1/30/09
to
Zayd Abdullah wrote:
> Are there going to be a one click installer for this new version?

Luis plans on releasing a mingw 1.8.6 and a mingw 1.9, so yeah [he was
waiting for the official release first].

Zayd Abdullah

unread,
Jan 30, 2009, 7:47:16 PM1/30/09
to
Cool.. :)

Sent from my iPhone

Message has been deleted

Jayce Meade

unread,
Jan 31, 2009, 5:23:32 AM1/31/09
to
Fantastic! Thanks!

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Andrés Suárez" <ans...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 1:53 AM
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby...@ruby-lang.org>
Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9.1 is released

> If you are searching for win32 binaries of ruby1.9, this can help you:
>
> http://www.garbagecollect.jp/ruby/mswin32/en/download/release.html
>
>
> Thanks to all the Ruby's team development for their incredible job.
>
> Regards,
> Andrés

Emanuele Ricci

unread,
Jan 31, 2009, 5:32:56 AM1/31/09
to
Ruby banzaaaaaaaaaai!

Jayce Meade

unread,
Jan 31, 2009, 5:34:12 AM1/31/09
to
C:\Documents and Settings\User>gem install ftools
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/package.rb:10:in `require': 126: The
specified
odule could not be found. - c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/i386-mswin32/zlib.so
(Load
rror)
from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/package.rb:10:in `<top
(required)>

from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/format.rb:9:in `require'
from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/format.rb:9:in `<top
(required)>'
from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/installer.rb:11:in `require'
from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/installer.rb:11:in `<top
(required
>'
from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/dependency_installer.rb:3:in
`requ
re'
from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/dependency_installer.rb:3:in
`<top
(required)>'
from
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/commands/install_command.rb:4:in `
equire'
from
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/commands/install_command.rb:4:in `
top (required)>'
from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:140:in
`require

from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:140:in
`rescue
n load_and_instantiate'
from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:132:in
`load_an
_instantiate'
from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:65:in `[]'
from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:118:in
`find_co
mand'
from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:104:in
`process
args'
from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/command_manager.rb:75:in `run'
from c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/gem_runner.rb:39:in `run'
from c:/ruby/bin/gem.bat:32:in `<main>'

C:\Documents and Settings\User>

Got a few errors... figured it was due to uninstalled gems but the zlib.dll
thing is cropping up again. How do I fix this?

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Jayce Meade" <azimuth-...@live.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 2:23 AM

saravanan K

unread,
Jan 31, 2009, 6:19:11 AM1/31/09
to
[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

Ruby Rocks :)

2009/1/31 Emanuele Ricci <maurice...@gmail.com>

Sean O'Halpin

unread,
Jan 31, 2009, 7:39:53 AM1/31/09
to
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yu...@yugui.jp> wrote:
>
> Hi, folks.

>
> I am proud to announce the release of Ruby 1.9.1. This is the first
> stable release of Ruby 1.9 series.

Wonderful news! Congratulations!

Sean

Luis Lavena

unread,
Jan 31, 2009, 8:09:58 AM1/31/09
to
> From: "Jayce Meade" <azimuth-rubyt...@live.com>

> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 2:23 AM
> To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-t...@ruby-lang.org>

> Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9.1 is released
>
> > Fantastic! Thanks!
>
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > From: "Andrés Suárez" <ans...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 1:53 AM
> > Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
> > To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-t...@ruby-lang.org>

> > Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9.1 is released
>
> >> If you are searching for win32 binaries of ruby1.9, this can help you:
>
> >>http://www.garbagecollect.jp/ruby/mswin32/en/download/release.html
>
> >> Thanks to all the Ruby's team development for their incredible job.
>
> >> Regards,
> >> Andrés
> >> --
> >> Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
>

You guys never read the instructions:

http://www.garbagecollect.jp/ruby/mswin32/en/documents/install.html

If you're installing garbage collect releases, you need to follow
these rules.

HTH,
--
Luis Lavena

Wu Junchen

unread,
Jan 31, 2009, 9:38:26 AM1/31/09
to
How can I make it works in cygwin?
(gcc version 4.3.2 20080827 (alpha-testing) 1 (GCC))
There are some errors when I make it:

uncommon.mk:624: warning: overriding commands for target `opt_sc.inc'
Makefile:283: warning: ignoring old commands for target `opt_sc.inc'
uncommon.mk:624: warning: overriding commands for target `optinsn.inc'
Makefile:283: warning: ignoring old commands for target `optinsn.inc'
uncommon.mk:624: warning: overriding commands for target `optunifs.inc'
Makefile:283: warning: ignoring old commands for target `optunifs.inc'
uncommon.mk:624: warning: overriding commands for target `insns.inc'
Makefile:283: warning: ignoring old commands for target `insns.inc'
uncommon.mk:624: warning: overriding commands for target
`insns_info.inc'
Makefile:283: warning: ignoring old commands for target `insns_info.inc'
uncommon.mk:624: warning: overriding commands for target `vmtc.inc'
Makefile:283: warning: ignoring old commands for target `vmtc.inc'
uncommon.mk:624: warning: overriding commands for target `vm.inc'
Makefile:283: warning: ignoring old commands for target `vm.inc'
uncommon.mk:653: warning: overriding commands for target `node_name.inc'
Makefile:287: warning: ignoring old commands for target `node_name.inc'
uncommon.mk:668: warning: overriding commands for target
`known_errors.inc'
Makefile:290: warning: ignoring old commands for target
`known_errors.inc'
uncommon.mk:671: warning: overriding commands for target `miniprelude.c'
Makefile:293: warning: ignoring old commands for target `miniprelude.c'
uncommon.mk:680: warning: overriding commands for target `newline.c'
Makefile:296: warning: ignoring old commands for target `newline.c'
uncommon.mk:742: *** target file `up' has both : and :: entries. Stop.

Wu Junchen

unread,
Jan 31, 2009, 10:11:37 AM1/31/09
to
Wu Junchen wrote:
> How can I make it works in cygwin?
> (gcc version 4.3.2 20080827 (alpha-testing) 1 (GCC))
> There are some errors when I make it:
>
After downloaded the package from the ftp instead of checking out from
svn,I can build it successfully,maybe the wrong thing I did is that
before exec ./configure,I had executed 'autoconf' and make someting goes
wrong.

Daniel Roux

unread,
Jan 31, 2009, 3:05:55 PM1/31/09
to
[Note: parts of this message were removed to make it a legal post.]

Thanks to everybody involved, for all the effort you put into this, for
making my favorite language better.
Congratulations to all the community.

--
Daniel Roux

Charles L.

unread,
Jan 31, 2009, 10:17:37 PM1/31/09
to
This is great - nice work by the ruby team!

In updating one of my gems for 1.9 compatability, I came across this
behaviour (which I don't believe I've seen noted in the other changes
lists), and just wanted to find out if it is expected:

$ irb
>> a = *[1]; p a
=> 1
>>
$ irb1.9
>> a = *[1]; p a
=> [1]
>>

Regards,

Charles

Jayce Meade

unread,
Feb 1, 2009, 1:39:13 AM2/1/09
to
You can get binaries of PDCurses, GDBM, OpenSSL, readline and Zlib at
Porting Libraries to Win32.

http://jarp.does.notwork.org/win32/ is the link it gives for that, but my
browsers won't connect. Is anyone else having that problem?

-jayce

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Luis Lavena" <luisl...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 5:10 AM
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby...@ruby-lang.org>
Subject: Re: Win32 Binary errors

Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner

unread,
Feb 1, 2009, 8:22:30 AM2/1/09
to
Jayce Meade wrote:
> You can get binaries of PDCurses, GDBM, OpenSSL, readline and Zlib at
> Porting Libraries to Win32.
>
> http://jarp.does.notwork.org/win32/ is the link it gives for that, but
> my
> browsers won't connect. Is anyone else having that problem?

I also cannot reach this. Trying to "ping" (61.197.191.146) leads to
lost packages.

Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner

WATANABE Hirofumi

unread,
Feb 1, 2009, 9:00:17 AM2/1/09
to
Hi,

Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner wrote:
> Jayce Meade wrote:
>> You can get binaries of PDCurses, GDBM, OpenSSL, readline and Zlib at
>> Porting Libraries to Win32.
>>
>> http://jarp.does.notwork.org/win32/ is the link it gives for that, but
>> my
>> browsers won't connect. Is anyone else having that problem?
>
> I also cannot reach this. Trying to "ping" (61.197.191.146) leads to
> lost packages.

The hard disk was crashed two days ago.
Wait patiently.

--
eban

Heesob Park

unread,
Feb 1, 2009, 9:18:48 AM2/1/09
to
2009/2/1 WATANABE Hirofumi <eb...@os.rim.or.jp>:
For the time being, you can download the required dll files at
http://121.78.227.9/ruby-dll/


Regards,

Park Heesob

Matthias Tarasiewicz

unread,
Feb 1, 2009, 4:09:01 PM2/1/09
to
hi list,
we are currently preparing Ruby 1.9.1-p0 and 1.8.7-p72 binary packages
for Mac OSX (Leopard, Tiger, Panther and below also supported). I'll
keep you all posted when the final packages are ready.
Project page: http://rubyosx.com

regards,
matthias

Ollivier Robert

unread,
Feb 3, 2009, 4:41:21 AM2/3/09
to
In article <b37300880901300943r635...@mail.gmail.com>,
Gregory Brown <gregory...@gmail.com> wrote:
>A huge thanks to all of ruby-core for this, and for your hard work on
>release management, Yugui.

Kudos to the team!

>Is there a possibility that Ruby 1.8.8 will go back to being similar
>to 1.8.6 and remove the 1.9 compatibility shims?
>This would make maintaining old 1.8 code much easier.

I second that.
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- EEC/RIF/SEU -=-
Systems Engineering Unit

Ubaldo Villaseca

unread,
Feb 9, 2009, 7:10:17 PM2/9/09
to
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yu...@yugui.jp> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1

>
> Hi, folks.
>
> I am proud to announce the release of Ruby 1.9.1. This is the first
> stable release of Ruby 1.9 series.
>
> Ruby 1.9 is a new series of Ruby. It is modern, faster, with clearer
> syntax, multilingualized and much improved version of Ruby. Ruby 1.8
> series has been used since 2003 and many great products were born on it.
> Today Ruby 1.9 series starts its history as 1.8 series did.
>
> Notice that Ruby 1.8 still remains. 1.8.8 will be released this year.
>
> == Changes
> You can read about major chanes since 1.8.7 at at
> http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/tags/v1_9_1_0/NEWS .
>
> We have fixed 7 bugs since 1.9.1 RC2.
> http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby-19/issues?query_id=11
>
> If you encounter any bugs or any problems, please let us know it via the
> official issue tracking system (http://redmine.ruby-lang.org ).
>
> == Location
> * ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.1-p0.tar.bz2
> SIZE: 7190271 bytes
> MD5: 0278610ec3f895ece688de703d99143e
> SHA256: de7d33aeabdba123404c21230142299ac1de88c944c9f3215b816e824dd33321
>
> * ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.1-p0.tar.gz
> SIZE: 9025004 bytes
> MD5: 50e4f381ce68c6de72bace6d75f0135b
> SHA256: a5485951823c8c22ddf6100fc9e10c7bfc85fb5a4483844033cee0fad9e292cc
>
> * ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.9/ruby-1.9.1-p0.zip
> SIZE: 10273609 bytes
> MD5: 3377d43b041877cda108e243c6b7f436
> SHA256: 00562fce4108e5c6024c4152f943eaa7dcc8cf97d5c449ac102673a0d5c1943b
>
>
> Thanks,
> - -- Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) <yu...@yugui.jp>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkmDLZ4ACgkQOXzH5JLb/AWYWgCcC2PXYjaV2tCFrO+LFQoObhrM
> UmIAn0EXvi2E6+aIa+9KCdhKSie+2tcL
> =fAek
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>

Hi,
I'm a kind of confused. It seem as this is the first production
release (p0) and therefore it would be the latest Ruby stable
distribution; but the download page at www.ruby-lang.org still shows
1.8.7-p72 as the stable and recommended one.
Do I need to wait for a final production release (somethin new for me)
or it is www.ruby-lang.org update issue.

Thanks,
Ubaldo

James Gray

unread,
Feb 9, 2009, 8:52:56 PM2/9/09
to
On Feb 9, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Ubaldo Villaseca wrote:

> It seem as this is the first production
> release (p0) and therefore it would be the latest Ruby stable
> distribution; but the download page at www.ruby-lang.org still shows
> 1.8.7-p72 as the stable and recommended one.

Sorry. I have updated the link now.

James Edward Gray II


Marco Mastrodonato

unread,
Mar 31, 2009, 4:40:34 AM3/31/09
to
I want to thank all ruby team for this great work.
If i can say it, i'd like to have an installer for windows as it was for
the old 1.8.6

Tina Lee

unread,
Dec 6, 2010, 2:22:02 AM12/6/10
to
Hello. Everyone!
0 new messages