Python development tools
wongj...@yahoo.com
IDLE. I have used IDLE , but I want to try out others also. I saw
stuff like PyCrust, but I don't see that it can run the script as
well.
Thanks,
RR
Mike Driscoll
wrote:
Check out PyDev for Eclipse. It's like Visual Studio for Python...I
actually find it kind of clunky, but it is cool!
To see what else there is, check out the Python wiki:
http://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonEditors
Mike
bvidinli
it is still far away from delphi but, it is closest anyway.
2008/4/23, wongj...@yahoo.com <wongj...@yahoo.com>:
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
--
İ.Bahattin Vidinli
Elk-Elektronik Müh.
-------------------
iletisim bilgileri (Tercih sirasina gore):
skype: bvidinli (sesli gorusme icin, www.skype.com)
msn: bvid...@iyibirisi.com
yahoo: bvidinli
kperk...@gmail.com
wrote:
SPE is a very nice, and free python development tool. Written in
python ansd uses wxpython for the gui.
bruno.des...@gmail.com
wrote:
emacs + python-mode (the one from Python, not the horror that ships
with recent emacs versions) + ecb (Emacs code browser)
No bells and whistles, no clickodrom, but one of the most powerful
combo you can get. But be warned: learning and configuring emacs is
not for wheenies !-)
Trent Nelson
Ignoring the 'free' part of your question, I've recently moved from PyDev to Wing IDE (www.wingware.com), and would highly recommend it.
Trent.
Torsten Bronger
bruno.des...@gmail.com writes:
> On 23 avr, 19:39, "wongjoek...@yahoo.com" <wongjoek...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Are there any completely free developent tools for python scripts
>> like IDLE. I have used IDLE , but I want to try out others
>> also. I saw stuff like PyCrust, but I don't see that it can run
>> the script as well.
>
> emacs + python-mode (the one from Python, not the horror that
> ships with recent emacs versions)
What's so bad about it?
I just installed python-mode (is this the one with the "py-"
prefixes?), and it ends multi-line strings at single quotes. That's
bad.
Tschö,
Torsten.
--
Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus
Jabber ID: bro...@jabber.org
(See http://ime.webhop.org for further contact info.)
casti...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hall�chen!
>
> bruno.desthuilli...@gmail.com writes:
> > On 23 avr, 19:39, "wongjoek...@yahoo.com" <wongjoek...@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
>
> >> Are there any completely free developent tools for python scripts
> >> like IDLE. I have used IDLE , but I want to try out others
> >> also. I saw stuff like PyCrust, but I don't see that it can run
> >> the script as well.
>
> > emacs + python-mode (the one from Python, not the horror that
> > ships with recent emacs versions)
>
> What's so bad about it?
>
> I just installed python-mode (is this the one with the "py-"
> prefixes?), and it ends multi-line strings at single quotes. That's
> bad.
>
> Torsten.
>
> --
> Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus
> (Seehttp://ime.webhop.orgfor further contact info.)
Did you guys see PyPE editor? It just come out.
Bruno Desthuilliers
> Hallöchen!
>
> bruno.des...@gmail.com writes:
>
>> On 23 avr, 19:39, "wongjoek...@yahoo.com" <wongjoek...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Are there any completely free developent tools for python scripts
>>> like IDLE. I have used IDLE , but I want to try out others
>>> also. I saw stuff like PyCrust, but I don't see that it can run
>>> the script as well.
>> emacs + python-mode (the one from Python, not the horror that
>> ships with recent emacs versions)
>
> What's so bad about it?
I'd have to reinstall it to tell you exactly, but I do remember
something really bad wrt/ the embedded python-shell, which is one the
very strength of the emacs+python-mode combo.
> I just installed python-mode (is this the one with the "py-"
> prefixes?),
It's the one with ;; Copyright (C) 1992,1993,1994 Tim Peters
> and it ends multi-line strings at single quotes.
it chokes on unbalanced single quotes in triple-single-quoted strings,
and on unbalanced double-quotes in triple-double-quoted strings, yes.
Given that I never use triple-single-quoted strings (and don't remember
having seen such a thing in the thousands of third-part .py files I've
read so far), I'd qualify this as at most a very minor annoyance. Not
having proper python-shell and pdb integration is wwwwaaaayyyy more
annoying IMHO.
Torsten Bronger
Bruno Desthuilliers writes:
> [...]
>
>> and it ends multi-line strings at single quotes.
>
> it chokes on unbalanced single quotes in triple-single-quoted
> strings, and on unbalanced double-quotes in triple-double-quoted
> strings, yes. Given that I never use triple-single-quoted strings
> (and don't remember having seen such a thing in the thousands of
> third-part .py files I've read so far), I'd qualify this as at
> most a very minor annoyance. Not having proper python-shell and
> pdb integration is wwwwaaaayyyy more annoying IMHO.
My formulation was unfortunate. What doesn't work (at least for me)
is something like
"""This is a docstring in which some "variables" are quoted."""
Here, "variables" doesn't seem to belong to the docstring for
python-mode.
Banibrata Dutta
> On Windows, I use "PyScripter", and it's quite nice and functional.
> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> >
>
>
> --
> regards,
> Banibrata
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/bdutta
>
--
regards,
Banibrata
http://www.linkedin.com/in/bdutta
Bruno Desthuilliers
> Hallöchen!
>
> Bruno Desthuilliers writes:
>
>> [...]
>>
>>> and it ends multi-line strings at single quotes.
>> it chokes on unbalanced single quotes in triple-single-quoted
>> strings, and on unbalanced double-quotes in triple-double-quoted
>> strings, yes. Given that I never use triple-single-quoted strings
>> (and don't remember having seen such a thing in the thousands of
>> third-part .py files I've read so far), I'd qualify this as at
>> most a very minor annoyance. Not having proper python-shell and
>> pdb integration is wwwwaaaayyyy more annoying IMHO.
>
> My formulation was unfortunate. What doesn't work (at least for me)
> is something like
>
> """This is a docstring in which some "variables" are quoted."""
>
> Here, "variables" doesn't seem to belong to the docstring for
> python-mode.
Nope, but it doesn't break anything neither. At this stage, this is a
less than minor annoyance to me.