On 2013-05-16 14:08, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> > So rather than
> >>a
> >>b
> >>c
> >>d
> >>e
> >>f
> > I would get [a, b, c, d, e, f]
>
> all_items = []
> for row in reader:
> all_items.append(row[0])
And following up here, this could be tidily rewritten as
all_items = [row[0] for row in reader]
-tkc