Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

有中国人乎?

2 views
Skip to first unread message

bik...@live.cn

unread,
Apr 13, 2008, 3:18:14 AM4/13/08
to
Python这种语言有前途吗?在下想学他一学.

Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven

unread,
Apr 13, 2008, 4:33:11 AM4/13/08
to bik...@live.cn, pytho...@python.org
(My Mandarin is not very good.)

-On [20080413 09:24], bik...@live.cn (bik...@live.cn) wrote:
>Python这种语言有前途吗?在下想学他一学.

Python indeed does have a good future.
I am not quite sure with 在下想学他一学 if you are asking for someone to
teach to you or if you want to teach others.

--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン
http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/
My greatest fear... Is that all my Memories will be lost... Like
tears, in the rain...

Penny Y.

unread,
Apr 13, 2008, 5:31:54 AM4/13/08
to pytho...@python.org
bik...@live.cn 写道:
> Python这种语言有前途吗?在下想学他一学.

hehe, so humorous you are!
Yes I think python has good future.
But it depends on what you use it to do.
If you're a singer, a financier, a historian etc, you don't need python.
But if you are playing in computer programming, it's valuable for you to
take some time learning python.
btw,I'm also newbie to python,but I like it.

--penny

Steve Holden

unread,
Apr 13, 2008, 7:57:27 AM4/13/08
to pytho...@python.org
bik...@live.cn wrote:
> Python这种语言有前途吗?在下想学他一学.

是, Python 有未来。但学会从未是立即, 和将需要一点时间。

regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/

Penny Y.

unread,
Apr 13, 2008, 8:05:22 AM4/13/08
to python list
Steve Holden 写道:

> 但学会从未是立即, 和将需要一点时间。
>

What do you mean?
If I understand you correctly, maybe it should be,

学习python不可一日而成,需要循序渐进.

Am I right?

Jerry Fleming

unread,
Apr 14, 2008, 4:21:26 AM4/14/08
to
Penny Y. wrote:
> bik...@live.cn 写道:
>> Python这种语言有前途吗?在下想学他一学.
>
> hehe, so humorous you are!
> Yes I think python has good future.
> But it depends on what you use it to do.
> If you're a singer, a financier, a historian etc, you don't need python.
A singer uses his/here throat; a financier uses the abacus -- well,
traditionally. Anyway, python is useful only when computer is useful. It
is helpful for programming guru, and newbies as well to do the 'quick
tricks'.

Steve Holden

unread,
Apr 14, 2008, 2:17:11 PM4/14/08
to pytho...@python.org

I have no idea. Babelfish (from which I obtained my reply as well as
whatever understanding I had of the original inquiry) translated my reply as

But the academic society never is immediately, with will need time

whereas yours becomes

Studies python not to be possible on first to become, needs to proceed
in an orderly way

Since what I entered in English was something like "Yes, Python has a
future. But it will take some study". Perhaps you can tell me whether
your translation gives the correect flavor. I'm pretty sure the
babelfish mangled my intent.

John Henry

unread,
Apr 14, 2008, 3:02:20 PM4/14/08
to

ROFL

I would not recomend using babalfish to translate between Chinese and
English. It does a *horrible* job at that.

But then in this particular case, it was able to convey what you
wanted to say - in a rather awkward fashion. :-)

Gabriel Genellina

unread,
Apr 14, 2008, 9:40:18 PM4/14/08
to pytho...@python.org
En Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:02:20 -0300, John Henry <john10...@hotmail.com>
escribió:

> On Apr 14, 11:17 am, Steve Holden <st...@holdenweb.com> wrote:

>> I have no idea. Babelfish (from which I obtained my reply as well as
>> whatever understanding I had of the original inquiry) translated my
>> reply as
>>
>> But the academic society never is immediately, with will need time
>>
>> whereas yours becomes
>>
>> Studies python not to be possible on first to become, needs to proceed
>> in an orderly way
>>
>> Since what I entered in English was something like "Yes, Python has a
>> future. But it will take some study". Perhaps you can tell me whether
>> your translation gives the correect flavor. I'm pretty sure the
>> babelfish mangled my intent.

> ROFL
>
> I would not recomend using babalfish to translate between Chinese and
> English. It does a *horrible* job at that.

It does a *horrible* job with any language. It can be used to translate
from any foreign language into your native language, and then you can try
to guess the meaning - but even a 5yr old boy can make more meaningful
sentences than Babelfish output :)

> But then in this particular case, it was able to convey what you
> wanted to say - in a rather awkward fashion. :-)

Probably thanks to the amazing capabilities of your human brain, not
Babelfish :)

--
Gabriel Genellina

Jack

unread,
Apr 23, 2008, 2:48:00 AM4/23/08
to Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven, pytho...@python.org, bik...@live.cn
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven 写道:

> (My Mandarin is not very good.)
>
> -On [20080413 09:24], bik...@live.cn (bik...@live.cn) wrote:
>> Python这种语言有前途吗?在下想学他一学.
>
> Python indeed does have a good future.
> I am not quite sure with 在下想学他一学 if you are asking for someone to
> teach to you or if you want to teach others.
>

不错的语言啊,可惜一直用C++

jack_l_china.vcf

pirata.w

unread,
Jun 11, 2008, 10:54:24 PM6/11/08
to
On 2008-04-13, Penny Y. <pyl...@arcor.de> wrote:
> bik...@live.cn 写道:
>> Python这种语言有前途吗?在下想学他一学.
个人感觉是很不错的语言
0 new messages