Python.org, Website of Satan
humblyth...@usa.com
194 + 109 + 137 + 226 = 666
What is this website with such a demonic name and IP address? What
evils are the programmers who use this language up to?
jay j bee
1105495569.4...@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com,
"humblyth...@usa.com" <humblyth...@usa.com> wrote:
"Python - why settle for snake oil when you can have the whole snake?"
Greetzzzzz
La bouche de la vérité - Déjà Vu Le Prophéte
Monty Python -- especially John Clesse, Eric Idle
& Michael Palin -- very funny !!!!!!!!
he he he ;-)
Luis M. Gonzalez
Now we'll have to kill you...
DogWalker
But is 194.109.137.226 the only one? What other sites are in league
with the python?
Tim Churches
>
> python.org = 194.109.137.226
>
> 194 + 109 + 137 + 226 = 666
>
> What is this website with such a demonic name and IP address? What
> evils are the programmers who use this language up to?
More evidence of Beelzebub at work: GUIDO VAN ROSSUM is an anagram of
SAVIOUR MUD SONG - besmirching the name of our Lord through filthy canticles!
Tim C
Jane
"La bouche de la vérité - Déjà Vu Le Prophéte"
<yessireeye...@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:1105497928....@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Believe it or not, we have something in common! I love 'em, too!
Jane
>
Brian Eable
> python.org = 194.109.137.226
>
> 194 + 109 + 137 + 226 = 666
BUT!
perl -e '$a="194.109.137.226"; @a = reverse split /\./, $a; for $i (0..3) { $sum += $a[$i]*(256**$i) } print "sum = $sum\n"'
226 + 35072 + 7143424 + 3254779904 = 3261958626
Which is NOT 666.
--
a house-blowing wolfen sneezer / might be a porcine tortfeasor. -- plorkwort
http://beable.com
TimC
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
Writing code that has to be indented *exactly* or it just won't
work. I bet they all use eVIl VI too.
--
TimC -- http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/staff/tconnors/
A new verb was accidently created during a discussion about KDE 3 and Debian.
It was said that KDE 3 will sid soon. -- Debian Weekly News Jan 14,2003
Tim Daneliuk
Yes, it's troublesome, perhaps more than you realize. Consider:
10.255.255.146
Yikes! Potential demonic (daemonic?) worship could be practiced non-routably...
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/
Jon Perez
actually people out there who will take this seriously.
http://rmitz.org/freebsd.daemon.html
Don't forget Python == Snake == Serpent == ...
;-D
humblyth...@usa.com wrote:
> python.org = 194.109.137.226
>
> 194 + 109 + 137 + 226 = 666
>
Tim Churches
>
> Writing code that has to be indented *exactly* or it just won't
> work. I bet they all use eVIl VI too.
>
> --
> TimC -- http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/staff/tconnors/
Hey, two (real, actual) TimCs from the same country posting to the same list on the
same stupid topic...
TimC
kosh
Geeze did you miss out on the demon summoning rituals last week? Wow that was
a great thing you missed out on. I am sorry I can't tell you about the future
events though. Only great wizards are allowed to come and they all know when
the events are. :)
ToYKillAS
damn Franc Maçons
--
Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death,
I will fear no evil, for you are with me;
your rod and your staff, they comfort me.
Jane
<humblyth...@usa.com> wrote in message
news:1105495569.4...@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Jane
Gerhard Haering
> [...] Some people have too much time on their hands...
OMG, PyPy is full of evil, too!!!1
print sum([ord(x) for x in "PyPy!!!!!!!!"])
or, if you haven't upgraded to 2.4, yet:
import operator
print reduce(operator.add, [ord(x) for x in "PyPy!!!!!!!!"])
-- Gerhard
Craig Ringer
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 10:15:34AM -0500, Jane wrote:
> > [...] Some people have too much time on their hands...
>
> OMG, PyPy is full of evil, too!!!1
>
> print sum([ord(x) for x in "PyPy!!!!!!!!"])
>
> or, if you haven't upgraded to 2.4, yet:
That'll work fine in Python 2.3. I think you meant:
print sum(ord(x) for x in "PyPy!!!!!!!!")
which is a different matter entirely (well, regarding compatibility
anyway).
--
Craig Ringer
Lucas Raab
Better get some ointment for that burn!!
Jane
"Lucas Raab" <pytho...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:UsuFd.5434$KJ2....@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
Huh???
Jane
Arich Chanachai
You said that people have too much "time" on their "hands", so he
suggested ointment to prevent the irritation etc... He was probably
also getting at the topic of this thread (hint: Satan = Hell = Fire), so
the ointment puts out the burn.
Have fun folks!
- Arich
Lucas Raab
I'd also like to add that the term "burn" means to be made look stupid
or be insulted.
Dan Bishop
There are 6 853 010 possible dotted quads that add up to 666. Surely
python.org is not the only one.
Peter Renzland
What is the simplest/fastest Python program to determine how many
IP addresses sum up to 666?
The simplest/fastest enumerator?
The simplest/fastest that determines which ones of them are home pages?
BTW, www.churchofsatan.org is 216.168.224.70
That adds up to 666 + 12
Are they hedging their bets? :-)
-- Peter
Michael Hoffman
> What is the simplest/fastest Python program to determine how many
> IP addresses sum up to 666?
>
> The simplest/fastest enumerator?
>
> The simplest/fastest that determines which ones of them are home pages?
This seems to work although it could be made more efficient or elegant.
Also, the failed gethostbyaddr() calls take forever.
from socket import gethostbyaddr, herror
for a in xrange(256):
if a < 666-255*3:
continue
for b in xrange(256):
if a+b < 666-255*2:
continue
for c in xrange(256):
if a+b+c < 666-255:
continue
for d in xrange(256):
if a + b + c + d == 666:
ip_address = "%d.%d.%d.%d" % (a, b, c, d)
try:
hostname, aliaslist, ipaddrlist =
gethostbyaddr(ip_address)
except herror:
hostname = "NONE"
print hostname, ip_address
break
--
Michael Hoffman
Roy Smith
Michael Hoffman <cam....@mh391.invalid> wrote:
> Peter Renzland wrote:
> > What is the simplest/fastest Python program to determine how many
> > IP addresses sum up to 666?
> >
> > The simplest/fastest enumerator?
> >
> > The simplest/fastest that determines which ones of them are home pages?
>
> This seems to work although it could be made more efficient or elegant.
> Also, the failed gethostbyaddr() calls take forever.
>
> from socket import gethostbyaddr, herror
>
> for a in xrange(256):
> if a < 666-255*3:
> continue
I'm not sure what you meant to do, but note that 'a < 666-255*3' is
false for all values of 'a' generated by the xrange() call. Removing
that test would make the code more efficient. Hard to say if it would
make it more elegant :-)
Denis S. Otkidach
Michael Hoffman <cam....@mh391.invalid> wrote:
> from socket import gethostbyaddr, herror
>
> for a in xrange(256):
> if a < 666-255*3:
> continue
> for b in xrange(256):
> if a+b < 666-255*2:
> continue
> for c in xrange(256):
> if a+b+c < 666-255:
> continue
> for d in xrange(256):
> if a + b + c + d == 666:
Certainly, it can be done more efficient:
for a in xrange(256):
for b in xrange(max(0, (666-255*2)-a), 256):
for c in xrange(max(0, (666-255)-a-b), min(666-a-b+1, 256)):
d = 666-a-b-c
...
I've checked these IPs with ip2cc (which can miss entries registered
last month): there are 2907248 "evil" addresses, most of them (1568430)
in USA. Too many to resolve.
--
Denis S. Otkidach
http://www.python.ru/ [ru]
mr_little
> perl -e '$a="194.109.137.226"; @a = reverse split /\./, $a; for $i
(0..3) { $sum += $a[$i]*(256**$i) } print "sum = $sum\n"'
>
> 226 + 35072 + 7143424 + 3254779904 = 3261958626
>
> http://3261958626/
>
> Which is NOT 666.
Are you afraid python? :)
Steve Holden
And here was me just thinking that the burn would result from the
inevitable flames. Newsgroups really re a continual surprise.
regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden http://www.holdenweb.com/
Python Web Programming http://pydish.holdenweb.com/
Holden Web LLC +1 703 861 4237 +1 800 494 3119
Brian Eable
Huh? Alt.prophecies.nostradamus is ALL ABOUT PERL!
And at the end of the age
There shall be a mysterious language
Filled with punctuation
It will connect many things.
> Are you afraid python? :)
I asked you to stop calling me python.
Feel free to write a python version if you want to.
--
It's explained on my website.. but you have to have a bona fide degree
in science to understand it Mr. Ruken Dukin Kookin. -- George Hammond
http://beable.org
Michael Hoffman
> Certainly, it can be done more efficient:
Yes, of course. I should have thought about the logic of my code before
posting. But I didn't want to spend any more time on it than I had to. ;-)
--
Michael Hoffman
Stephen Waterbury
Bah, you satanic types are so lazy.