Does Python3 offer a FrozenDict?

[Johannes Bauer]

Hello group,

is there anything like a frozen dict in Python3, so I could do a

foo = { FrozenDict({"a" : "b"}): 3 }

or something like that?

Regards,
Johannes

--
"Meine Gegenklage gegen dich lautet dann auf bewusste Verlogenheit,
verlästerung von Gott, Bibel und mir und bewusster Blasphemie."
-- Prophet und Visionär Hans Joss aka HJP in de.sci.physik
<48d8bf1d$0$7510$5402...@news.sunrise.ch>

[bearoph...@lycos.com]

Johannes Bauer:

> is there anything like a frozen dict in Python3, so I could do a
> foo = { FrozenDict({"a" : "b"}): 3 }

You can adapt this code to Python3 (and post a new recipe? It may be
positive to create a new section of the Cookbook for Py3 only):
http://code.activestate.com/recipes/414283/

Please remember that Py3 is very new, so 99% of the stuff present for
Py2.x is absent. Using Py3 is your choice.

Bye,
bearophile

[Paul Moore]

On 16 Dec, 17:28, bearophileH...@lycos.com wrote:
> Johannes Bauer:
>
> > is there anything like a frozen dict in Python3, so I could do a
> > foo = { FrozenDict({"a" : "b"}): 3 }
>
> You can adapt this code to Python3 (and post a new recipe? It may be
> positive to create a new section of the Cookbook for Py3 only):http://code.activestate.com/recipes/414283/

There's actually only tiny changes needed (I believe)
- Change exception syntax: raise AttributeError("A frozendict cannot
be modified.")
- (bugfix for the original version): add **kw arg to __new__ (passed
to dict.__init__)

Simple testing looks OK. And the resulting code is OK for both 2.x and
3.0.

Moral - don't assume that all code needs to be rewritten for Python
3.0 :-)

Paul.

PS I imagine that 2to3 would have fixed this up fine, but it was so
easy to do by hand that I didn't bother :-)

[bearoph...@lycos.com]

Paul Moore:

> Moral - don't assume that all code needs to be rewritten for Python
> 3.0 :-)

In practice this time your moral is of little use: having a place that
allows you to choose Py3 OR Py2 code is much better and tidier, helps
you save time, helps you avoid wasting some time, etc.

Bye,
bearophile

[Steven D'Aprano]

On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:59:30 +0100, Johannes Bauer wrote:

> Hello group,
>
> is there anything like a frozen dict in Python3, so I could do a
>
> foo = { FrozenDict({"a" : "b"}): 3 }
>
> or something like that?

If *all* you want is to use it as a key, then:

tuple(sorted(some_dict.items))

may do the job.

--
Steven

[Johannes Bauer]

Steven D'Aprano schrieb:

Well, I'd like to access it like a dict afterwards, e.g.

for (i, j) in foo.items():
print(i["a"])

[Johannes Bauer]

bearoph...@lycos.com schrieb:

> Johannes Bauer:
>> is there anything like a frozen dict in Python3, so I could do a
>> foo = { FrozenDict({"a" : "b"}): 3 }
>
> You can adapt this code to Python3 (and post a new recipe? It may be
> positive to create a new section of the Cookbook for Py3 only):
> http://code.activestate.com/recipes/414283/

Well, yes, I've been using something like that so far - but I think this
is functionality the language should provide - therefore I thought maybe
Python3 included something like this already.