"Ross Presser" <rpre...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7356458.493.1316851133115.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqbr29...
> As Rod and many others have said, PostScript itself does not have any
> concept of next line. Your search for a built in thingy to do this will be
> futile.
>
> That said, there are PostScript *LIBRARIES* that can aid what you are
> trying to do. They generally call themselves typesetting systems. One that
> I used heavily in a production project (many thousands of letters sent
> each week) was Gonzo.ps. http://www.tinaja.com/glib/gonzotut.pdf
>
> Another you may want to look at is QuikScript.
> http://seit.unsw.adfa.edu.au/staff/sites/gfreeman/qs.html
>
> Another is the TinyMenu.
> http://www.cappella.demon.co.uk/tinyfiles/tinymenu.html
>
> None of these are "oh, now I have an easy linefeed routine I can use."
Is it anything more than a relative move-to, based on the font size?!
> They involve changing how you are doing things on a pretty big scale.
>But once you buy in, you can typeset pretty rapidly, even automatically
> generate nicely typeset books from other programs.
>
> Good luck.
I fetched the non *.pdf file - I hate pdf like I hate Micro$loth,
and <links> have become like business-cards were in past decades.
I knew I should never have opened this can-o-worms:
wrapping the lines, to avoid page-breaks [and corresponding
Adobe READ-speech] un-naturalness, was replaced by manually
editing the ascii text before converting to pdf.
Then my favorite created text-to-pdf just spoke,
"dot dot dot ...N",
although it LOOKED perfect -- on WIN7.
On linux where the original ascii-to-pdf was done, pdf looked good
and IMPORTANTLY pdf-to-text was good.
So when I went back to Win7-Adobe:
<save as text> did indeed show:
".......N".
It's strange that Win7/Adobe can render the pdf,
but can't translate back to text
that which linux/xpdf created.
That's why I say that the use of ps/pdf for plain text, is a criminal
waste of resources.