Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Mumps V1 issues with Fileman: Issue 2
150 views
Skip to first unread message
Sam Habiel
May 23, 2013, 4:55:07 PM5/23/13
to
Mumps V1 does not properly execute this line:
N S @("DFN(DFL)=$O("_DFR(DFL)_"DFN(DFL)))")
The error is ,Z58,: too much indirection.
Sam
N S @("DFN(DFL)=$O("_DFR(DFL)_"DFN(DFL)))")
The error is ,Z58,: too much indirection.
Sam
cais....@gmail.com
May 24, 2013, 1:49:29 AM5/24/13
to
Sam
The question :
What is value of DFL,DFR(DFL) and DFN(DFL) ??
With simple value , working perfect on MV1.
Josef
The question :
What is value of DFL,DFR(DFL) and DFN(DFL) ??
With simple value , working perfect on MV1.
Josef
cais....@gmail.com
May 24, 2013, 1:58:09 AM5/24/13
to
... and this code-line is correct ?
Because , after NEW /clear Stack/ all local-variable is UNDEFINED !
Because , after NEW /clear Stack/ all local-variable is UNDEFINED !
rtweed
May 24, 2013, 5:28:23 AM5/24/13
to
I would fully concur with the conclusions of the error message!
Rob
Rob
Sam Habiel
May 24, 2013, 11:50:13 AM5/24/13
to
Rob,
This is just one example. Code constructions like this are very common in Fileman. The reason they exist is that the core of Fileman was written in the late 70's to early 80's. Some parts (like %DT) are late 60's code. Keep in mind which Mumps standard was being used. The subscript indirection syntax was added to the Mumps standard specifically because of these issues.
Sam
This is just one example. Code constructions like this are very common in Fileman. The reason they exist is that the core of Fileman was written in the late 70's to early 80's. Some parts (like %DT) are late 60's code. Keep in mind which Mumps standard was being used. The subscript indirection syntax was added to the Mumps standard specifically because of these issues.
Sam
Bill Gunshannon
May 24, 2013, 12:13:09 PM5/24/13
to
In article <0f4ff93b-f239-454a...@googlegroups.com>,
up with unbalanced "()" in the posted example.
bill
> On Friday, May 24, 2013 2:28:23 AM UTC-7, rtweed wrote:
>> I would fully concur with the conclusions of the error message!
>>
>>
>>
>> Rob
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, 23 May 2013 21:55:07 UTC+1, Sam Habiel wrote:
>>
>> > Mumps V1 does not properly execute this line:
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> > N S @("DFN(DFL)=$O("_DFR(DFL)_"DFN(DFL)))")
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> > The error is ,Z58,: too much indirection.
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Sam
--
Bill Gunshannon | de-moc-ra-cy (di mok' ra see) n. Three wolves
bill...@cs.scranton.edu | and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.
University of Scranton |
Scranton, Pennsylvania | #include <std.disclaimer.h>
Sam Habiel <sam.h...@gmail.com> writes:
> Rob,
> This is just one example. Code constructions like this are very common in Fileman. The reason they exist is that the core of Fileman was written in the late 70's to early 80's. Some parts (like %DT) are late 60's code. Keep in mind which Mumps standard was being used. The subscript indirection syntax was added to the Mumps standard specifically because of these issues.
> Sam
Maybe it is some subtlty of Mumps that I haven't grasped yet but I come
> Rob,
> This is just one example. Code constructions like this are very common in Fileman. The reason they exist is that the core of Fileman was written in the late 70's to early 80's. Some parts (like %DT) are late 60's code. Keep in mind which Mumps standard was being used. The subscript indirection syntax was added to the Mumps standard specifically because of these issues.
> Sam
up with unbalanced "()" in the posted example.
bill
> On Friday, May 24, 2013 2:28:23 AM UTC-7, rtweed wrote:
>> I would fully concur with the conclusions of the error message!
>>
>>
>>
>> Rob
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, 23 May 2013 21:55:07 UTC+1, Sam Habiel wrote:
>>
>> > Mumps V1 does not properly execute this line:
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> > N S @("DFN(DFL)=$O("_DFR(DFL)_"DFN(DFL)))")
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> > The error is ,Z58,: too much indirection.
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Sam
Bill Gunshannon | de-moc-ra-cy (di mok' ra see) n. Three wolves
bill...@cs.scranton.edu | and a sheep voting on what's for dinner.
University of Scranton |
Scranton, Pennsylvania | #include <std.disclaimer.h>
Rod Dorman
May 24, 2013, 2:14:33 PM5/24/13
to
In article <b09hsl...@mid.individual.net>,
Bill Gunshannon <bill...@cs.uofs.edu> wrote:
> ...
Assume for the moment that
DFL=5
DFR(5)="ABC("
DFN(5)=10
ABC(20)="X"
Then S @("DFN(DFL)=$O("_DFR(DFL)_"DFN(DFL)))")
is S DFN(DFL)=$O(ABC(DFN(DFL)))
i.e. S DFN(5)=$O(ABC(10))
thus setting DFN(5) to 20
--
-- Rod --
rodd(at)polylogics(dot)com
Bill Gunshannon <bill...@cs.uofs.edu> wrote:
> ...
>Maybe it is some subtlty of Mumps that I haven't grasped yet but I come
>up with unbalanced "()" in the posted example.
It depends upon the value of DFR(DFL)
>up with unbalanced "()" in the posted example.
Assume for the moment that
DFL=5
DFR(5)="ABC("
DFN(5)=10
ABC(20)="X"
Then S @("DFN(DFL)=$O("_DFR(DFL)_"DFN(DFL)))")
is S DFN(DFL)=$O(ABC(DFN(DFL)))
i.e. S DFN(5)=$O(ABC(10))
thus setting DFN(5) to 20
--
-- Rod --
rodd(at)polylogics(dot)com
Ray Newman
May 24, 2013, 6:18:39 PM5/24/13
to
Ray Newman
Rod Dorman
May 28, 2013, 1:52:13 PM5/28/13
to
In article <a6464660-f673-4edc...@googlegroups.com>,
Ray Newman <r...@woopwoop.com> wrote:
>On Friday, 24 May 2013 06:55:07 UTC+10, Sam Habiel wrote:
>> Mumps V1 does not properly execute this line:
>>
>> N S @("DFN(DFL)=$O("_DFR(DFL)_"DFN(DFL)))")
>>
>> The error is ,Z58,: too much indirection.
>
>On Friday, 24 May 2013 06:55:07 UTC+10, Sam Habiel wrote:
>> Mumps V1 does not properly execute this line:
>>
>> N S @("DFN(DFL)=$O("_DFR(DFL)_"DFN(DFL)))")
>>
>> The error is ,Z58,: too much indirection.
>
>I get M6, Undefined local variable (which is what the error should be) on my
>system (MUMPS V1.61).
What were the values of DFL, DFR(DFL), and DFN(DFL)?
>system (MUMPS V1.61).
Sam Habiel
May 28, 2013, 4:40:49 PM5/28/13
to
DFL is 2
+6^DITR> W DFR(DFL)
^UTILITY(U,$J,DDF(1),D0,"1",
DFN(DFL) is 0.
Sam
+6^DITR> W DFR(DFL)
^UTILITY(U,$J,DDF(1),D0,"1",
DFN(DFL) is 0.
Sam
Sam Habiel
May 28, 2013, 5:18:41 PM5/28/13
to
Also,
DDF(1)=.84, U="^", D0=101
Sam
DDF(1)=.84, U="^", D0=101
Sam
Ray Newman
May 28, 2013, 7:54:56 PM5/28/13
to
**50,MUMPS V1.62 for Darwin x86_64 Built May 27 2013 at 11:38:59
Works here...
Ray
Sam Habiel
May 29, 2013, 3:49:29 PM5/29/13
to
Okay. I have 1.61. Time to upgrade and try again.
Sam
Sam
Sam Habiel
Jul 16, 2013, 1:50:32 PM7/16/13
to
Mr. Newman,
I confirmed that this is fixed over the weekend.
I will work on making changes to MV1 to fix the issues with closing $P and then try to find a solution to the Function keys issue.
Sam
I confirmed that this is fixed over the weekend.
I will work on making changes to MV1 to fix the issues with closing $P and then try to find a solution to the Function keys issue.
Sam
0 new messages