Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
anyone using prevayler this year?
83 views
Skip to first unread message
gavino
Jan 8, 2012, 10:07:01 PM1/8/12
to
always interested in hearing from anyone using a prevalence layer, to me as a ssyadmin this would seem the big thing people would do moving to, but I think cl-prevalnce is not maintained? java version www.prevayler.org although I can't get to the newer wiki.
Johan Ur Riise
Jan 12, 2012, 3:07:10 AM1/12/12
to
gavino <gavc...@gmail.com> writes:
> always interested in hearing from anyone using a prevalence layer, to me as a ssyadmin this would seem the big thing people would do moving to, but I think cl-prevalnce is not maintained? java version www.prevayler.org although I can't get to the newer wiki.
I use it. Maintained or not, I regard it as finished and stable.
> always interested in hearing from anyone using a prevalence layer, to me as a ssyadmin this would seem the big thing people would do moving to, but I think cl-prevalnce is not maintained? java version www.prevayler.org although I can't get to the newer wiki.
gavino
Jan 23, 2012, 4:52:08 AM1/23/12
to
Can I see the site? Is it pubic? prevayler seems like an outstanding idea. So it is finished and stable? The lisp version or java version?
speake...@gmail.com
Jan 24, 2012, 11:41:59 AM1/24/12
to
cl-prevalance can be found here http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-prevalence/
and is pretty much feature-complete with regards to the original Prevalence white-paper.
I've used it in the past as the back-end for custom made content management systems instead of a relational database.
There's no real active development because there's just not much work to do on except maybe bug fixes.
I'm pretty sure Sven (the author) accepts patches if you would want to improve something or fix bugs.
and is pretty much feature-complete with regards to the original Prevalence white-paper.
I've used it in the past as the back-end for custom made content management systems instead of a relational database.
There's no real active development because there's just not much work to do on except maybe bug fixes.
I'm pretty sure Sven (the author) accepts patches if you would want to improve something or fix bugs.
Raffael Cavallaro
Jan 24, 2012, 1:50:13 PM1/24/12
to
On 2012-01-24 16:41:59 +0000, speake...@gmail.com said:
> I'm pretty sure Sven (the author) accepts patches if you would want to
> improve something or fix bugs.
gavino will be submitting patches right after his hockey match with
> I'm pretty sure Sven (the author) accepts patches if you would want to
> improve something or fix bugs.
mephistopheles.
warmest regards,
Ralph
--
Raffael Cavallaro
gavino
Feb 4, 2012, 11:42:21 PM2/4/12
to
awesome!! so it is complete thats why no updates. How nice did it work for you? Was updating the data model any problem?
gavino
Feb 4, 2012, 11:59:50 PM2/4/12
to
awesome, good to hear , I think object prevalence is one of the next big things and am amazed that more companies are not building on it.
gavino
Feb 5, 2012, 12:00:33 AM2/5/12
to
Raffael did I fuck your lil sister or something? What did I ever do to you?
Johan Ur Riise
Feb 6, 2012, 9:09:22 AM2/6/12
to
gavino <gavc...@gmail.com> writes:
> Can I see the site? Is it pubic? prevayler seems like an outstanding idea. So it is finished and stable? The lisp version or java version?
Sorry late answer. No, it is internal.
> Can I see the site? Is it pubic? prevayler seems like an outstanding idea. So it is finished and stable? The lisp version or java version?
0 new messages