Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Any users of Harlequin's KnowledgeWorks? Screamer?

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Kaelin Colclasure

unread,
Mar 22, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/22/99
to
I am contemplating a project that will involve a fairly straightforward
inferencing component, and I wondered if and KnowledgeWorks (KW) users
might be lurking about. And especially any KW users who are also familiar
with Screamer and might offer their opinions of how the two compare.

I played a bit with Screamer somewhen back in the mists of antiquity, but
never did get all of it quite working. (I think I was using CMUCL on SunOS
at the time.) The functionality was perfect for what I have in mind -- but
if KW offers similar capabilities off-the-shelf with support, I'd
rather buy it than try to port Screamer.

David E. Young

unread,
Mar 23, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/23/99
to Kaelin Colclasure
On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Kaelin Colclasure wrote:
>I am contemplating a project that will involve a fairly straightforward
>inferencing component, and I wondered if and KnowledgeWorks (KW) users
>might be lurking about. And especially any KW users who are also familiar
>with Screamer and might offer their opinions of how the two compare...

Hello Kaelin. Some six months or so ago I evaluated KW; as a platform for
building "traditional" rule-based systems it seemed to be just fine. As a bit
of background, I migrated a component from our KBS used for network element
simulation; KW offered the constructs necessary to do the port successfully.

I can't help you with Screamer, but you might also consider having a look at
Loom (http://www.isi.edu/isd/LOOM/LOOM-HOME.html). I'm currently using this
platform for some advanced modeling and reasoning, and it seems quite powerful.

Regards,

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
David E. Young
Fujitsu Network Communications "The fact that ... we still
(david...@fnc.fujitsu.com) live well cannot ease the pain of
feeling that we no longer live nobly."
-- John Updike
"Programming should be fun,
programs should be beautiful"
-- P. Graham


Jeffrey Mark Siskind

unread,
Mar 23, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/23/99
to
Kaelin Colclasure <kae...@himalia.talarian.com> writes:
> I played a bit with Screamer somewhen back in the mists of antiquity, but
> never did get all of it quite working. (I think I was using CMUCL on SunOS
> at the time.)

What parts of Screamer didn't work under CMUCL/SunOS? I might be able to help
fix it.

Jeff (http://www.neci.nj.nec.com/homepages/qobi)

Kaelin Colclasure

unread,
Mar 23, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/23/99
to
Thanks for the info -- and the pointer to LOOM. I'll have a look. I'm waiting
to hear back from the Harlequin folks anyway...

Kaelin Colclasure

unread,
Mar 23, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/23/99
to
Jeff,

Mea culpa -- after posting my article I recalled that it was ACL/Win 3.1
that I was unsuccessfully trying to coax into swallowing Screamer. It
worked fine (as far as I explored) with CMUCL/SunOS.

ACL/Win has since undergone a major overhaul by Franz, and is now vastly
more compatible -- but this project I want hosted on Solaris, and right
now I don't have *any* CL implementation there. (A situation which I plan
to rectify.) :-)

0 new messages