Will noncommercial ACL generate applications.
Thaddeus L Olczyk
I was wondering if it is permitted to use the free version
of ACL to do it with.
If not I'll go some other way ( Cincom if I'm adventurous,
or I'll just stick with BCB if I'm not ).
Richard Krush
Here's a quotation from ACL 6.1 documentation [1]:
"Note that generate-application and generate-executable are
only available in Enterprise versions of Allegro CL."
I believe this means that Trial versions of ACL are not capable of doing
what you want, so I guess you will have to use some other development
software.
[1] http://www.franz.com/support/documentation/6.1/doc/delivery.htm
Good Luck!
P.S. Even though Smalltalk is not Lisp, it's still a better solution than
BCB, in my opinion :-)
--
Richard Krushelnitskiy "I know not with what weapons World War III will
rich...@gmx.net be fought, but World War IV will be fought with
http://rkrush.cjb.net sticks and stones." -- Albert Einstein
Thomas F. Burdick
You do know there are other Common Lisp systems besides ACL, right? ;-)
It seems really weird to me that if you can't deploy your applications
with ACL, you'd rather switch languages than implementations. I think
you can do what you want with Lispworks or Corman on Windows, or LW,
CMUCL, or CLISP on Unix. Not that there's anything wrong with
Smalltalk, it's just a bit of a drastic step.
--
/|_ .-----------------------.
,' .\ / | No to Imperialist war |
,--' _,' | Wage class war! |
/ / `-----------------------'
( -. |
| ) |
(`-. '--.)
`. )----'
Joe Marshall
"Thomas F. Burdick" <t...@monsoon.OCF.Berkeley.EDU> wrote in message
news:xcvofdx...@monsoon.OCF.Berkeley.EDU...
> Thaddeus L Olczyk <olc...@interaccess.com> writes:
>
> > I have some applications I have to write for my use.
> > I was wondering if it is permitted to use the free version
> > of ACL to do it with.
> > If not I'll go some other way ( Cincom if I'm adventurous,
> > or I'll just stick with BCB if I'm not ).
>
> You do know there are other Common Lisp systems besides ACL, right? ;-)
> It seems really weird to me that if you can't deploy your applications
> with ACL, you'd rather switch languages than implementations.
Can one switch languages rather than implementations?
In any case, why compound your problems by abandoning the existing
code *and* the existing implementation?
Paul D. Lathrop
news:xcvofdx...@monsoon.OCF.Berkeley.EDU...
>
> > I have some applications I have to write for my use.
> > I was wondering if it is permitted to use the free version
> > of ACL to do it with.
> > If not I'll go some other way ( Cincom if I'm adventurous,
> > or I'll just stick with BCB if I'm not ).
>
> You do know there are other Common Lisp systems besides ACL, right? ;-)
> It seems really weird to me that if you can't deploy your applications
> with ACL, you'd rather switch languages than implementations. I think
> you can do what you want with Lispworks or Corman on Windows, or LW,
> CMUCL, or CLISP on Unix. Not that there's anything wrong with
> Smalltalk, it's just a bit of a drastic step.
Lispworks for Windows will do that, but not int the non-commercial version.
I don't know about Corman, though.
Thaddeus L Olczyk
The code doesn't exist yet. That's why I ask to be sure I can do it
*before* I write the code.
Roger Corman
wrote:
>"Thomas F. Burdick" <t...@monsoon.OCF.Berkeley.EDU> wrote in message
>news:xcvofdx...@monsoon.OCF.Berkeley.EDU...
>> Thaddeus L Olczyk <olc...@interaccess.com> writes:
>>
>> > I have some applications I have to write for my use.
>> > I was wondering if it is permitted to use the free version
>> > of ACL to do it with.
>> > If not I'll go some other way ( Cincom if I'm adventurous,
>> > or I'll just stick with BCB if I'm not ).
>Lispworks for Windows will do that, but not int the non-commercial version.
>I don't know about Corman, though.
>
For Windows platforms, you can save applications with the free personal
version of Corman Lisp 1.5.
See the samples provided, and the product documentation for details