Help needed with updating JSP Structs Bean using Tomcat
Miles Davenport
from a properties file ok.
I have changed the properties file so the contents are different, but cannot
get the new details to display. I have tried the following:
-Stop and restart Apache and Tomcat.
-Delete the Tomcat compiled Java and associated class for the JSP, and stop
restart the server.
-Cleared my browsers cache.
- Checked logs for exceptions and errors, things look ok.
None of these things work :( I have read about Tomcats management
interface, but it has not been enabled. Is there some other cache I am not
aware of ?
Can someone please give me some pointers about where I am going wrong. Is
there something easy I am missing (I hope so ;) ).
thanks
Miles.
<%@ page language="java" %>
<%@ page import="uk.co.???????.struts.*" %>
<%@ taglib uri="/WEB-INF/struts-bean.tld" prefix="bean" %>
<html>
<head>
<body>
<bean:message key="lable.title.email"/>
<p>
<bean:message key="lable.title.registration"/>
<p>
<bean:message key="lable.title.myDetails"/>
</body>
</html>
Andrew Thompson
> I have the following code (please see base of email) which displays
> text from a properties file ok.
> Can someone please give me some pointers about where I am going
> wrong. Is there something easy I am missing (I hope so ;) ).
1) This is not email, it is usenet.
2) You are cross-posting to six groups.
Two would require some justification,
but six is simply ridiculous.
--
Andrew Thompson
* http://www.PhySci.org/ Open-source software suite
* http://www.PhySci.org/codes/ Web & IT Help
* http://www.1point1C.org/ Science & Technology
Miles Davenport
partly agree that the cross-post may have been abit over the top, but all
the groups seem to be valid, and having searched numerous Java resources
have still not found a solution.
What I do find frustrating is the way that Andrew does not have have a valid
from address. I have been using Usenet for quite a while, and find the
superior attitude of some users frustrating. It is this sort attitude that
really puts of novice users, and makes resources like Usenet seem elitist.
I have nothing to prove, but felt people like Andrew need the odd pointer.
Andrew, please don't reply to this thread, as I don't want to waste any
more bandwidth. If you feel you must reply, please email me directly.
thanks
Miles.
ps. If anyone out there has a potential solution to the original post,
please post, or email me directly. :)
Andrew Thompson
> I really must thank Andrew for his constructive reply to my query. I
> do partly agree that the cross-post may have been abit over the top,
Who are _you_ agreeing with? I stated
your gross-posting was 'ridiculous', not
a 'bit over the top'.
> What I do find frustrating is the way that Andrew does not have have
> a valid from address. I have been using Usenet for quite a while,
> and find the superior attitude of some users frustrating.
You poor, precious thing.
There there, there there.
>..It is this
> sort attitude that really puts of novice users, and makes resources
> like Usenet seem elitist.
Some of got to work to increase the S/N ratio.
> I have nothing to prove, but felt people like Andrew need the odd
> pointer.
Your certainly odd enough.
>...Andrew, please don't reply to this thread, as I don't want
> to waste any more bandwidth. If you feel you must reply, please
> email me directly.
Thanks for your suggestion. No.