Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Eclipse-3.7.2, findbugs-2.0.2, JDK-1.7.0_xx?

26 views
Skip to first unread message

Volker Borchert

unread,
Apr 10, 2013, 8:16:03 AM4/10/13
to

I am using Eclpise-3.7.2 with findbugs-2.0.2 to work on an application
compiled against and running on JDK/JRE-1.7.0_xx. However, I am running
Eclipse itself on JDK-1.6.0_xx because my favourite database brwoser,
jORA, does not run properly otherwise.

In this set-up, findbugs fails to recognize the news of 1.7, like the
Objects class or the additional java.sql.ResultSet methods.

I couldn't find a setting for this. Am I missing something obvious or
is findbugs condemned to analyze against the JDK the hosting Eclipse
is running on?

TIA
Volker

--

"I'm a doctor, not a mechanic." Dr Leonard McCoy <mc...@ncc1701.starfleet.fed>
"I'm a mechanic, not a doctor." Volker Borchert <v_bor...@despammed.com>

Arne Vajhøj

unread,
Apr 10, 2013, 7:46:41 PM4/10/13
to
On 4/10/2013 8:16 AM, Volker Borchert wrote:
> I am using Eclpise-3.7.2 with findbugs-2.0.2 to work on an application
> compiled against and running on JDK/JRE-1.7.0_xx. However, I am running
> Eclipse itself on JDK-1.6.0_xx because my favourite database brwoser,
> jORA, does not run properly otherwise.
>
> In this set-up, findbugs fails to recognize the news of 1.7, like the
> Objects class or the additional java.sql.ResultSet methods.
>
> I couldn't find a setting for this. Am I missing something obvious or
> is findbugs condemned to analyze against the JDK the hosting Eclipse
> is running on?

Is FindBug run via an Eclipse plugin or an Ant script?

If the first try the second.

Arne


Volker Borchert

unread,
Apr 23, 2013, 7:46:07 PM4/23/13
to
Arne Vajhøj wrote:

> Is FindBug run via an Eclipse plugin or an Ant script?
>
> If the first try the second.

Tried that, but got really strange messages that seemed to indicate
that file names were broken in two sometimes. Gave up on that for now.
0 new messages