The Speed of Light is Less Than the Radiant Speed of Photons in Vacuum

[Adolf Arch-Impersonator]

On May 20, 9:06 am, Brad Guth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 2, 3:42 am, Ksuvo <aki.karppi...@tut.fi> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > 30.4.2013 3:45, hanson kirjoitti:
>
> > > Anti-"Status quo" advocate and "imperial thinker" in his own inner
> > > circle, "Brad Guth" <bradg...@gmail.com>, wrote:
>
> > > Jewish Jailbird "G=EMC^2" Herbert Glazier wrote:
> > > c is a constant and even when imperial thinkers say that very cold
> > > sodium slows light to 3mph I say bull, and give the real reason
> > > .... which is "G=EMC^2"... -- TreBert
>
> > > Brad Guth wrote:
> > > Except there's still no objective proof that any singular photon wave
> > > has to go anywhere.
>
> > > Poutnik wrote:
> > > Brad, are you aware about any photon not going anywhere ?
>
> > > Brad Guth wrote:
> > > I simply can't seem to find any objective evidence that a singular
> > > photon wavelength and its supposed quantum particle move anywhere.
>
> > > hanson wrote:
> > > Pity indeed, Brad. What you just said certainly is the case in your own
> > > inner world,  because large quanta of evidence show that around your
> > > inner world there is an outer circle that prevents you from finding and
> > > seeing the light, which you expressed when, you,
>
> > > :::Brad said::: Notice how spook/mole "hanson" is [from]
> > > :::Brad said::: MI5/CIA and their Zionist Nazi DARPA.
> > > :::Brad said::: Notice that spook/mole "hanson" who is an
> > > :::Brad said::: MI5/CIA shadow has no public profile nor
> > > :::Brad said::: "Recent Activity", thus' clearly a Google/NOVA
> > > :::Brad said::: Groups insider that's cloaked as supposedly
> > > :::Brad said::: banished, except with no posting restrictions
> > > :::Brad said::: of Organized  Corporate Crime Lords"
> > > :::Brad said::: "the last decade was scripted and orchestrated :::Brad
> > > said:::  by "hanson"
>
> > > Brad, why don't learn too how to __roll in the right circles__?
> > > Till you do, Brad, thanks for the laughs.... ahahahahanson
>
> > That was a good question! I think that the light speed of vacuum could
> > be diiferent in different orbital from the Galaxy's center!
>
> > But when tha light is coming here, from there, it's velocity is coming
> > to be same than in our Orbital: 1200/3684....
>
> Hanson and HVAC are the same individual.  So, figure that you've been
> snookered all along and perhaps you'll start to understand.
>
> Aether is what likely keeps the photon replication process at that
> maximum velocity of 'c', which has nothing to do with the FTL
> potential of what entangled photons can mange to pull off.

Talking about "speed of light" is only 50% the same as talking about
"speed of propogation", IMO. Photon speedsters wish to always put
forth the notion that light moves in the direction where a photon's
maximum velocity, particularly in the anti-longitudinal direction (at
maximum momentum) becomes terminated at c.

But since a photon is also a massless particle, then the velocity of
its scalar wave, as a longitudinal wave, which only has a middle
propagation speed, can reach out to infinity. Tesla measured this more
than 100 years ago, by transmitting a scalar wave around the world,
determining a standing wave resonance of 12 cps.

This resonance, when divided by the Schumann frequency, or 7.8 cps,
equals 1.5c, or the velocity of photon propagation (around the earth).
Different sized planets measure different standing wave resonances,
including black holes. The cool thing is that these standing wave
resonances can be duplicated in the field of g-wave transmission, just
in case the current TCP/IP becomes over-regulated.

[Adolf Arch-Impersonator]

On May 20, 9:47 am, Adolf Arch-Impersonator <goosestom...@gmail.com>
wrote:

According to the theory of particles with an identified mass (and
therefore identified momentum), the field strength should decrease
with the square of the distance. As a consequence of this sort of
'closed circuit law of the universe', received power should be smaller
than transmitted power. The field strength in this scenario should
continue to decrease quadratically with the distance.

If anyone doubts that TCP/IP can't be replaced, then here's a device
that operates on the scalar wave principle. These waves can transmit
through the earth instantaneously, and require no telephone lines or
cables:

http://i1361.photobucket.com/albums/r668/AdolfArchImpersonator/scalar_kit_zps23c1e19b.jpg

Scalar wave transmission has no power loss during transmission. If the
dielectric between two spherical electrodes remains open, it is
therefore able to interrelate with the scalar wave fields of the
environment. Other scalar fields with modulating frequency and phase
position present, can increase the signal efficiency to over 100% of
the input power, because this remains an open system.