You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
Hi there! I suppose, the answer to my question is a plain "no", but I'll try it anyway, because it would be all too nice: Is it possible to use a HTML table in the output of a haddock run, performed on a *.hs file? I would like to display an overview in the description part of the HTML output, formatted with such a table. But the haddock manual seems to me to suggest that this is not accepted.
Albert Y. C. Lai
unread,
Sep 3, 2009, 10:14:02 PM9/3/09
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
noknok wrote: > Is it possible to use a HTML > table in the output of a haddock run, performed on a *.hs file? I > would like to display an overview in the description part of the HTML > output, formatted with such a table. But the haddock manual seems to > me to suggest that this is not accepted.
I don't see a table markup in the Haddock manual. I don't see a way to smuggle in your own html code either.
ticktick
unread,
Sep 8, 2009, 6:25:33 AM9/8/09
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
Yeah. My question was superfluous, indeed. Thank you, Albert.
ticktick
unread,
Sep 8, 2009, 6:55:05 AM9/8/09
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
On Sep 4, 4:14 am, "Albert Y. C. Lai" <tre...@vex.net> wrote:
Yeah. My question was superfluous, indeed. Thank you, Albert.