MindForth is not a game.

[menti...@gmail.com]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MindForth is a conversational artificial intelligence (AI).

http://ai.neocities.org/mindforth.txt is the AI source code.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-language_understanding is a problem solved by MindForth.

http://ai.neocities.org/InFerence.html is the module for automated reasoning with logical inference.

http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=307824.307853 is a pertinent paper by the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).

[Manuel Rodriguez]

Perhaps we can describe it from a different perspective. Is it possible
to find fact which are proving that Mindforth is a game? Sure, many of
them are available. It make sense to use it as a working hypothesis,
search for as many information available as possible which are supporting
the thesis and then ask for the counter argument.

The working hypothesis was formulated in the past, but it make sense to
repeat it again:

- Mindforth is a game.
- Mindforth is a captcha to identify if the user is a human or a robot
- Mindforth isn't an AI, but an environment for an AI. This is called
in the literature a strong AI.

On Monday, October 14, 2019 at 1:46:17 PM UTC+2, menti...@gmail.com wrote:
> http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=307824.307853 is a pertinent paper
> by the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).

This references to a paper which has full bibliographic metadata:

Frenger, Paul. "Mind. Forth: thoughts on artificial intelligence and
Forth." ACM Sigplan Notices 33.12 (1998): 25-31.