Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Convert COBOL to JAVA

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Jeff Baynard

unread,
Aug 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/3/00
to
Could anyone explain to me why this might need to be done. A colleaque at
work is leaving the company to work for another, converting COBOL
application to JAVA. Now, I don't know anymore specifics. It sounds bogus
to me.

Jeff

Paddy Coleman

unread,
Aug 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/3/00
to
Jeff,

It is also unnecessary as you can intermix COBOL and Java quite easily
with MERANT's Net Express 3.1.

For more details see:

http://www.merant.com/products/microfocus/net_express/

Hope this helps.

Paddy Coleman
Manager, E-Business Support, EMEA
MERANT International.

Jeff Baynard <uni...@macconnect.com> wrote in message
news:8mat3...@enews4.newsguy.com...

Bill

unread,
Aug 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/3/00
to
Many clients in non ibm 'shops' prefer to buy unix c/java solutions. I know of
one company that is rewriting their entire COBOL application, (2+ million
lines) in C++. AS a system written in C++ is 'preferred' to one written in
COBOL. Who cares about reliability/functionality etc etc. It just 'sounds
better' to say I'm investing in a JAVA solution than a COBOL solution. So a
COBOL/JAVA converter sounds attractive.

Also there appears to be more Java / C programmers than COBOL programmers.

Bill

Foodman

unread,
Aug 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/3/00
to
In article <8mat3...@enews4.newsguy.com>,

"Jeff Baynard" <uni...@macconnect.com> wrote:
> Could anyone explain to me why this might need to be done

Hi:

I don't think anyone could explain to you why this must be done.
Could ANYONE come up with a SOUND DOLLARS AND CENTS REASON why
anyone would want to convert COBOL to anything other than COBOL?
I can just imagine what an incomprehensible mess would arise
from such a venture.

Thanks

Tony Dilworth


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

David D. Branigan

unread,
Aug 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/3/00
to
What if a company is currently using CICS for online and wants to convert to
a web-based solution. Many of the skills and techniques are similar if JAVA
is used to replace COBOL. CGI programming is in a sense
pseudo-conversational.

--
David D. Branigan, Ed.D.
Associate Professor - CIS
DeVry Institute of Technology
voice: 708 342-3289
fax: 708 342-3315
email: dkbr...@ix.netcom.com
|{:->)#


Jeff Baynard <uni...@macconnect.com> wrote in message
news:8mat3...@enews4.newsguy.com...

deskware...@my-deja.com

unread,
Aug 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/3/00
to
Yes, the web is in a sense pseudo-conversational. CobolScript is a
logical extension of these skill sets for anyone wanting to do interenet
programming. CobolScript is a server side scripting
language based on COBOL. Here are some examples:

CGI: http://www.cobolscript.com/samples.htm
WML: http://www.cobolscript.com/wml.htm
HDML: http://www.cobolscript.com/hdml.htm

Database connectivity: http://www.cobolscript.com/profwin.htm
http://www.cobolscript.com/profunix.htm.


Matthew Dean
de...@deskware.com


In article <8mbr5i$sol$1...@slb6.atl.mindspring.net>,

Thane Hubbell

unread,
Aug 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/3/00
to
To get the COBOL program to run in the web browser, or Database, or
any other JVM. Personally, I would save a lot of effort and use
PerCOBOL from http://www.legacyj.com to do this.

On Thu, 03 Aug 2000 00:40:06 -0400, "Jeff Baynard"
<uni...@macconnect.com> wrote:

>Could anyone explain to me why this might need to be done. A colleaque at
>work is leaving the company to work for another, converting COBOL
>application to JAVA. Now, I don't know anymore specifics. It sounds bogus
>to me.
>
>Jeff

---
Try a better search engine: http://www.google.com
My personal web site: http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/2006/

G Moore

unread,
Aug 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/3/00
to
Bill <wfs...@bellatlantic.net> wrote:

>Many clients in non ibm 'shops' prefer to buy unix c/java solutions. I know of
>one company that is rewriting their entire COBOL application, (2+ million
>lines) in C++. AS a system written in C++ is 'preferred' to one written in
>COBOL. Who cares about reliability/functionality etc etc. It just 'sounds
>better' to say I'm investing in a JAVA solution than a COBOL solution. So a
>COBOL/JAVA converter sounds attractive.

ok, that's just gotta take the cake. converting from cobol to C? i
mean, if you need real time interaction or queues, that'd be one
thing, but if they are just converting cause they are stupid...

i'd love to see how they handle moving from pic usage display to
non-portable data types.


>Also there appears to be more Java / C programmers than COBOL programmers.

reply to email gvwm...@spam.ix.netcom.com remove the spam

aflinsch

unread,
Aug 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/3/00
to
Jeff Baynard wrote:
>
> Could anyone explain to me why this might need to be done. A colleaque at
> work is leaving the company to work for another, converting COBOL

Sounds to me like there are some new upper level managers who like to
spew new and improved buzzwords. Perhaps they want to be known as the
folks who brought the current system into the modern age. They most
likely will end up being known as the bozos who screwed up the whole
works, and kept going over budget.


> application to JAVA. Now, I don't know anymore specifics. It sounds bogus
> to me.

Of course it's bogus, it's a management decision.

G Moore

unread,
Aug 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/3/00
to
deskware...@my-deja.com wrote:

>Yes, the web is in a sense pseudo-conversational. CobolScript is a
>logical extension of these skill sets for anyone wanting to do interenet
>programming. CobolScript is a server side scripting
>language based on COBOL. Here are some examples:
>
>CGI: http://www.cobolscript.com/samples.htm
>WML: http://www.cobolscript.com/wml.htm

i dunno. it looks like a combination between cobol and html to me.
i think cobolhttp or whatever it's called might be better (that's if
they can include a tool like netscape composer to build webpages).

Warren Simmons

unread,
Aug 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/3/00
to
Jeff,

I don't think so. Bogus, that is.

Warren Simmons


"Jeff Baynard" <uni...@macconnect.com> wrote in message
news:8mat3...@enews4.newsguy.com...

> Could anyone explain to me why this might need to be done. A colleaque
at
> work is leaving the company to work for another, converting COBOL

> application to JAVA. Now, I don't know anymore specifics. It sounds
bogus
> to me.
>

> Jeff

Michael Mattias

unread,
Aug 4, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/4/00
to
Foodman <foodm...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:8mbkq7$ht2$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...

> In article <8mat3...@enews4.newsguy.com>,
> "Jeff Baynard" <uni...@macconnect.com> wrote:
> > Could anyone explain to me why this might need to be done
>
> Could ANYONE come up with a SOUND DOLLARS AND CENTS REASON why
> anyone would want to convert COBOL to anything other than COBOL?


Big Project. Big Budget. More dollars for manager to play with. Feels Good.

That may explain the dollars, but I don't see the cents, either.

MCM


Jerry P

unread,
Aug 4, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/4/00
to
Dunno.

Heard of a lot of legacy Java applications being converted TO COBOL,
but not the reverse.

Can't imagine why someone would go COBOL --> Java; maybe "Because it's
there?"

Howard Brazee

unread,
Aug 4, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/4/00
to

Jerry P wrote:
>
> Dunno.
>
> Heard of a lot of legacy Java applications being converted TO COBOL,
> but not the reverse.
>
> Can't imagine why someone would go COBOL --> Java; maybe "Because it's
> there?"


Maybe he went to the colleges and asked what skills they were teaching.

Mike Sheehan

unread,
Aug 4, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/4/00
to
Perhaps they have a "java only here policy" - seeing COBOL as legacy code...
But as many have said there is plenty of scope for mixing java with COBOL.
Startups have successfully gone the Java route e.g. a scottish bank; but
conversions are a different kettle of fish.

Mike

piasa...@my-deja.com

unread,
Aug 4, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/4/00
to
In article <8mat3...@enews4.newsguy.com>,
"Jeff Baynard" <uni...@macconnect.com> wrote:

You ever think that maybe a JAVA programmer makes more money???


> Could anyone explain to me why this might need to be done. A
colleaque at
> work is leaving the company to work for another, converting COBOL
> application to JAVA. Now, I don't know anymore specifics. It sounds
bogus
> to me.
>
> Jeff
>

Howard Brazee

unread,
Aug 4, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/4/00
to
Mike Sheehan wrote:
>
> Perhaps they have a "java only here policy" - seeing COBOL as legacy code...
> But as many have said there is plenty of scope for mixing java with COBOL.
> Startups have successfully gone the Java route e.g. a scottish bank; but
> conversions are a different kettle of fish.

My shop mixed languages. They allow us to pick a language more suited
for particular tasks. Theoretically, this would allow us to expand our
skill set as well.

Except what happens is that we are needed at our current tasks, so we
don't get to expand our skill sets. Then we change jobs, leaving a task
without skilled workers to do that task.

Thane Hubbell

unread,
Aug 4, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/4/00
to
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000 07:25:59 -0500, "Jerry P" <jer...@bisusa.com>
wrote:

>Dunno.
>
>Heard of a lot of legacy Java applications being converted TO COBOL,
>but not the reverse.
>

I want to hear more about THAT. Tell us more!

G Moore

unread,
Aug 4, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/4/00
to
aflinsch <avfl...@att.net> wrote:

>Perhaps they want to be known as the
>folks who brought the current system into the modern age. They most
>likely will end up being known as the bozos who screwed up the whole
>works, and kept going over budget.

hehe. most modernization could be handled by changing the applications
and hardware specs, *not* the language it is coded in.

WDS

unread,
Aug 4, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/4/00
to
On Thu, 03 Aug 2000 00:40:06 -0400, Jeff Baynard wrote:

>Could anyone explain to me why this might need to be done. [...]

Such a conversion is often either an attempt at seeking portability or
an effort to www-ize all applications.

--
Reply Addr:-->WDavid dot Simon at ATL dot frb dot org<--
------------...@Spammer.Trasher----------------

brucepbarrett

unread,
Aug 5, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/5/00
to
Check back in a couple of years to see what they are running for production.

"aflinsch" <avfl...@att.net> wrote in message
news:3989B903...@att.net...


> Jeff Baynard wrote:
> >
> > Could anyone explain to me why this might need to be done. A colleaque
at
> > work is leaving the company to work for another, converting COBOL
>

> Sounds to me like there are some new upper level managers who like to

> spew new and improved buzzwords. Perhaps they want to be known as the


> folks who brought the current system into the modern age. They most
> likely will end up being known as the bozos who screwed up the whole
> works, and kept going over budget.
>
>

> > application to JAVA. Now, I don't know anymore specifics. It sounds
bogus
> > to me.
>

Gazaloo

unread,
Aug 5, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/5/00
to
"Jeff Baynard" <uni...@macconnect.com> wrote in message
news:8mat3...@enews4.newsguy.com...
> Could anyone explain to me why this might need to be done. A colleaque at
> work is leaving the company to work for another, converting COBOL
> application to JAVA. Now, I don't know anymore specifics. It sounds
bogus
> to me.

it's most frequently a strategic choice. particularly in the case of Java,
as it's not so much the language that is the compelling factor (though it is
a very good clean language suited for many tasks), but that you can consider
Java (with all the supporting classes, J2EE et al) to provide a machine and
operating system independent PLATFORM upon which you can host your
applications.
--
Gazaloo
g...@home.com

James J. Gavan

unread,
Aug 6, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/6/00
to

brucepbarrett wrote:
>
> Check back in a couple of years to see what they are running for production.

Some guidance on target date please. Should I check before or after
COBOL 200X is released ?

Jimmy

brucepbarrett

unread,
Aug 6, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/6/00
to
Maybe "Yes". Maybe "No".

"James J. Gavan" <jjg...@home.com> wrote in message
news:398CDC1B...@home.com...

Howard Brazee

unread,
Aug 7, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/7/00
to
piasa...@my-deja.com wrote:

> In article <8mat3...@enews4.newsguy.com>,
> "Jeff Baynard" <uni...@macconnect.com> wrote:
>
> You ever think that maybe a JAVA programmer makes more money???

So why does a java programmer make more money? (I don't know whether to
spell it "java" or "Java", but it should not be "JAVA", as it is not an
acronym).

Supply and demand decides how much money a skill earns. But there are a
lot more schools creating Java programmers than Cobol programmers. The
supply needs to keep growing to match this, or else there will soon be a
correction.

Jeff York

unread,
Aug 7, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/7/00
to
Bill <wfs...@bellatlantic.net> wrote:

>Many clients in non ibm 'shops' prefer to buy unix c/java solutions. I know of
>one company that is rewriting their entire COBOL application, (2+ million
>lines) in C++.

They must need their f*****g brains testing..!

--
Jeff. Ironbridge, Shrops, U.K.
je...@jakfield.xu-netx.com (remove the x..x round u-net for return address)

... Some days you're the pigeon..
And some days you're the statue..

0 new messages