[COMSDK] Current Version, download location
usenet
The documentation is a little out of sync.
Is there any updated Version available?
Where's the download location?
FDW
Let me know where the doc's are out of sink and I will see if this can be
improved for a future version.
There have bin some minor changes in the COM-code and some bigger changes in
the trace and errorhandling code, the next version of the COMSDK will be
released when work on the source-code-generator tool is finished.
There will be a site, and it is not yet there ( we let you know ;-)
Frans.
"usenet" <vo...@null.com> wrote in message news:3ED67119...@null.com...
ilias
[repost, original post: usenet <vo...@null.com> 2.6.03 15:42]
[! for some reason the post was not feeded to e.g. google !]
-------------------------------------------------------------
"FDW" <fdewit_...@planet.nl> wrote in message news:<bbevgl$bnq$1...@reader11.wxs.nl>...
> usenet,
> Let me know where the doc's are out of sink and I will see if this can be
> improved for a future version.
I'll publish this, thus other users don't run into the same problems an loose time.
> There have bin some minor changes
"minor changes"
> in the COM-code and some bigger changes in
> the trace and errorhandling code,
"bigger changes"
> the next version of the COMSDK will be
> released when work on the source-code-generator tool is finished.
=> unspecified release date.
> There will be a site, and it is not yet there ( we let you know ;-)
Could you *please* show a little responsibility against the users of your tools?
At least publish the known Bugfixes, e.g. in knowvo.com or an equivalent site.
ilias
[repost, original post: usenet <vo...@null.com> 1.6.03 17:56]
[! for some reason the post was not feeded to e.g. google !]
-------------------------------------------------------------
I got some answers indirect in another thread.
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=qYZBa.9394$KF1.140209@amstwist00
"
Is a work in progress, completely written in VO and will be updated
for 2.7, Devcon Attendees already have a new version that support
creating COMServers with events.
I agree i's a lot of coding, but hey, we're coders :-) and we love it.
If you don't like the COMSDK, well that's your bad.
CU,
"
usenet wrote:
> I used the COMSDK for the creation of an Automation-Server Interface.
As VO2.6 ignores(!) the existence of Events in
Automation-Server-Interfaces.
Thus i use this 3rd-party product, COMSDK, which is included with the
distribution of VO2.6
> The documentation is a little out of sync.
> Is there any updated Version available?
I extract: yes, but it's limited to Devcon Attendees
> Where's the download location?
I extract: There is no download location. You have to attend Devcon,
to become the updated version.
-
Neither an download location, nor a supporting site is available.
This for a 'product', which is included in the official CAVO2.6 CD.
-
Is this the way to keep existent - and attract new - customers for
this product (VO)?
ilias
>
> The documentation is a little out of sync.
Creating a WIA Application:
Adding WIA Events:
The document refers to "SafeWia.Script" (change it to Wia.Script).
But i could not found any "xxx.Script" reference in the code i've
generated for my automation server
Ed Richard
I've found that using the SafeWia.Script progid (from MS-doc) is the only
way to make it work 'reliable'. Do you have other experiences?
Ed
"ilias" <use...@abeon.com> wrote in message
news:35a10d4c.03060...@posting.google.com...
ilias
> Ilias,
>
> I've found that using the SafeWia.Script progid (from MS-doc) is the only
> way to make it work 'reliable'. Do you have other experiences?
I don't know WIA / WIA.Script etc.
I wrote you my experience:
I follow your "WIA Tutorial" as a guide to create MyServer.
When coming to the events, i saw you're mentioning "SafeWia.Script".
And i try to change "SafeMyServer.Script => MyServer.Script".
> > But i could not found any "xxx.Script" reference in the code i've
> > generated for my automation server
So you may state at this point, that SafeWia.Script is WIA-Specific
and that this change will not be neccessary for *any* generated
automation-Server.
Ed Richard
> So you may state at this point, that SafeWia.Script is WIA-Specific
> and that this change will not be neccessary for *any* generated
> automation-Server.
Point taken.
Ed