Re: Gary Lee Burnore, databasix, and protecting the public.

[Gregory Hall]

"Aratzio" <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:2724s59k6hhioebdl...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:23:02 -0400, in the land of news.groups, "atlas
> bugged" <atlasbug...@gmail.com> got double secret probation for
> writing:
>
>>"Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries" <rhonda...@earthling.net> wrote in message
>>news:3llc1e....@news.alt.net...
>>> John Bartlett wrote:
>>>>>> Why aren't you posting from your Databasix account?
>>>>>
>>>>> I have 8 or 9 nntp accounts. All of them get exercise--although
>>>>> not much lately, because I have more productive things to
>>>>> do--and that post was Altopia's turn.
>>
>>Oh, sure, do let us know when DBSUX's turn rolls around.
>>
>>>> Nice dodge though all too predictable. Tell us the real reason.
>>>
>>> I think you should not be addressing me--in the newsgroup or anywhere.
>>
>>Every few months, someone trots out this same vapid defense of Burnore.
>>
>>For those of you in AUK (or, that is to say, both of you) equipped to
>>think
>>in terms of analogy, this bit is like:
>>
>>"You say the guy stabbed someone with a knife. But that's false, I've
>>*investigated* this. He shot someone with a gun."
>>
>>"Therefore, the shooter is the *true victim* of a *smear campaign.*"
>>
>>"Don't dignify the false knife theory with a response...or, at least not
>>until I'm easily trolled into it in a few months."
>>
>>The Megan's registry bit is a lame dodge. Megan Kanka had neither lived -
>>nor died - at the time of the offense.
>>
>>"Ex Post Facto" is a legal concept that is honored in the breach these
>>days,
>>but it still survives.
>>
>>No one, not even Burnore, has denied he essentially did what he did.
>
> You know, chuck, I am not a lawyer, but I am pretty sure the lawyer in
> your case engaging the defendants outside of court in debate about the
> case or anything even related to the case, is downright stupid.
>
> In case you were thinking that your anonymity is protected because you
> use Altopia, a subpoena to Altopia for your information would be valid
> since you are a principle in the case. Trying to get general users
> information would get you smacked down pretty hard, but principals in
> the case is a whole different matter.
>
> If you knew Chris you would know that his policy does not include the
> actual parties involved in such a case.
>
> I do hope the Judge does not find out what you did, I doubt it will
> reflect well upon your professionalism.

But, what if a subpoena disclosed the fact that atlas bugged, in this
particular case, is just another of my many socks?

Bwahahhahahahahhahaha. Moron! Go shave your legs - they're disgustingly
stubbly.

--
Gregory Hall

[Gregory Hall]

"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:o364s55vsj0rs454r...@4ax.com...

>
> Gary kissed his girlfriend's 17 year old daughter. Very
> inappropriate, but not anywhere near what you dishonestly try to
> imply.
> Is there a specific reason you are trying to make it appear as if
> Gary did that which he did not?

Maybe you should read this:

http://www.uffnet.com/mirrors/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_2/Doc3.JPG

--
Gregory Hall