Re: Two is Enough: Breeder pleasing mostly
Kenny McCormack
Pirate Queen <crumsy...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Mar 17, 3:00 pm, gaze...@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
>wrote:
>
>> (This discussion group is about C, ...)
>>
>> Wrong. It is only OCCASIONALLY a discussion group
>> about C; mostly, like most "discussion" groups, it is
>> off-topic Rorsharch revelations of the childhood
>> traumas of the participants...
>
>HAW! That's probably one of the most brilliant comments that I have
>heard in a damn long while.
>Kudos to you, Mr. McCormack.
Why, thank you.
CLC is, indeed, a very funny newsgroup, that actually pretends to be
about C. You should check it out.
--
(This discussion group is about C, ...)
Wrong. It is only OCCASIONALLY a discussion group
about C; mostly, like most "discussion" groups, it is
off-topic Rorsharch revelations of the childhood
traumas of the participants...
Bill Reid
wrote:
> In article <bb1a1477-9e8b-42e5-8722-e18c76bc6...@k17g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
Well, I hate to be THAT GUY, but I would like to
point out that it was actually I who wrote the above...
Not that I'm demanding attribution or royalties if
somebody wants to use it in their .sig, but I would
like to point out that "Rorsharch" is actually spelled
"Rorschach", so you might want to edit it for literacy...
---
William Ernest Reid
Kenny McCormack
Bill Reid <horme...@gmail.com> wrote:
...
>Well, I hate to be THAT GUY, but I would like to
>point out that it was actually I who wrote the above...
Indeed. You get full credit.
>Not that I'm demanding attribution or royalties if
>somebody wants to use it in their .sig, but I would
>like to point out that "Rorsharch" is actually spelled
>"Rorschach", so you might want to edit it for literacy...
The general idea is to use it as is, so there's no question of
attribution. The typos are endearing.
Pirate Queen
> >point out that it was actually I who wrote the above...
>
> Indeed. You get full credit.
...and the Pirate Queen doffs her cap to you as well, Mr. Reid.
> >Not that I'm demanding attribution or royalties if
> >somebody wants to use it in their .sig, but I would
> >like to point out that "Rorsharch" is actually spelled
> >"Rorschach", so you might want to edit it for literacy...
>
> The general idea is to use it as is, so there's no question of
> attribution. The typos are endearing.
*And* FUNNY - don't forget the funny!
T. - gold stars all around except for the people I hate