Why I no longer write in C...

[Chad]

Because it doesn't get me laid. It goes like this. One of the Senior Software Engineers at AOL Time Warner always preached that write software in order to get laid. This never happened when I was writing C on a *nix box. However, it does happen now that I'm writing Java and JavaScript on a Windows box. Seriously.

All the hot looking women from Sales, Marketing, and R & D go "You are super smart." At which point I have to refrain from saying "God gave me both a large IQ and a large p-n-s."

[fir]

W dniu czwartek, 11 stycznia 2018 17:42:44 UTC+1 użytkownik Chad napisał:
> Because it doesn't get me laid. It goes like this. One of the Senior Software Engineers at AOL Time Warner always preached that write software in order to get laid. This never happened when I was writing C on a *nix box. However, it does happen now that I'm writing Java and JavaScript on a Windows box. Seriously.
>
> All the hot looking women from Sales, Marketing, and R & D go "You are super smart." At which point I have to refrain from saying "God gave me both a large IQ and a large p-n-s."

those wisches are contradictive if you would get bigger iq you wouldnt longer pray or dream for big dik

funny and quite correct java (and generally "no c") is involved if we talk about small iq ;c (c is like a 'force' from star wars one difference c is probably higher)

ps i quite long not written or thing nothing about c.. though today i got one thought : it is about give a keyword that would tell a variable has other scope then default - it would be mostly usefull maybe to make some block scope variable to be accessible outside block (when it would be hande to define in block but you want use it below) .. or possibly to allow defining some variables down below and use it higher
(im not saying this is necessarely good idea but worth rethinking)

[Mr. Man-wai Chang]

On 12/1/2018 00:42, Chad wrote:
> Because it doesn't get me laid. It goes like this. One of the Senior Software Engineers at AOL Time Warner always preached that write software in order to get laid. This never happened when I was writing C on a *nix box. However, it does happen now that I'm writing Java and JavaScript on a Windows box. Seriously.

There is nothing wrong about being fluent in multiple programming
languages, as long as your brain could master them and got paid.

Forget about that 72 virgins complex! ;)

--
@~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[Chris M. Thomasson]

On 1/11/2018 8:42 AM, Chad wrote:
> Because it doesn't get me laid.

lol! :^)

[...]

[Real Troll]

On 11/01/2018 16:42, Chad wrote:
> Because it doesn't get me laid.

I would say because your brain is located on your penis. People with
correct location of their brains tend to use any programming language
that can do the job swiftly and profitably.

[Jorgen Grahn]

I've noticed that most or all of your postings involve misogyny and/or
a weird attitude to women and sex. Maybe you'd want to seek
professional help for that?

Yes, I'm serious. It sounds (to me) like a burden for you, and
possibly a danger to women around you.

(Or perhaps you're just trolling very consistently, in which case I
salute you.)

/Jorgen

--
// Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Oo o. . .
\X/ snipabacken.se> O o .

[Jerry Stuckle]

No, it's just that he's a 27 year old virgin. Even the prostitutes turn
him down.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstu...@attglobal.net
==================

[Chad]

You're just mad because because the feds know about your farm porn.

[Jerry Stuckle]

ROFLMAO! You mean the pictures of you and the sheep?

[Chad]

I bet that though excites you. Sorry homegirl, you aren't privy to such pictures.

[Jerry Stuckle]

So you admit the only sex you can get is with sheep. ROFLMAO!

No, it doesn't excite me. But I can see it does you!

[David Brown]

<snip>

If you two want to exchange sexist insults, could you do it by email?

[mark.b...@gmail.com]

On Tuesday, 16 January 2018 10:02:55 UTC, David Brown wrote:
> <snip>
>
> If you two want to exchange sexist insults, could you do it by email?

Of course they could, but then they wouldn't get a reaction from you,
would they?

Your headers suggest you are using Thunderbird, so I'm sure you could just
kill-file them - it would obviously be no loss. Neither seem to have any
useful contribution to make.

[David Brown]

I think it is important for normal people to make it clear that posts
like Chad (in particular) and Jerry have been making here are not
welcome in this arena. Simply ignoring all such posts is silent
acceptance of them, and I don't believe there are many here that think
this kind of attitude is tolerable.

I have no real hope of either of these posters changing their ways, and
there is no way for anyone to force them to stop. But turning a blind
eye is not the right solution.

[Malcolm McLean]

On Tuesday, January 16, 2018 at 3:07:53 PM UTC, David Brown wrote:
> On 16/01/18 13:21, mark.b...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 16 January 2018 10:02:55 UTC, David Brown wrote:
> >> <snip>
> >>
> >> If you two want to exchange sexist insults, could you do it by email?
> >
> > Of course they could, but then they wouldn't get a reaction from you,
> > would they?
> >
> > Your headers suggest you are using Thunderbird, so I'm sure you could just
> > kill-file them - it would obviously be no loss. Neither seem to have any
> > useful contribution to make.
> >
>
> I think it is important for normal people to make it clear that posts
> like Chad (in particular) and Jerry have been making here are not
> welcome in this arena. Simply ignoring all such posts is silent
> acceptance of them, and I don't believe there are many here that think
> this kind of attitude is tolerable.
>

Well no. I don't consider it acceptable either. But I judged it better
to quietly ignore.

[Chad]

Well, there is a Google Software Engineer who is a regular on this forum. So if you are that offended by me, then by all means, email him. I'm pretty sure him, and the people who could take any kind of action will totally follow up on it.

Seriously. For example, I ask him on a regular basis if him and Ricky are inbred twins. And as a result, his actions against my gmail account has been to let me continue on.

[Keith Thompson]

David Brown <david...@hesbynett.no> writes:
[...]

> I have no real hope of either of these posters changing their ways, and
> there is no way for anyone to force them to stop. But turning a blind
> eye is not the right solution.

I believe that turning a blind eye is *exactly* the right solution.

Trolls and spammers damage the group, but they're easy to deal with
by using a killfile. People who insist on publicly replying to
trolls and spammers also damage the group, but are more difficult
to filter out.

The majority of new articles I see here this morning are replies
to spam or trolling articles that I never saw.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) ks...@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

[David Brown]

On 16/01/18 18:18, Keith Thompson wrote:
> David Brown <david...@hesbynett.no> writes:
> [...]
>> I have no real hope of either of these posters changing their ways, and
>> there is no way for anyone to force them to stop. But turning a blind
>> eye is not the right solution.
>
> I believe that turning a blind eye is *exactly* the right solution.
>
> Trolls and spammers damage the group, but they're easy to deal with
> by using a killfile. People who insist on publicly replying to
> trolls and spammers also damage the group, but are more difficult
> to filter out.

For trolls and spammers - yes, that makes sense. When someone makes a
racist, sexist, homophobic or otherwise completely inappropriate post, I
want to see a reaction against it. It is not because I think Chad or
Jerry will realise these posts are not wanted and stop - nor is it for
the regular readers who killfile or ignore these people. It is for
people new to the group, or dropping in via Google Groups, who would not
want to join a community if they think it is frequented by people like
that. My posts against this sort of thread are to tell people that that
is /not/ who we are here in c.l.c.

I am sorry that explaining my single simple statement has resulted in
even more off-topic posts, and hope that there need be no more.

[Real Troll]

On 16/01/2018 22:39, David Brown wrote:
>
> For trolls and spammers - yes, that makes sense. When someone makes a
> racist, sexist, homophobic or otherwise completely inappropriate post,
> I want to see a reaction against it. It is not because I think Chad
> or Jerry will realise these posts are not wanted and stop - nor is it
> for the regular readers who killfile or ignore these people. It is
> for people new to the group, or dropping in via Google Groups, who
> would not want to join a community if they think it is frequented by
> people like that. My posts against this sort of thread are to tell
> people that that is /not/ who we are here in c.l.c.

What made you think that people are going to listen to you? Who are you
by the way? Are you some self anointed moderator here? If you are not
a moderator then please refrain from imposing your will on anybody
here. I am the Real Troll here and your views don't make any sense to
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

>
> I am sorry that explaining my single simple statement has resulted in
> even more off-topic posts, and hope that there need be no more.

Then don't post such views here. They are completely unnecessary and
futile to post them here. They only succeed in generating more rubbish
like the one you have realised are OT.

>
>>
>> The majority of new articles I see here this morning are replies
>> to spam or trolling articles that I never saw.

Then why don't you learn to create filters for such posts?


>>
>

[Jerry Stuckle]

And you are the one who determines who's welcome and who isn't?

Well, I think idiots like YOU aren't welcome here. All you do is bitch
about the specs and brag on how good you are. You add nothing of value
at all.

[Jerry Stuckle]

On 1/16/2018 11:51 AM, Chad wrote:
> Well, there is a Google Software Engineer who is a regular on this forum. So if you are that offended by me, then by all means, email him. I'm pretty sure him, and the people who could take any kind of action will totally follow up on it.
>
> Seriously. For example, I ask him on a regular basis if him and Ricky are inbred twins. And as a result, his actions against my gmail account has been to let me continue on.
>

Google does not control usenet. It was around long before Google
existed. But idiots like you don't understand that.

[Chad]

On Tuesday, January 16, 2018 at 7:46:37 PM UTC-8, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 1/16/2018 11:51 AM, Chad wrote:
> > Well, there is a Google Software Engineer who is a regular on this forum. So if you are that offended by me, then by all means, email him. I'm pretty sure him, and the people who could take any kind of action will totally follow up on it.
> >
> > Seriously. For example, I ask him on a regular basis if him and Ricky are inbred twins. And as a result, his actions against my gmail account has been to let me continue on.
> >
>
> Google does not control usenet. It was around long before Google
> existed. But idiots like you don't understand that.
>

Awwww....someone is still butthurt that Salesforce won't hire them. And let me add fire to the flame by saying you aren't getting any titty photos of me.

[Jerry Stuckle]

Nope, never would work for Salesforce. I preferred to work for IBM.
And after that, my own (successful) consulting business for Fortune 500
companies.

I didn't realize assholes had titties.

[deavmi,,,]

This isobviously a joke. And I salute him too, although Usenet seems to be a
strange place to be honest (I don't know, I wasn't born into it but only
started using it in the past few years).

[Steven Petruzzellis]

Usenet is a self-governing protocol based on the belief in good character that John Gohde lacks. No no. John Gohde never agreed to stop trolling. He lied about his trolling which surprised nobody. On and on. You're again trying to act like you know as much as Staci M. Elliot. You're the dull knife in the drawer and your many stupid programs show this. I have worked for the OEM PC business for 20 years. I've done business with large businesses making deals with the automotive industry and the insurance industry. Never, not even once, were we at any point told not to install any OS the customer wanted. We sold Unix, Ultix, MINIX, and more alongside MS OSs very successfully.

-
Puppy Videos!!
https://youtu.be/HHT9SJgYsH4
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[deavmi,,,]

Ek is a boer.

[Kenny McCormack]

In article <cone.1524437658....@freeshell.de>,
deavmi,,, <dea...@freeshell.de> wrote:
...
>Ek is a boer.

He's a farmer?

--
The key difference between faith and science is that in science, evidence that
doesn't fit the theory tends to weaken the theory (that is, make it less likely to
be believed), whereas in faith, contrary evidence just makes faith stronger (on
the assumption that Satan is testing you - trying to make you abandon your faith).

[Steven Petruzzellis]

Where did you go to school? I am an obsessed devotee of Pulseaudio, because that's where all the compelling breakthroughs are happening. Already moved on from that. Take it as you want!

Rhonda January Bass is trying ("very" hard) to project their trolling crap onto The Holy Ghost. For some time Rhonda January Bass has pushed the idea that The Holy Ghost needs 'quotes' to point out all his forgeries. The fact is that no one needs any reason to do that. So Rhonda January Bass pulls this nonsensical circus baloney in a feeble attempt to 'push' the idea that The Holy Ghost is like him. The Holy Ghost pwns Rhonda January Bass in every way possible. Rhonda January Bass's actions are altogether perfectly duplicitous. There can be no ambiguity that as soon as any former 'filtered person' does one thing to annoy the little wimp's feelings that they'll be ignored again.

He is as incompetent as Rhonda January Bass. Rhonda January Bass doesn't know if there is a free open source program to handle such tasks.



--
Best CMS Solution of 2017
http://tinyurl.com/gsleb4p
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB