Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

off topic but please forgive me me and answer

1 view
Skip to first unread message

superpollo

unread,
Apr 1, 2010, 4:41:18 PM4/1/10
to
how much is one half times one half?

123Jim

unread,
Apr 1, 2010, 4:46:10 PM4/1/10
to

"superpollo" <ute...@esempio.net> wrote in message
news:4bb504f0$0$1133$4faf...@reader3.news.tin.it...

> how much is one half times one half?

one half of one half is a quarter


Seebs

unread,
Apr 1, 2010, 4:47:29 PM4/1/10
to
On 2010-04-01, superpollo <ute...@esempio.net> wrote:
> how much is one half times one half?

That depends on what you're multiplying.

-s
--
Copyright 2010, all wrongs reversed. Peter Seebach / usenet...@seebs.net
http://www.seebs.net/log/ <-- lawsuits, religion, and funny pictures
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_(Scientology) <-- get educated!

superpollo

unread,
Apr 1, 2010, 4:48:10 PM4/1/10
to
Seebs ha scritto:

> On 2010-04-01, superpollo <ute...@esempio.net> wrote:
>> how much is one half times one half?
>
> That depends on what you're multiplying.

i what sense?

Eric Sosman

unread,
Apr 1, 2010, 4:54:20 PM4/1/10
to
On 4/1/2010 4:41 PM, superpollo wrote:
> how much is one half times one half?

Less than the sound of one hand clapping?

No, sorry, that was flippant. Here's how to work it out:

I I I I I^2
---- ---- = ----- = ----- = I^(2-4)
II II II II I^4

... and since unity raised to any power at all is unity,
the answer is one.

--
Eric Sosman
eso...@ieee-dot-org.invalid

Seebs

unread,
Apr 1, 2010, 4:56:01 PM4/1/10
to

> i what sense?

In the sense that different kinds of objects use different rules
for multiplication.

(1/2) * (1/2) = 0
(0.5) * (0.5) = 0.25

Sjouke Burry

unread,
Apr 1, 2010, 8:58:09 PM4/1/10
to
superpollo wrote:
> how much is one half times one half?
On april first it is 42.

Ian Collins

unread,
Apr 1, 2010, 9:06:15 PM4/1/10
to

Maybe, but for us in more advanced nations, the question was asked on
the 2nd!

--
Ian Collins

Sjouke Burry

unread,
Apr 1, 2010, 9:57:22 PM4/1/10
to
The OP gives 4/1/2010 10:54 PM in the header,
so the answer is still 42.

Phred Phungus

unread,
Apr 1, 2010, 11:42:32 PM4/1/10
to
Eric Sosman wrote:
> On 4/1/2010 4:41 PM, superpollo wrote:
>> how much is one half times one half?
>
> Less than the sound of one hand clapping?
>
> No, sorry, that was flippant. Here's how to work it out:
>
> I I I I I^2
> ---- ---- = ----- = ----- = I^(2-4)
> II II II II I^4
>
> ... and since unity raised to any power at all is unity,
> the answer is one.
>

Eric, you missed the second half of the solution. Out of symmetry
considerations the solution could as easily have been i^2 == -1. A
plausible equiprobabilty would yield the the superposition state as
.5(1) + .5(-1) = 0, which is clearly consistent with the one-hand clap.
--
fred

Phil Carmody

unread,
Apr 2, 2010, 7:57:56 AM4/2/10
to
Seebs <usenet...@seebs.net> writes:
> On 2010-04-01, superpollo <ute...@esempio.net> wrote:
>> Seebs ha scritto:
>>> On 2010-04-01, superpollo <ute...@esempio.net> wrote:
>>>> how much is one half times one half?
>
>>> That depends on what you're multiplying.
>
>> i what sense?
>
> In the sense that different kinds of objects use different rules
> for multiplication.

Absolutely.

> (1/2) * (1/2) = 0

Nope, that's zero times zero. Fortunately it equals zero as expected.

> (0.5) * (0.5) = 0.25

A very conventional answer. I prefer half times half being three,
as half a dozen times half a dozen is three dozen.

Phil
--
I find the easiest thing to do is to k/f myself and just troll away
-- David Melville on r.a.s.f1

Message has been deleted

Ben Bacarisse

unread,
Apr 2, 2010, 1:05:08 PM4/2/10
to
Phil Carmody <thefatphi...@yahoo.co.uk> writes:
<snip>

> A very conventional answer. I prefer half times half being three,
> as half a dozen times half a dozen is three dozen.

It's 1/4 of a square dozen (which is 3 dozen as you say).

--
Ben.

Phil Carmody

unread,
Apr 2, 2010, 5:53:08 PM4/2/10
to

I double-checked, using units in the complex plane, and (1,half)
times (1,half) was (1,one).

In summary, I'm now divided as to what it should be.

Keith Thompson

unread,
Apr 2, 2010, 6:18:03 PM4/2/10
to
Phil Carmody <thefatphi...@yahoo.co.uk> writes:
> Ben Bacarisse <ben.u...@bsb.me.uk> writes:
>> Phil Carmody <thefatphi...@yahoo.co.uk> writes:
>> <snip>
>>> A very conventional answer. I prefer half times half being three,
>>> as half a dozen times half a dozen is three dozen.
>>
>> It's 1/4 of a square dozen (which is 3 dozen as you say).
>
> I double-checked, using units in the complex plane, and (1,half)
> times (1,half) was (1,one).

I get (0.75, one).

> In summary, I'm now divided as to what it should be.

> -- David Melville on r.a.s.f1

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) ks...@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Nokia
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

Richard Bos

unread,
Apr 3, 2010, 1:45:29 PM4/3/10
to
Ben Bacarisse <ben.u...@bsb.me.uk> wrote:

How gross.

Richard

Phil Carmody

unread,
Apr 6, 2010, 2:27:45 AM4/6/10
to
Keith Thompson <ks...@mib.org> writes:
> Phil Carmody <thefatphi...@yahoo.co.uk> writes:
>> Ben Bacarisse <ben.u...@bsb.me.uk> writes:
>>> Phil Carmody <thefatphi...@yahoo.co.uk> writes:
>>> <snip>
>>>> A very conventional answer. I prefer half times half being three,
>>>> as half a dozen times half a dozen is three dozen.
>>>
>>> It's 1/4 of a square dozen (which is 3 dozen as you say).
>>
>> I double-checked, using units in the complex plane, and (1,half)
>> times (1,half) was (1,one).
>
> I get (0.75, one).

I'm betting you didn't start with units, which would
explain why you didn't finish with a unit either. I'm in
(r, theta) notation, not (x, y).

Phil
--
I find the easiest thing to do is to k/f myself and just troll away

0 new messages