On Thursday, 5 March 2020 10:22:47 UTC+2, David Brown wrote:
> On 05/03/2020 08:25, Real Troll wrote:
> > On 05/03/2020 07:11, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> >> OFF TOPIC. This has nothing to do with C++. Go to a hardware forum.
> >>
> >> Christian
> >
> > Are you the new moderator here or are you simply looking for a fight?
> >
>
> There is no moderator here, but Woodbrian's thinly veiled spam annoys a
> lot of people. He is trying to advertise for customers - in a
> desperate, annoying, and clearly futile manner. He posts some daft
> stuff - but /no one/ plans to buy a big fast server to handle customers
> when they don't have any, /no one/ who needs a server for their IT
> business should need a Usenet group to tell them about cloud services
> (the guy is obsessed with the idea of "middleware as a service" - cloud
> servers can't be a new thought for him). And /no one/ posts in a C++
> newsgroup when they actually want advice on server hardware.
Middleware as service does not seem to work even for dominant
monsters, who have all planet tightly covered with their powerful
servers, skyscrapers full of talented programmers and unimaginable
marketing budgets.
Example: Microsoft bought Skype, added its middleware services into
Skype's communications (that were P2P at first) and what was
once brilliant for global interaction product degraded into mediocre.
Pointless traffic in middle deteriorated latency and throughput of
the product badly. And market just shrugs and switches to alternatives
(like Zoom or Slack or just name it) like usually.
> He is merely spamming here. (Surely you should be able to recognize a
> fellow Troll?) Now, I wish him all the best in his business and success
> in his project - just as a do for anyone else.
Note that he is most likely convinced in opposite. To me it is even unclear
what the actual points and goals are of what he does. The comp.lang.c++
would no way fit into list of places that I would consider as marketing
channel. He is apparently not real businessman but still.
> But he has been at this
> for years - desperately offering money and free work hours for anyone
> who might use his product. When you can't pay people to take it, and
> have tried for many years, there is something badly wrong with your
> product or your business model.
Most people learn from analysing their previous successes and
failures, smarter people even learn from successes and
failures of others analysed by others. Woodbrian is avoiding doing
either ... despite he clearly isn't entirely dumb. So some aspect of
why to have such "product" is rational for him is apparently unclear
to us.
> This group is a fine place to discuss the C++ involved in his project -
> but not a place to advertise for customers.
It is fine to evaluate and discuss servers and communications of
whatever scale systems here too. Performance critical parts of such
systems are often written in C++ anyway. However I doubt that
it does help Woodbrian in any way. He just avoids discussing most
of the painfully obvious points raised.