Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
I correct, read again...
10 views
Skip to first unread message
Ramine
May 10, 2016, 10:08:52 PM5/10/16
to
Hello,
I must be more clearer...
C++ and C and Java have weaker memory model than the x86 architecture
strong memory model, and that's error prone and not safe, because the
way of thinking of C and C++ is a more optimization way of thinking,
this is why i think that's dangerous, i think if i want to follow the
Spirit of Spark, i must say that since FreePascal and Delphi don't
reorder loads and stores on x86 , so that's make the life easier for us
on x86 , since that makes the reasoning easier for sequential
consistency etc.
This is why i don't like C or C++.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane
I must be more clearer...
C++ and C and Java have weaker memory model than the x86 architecture
strong memory model, and that's error prone and not safe, because the
way of thinking of C and C++ is a more optimization way of thinking,
this is why i think that's dangerous, i think if i want to follow the
Spirit of Spark, i must say that since FreePascal and Delphi don't
reorder loads and stores on x86 , so that's make the life easier for us
on x86 , since that makes the reasoning easier for sequential
consistency etc.
This is why i don't like C or C++.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane
0 new messages